Post Reply
Favorite
Incest Legalized?
|
shuyi000 wrote: So... let me rephrase is... its "Morally worng for me" er u left out the ?... do u know english? |
|
You will die in 7 days, look at that avatar :D
|
|
|
joeljjison wrote: siblings cousins.. maybe.. .they're the idiots... what about when parents and kids? you think it's not possible... i heard a matter like this from the news... |
|
You will die in 7 days, look at that avatar :D
|
|
|
Right on girl! You said it!! |
|
You will die in 7 days, look at that avatar :D
|
|
|
SEAmaya wrote: shuyi000 wrote: So... let me rephrase is... its "Morally worng for me" er u left out the ?... do u know english? ....?????? |
|
STRESS... I got Projects, Reports and Exams to take care of... =.='"
|
|
|
whats bestiality... if u mean rape... it could be wrong but paedophilia is by far worst xD whats stupider is the kids that get raped on myspace don't even bother thinking about... they just webcam offer to be raped xD uh silly children!!bless them though... |
|
You will die in 7 days, look at that avatar :D
|
|
|
shuyi000 wrote: SEAmaya wrote: shuyi000 wrote: So... let me rephrase is... its "Morally worng for me" er u left out the ?... do u know english? ....?????? oh i didnt see... my bad... lol sorry i thought u were asking xD haha |
|
You will die in 7 days, look at that avatar :D
|
|
|
h4x0rz wrote: Azn_gurl wrote: huh....but incest that produces pregnancy might end up in that disease where the baby has the skin problem.......It's like H*something something* I *something something* I think it's called harlequin ichthyosis....it's a really sad and scary disease.....where the babies' skin gets abnormally thick and dry and whenever it moves, the skin basically cracks which exposes a lot of raw flesh which is easy to get infected..so they die early....TT^TT Please don't google it. infact,that disease has a thread on extended discussion. maes me wanna pue (both the disease and the idea of incest) *shiver* I don't wanna think about it......the pictures on google image scared me enough..... |
|
Big Bang (TOP and Taeyang) are the best stress relievers....and procrastinati...
|
|
|
Get some things straight:
- even if incest was legal (in which case, the term would disappear I guess, since it would be just another sexual relationship), rape would not be. Those are different. So that would not be the problem. Legalizing rape would be a whole different area - we do not regulate sexual realtions between people prone to have deformed children. Like people over 55, or those with "bad genes". So it this is to be the basis for the argument against incest, we should expand the laws to cover eugenics (?). If you are against this, then you can not use defects as the only argument against incest. The only thing you can claim then is: morally wrong (according to own ethics). This you can always claim (in any situation or in any matter). This is no doubt the reason it is illegal. We can see this, especially nationally, in difference between rural and urban areas. Although it is legal in Norway to marry a cousin, it usually only happens in very rural regions that would otherwise die out. here it is not considered a "bad thing". I do not know how many countries have laws against marrying cousins globally, or if any country opens for even closer family marriages. |
|
|
|
|
No, incest should not be allowed, I have no moral reasons, if that was all I wouldn't care, its there lives, BUT, I'm thinking about little Timmy who is going to be horribly disfigured because his gene's were to close to one another, not only that he has a less chance of surviving, and we people need to expand the gene pool as much as possible, the only reason I'm against incest is genetics.
|
|
who raeps phace, i raep phace
|
|
|
jestorebo wrote: Get some things straight: - even if incest was legal (in which case, the term would disappear I guess, since it would be just another sexual relationship), rape would not be. Those are different. So that would not be the problem. Legalizing rape would be a whole different area - we do not regulate sexual realtions between people prone to have deformed children. Like people over 55, or those with "bad genes". So it this is to be the basis for the argument against incest, we should expand the laws to cover eugenics (?). If you are against this, then you can not use defects as the only argument against incest. The only thing you can claim then is: morally wrong (according to own ethics). This you can always claim (in any situation or in any matter). This is no doubt the reason it is illegal. We can see this, especially nationally, in difference between rural and urban areas. Although it is legal in Norway to marry a cousin, it usually only happens in very rural regions that would otherwise die out. here it is not considered a "bad thing". I do not know how many countries have laws against marrying cousins globally, or if any country opens for even closer family marriages. If you have bad gene's theres nothing you can do about it, or if your old, now you can do something about screwing your sister, its not a fair comparison, and if you were born retarded for a reason that could of been easily avoided I think you would agree. |
|
who raeps phace, i raep phace
|
|
|
dmit: so what? You can do something about it: not pass it on! I have a sideline where the men have so to speak no spine. And the last male member asked his sister to abort if she had a male child (the women are the carriers). Turns it she got a daughter. But she had an ulatrasound, and she was right to do that. Can not help it? That's no reason to spread bad genes. You can not help sexual attraction or longing for sex. You can always help having sex yes, which is my point. They could regulate everyone that are prone to have deformed children. So if that's the argument: then people should be for such a law. Otherwise it's hypocricy. Children of people who passed bad genes on, have a much bigger reason to be angry if they get the syndrome. There the chances may have been very clear. Inbreeding usually takes a few generations I believe. Bad genes come at once. My sideline is apparently at 99% chance. Why aren't they regulated if the case is to prevent deformity? I'd rather have children of a brother and a sister, then have such bad genes passed on forever. The guy (in my sideline) uses a trolley and sticks to get around, and you only focus on the POSSIBLE deformity with legalizing incest. That just seems silly to me.
|
|
|
|
|
hildren being disabled after an sibling or family members have sex, this is'nt true the defigurement or disablement of the child is only likely o happen if there was a lage chain of this going on (child s born has sex with family member, new child born has sex with amily member and so on).
I'm still against incest sex/marage |
|
Qoute me if you want an reply!
|
|
|
|
|
huh?
|
|
|
ewwww thats almost worse than gay stuff!!!! whats this world coming 2!!!!????
|
|
if life is so fair how come roses have thorns?!lol
|
|
|
thats just sick swt
|
|
sry not on9 alot..busy
|
Videos |
Popular Free Anime |
Community |
Support |
Premium Services |
Partnerships |
Crunchyroll |