First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
Post Reply Eritrean migrants crashed party, shot the host after calling him a racist, then was let go because he didn't know a gun
22866 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
The White House
Offline
Posted 12/7/17
The Swedish court systems are a special type of court system. It seems that you can shoot someone then get away with it by saying the person is a racist and you didn't know a gun could shoot someone. Do you think it's right for them to let someone off the hook who says they didn't think a gun could shoot someone?

This migrant confronted the host of a party to complain about his car, called him a racist, then pulled out a gun and shot him. This migrant now claims he didn't know the gun could fire and the "justice" system let him off because he didn't know the gun could shoot someone despite him pulling a gun out and pulling the trigger.

http://www.friatider.se/sk-t-svensk-och-skyllde-p-rasism-nu-frias-han-av-hovr-tten

http://www.friatider.se/j-vla-rasister-maskerat-g-ng-gick-till-attack-mot-kr-ftskiva-med-pistol-och-hockeyklubbor

8512 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / a pop tart
Offline
Posted 12/7/17
oWo, unfortunately for me I can't read Swedish.
Posted 12/7/17
Absolutely disgusting if true.
22866 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
The White House
Offline
Posted 12/7/17
P.S. Just put the page into google chrome and it has a bad translator so you can read the bad translation.
mxdan 
11681 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / A Husk.
Offline
Posted 12/7/17

Rujikin wrote:

P.S. Just put the page into google chrome and it has a bad translator so you can read the bad translation.


Not a smart idea to be honest. So much is lost in google translations that it's better to just not read it at all.

Also, all this is is one of those look at this unique situation that justifies my irrational stance on immigration, articles.

Here is one too:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/03/man-who-saved-two-children-from-house-fire-to-be-deported-from-uk
22866 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
The White House
Offline
Posted 12/7/17

mxdan wrote:


Rujikin wrote:

P.S. Just put the page into google chrome and it has a bad translator so you can read the bad translation.


Not a smart idea to be honest. So much is lost in google translations that it's better to just not read it at all.

Also, all this is is one of those look at this unique situation that justifies my irrational stance on immigration, articles.

Here is one too:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/03/man-who-saved-two-children-from-house-fire-to-be-deported-from-uk


More like it justifies my rational stance on a fair and blind justice system for all. We all know he was let off easily because he was a migrant. A native would receive real punishment from it.
mxdan 
11681 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / A Husk.
Offline
Posted 12/7/17

Rujikin wrote:


mxdan wrote:


Rujikin wrote:

P.S. Just put the page into google chrome and it has a bad translator so you can read the bad translation.


Not a smart idea to be honest. So much is lost in google translations that it's better to just not read it at all.

Also, all this is is one of those look at this unique situation that justifies my irrational stance on immigration, articles.

Here is one too:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/03/man-who-saved-two-children-from-house-fire-to-be-deported-from-uk


More like it justifies my rational stance on a fair and blind justice system for all. We all know he was let off easily because he was a migrant. A native would receive real punishment from it.


How do you know anyone couldn't of been substituted in that scenario with the same outcome?
22866 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
The White House
Offline
Posted 12/7/17 , edited 12/7/17

mxdan wrote:

How do you know anyone couldn't of been substituted in that scenario with the same outcome?


Sweden is normally pretty harsh on people who shoot other people, well the sentence is the Jail isn't quite as harsh.
15748 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M
Offline
Posted 12/7/17 , edited 12/7/17
Okay, even wading through the awful google translate, I can tell that your OP is wildly misleading. The injury seems to be a non-fatal shot to the leg, and the gun was something designed to shoot rubber balls or blanks, so it actually isn't designed to fire anything. Overall, its tough to tell exactly what happened due to the translation, but whatever the case, the OP is pretty terrible.
22866 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
The White House
Offline
Posted 12/7/17

sundin13 wrote:

Okay, even wading through the awful google translate, I can tell that your OP is wildly misleading. The injury seems to be a non-fatal shot to the leg, and the gun was something designed to shoot rubber balls or blanks, so it actually isn't designed to fire anything. Overall, its tough to tell exactly what happened due to the translation, but whatever the case, the OP is pretty terrible.


I never said it was fatal or anyone died how was it misleading?



A gun is always loaded. You never point a gun at someone unless you intend to kill them because if the gun just happens to be loaded you may shoot them. Even guns that shoot rubber balls and blanks could have a pebble in them. Even if they are just a rubber bullet it can still kill if you are hit in the right spot and even a blank can injure.

There is a reason the punishment for mishandling guns is pretty heavy. I'm surprised you don't agree considering how you seem to be for gun control.

I already said what happened. You can read from the translation well enough if you know english well.
mxdan 
11681 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / A Husk.
Offline
Posted 12/7/17 , edited 12/7/17

Rujikin wrote:

Sweden is normally pretty harsh on people who shoot other people, well the sentence is the Jail isn't quite as harsh.


Well here's the thing. You say that Sweden is 'normally' harsh. This situation isn't all that normal in its entirety. That's the issue with context specific hypotheticals. We don't know for certain that the punishment wouldn't of been the same for a different person given an identical situation. There are a lot of variables besides immigration status but that won't stop you from making arguments that break apart. No sir.
Posted 12/7/17
Meh.
22866 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
The White House
Offline
Posted 12/7/17

mxdan wrote:


Rujikin wrote:

Sweden is normally pretty harsh on people who shoot other people, well the sentence is the Jail isn't quite as harsh.


Well here's the thing. You say that Sweden is 'normally' harsh. This situation isn't all that normal in its entirety. That's the issue with context specific hypotheticals. We don't know for certain that the punishment wouldn't of been the same for a different person given an identical situation. There are a lot of variables besides immigration status but that won't stop you from making arguments that break apart. No sir.


A gun is always loaded. You never point a gun at someone unless you intend to kill them because if the gun just happens to be loaded you may shoot them. Even guns that shoot rubber balls and blanks could have a pebble in them. Even if they are just a rubber bullet it can still kill if you are hit in the right spot and even a blank can injure.
runec 
38590 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 12/7/17


Done in one. Last one out turn off the lights.
15748 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M
Offline
Posted 12/7/17 , edited 12/7/17

Rujikin wrote:


I never said it was fatal or anyone died how was it misleading?

A gun is always loaded. You never point a gun at someone unless you intend to kill them because if the gun just happens to be loaded you may shoot them. Even guns that shoot rubber balls and blanks could have a pebble in them. Even if they are just a rubber bullet it can still kill if you are hit in the right spot and even a blank can injure.

There is a reason the punishment for mishandling guns is pretty heavy. I'm surprised you don't agree considering how you seem to be for gun control.

I already said what happened. You can read from the translation well enough if you know english well.



You are right. With my English skills, I should easily be able to understand stuff like this:
"He flew to Africa and a wrestling match occurred. "
"Free Times has previously written about the attack on the private crayfish plate"
"The values ​for the cancer plate acted flashlessly"

Damn cancer plates acting flashlessly on those crayfish during a wrestling match in Africa.

But anyways, stating that someone was shot holds the assumption that they were shot with an actual bullet and either died or suffered serious wounds. Sure, I could technically say "I shot my sister ten times and then ate dinner" and you would think "What a monster!" and then I could say "I just shot her with a water gun!". By leaving out that information you are misleading by omission.

Further, the same could be said with your gun statements. You act like "of course he should have known that a bullet would come out", but if it was a gun designed to fire blanks, you may not expect projectiles to come out. By not stating that this wasn't a true "gun", you are misleading the reader.

The OP should be written in a way to start from a place of knowledge, not spread propaganda and leave it to the readers to sift through your terrible sources (seriously, where do you even find this garbage?). There is no reason for this thread other than blind propaganda. It is impossible to figure out the facts of the case with google translate so the only thing that can be reasonably obtained through this thread is poorly justified hatred.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.