First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
Best Strategy (RTS) Game Ever
14495 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Way of The Ninja...
Offline
Posted 9/28/06
For once stratify and I agree fft sucked majorly. I just dont see what people like about it and I do like some strategies like C&C's are usually adequate
1289 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / GA luthersville
Offline
Posted 9/28/06

quater wrote:

For once stratify and I agree fft sucked majorly. I just dont see what people like about it and I do like some strategies like C&C's are usually adequate


i just like any FF just about >.>
Posted 9/28/06
see all the rpgs ones are great for the most part...but they are right to an extent fft isnt that great of a game it was a great game @ the time when it came out but now its pretty much useless the good games are the ones that stand the test of time and tactics just didnt do that..just because you plant the ff name on a game doesnt mean it will be fantastic look @ dirge of cerberus lol






Trevor (OP)
2055 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Undisclosed
Offline
Posted 9/28/06

bawitback wrote:

http://www.amazon.com/The-Best-of-RTS-for-PC/lm/R2R11XX7FBQAHN/ref=cm_lm_byauthor_title_full/102-5427646-8055309

StarCraft ftw.


Na, some people think horrible games like WarCraft 3 are good.

I try to understand and respect their opinions. However, I have my limits. I still can't understand them.


What is bad about WC3? This has always been mind boggling me. Some of my friends also can't stand it. I'm curious.


Compared with StarCraft, WC3 lacks the strategy. It's more about micro. StarCraft players generally hate this. StarCraft is generally divided in micro/macro so there's more room for strategic manuvers. WC3 however has all its strategy in micro.

Micro = micromanagement such as controlling units.
Macro = macromanagement such as making workers and sending them to harvest resources/make structures etc.
1289 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / GA luthersville
Offline
Posted 9/28/06

kyocool wrote:

see all the rpgs ones are great for the most part...but they are right to an extent fft isnt that great of a game it was a great game @ the time when it came out but now its pretty much useless the good games are the ones that stand the test of time and tactics just didnt do that..just because you plant the ff name on a game doesnt mean it will be fantastic look @ dirge of cerberus lol



Trevor (OP)



eh ya i see what you are saying and i have yet to see dirge of cerberus, is it that bad?


14495 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Way of The Ninja...
Offline
Posted 9/28/06
You have units to gather in Warcraft 3 and I think the game can be fun when played in moderation but the graphics on it suk
477 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Atlanta
Offline
Posted 9/28/06
I'm a Command & Conquer fan, but that's just me.
1289 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / GA luthersville
Offline
Posted 9/28/06
eh i dont play WC or anything like it but i think its a ok game
15944 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 9/28/06
I like AoE but for some reason none of my friends do
Posted 9/28/06
well its not bad just the level design was horrible and the enemies are pretty lame....... the story itself was good the game around it though just didnt support the good story


and its only like 9 or 10 hours long


Trevor (OP)
14495 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Way of The Ninja...
Offline
Posted 9/28/06
WC, C&C, AOE and Starcraft are all good games do we have to be such geeks out here as to argue our points over who's we think is better and why Star craft beats Warcraft. Can we not just say what game we think is the best and then move on.
2055 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Undisclosed
Offline
Posted 9/28/06

logain wrote:

I like AoE but for some reason none of my friends do


The answer here is obvious.
1) it's a microsoft game.
2) microsoft games suck.
3) it's a microsoft game. the guys that made it must have had no experience in gaming whatsoever and just got a bunch of polls and tried to make sense of it.
4) microsoft games really suck.
5) it's a microsoft game. they had to make it educational.
6) microsoft games are horrible. xBox is also horrible.
7) it's a microsoft game. 90% of the units are useless in that game.
8)Microsoft sucks.
9) The nerds in the company haven't played games cept computer card/chess games.
10) microsoft game is a bad company that likes monopoly and totalitarianism.
11) Microsoft buys game quality. That's why games like Oblivion or WoW/Guild Wars/Total War will always be better. People with their passion for games heads it.


Your friends have right for not liking AoE.
2140 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / America, Fuck Yeah.
Offline
Posted 9/28/06
Starcraft is undoubtedly the best RTS game out there. Almost just because tassadar is such a badass. Next in line would have to be the Age games (Age of empires, mythology, ect.) they are great RTS games. Next in line would be Warcraft 3. its good, but not that good. RTs games are great people, it challenging to test yourelf against others, thats why its Real Time Strategy.

ps. World of warcraft rules. (although it will eat your soul)
14495 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Way of The Ninja...
Offline
Posted 9/28/06
Glad we took my advice and relaxed. Microsoft makes many entertaining games that have good quality just because it isnt Warcraft doesnt mean it isnt good and by the way you are not making many friends saying Xbox sucks. I agree but many people really like it for some reason.
2055 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Undisclosed
Offline
Posted 9/28/06
Oh, one game that I do like is Age of Wonders: Shadow Magic/Original.
Another game that owns is the total war series, more specifically Rome: Total War.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.