First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
Post Reply GN Arms vs Meteor
Creator
20924 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Singapore
Offline
Posted 3/28/08
wat du u think guys?



Versus



Who shall win?
Creator
2982 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
36 / M / Earth
Offline
Posted 3/28/08
Its hard to tell Its vulnerable to high manuever Gn-X.
It can use Gn Beam Shield in all surrounding

4439 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / New Jersey
Offline
Posted 3/29/08
GN arms beats meteor but GP03 beats both
Moderator
15846 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / The smallest coun...
Offline
Posted 3/29/08
GN arms dont hv much weaponary than the meteor
5742 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / ITABUNA
Offline
Posted 3/29/08
meteor uahahhahahahaha
Posted 3/29/08
It's got the GN shield, and it's a helluva lot versatile than the METEOR, it's also readily deployable and available..
Member
1674 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Toronto
Offline
Posted 3/29/08
Gn-arms seems more mobile and has bigger range guns
Member
906 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27
Offline
Posted 4/1/08

Sleepneeded127 wrote:

GN arms beats meteor but GP03 beats both


No... GN Arms owns both... simple reason... both the GP03 Dendrobium and METEOR are attachments to the Gundams that requires it to be docked in the mobile suit to be used. On the other hand, the GN Arms is itself, combat capable and has a cockpit which a pilot can use to fight with the Gundams. Not to mention that they're the containers for the Gundams...
4439 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / New Jersey
Offline
Posted 4/1/08

Genesic_Shin_Zyrael_Kaiser wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:

GN arms beats meteor but GP03 beats both


No... GN Arms owns both... simple reason... both the GP03 Dendrobium and METEOR are attachments to the Gundams that requires it to be docked in the mobile suit to be used. On the other hand, the GN Arms is itself, combat capable and has a cockpit which a pilot can use to fight with the Gundams. Not to mention that they're the containers for the Gundams...


GN Arms dont come close to the Weapons the GP03 has. GN Arm have no physical ranged weapons except a for smaller amount of missiles making it almost useless at a distance. the GP03 was all made in intercept battleships so its faster and still very numerable. the Tow anit ship mine would take out the GN Arms. the grapple pincers would rip it a part or cut it to with the giant beam sabers
Posted 4/1/08

Sleepneeded127 wrote:


Genesic_Shin_Zyrael_Kaiser wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:

GN arms beats meteor but GP03 beats both


No... GN Arms owns both... simple reason... both the GP03 Dendrobium and METEOR are attachments to the Gundams that requires it to be docked in the mobile suit to be used. On the other hand, the GN Arms is itself, combat capable and has a cockpit which a pilot can use to fight with the Gundams. Not to mention that they're the containers for the Gundams...


GN Arms dont come close to the Weapons the GP03 has. GN Arm have no physical ranged weapons except a for smaller amount of missiles making it almost useless at a distance. the GP03 was all made in intercept battleships so its faster and still very numerable. the Tow anit ship mine would take out the GN Arms. the grapple pincers would rip it a part or cut it to with the giant beam sabers


What of the manueverability of the GN Arms, and it's applications in atmospheric warfare? Not to mention the GP03 doesn't have the sensors capable of looking thru GN particle interference....

ED: Not to mention the GN Arms looks so cool, docked or undocked, the Dendrobium looks like a heap of strapped-on parts.... I dunno how to describe the METEOR though....
4439 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / New Jersey
Offline
Posted 4/1/08

thesilentreviewer wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:


Genesic_Shin_Zyrael_Kaiser wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:

GN arms beats meteor but GP03 beats both


No... GN Arms owns both... simple reason... both the GP03 Dendrobium and METEOR are attachments to the Gundams that requires it to be docked in the mobile suit to be used. On the other hand, the GN Arms is itself, combat capable and has a cockpit which a pilot can use to fight with the Gundams. Not to mention that they're the containers for the Gundams...


GN Arms dont come close to the Weapons the GP03 has. GN Arm have no physical ranged weapons except a for smaller amount of missiles making it almost useless at a distance. the GP03 was all made in intercept battleships so its faster and still very numerable. the Tow anit ship mine would take out the GN Arms. the grapple pincers would rip it a part or cut it to with the giant beam sabers


What of the manueverability of the GN Arms, and it's applications in atmospheric warfare? Not to mention the GP03 doesn't have the sensors capable of looking thru GN particle interference....

the battle would not take place in the atmosphere since GP03 cant
the GN Ams dont have sensors capable of looking through M particle interference ether.



Posted 4/1/08

Sleepneeded127 wrote:


thesilentreviewer wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:


Genesic_Shin_Zyrael_Kaiser wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:

GN arms beats meteor but GP03 beats both


No... GN Arms owns both... simple reason... both the GP03 Dendrobium and METEOR are attachments to the Gundams that requires it to be docked in the mobile suit to be used. On the other hand, the GN Arms is itself, combat capable and has a cockpit which a pilot can use to fight with the Gundams. Not to mention that they're the containers for the Gundams...


GN Arms dont come close to the Weapons the GP03 has. GN Arm have no physical ranged weapons except a for smaller amount of missiles making it almost useless at a distance. the GP03 was all made in intercept battleships so its faster and still very numerable. the Tow anit ship mine would take out the GN Arms. the grapple pincers would rip it a part or cut it to with the giant beam sabers


What of the manueverability of the GN Arms, and its applications in atmospheric warfare? Not to mention the GP03 doesn't have the sensors capable of looking thru GN particle interference....

the battle would not take place in the atmosphere since GP03 cant
the GN Ams dont have sensors capable of looking through M particle interference ether.





Guess that evens it out..... what of the durability of Luna Titanium(gundarium) vs GN-enhanced E-Carbon?
4439 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / New Jersey
Offline
Posted 4/1/08

thesilentreviewer wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:


thesilentreviewer wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:


Genesic_Shin_Zyrael_Kaiser wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:

GN arms beats meteor but GP03 beats both


No... GN Arms owns both... simple reason... both the GP03 Dendrobium and METEOR are attachments to the Gundams that requires it to be docked in the mobile suit to be used. On the other hand, the GN Arms is itself, combat capable and has a cockpit which a pilot can use to fight with the Gundams. Not to mention that they're the containers for the Gundams...


GN Arms dont come close to the Weapons the GP03 has. GN Arm have no physical ranged weapons except a for smaller amount of missiles making it almost useless at a distance. the GP03 was all made in intercept battleships so its faster and still very numerable. the Tow anit ship mine would take out the GN Arms. the grapple pincers would rip it a part or cut it to with the giant beam sabers


What of the manueverability of the GN Arms, and its applications in atmospheric warfare? Not to mention the GP03 doesn't have the sensors capable of looking thru GN particle interference....

the battle would not take place in the atmosphere since GP03 cant
the GN Ams dont have sensors capable of looking through M particle interference ether.





Guess that evens it out..... what of the durability of Luna Titanium(gundarium) vs GN-enhanced E-Carbon?


the I Field will stop all beam attacks but the GN field can be broken after a few beam hits as shown with Virtue and the GN-X's 1st attacked so the mega beam cannon of the GP03 should be able to as well.
Posted 4/1/08

Sleepneeded127 wrote:


thesilentreviewer wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:


thesilentreviewer wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:


Genesic_Shin_Zyrael_Kaiser wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:

GN arms beats meteor but GP03 beats both


No... GN Arms owns both... simple reason... both the GP03 Dendrobium and METEOR are attachments to the Gundams that requires it to be docked in the mobile suit to be used. On the other hand, the GN Arms is itself, combat capable and has a cockpit which a pilot can use to fight with the Gundams. Not to mention that they're the containers for the Gundams...


GN Arms dont come close to the Weapons the GP03 has. GN Arm have no physical ranged weapons except a for smaller amount of missiles making it almost useless at a distance. the GP03 was all made in intercept battleships so its faster and still very numerable. the Tow anit ship mine would take out the GN Arms. the grapple pincers would rip it a part or cut it to with the giant beam sabers


What of the manueverability of the GN Arms, and its applications in atmospheric warfare? Not to mention the GP03 doesn't have the sensors capable of looking thru GN particle interference....

the battle would not take place in the atmosphere since GP03 cant
the GN Ams dont have sensors capable of looking through M particle interference ether.





Guess that evens it out..... what of the durability of Luna Titanium(gundarium) vs GN-enhanced E-Carbon?


the I Field will stop all beam attacks but the GN field can be broken after a few beam hits as shown with Virtue and the GN-X's 1st attacked so the mega beam cannon of the GP03 should be able to as well.


I believe I was asking about the durability of their armor, not their active defense mechanisms.... but oh well....
4439 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / New Jersey
Offline
Posted 4/1/08

thesilentreviewer wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:


thesilentreviewer wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:


thesilentreviewer wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:


Genesic_Shin_Zyrael_Kaiser wrote:


Sleepneeded127 wrote:

GN arms beats meteor but GP03 beats both


No... GN Arms owns both... simple reason... both the GP03 Dendrobium and METEOR are attachments to the Gundams that requires it to be docked in the mobile suit to be used. On the other hand, the GN Arms is itself, combat capable and has a cockpit which a pilot can use to fight with the Gundams. Not to mention that they're the containers for the Gundams...


GN Arms dont come close to the Weapons the GP03 has. GN Arm have no physical ranged weapons except a for smaller amount of missiles making it almost useless at a distance. the GP03 was all made in intercept battleships so its faster and still very numerable. the Tow anit ship mine would take out the GN Arms. the grapple pincers would rip it a part or cut it to with the giant beam sabers


What of the manueverability of the GN Arms, and its applications in atmospheric warfare? Not to mention the GP03 doesn't have the sensors capable of looking thru GN particle interference....

the battle would not take place in the atmosphere since GP03 cant
the GN Ams dont have sensors capable of looking through M particle interference ether.





Guess that evens it out..... what of the durability of Luna Titanium(gundarium) vs GN-enhanced E-Carbon?


the I Field will stop all beam attacks but the GN field can be broken after a few beam hits as shown with Virtue and the GN-X's 1st attacked so the mega beam cannon of the GP03 should be able to as well.


I believe I was asking about the durability of their armor, not their active defense mechanisms.... but oh well....


lol i forgot to make the point on that it i thought i put it at the top sry
well all we know is that both can take a few beam hits and beam saber will cut both easy so i from what we can tell they are equal when it come to beam tech but ill give E-carbon a bit of and edge against machine gun and other shell based fire
First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.