First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
Britians Fighting forces
2089 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / England
Offline
Posted 2/20/08 , edited 3/17/08
Do you think they have enough money to do the job they do?

Are they doing what is needed?

Do you believe they have always done a good job?

Are they the best trained in the world?

Why do people always think you mean the Army when you say Armed serviceses?

What is your view and why on any questions here or more if you can think of any I havent mentioned.
10 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 2/20/08
they get overfunded, and are fighting wars we shouldn't be in.
Posted 2/20/08

evilpen14 wrote:

Do you think they have enough money to do the job they do?

Are they doing what is needed?

Do you believe they have always done a good job?

Are they the best trained in the world?

What is your view and why on any questions here or more if you can think of any I havent mentioned.


1. They have plenty

2. Sure

3. They have a pretty good record from 1900 and onwards... the only flaw was Dunkirk during WWII

4. Nope... To be honest, the Germans outclass the Amercians easily

5. N/A
3426 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / my dream is world...
Offline
Posted 2/20/08
the english army suck how do i know? im englishits like most armies in the world though they go around doing needless things and lots of bad stuff and getting away with it like rape and murder for example.
how many cover ups have the military had, what do you think?
Posted 2/20/08
I knew a british ex-military guy who was in the Falkland Islands war who left the UK to immigrate to the US because he wanted to own guns.
14676 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 2/20/08
any country with nuclear weapons doesn't need a strong army. If backed into a corner, I believe Britain would nuke first and ask questions later
655 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / uk
Offline
Posted 2/21/08

kedakai wrote:

any country with nuclear weapons doesn't need a strong army. If backed into a corner, I believe Britain would nuke first and ask questions later



I think your thinking about the US :P
7716 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
77 / M / Florida, US
Offline
Posted 2/21/08
Um... you can't win wars with nukes. We're working on military technology and have troops in order to have practical wars. Nukes are basically a suicide/homicide decision since more than 1 country has them.

And I doubt anyone can answer this question since there are so many military forces that we don't personally know about. You can't compare them all. I do think that N. Korea might have some scary soldiers. There were rumors that the elite soldiers in N. Korea practiced fighting and killing on prisoners to receive training. Not to mention that many countries that are military based focus on lifelong military training on many soldiers. But, I have no clear idea since these are all assumptions.
7886 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / Melbourne
Offline
Posted 2/21/08
i think the british will lose any war if they run out of tea bags on the battle field.
14676 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 2/21/08

DemDem wrote:


kedakai wrote:

any country with nuclear weapons doesn't need a strong army. If backed into a corner, I believe Britain would nuke first and ask questions later



I think your thinking about the US :P


To my knowledge Britain or the U.K. is a member of the "nuclear club." 100-200 warheads. You might know better than me. My opinion is Britain does not have a strong army, if abandoned by strong army friends like the U.S. in a time of war, I believe they would utilize all of their resources to protect their own interests. For example, if the "Battle of Britain" in WWII were to happen again today, where instead of winning the air war they were on the verge of losing, nukes would easily be on the table as an option. Any country backed into a corner, especially on their home soil, would strongly consider this option. I don't think Britain would make a rash or unqualified decision to use nukes unless they really need to.
3356 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
41 / M / Earth
Offline
Posted 2/21/08

BillyG2093 wrote:


evilpen14 wrote:

Do you think they have enough money to do the job they do?

Are they doing what is needed?

Do you believe they have always done a good job?

Are they the best trained in the world?

What is your view and why on any questions here or more if you can think of any I havent mentioned.


1. They have plenty

2. Sure

3. They have a pretty good record from 1900 and onwards... the only flaw was Dunkirk during WWII

4. Nope... To be honest, the Germans outclass the Amercians easily

5. N/A




Clear, Concise, and to the point. I tend to agree with the answers provided. But as a side note : They were designed to work in unison with other NATO members not on their own. However, things are changing on the battlefield. Because of their smaller and sleaker units they can do a much better job in surgical operations than most countries can.
66 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Bristol
Offline
Posted 2/21/08

Kenshin1986 wrote:

i think the british will lose any war if they run out of tea bags on the battle field.


lol very stereotypical comment there....
2910 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / With in the light
Offline
Posted 2/21/08

Kenshin1986 wrote:

i think the british will lose any war if they run out of tea bags on the battle field.


Totally agree.

I believe American military are better trained and arm.
Just look at how much money Bush put in the military.
66 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Bristol
Offline
Posted 2/21/08
S.A.S
3065 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / F / Hawaii
Offline
Posted 2/21/08

Kenshin1986 wrote:

i think the british will lose any war if they run out of tea bags on the battle field.


well they can always tea bag each other
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.