First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
***YOUTUBE HQ SHOOTING***
12219 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Australia
Offline
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

DipChip wrote:


MrAnimeSK wrote:


runec wrote:





Watch her you tube videos. Those tits are fantastic. You soy boy. (lol)


Hey, has it ever occurred to you that girls all went SJW because guys like you kept sexually objectifying them?



Nope.
runec 
40024 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

karatecowboy wrote:
So, do you think this woman had any fear of God or Hell in her?


She shot three people and then herself over Youtube work out videos.

I sincerely doubt there were any deep existential thoughts involved.
11847 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
35 / M / People's Republic...
Online
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18


My guess that, however, you have stopped to wonder if SJWs have enough depth to realize that being amazed by physical beauty is not the same thing as considering someone an object like a fork or a chair. I know I have. I'm leaning towards no.



runec wrote:


karatecowboy wrote:
So, do you think this woman had any fear of God or Hell in her?


She shot three people and then herself over Youtube work out videos.

I sincerely doubt there were any deep existential thoughts involved.


That raises an interesting point. Is a basic fear of God intrinsically a deep thing? I remember when I was a kid my parents told me "I may not catch you... but God knows". Back then my deepest thoughts were of LEGO.
runec 
40024 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

karatecowboy wrote:
My guess that, however, you have stopped to wonder if SJWs have enough depth to realize that being amazed by physical beauty is not the same thing as considering someone an object like a fork or a chair. I know I have. I'm leaning towards no.


The phrase "waste of a magnificent set of tits" undercuts your point here I'm afraid. It's hard to argue that isn't objectifying.




karatecowboy wrote:
That raises an interesting point. Is a basic fear of God intrinsically a deep thing? I remember when I was a kid my parents told me "I may not catch you... but God knows". Back then my deepest thoughts were of LEGO.


At that age the concept of God is a nebulous threat to make you behave akin to the bogeyman or Santa Claus. It's a far cry from the existential question of life after death in the face of, you know, shooting some people then swallowing a bullet.

And besides, shooting people is pretty much breaking rule #1 of every notable religion on the planet so.
32 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
38 / O
Offline
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

karatecowboy wrote:

My guess that, however, you have stopped to wonder if SJWs have enough depth to realize that being amazed by physical beauty is not the same thing as considering someone an object like a fork or a chair. I know I have. I'm leaning towards no.


Yeah, I'm pretty sure no woman on the planet enjoys being treated like that.

11847 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
35 / M / People's Republic...
Online
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

runec wrote:



The phrase "waste of a magnificent set of tits" undercuts your point here I'm afraid. It's hard to argue that isn't objectifying.


Sure, if you make the assumption that his general estimation of women is limited to that statement and it's metric alone.






At that age the concept of God is a nebulous threat to make you behave akin to the bogeyman or Santa Claus. It's a far cry from the existential question of life after death in the face of, you know, shooting some people then swallowing a bullet.

And besides, shooting people is pretty much breaking rule #1 of every notable religion on the planet so.


I don't believe you have to have a deep-minded, intellectual understanding of God for the fear of Him to be there and active and meaningful. There are simple-minded saints and evil geniuses, so... Anyway, I think we agree that she had no fear of God in her. If she did, I imagine she would not have done what she did.

She seemed to value animal life as much as human life, calling meat murder. If she understood God and how we are moral agents created in His image then she would understand that there are meaningful differences between animals and humans. Certainly, she was a heathen and did not know Christ and what He did.


DipChip wrote:

Yeah, I'm pretty sure no woman on the planet enjoys being treated like that.



Like a deranged murderer who wasted her beauty? Sure. I can agree with that.
runec 
40024 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

karatecowboy wrote:
Sure, if you make the assumption that his general estimation of women is limited to that statement and it's metric alone.


It's not an assumption. He looked at a tragic scenario with one dead body and reduced the value of that person to how attractive he thought her breasts were. That's pretty much the textbook definition of objectifying. Furthermore, he both publicly made that statement then defended it as valid. It's not as if he made the statement then tried to clarify his intention as something different after being criticized.

The criticism is completely valid and his behaviour afterwards cements it.




karatecowboy wrote:
I don't believe you have to have a deep-minded, intellectual understanding of God for the fear of Him to be there and active and meaningful. There are simple-minded saints and evil geniuses, so... Anyway, I think we agree that she had no fear of God in her. If she did, I imagine she would not have done what she did.

She seemed to value animal life as much as human life, calling meat murder. If she understood God and how we are moral agents created in His image then she would understand that there are meaningful differences between animals and humans. Certainly, she was a heathen and did not know Christ and what He did.


No, you don't. You simply have to be taught to fear it. But again, I sincerely doubt she was contemplating any deep existential questions such as gods or the afterlife ( since you referenced Hell in your original statement ) when she shot the place up then shot herself. Do you fear a god and what is that god going to think about your actions since you may be about to meet them soon are different questions. The latter is a deeper consideration than the former.

Sigh. Don't preach, dude. Your "God" isn't everyone's god and wasn't her god. What you believe has no real bearing on this and certainly no bearing on what she did or did not believe.



karatecowboy wrote:
Like a deranged murderer who wasted her beauty? Sure. I can agree with that.


Again, reducing someone's value to how much you want to bang them is the very definition of objectifying someone.
9662 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Ark-La-Tex
Offline
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

karatecowboy wrote:

She seemed to value animal life as much as human life, calling meat murder.


It may not be murder, but what happens on factory farms is pretty messed up.
1785 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / F / PA, USA
Offline
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

DipChip wrote:

Hey, has it ever occurred to you that girls all went SJW because guys like you kept sexually objectifying them?



No, that's not how it works. It's both personal and complicated. There is no single explanation. Saying that "objectification" is the cause is foolish, especially when you try and connect the mockery of a killer to SJW-anything. Honestly, it sounds like you clung to some excuse to say that.


Damn, this thread is a train wreck, and no thanks to myself. I suppose this means that there isn't much to say on the topic, period.
11847 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
35 / M / People's Republic...
Online
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

runec wrote:

It's not an assumption. He looked at a tragic scenario with one dead body and reduced the value of that person to how attractive he thought her breasts were. That's pretty much the textbook definition of objectifying. Furthermore, he both publicly made that statement then defended it as valid. It's not as if he made the statement then tried to clarify his intention as something different after being criticized.


It's a comment about her boobs. Nothing more. Any "reducing" brought to the picture is something you brought. You're projecting that onto he and I. It's something SJW pharisees love to do that they can demonize others and in turn feel self-righteous and good about themselves.

My sister mentioned Dwayne Johnson the author day. I commented that he has an enviable physique. You'd have be a real dick and or idiot to conclude that I was expressing my thoughts about his entire value as a human with that statement.




karatecowboy wrote:
I don't believe you have to have a deep-minded, intellectual understanding of God for the fear of Him to be there and active and meaningful. There are simple-minded saints and evil geniuses, so... Anyway, I think we agree that she had no fear of God in her. If she did, I imagine she would not have done what she did.

She seemed to value animal life as much as human life, calling meat murder. If she understood God and how we are moral agents created in His image then she would understand that there are meaningful differences between animals and humans. Certainly, she was a heathen and did not know Christ and what He did.


No, you don't. You simply have to be taught to fear it. But again, I sincerely doubt she was contemplating any deep existential questions such as gods or the afterlife ( since you referenced Hell in your original statement ) when she shot the place up then shot herself. Do you fear a god and what is that god going to think about your actions since you may be about to meet them soon are different questions. The latter is a deeper consideration than the former.



Sigh. Don't preach, dude. Your "God" isn't everyone's god and wasn't her god. What you believe has no real bearing on this and certainly no bearing on what she did or did not believe.


And that's your belief about God and it certainly isn't everyone's belief about God. But you still act as if it has some bearing on this, and some bearing on what I think and make of the situation.

Hypocritically, you're preaching right now with that statement.

Finally, preaching is not a sin.



Again, reducing someone's value to how much you want to bang them is the very definition of objectifying someone.


Please quote either of our original comments, bolding the part that refers to her entire value as a human. Also, bold the part that claims her boobs are the sum of that.

11847 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
35 / M / People's Republic...
Online
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18


Dude don't you know? Women, especially foreigners, and especially ones with ancestry associated with the Warlord of Peace, are never responsible for their actions. Behind the evil done by any person of Royal Marginalized Status is the puppeteering of an evil White Christian Straight Genitally-Intact Male.

9662 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Ark-La-Tex
Offline
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

karatecowboy wrote:

especially ones with ancestry associated with the Warlord of Peace, are never responsible for their actions.




Muhammad was Arabian; the shooter was Persian.
11847 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
35 / M / People's Republic...
Online
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

geauxtigers1989 wrote:


It may not be murder, but what happens on factory farms is pretty messed up.





geauxtigers1989 wrote:




Muhammad was Arabian; the shooter was Persian.


Yah I'm aware. She was from Iran, though. The Islamic Republic thereof.

I grew up on a farm, but I'm personally torn about the meat thing. (Dairy farm). Consequently I eat a lot of cheese. That seemed to be preordained, though, being from Wisconsin.

It strikes me as perhaps significant that alleged murder of animals was not enough to warrant killing, but demonetizing of her videos was?

I think to myself it's too bad she didn't hear about the Brave browser. Then, on the other hand, I also have this "good riddance" sentiment about it.

I notice that in the USA and West in general, these massacre-ists tend to be atheistic, followed by Islamic. For the former it's lacking the fear of God, for the latter it's the wrong god.
9662 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Ark-La-Tex
Offline
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18

karatecowboy wrote:


Yah I'm aware. She was from Iran, though. The Islamic Republic thereof.

I grew up on a farm, but I'm personally torn about the meat thing. (Dairy farm). Consequently I eat a lot of cheese. That seemed to be preordained, though, being from Wisconsin.

I notice that in the USA and West in general, these massacre-ists tend to be atheistic, followed by Islamic. For the former it's lacking the fear of God, for the latter it's the wrong god.


She wasn't Muslim, though. She was a registered member of a faith I didn't know existed until literally just now.

I don't view consumption of meat and other animal products as inherently bad. It's just the treatment of animals on factory farms makes me rage.

My dad's from Wisconsin, and I vacationed there a lot in my childhood. I totally get the cheese thing.

As for the bold, let me quote Lumen Gentium:


“But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place among whom are the Muslims: these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.
21197 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Texas
Offline
Posted 4/7/18 , edited 4/7/18
The Bitch was just plain crazy! Does nobody here understand that???
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.