First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
Incest Legalized?
3166 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / I would like to b...
Offline
Posted 3/12/08
if that happen...the paperwork will be very confusing.......that is just wrong unless it is by accident.like they separate at birth and fall in love without knowing they are related or something...small gene pool is dangerous.we sould all go out and meet new ppl......
2424 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
34 / M / Philippines
Offline
Posted 3/13/08
Uhn this can be done only in manga
1328 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
40 / M / Closing in
Offline
Posted 3/13/08
The problem should be family loyalty. Although incest can be consensual, maybe it mostly is - I just don't know, in cases of sexual abuse, involuntary sex, if incest is legalized, families can claim that it is consensual, and the victim can out of loyaltyback the story, even though victimized. "Ratting" on your family is hard to do, even for a victim (studies have shown, me I'd tell right away). DNA testing and such, may prove useless. Then the only protection would be age, which is not such a good barrier, and may be considered pointless interference. This has to do with evidence, proving sexual abuse.
604 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 3/13/08
we're sorry you're deformed, but damnit your mums so god damned hot, how could i resist?? you know, if you ever want to tap that ass you have my blessing to do so son. lets keep it all in the family.....
Posted 3/13/08

jestorebo wrote:

Midnight: (you again apparently) it would hardly have the same consequences. A society where murder is allowed wouldn't function properly. The leaders would keep on getting killed (and in continous fashion, this would eventually be a bad thing). Everyone would be uneasy. Even if someone were to be pregnant, they could have an abortion. Besides the odds of pregnancy would be 0 within the same sex, so one could allow same sex incest then. Sex is always "dangerous" when it comes to pregnancy, diseases and simple heart failures, etc. Besides, how many do you think would do the incest rhumba? It wouldn't happen in most families, even if allowed. The impact of legalized incest versus legalized murder is on completely different scale. If incest was legal I would still feel safe walking on the street, society would continue, it wouldn't affect me even indirectly. How many people do you assume would be "lucky" if incest was allowed?


Well, obviously you didn't get my sarcasm!
Besides that, I think that there are a lot of people who are pro legalizing incest, since they don't really see the consequences of it, some are even so ignorant that they don't know what this means. And I personally believe that there are quite a lot of degenerated people who want it legalised. It's fucked up. And people who say that it doesn't really bother them nor concern them are IDIOTS! Why? Well it is clear that genetic deformations, mutations and so on will have a sever impact on the future generations of humanity, this means that it does also have an *indirect* impact on you, or your future family, children, and even if doesn't have, it is selfish of you to think like that >;( .... And after the natural law you should not be sexually attracted by your siblings. This has nothing to do with morals, I don't actually give a shit about the morality of this acts, it is more the sever impact this would have on humanity, if it would become legal to have sex with your siblings and which would also lead to the allowance of having children with them. Gosh, this is sickening me.

Even if many families wouldn't *do* this for now, it will get more acceptable with the time, and even faster after its legalisation. It would be a the new trend. And seriously I don't want to see more idiots and retards and cripples to get born, not that I have something against this people, but it is not okay...to let something that could knowingly endanger soemone's life, in this case it would be the newborn incestic child, which will most probably be crippled or mentally degenerated. Such selfishness! Knowing the consequences and still wanting to do it is just plain selfish and stupid.

Floetry~
579 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F / England
Offline
Posted 3/14/08
I think that's good. I mean, I know people talk about birth defects, but it's not certain that it will happen, and they don't have to reproduce.
Posted 3/14/08
that is. . . interesting. . .
1126 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / F / somewhere tropical
Offline
Posted 3/14/08
EWWW.. people nowadays are turning their fantasies into reality.. i think next time they're gonna consent to child sex, maybe? man, that's screwed..
2535 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
The bar
Offline
Posted 3/14/08

JuliaRhys wrote:

A recent article from the Boston Globe newspaper recently looked at a recent Supreme Court case, which said this:

"If the Supreme Court says you have the right to consensual sex within your home," he told a reporter, "then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything."

Now people are trying to use this ruling to abolish laws that make incest illegal.

What do you think?


Who is attempting to abolish incest laws?! Motherf*ckers. . .
1063 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / A small town in t...
Offline
Posted 3/14/08
Incest legal this is some serious screwed up shit.
Posted 3/14/08

reikiaddict wrote:

Correct me if I'm wrong but isnt this a slippery slope fallacy?


Not really, but it would depend on the context.
Slippery slope fallacy just means that one event couldn't have happened unless another pre-occuring event happened.

Ala:

"I wouldn't have hit that blue car if the red car behind me hadn't have cut me off."

...or a better example would be a comment like

"All kids who play violent videogames will end up being violent and kill people."

Hope that makes sense. ^_^''
Posted 3/14/08

xidiya wrote:

I have worked extensively with legal contracts and the legal language in my last job and although the legal language leaves room for interpretation, I can tell you that anyone who is attempting to use the ruling in such a way is operating under a fallacy and their logic (or should I say knowledge) is sadly wanting. Why? Because the legal system albeit imperfect is not and never will be as open-ended as people seem to want to believe. Rick Sanotorum and others who brazenly set out to misconstrue the ruling are being completely ridiculous. Legal precedent is determined on a case by case basis. Taking a ruling outside of the context of the case and applying it to all and every case involving sex is a logical and a legal fallacy.


I work in the legal field too. I honestly think a lot of people have no clue how our government and legal system works. Cases are indeed looked at on a case-by-case basis. Sure, other cases that are similar are taken into consideration (ala precedent) when figuring out how to rule, but for the most part its done county/state levels and not applied federally. Which is exactly why in some states age of consent for sex is 13 and in others is 17 or so. The U.S constitution is just the minimum of rights we as Americans have. Each state has its own constitution with it’s own laws that may differ from other states. To make incest “legal” they would have to get it federally passed and that’s something that will probably never happen.
Posted 3/14/08
As long as they don't expect society to pay for taking care of their retarded offspring then I guess it's not that big of a deal.
8432 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Canada
Offline
Posted 3/14/08
Would people stop posting stupid posts in an extended discussion thread such as "yesss" or two word answers? Those retarded posts belong more in the general section.

I believe incest between adults should be decriminalized, since it is consensual sex and there isn't much harm done to other people. I can not find it more harmful to society than say homosexuality (which I don't really care about). Heck I believe smoking does more harm to society than both of those combined together with polygamy and adultery.

Smoking is practiced far beyond homosexuality and incest and unlike those two smoking actually affects other people through second hand smoke and the medical bill for people developing cancer from smoking is a lot higher than deformed children created by people practicing in unprotected incest.

Adultery and polygamy is losing its effect on society mainly due to the fact that marriages in modern society isn't really worth much. Many people prefer not to marry and even more people divorce soon after getting married. Marriage isn't such a binding contract as it used to be and I believe laws on adultery and polygamy are outdated.
604 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
77
Offline
Posted 3/15/08

Sulla wrote:

I bet the next thread would be is it alright to have sex with an horse.


How did you guess?
http://www.crunchyroll.com/forumtopic-127523/Man-Dies-By-Having-Sex-With-A-Horse.html

So the answer to your question would be "No, a donkey or a pony would be less dangerous."
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.