First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
It's ok to be white
12101 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
35 / M / People's Republic...
Online
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

-OlE- wrote:


right, the eastern front of world war II was brutal. horrible things happened there. still, the germans didn't really see the slavs as white either. or at least not the same as them. they considered them subhuman. well saying the germans saw it that way isn't very fair, the nazi's saw them that way and they controlled germany.


Yah. It's a complicated scenario. And, to paraphrase Galadriel, one that "even the wise" may not comprehend.
36 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / Eilat, Israel
Offline
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

-OlE- wrote:


karatecowboy wrote:






Makes me wonder if you're on to something.

I mean, white people bought black slaves and put some Japanese in camps... but it was other white people they threw in the ovens by the millions.


if we are talking about jews here i would think they weren't really considered "white" at the time. what makes someobody white is kind of a moving goalpost, depends on the person who is defining it. it has puzzled me why certain unseemly parts of white nationalism have such a problem with jews though, they look pretty dang white to me. not that i really care what color their skin is its all the same to me


Exactly, We are White Lol. I just don't get it. They must believe some paranoid conspiracy bs
12481 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Australia
Offline
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

William6057 wrote:

White people with guilt are stupid, racist white people are stupid, racist black people are stupid, etc.



jewishrapscallion wrote:



Racial guilt is one of the stupidest things ever. Sure I might bug Germans because of their past but I don't want them to hate themselves because of something the didn't personally do. Heck self hate is what lead to Hitler's rise and his solution of not hating yourself. I don't try to make Italians feel guilty for destroying our State during the Roman era.


If only more people had common sense and logic like you two.


karatecowboy wrote:


Makes me wonder if you're on to something.

I mean, white people bought black slaves and put some Japanese in camps... but it was other white people they threw in the ovens by the millions.

Nice troll comment. lol..

27486 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Prison
Online
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17
Not sure if this really qualifies as bait. I mean, I suppose it is a worthless thread in terms of discussion, but other than the topic of politics, I do not find the original post to be too inflammatory? There is barely anything to discuss in the first place. Mountains out of molehills, guys.

I am not sure why we are all up in arms in anticipation of a fuse being lit.
12481 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Australia
Offline
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Not sure if this really qualifies as bait. I mean, I suppose it is a worthless thread in terms of discussion, but other than the topic of politics, I do not find the original post to be too inflammatory? There is barely anything to discuss in the first place. Mountains out of molehills, guys.

I am not sure why we are all up in arms in anticipation of a fuse being lit.


Google the reactions to the posters. Or look on you tube and facebook and etc.
321 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

karatecowboy wrote:


MrAnimeSK wrote:


HopexLight wrote:



2017 man, where EEEEEEERBOOODEH has to be offended by at least something.


So it would seem. But i mean in general, people are not. The people i know and work with aren't. But the media makes it seem as if 2/3 people are a SJW or a minority.
And whilst i know that some POC were offended by "Its ok to be white" i guarantee its mostly white people, the SJW's doing what they do best, being offended on other peoples behalf's and speaking for them.


Makes me wonder if you're on to something.

I mean, white people bought black slaves and put some Japanese in camps... but it was other white people they threw in the ovens by the millions.


Egyptians treated us like slaves. Romans treated everyone like slaves. Indians had slavery till the British outlawed it. The chinese people are slaves to their communist overlords. Many countries in Africa only outlawed slavery in the past 50 years and even then some still practice it while its illegal. Africans caught Africans and sold them to white traders who shipped them across the Atlantic. Muslims treat women like slaves.

I don't get why people are so focused on whites having slaves. Everyone had slaves and many times treated their slaves far worse than the Europeans did.



-OlE- wrote:


karatecowboy wrote:






Makes me wonder if you're on to something.

I mean, white people bought black slaves and put some Japanese in camps... but it was other white people they threw in the ovens by the millions.


if we are talking about jews here i would think they weren't really considered "white" at the time. what makes someobody white is kind of a moving goalpost, depends on the person who is defining it. it has puzzled me why certain unseemly parts of white nationalism have such a problem with jews though, they look pretty dang white to me. not that i really care what color their skin is its all the same to me


Its really hard to keep up with the current trend. Some years were white and some years were Jewish depending on who is spinning what. The main thing is they think we control the world and there are some prominent "jews" who do try doing this; I put it in quotes because the biggest is Soros and he sold Jews to the NAZI so in my book that makes him a NAZI.
27486 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Prison
Online
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

MrAnimeSK wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Not sure if this really qualifies as bait. I mean, I suppose it is a worthless thread in terms of discussion, but other than the topic of politics, I do not find the original post to be too inflammatory? There is barely anything to discuss in the first place. Mountains out of molehills, guys.

I am not sure why we are all up in arms in anticipation of a fuse being lit.


Google the reactions to the posters. Or look on you tube and facebook and etc.


I feel the OP should have edited this post to include the context of this. In essence, stating opinions and reasoning as to what should be done and why.

Personally, this thread is not that much more irritating than a generic "You are all worthwhile people". Heck, I would say it is even less irritating, since I could agree that there is nothing wrong with being of any "racial" descent, but the idea that everyone is inherently worthwhile or valuable seems contrived, saccharine, and worst of all, utterly perfunctory.

...Sorry, just expressing anger on another topic. Moving on.

OT: Not sure how to feel, I need to read more into it. As with everyone else, I just tend not to care. The posters really just amount to principle. I typically espouse principle more than the harm of the act itself, but I realize being angry over every little thing just makes someone's ideology seems a bit more trivial than before.
xxJing 
42134 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / Duckburg
Online
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Not sure if this really qualifies as bait. I mean, I suppose it is a worthless thread in terms of discussion, but other than the topic of politics, I do not find the original post to be too inflammatory? There is barely anything to discuss in the first place. Mountains out of molehills, guys.

I am not sure why we are all up in arms in anticipation of a fuse being lit.


I think it's the fact that publicly the statement "It's Okay to Be White" is seen as racist. Regardless of how it really is, the news and social media love to marginalize straight white men and white women who aren't ultra feminists. You have people read this stuff and think, "Wait, I didn't do anything? Why are you attacking me?" and then other people reply "Oh great another white person crying because they have a privileged life." and then you just end up with angry people starting to form a crowd.
27486 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Prison
Online
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

xxJing wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Not sure if this really qualifies as bait. I mean, I suppose it is a worthless thread in terms of discussion, but other than the topic of politics, I do not find the original post to be too inflammatory? There is barely anything to discuss in the first place. Mountains out of molehills, guys.

I am not sure why we are all up in arms in anticipation of a fuse being lit.


I think it's the fact that publicly the statement "It's Okay to Be White" is seen as racist. Regardless of how it really is, the news and social media love to marginalize straight white men and white women who aren't ultra feminists. You have people read this stuff and think, "Wait, I didn't do anything? Why are you attacking me?" and then other people reply "Oh great another white person crying because they have a privileged life." and then you just end up with angry people starting to form a crowd.


I was criticizing the posts that took the thread too seriously. In essence, if one is going to bait me, I expect work and effort, not two lines and a picture. I do not disagree with the idea that the thread is mostly void of discussion on just the original post alone, but at the same time, it is so low key I cannot imagine mustering the anger in the first place.
27486 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Prison
Online
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

jewishrapscallion wrote:


karatecowboy wrote:


MrAnimeSK wrote:


HopexLight wrote:



2017 man, where EEEEEEERBOOODEH has to be offended by at least something.


So it would seem. But i mean in general, people are not. The people i know and work with aren't. But the media makes it seem as if 2/3 people are a SJW or a minority.
And whilst i know that some POC were offended by "Its ok to be white" i guarantee its mostly white people, the SJW's doing what they do best, being offended on other peoples behalf's and speaking for them.


Makes me wonder if you're on to something.

I mean, white people bought black slaves and put some Japanese in camps... but it was other white people they threw in the ovens by the millions.


Egyptians treated us like slaves. Romans treated everyone like slaves. Indians had slavery till the British outlawed it. The chinese people are slaves to their communist overlords. Many countries in Africa only outlawed slavery in the past 50 years and even then some still practice it while its illegal. Africans caught Africans and sold them to white traders who shipped them across the Atlantic. Muslims treat women like slaves.

I don't get why people are so focused on whites having slaves. Everyone had slaves and many times treated their slaves far worse than the Europeans did.



-OlE- wrote:


karatecowboy wrote:






Makes me wonder if you're on to something.

I mean, white people bought black slaves and put some Japanese in camps... but it was other white people they threw in the ovens by the millions.


if we are talking about jews here i would think they weren't really considered "white" at the time. what makes someobody white is kind of a moving goalpost, depends on the person who is defining it. it has puzzled me why certain unseemly parts of white nationalism have such a problem with jews though, they look pretty dang white to me. not that i really care what color their skin is its all the same to me


Its really hard to keep up with the current trend. Some years were white and some years were Jewish depending on who is spinning what. The main thing is they think we control the world and there are some prominent "jews" who do try doing this; I put it in quotes because the biggest is Soros and he sold Jews to the NAZI so in my book that makes him a NAZI.


The idea is of recency, and is often tied into the "40 acres and a mule" suggestion once made to the White House administration in the reconstruction period, alongside the decades of racial discrimination that followed the Civil War's conclusion, up to the Civil Rights Movements, and all that.

Things do tend to persist in one way or another, even over a hundred years, and in a way, I think it is a helpful thing to never forget.
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

-OlE- wrote:


karatecowboy wrote:


-OlE- wrote:


if we are talking about jews here i would think they weren't really considered "white" at the time. what makes someobody white is kind of a moving goalpost, depends on the person who is defining it. it has puzzled me why certain unseemly parts of white nationalism have such a problem with jews though, they look pretty dang white to me. not that i really care what color their skin is its all the same to me


Either or. There were actually more Slavs (Poles, Czech, Ukranians, Russians) killed in the camps than Jews.

I lost relatives in the camps. I'm still waiting for my reparations.


right, the eastern front of world war II was brutal. horrible things happened there. still, the germans didn't really see the slavs as white either. or at least not the same as them. they considered them subhuman. well saying the germans saw it that way isn't very fair, the nazi's saw them that way and they controlled germany.


If a Jew and a Germanic person are indistinguishable by the pigmentation (Or lack of) of their skin, what possible reason do you have that would implicate Nazis not considering Jews "white"?

"In the hierarchy of Nazi racism, the "Aryans" were the superior race, destined to rule the world after the destruction of their racial arch-foe, the Jews. The lesser races over whom the Germans would rule included the Slavs — Poles, Russians, Ukrainians. ... Hitler's racial policy with regard to the Slavs, to the extent that it was formulated, was "depopulation." The Slavs were to be prevented from procreating, except to provide the necessary continuing supply of slave laborers.""

I wouldn't call Nazism "white nationalism", it was more about pursing the cultural and economic supremacy of the German people.
321 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

ThatAnimeJew wrote:


-OlE- wrote:


karatecowboy wrote:

Makes me wonder if you're on to something.

I mean, white people bought black slaves and put some Japanese in camps... but it was other white people they threw in the ovens by the millions.


if we are talking about jews here i would think they weren't really considered "white" at the time. what makes someobody white is kind of a moving goalpost, depends on the person who is defining it. it has puzzled me why certain unseemly parts of white nationalism have such a problem with jews though, they look pretty dang white to me. not that i really care what color their skin is its all the same to me


Exactly, We are White Lol. I just don't get it. They must believe some paranoid conspiracy bs


There is truth in their beliefs of us controlling the wealth but its also a situation that was created out of anti-semitism and has long since been outdated. Its a relic of the past at this point.

Poland used to be a large country in Europe that welcomed Jews into their lands and treated us well. We had equal rights there while in other countries we were banned from certain professions to prevent us from getting to rich and powerful. Professions such as carpentry, masonry, and other trade skills. We however were able to read and write unlike most people that weren't nobles so we got into administration, business, and banking roles because we were able to perform those duties. Poland got ate up and Russia tried kicking all the Jews out so we had to flee to countries that discriminated against us and follow their rules which setup out later roles.

As time went on those professions became the professions of wealth and we were situated to take advantage of the new economic systems. So Jews did VERY well during those times and the wealth got passed on and on. During WW1 we had MANY businesses and were opposed to the warfare due to effect it had on business, as any business owner was concerned about. A scrawny art failure couldn't get any women because we took all his women away from him so he came to hate Jews and blamed us for not helping enough during WW1. He blamed us for the loss of Germany during WW1 for "hoarding wealth" and opposing the war. He blamed us for controlling everything because we did own a huge number of banks and businesses for how much of the population we made up so it was easy to convince people that the Bourgeoisie (Jews) were hoarding all the wealth and that they needed to redistribute the wealth to the Proletariat (Germans) when the Germans were all starving due to France destroying the German economy during the treaty of Versailles.

Those ideas has just carried on with hitler and communist fanboys. It also doesn't help that George Soros is going around manipulating economies and trying to manipulate politics of entire countries. He calls himself a Jew but he sold Jews to the NAZI's during WW2.
27486 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Prison
Online
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

GrandMasterTime wrote:


-OlE- wrote:


karatecowboy wrote:


-OlE- wrote:


if we are talking about jews here i would think they weren't really considered "white" at the time. what makes someobody white is kind of a moving goalpost, depends on the person who is defining it. it has puzzled me why certain unseemly parts of white nationalism have such a problem with jews though, they look pretty dang white to me. not that i really care what color their skin is its all the same to me


Either or. There were actually more Slavs (Poles, Czech, Ukranians, Russians) killed in the camps than Jews.

I lost relatives in the camps. I'm still waiting for my reparations.


right, the eastern front of world war II was brutal. horrible things happened there. still, the germans didn't really see the slavs as white either. or at least not the same as them. they considered them subhuman. well saying the germans saw it that way isn't very fair, the nazi's saw them that way and they controlled germany.


If a Jew and a Germanic person are indistinguishable by the pigmentation (Or lack of) of their skin, what possible reason do you have that would implicate Nazis not considering Jews "white"?

"In the hierarchy of Nazi racism, the "Aryans" were the superior race, destined to rule the world after the destruction of their racial arch-foe, the Jews. The lesser races over whom the Germans would rule included the Slavs — Poles, Russians, Ukrainians. ... Hitler's racial policy with regard to the Slavs, to the extent that it was formulated, was "depopulation." The Slavs were to be prevented from procreating, except to provide the necessary continuing supply of slave laborers.""

I wouldn't call Nazism "white nationalism", it was more about pursing the cultural and economic supremacy of the German people.


Not sure of the Neo-Nazis, but Nazi Germany did indeed have a "racial aspect" going on, that did not rely just on skin pigmentation, but more of blood? I believe that simply being of a certain heritage was enough to land one a star of David.

Racism is silly for the boundaries it comes up with, whether the imaginary or the significantly insignificant. A giant "No true Scotsmen" if I ever saw one. Racism, bigotry, etc isn't the most sensible ideology to attempt to "reason" out, really.
12481 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Australia
Offline
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

PeripheralVisionary wrote:



I feel the OP should have edited this post to include the context of this. In essence, stating opinions and reasoning as to what should be done and why.



Yeah, it is clear from most peoples replies on page 1 and 2 (along the lines of "who cares" or "abandon thread" or "bait thread") that they haven't even heard about how this is an actual thing(was organised and planned) and the reactions to it.
Like i can understand those replies by just seeing the picture and not knowing that it was actually an organised thing and not knowing how so many retards are accusing those posters of being racist hateful Nazi propaganda.

EDIT: the only logic in having a reaction like that is that you are either anti white or a SJW.
Posted 11/2/17 , edited 11/3/17

PeripheralVisionary wrote:

Not sure of the Neo-Nazis, but Nazi Germany did indeed have a "racial aspect" going on, that did not rely just on skin pigmentation, but more of blood? I believe that simply being of a certain heritage was enough to land one a star of David.

Racism is silly for the boundaries it comes up with, whether the imaginary or the significantly insignificant. A giant "No true Scotsmen" if I ever saw one.


Neo Nazism is pretty much a white supremacy movement or at least that is the impression I get. I don't really read literature dedicated to Neo Nazism so I can't comment past that but yeah Racism or even great emphasis on any kind of racial identity is stupid in my opinion but I hold that opinion because of my theology.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.