First  Prev  233  234  235  236  237  238  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  Next  Last
Post Reply Sexual Orientation
Posted 8/23/13

Syndicaidramon wrote:


anti-lambsacrifice wrote:Why can't we all just have both a penis and a vag? That just sounds like an amazing experience. O_o


Seeing as the male g-spot is inside the rectum and that we can orgasm purely from prostate stimuli without even touching the penis, it kinda works as a vagina. So in that sense, we kinda DO have both. :P


But do we still think that having children is a necessity?

3416 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Pandemonium
Offline
Posted 8/23/13 , edited 8/23/13

anti-lambsacrifice wrote:


Syndicaidramon wrote:


anti-lambsacrifice wrote:Why can't we all just have both a penis and a vag? That just sounds like an amazing experience. O_o


Seeing as the male g-spot is inside the rectum and that we can orgasm purely from prostate stimuli without even touching the penis, it kinda works as a vagina. So in that sense, we kinda DO have both. :P


But do we still think that having children is a necessity?



I don't. But that's up to every person to decide for themselves.
Posted 8/23/13

Syndicaidramon wrote:


anti-lambsacrifice wrote:


Syndicaidramon wrote:


anti-lambsacrifice wrote:Why can't we all just have both a penis and a vag? That just sounds like an amazing experience. O_o


Seeing as the male g-spot is inside the rectum and that we can orgasm purely from prostate stimuli without even touching the penis, it kinda works as a vagina. So in that sense, we kinda DO have both. :P


But do we still think that having children is a necessity?



I don't. But that's up to every person to decide for themselves.


We can say that, but if we have these things, MAYBE using them is a necessity.
3416 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Pandemonium
Offline
Posted 8/23/13

anti-lambsacrifice wrote:


Syndicaidramon wrote:


anti-lambsacrifice wrote:


Syndicaidramon wrote:


anti-lambsacrifice wrote:Why can't we all just have both a penis and a vag? That just sounds like an amazing experience. O_o


Seeing as the male g-spot is inside the rectum and that we can orgasm purely from prostate stimuli without even touching the penis, it kinda works as a vagina. So in that sense, we kinda DO have both. :P


But do we still think that having children is a necessity?



I don't. But that's up to every person to decide for themselves.


We can say that, but if we have these things, MAYBE using them is a necessity.


Well in terms of procreating, women have their vaginas and men have their penises.
We just have a vagina as well that doesn't work for procreating, but does work for sexual pleasure.
Posted 8/23/13

Syndicaidramon wrote:


anti-lambsacrifice wrote:


Syndicaidramon wrote:


anti-lambsacrifice wrote:


Syndicaidramon wrote:


anti-lambsacrifice wrote:Why can't we all just have both a penis and a vag? That just sounds like an amazing experience. O_o


Seeing as the male g-spot is inside the rectum and that we can orgasm purely from prostate stimuli without even touching the penis, it kinda works as a vagina. So in that sense, we kinda DO have both. :P


But do we still think that having children is a necessity?



I don't. But that's up to every person to decide for themselves.


We can say that, but if we have these things, MAYBE using them is a necessity.


Well in terms of procreating, women have their vaginas and men have their penises.
We just have a vagina as well that doesn't work for procreating, but does work for sexual pleasure. :P


That's one way to look at it. In terms of pregnancy, I'm probably just gonna let my vag go to waste. But my hesitancy in fully agreeing to do so comes from feeling like that's partly what it's for, and that it MAY be wasting.

3416 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Pandemonium
Offline
Posted 8/23/13



The world has an overpopulation problem. We don't need more people.
So in that context, not having children is a good thing.
10370 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / New York City
Offline
Posted 8/23/13
I'm all for it. It does nothing damaging to me or my mind, so why bother? Just my thought.
4033 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F / United States
Offline
Posted 8/23/13

Syndicaidramon wrote:




The world has an overpopulation problem. We don't need more people.
So in that context, not having children is a good thing. :)


I agree. Unfortunately though, the poor and the uneducated are the vast majority of this world's population and they will continue to procreate and make the problem even worse.
Posted 8/23/13

Syndicaidramon wrote:




The world has an overpopulation problem. We don't need more people.
So in that context, not having children is a good thing. :)


Just because people have done something too much does not mean we ought to deny the way it was perhaps intended to be..

3416 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Pandemonium
Offline
Posted 8/23/13

anti-lambsacrifice wrote:


Syndicaidramon wrote:




The world has an overpopulation problem. We don't need more people.
So in that context, not having children is a good thing. :)


Just because people have done something too much does not mean we ought to deny the way it was perhaps intended to be..


Clinging to something just because that's how it's always been, despite signs that it's time to let go is kinda silly, don't you think?
Posted 8/23/13 , edited 8/23/13

Syndicaidramon wrote:


anti-lambsacrifice wrote:


Syndicaidramon wrote:




The world has an overpopulation problem. We don't need more people.
So in that context, not having children is a good thing. :)


Just because people have done something too much does not mean we ought to deny the way it was perhaps intended to be..


Clinging to something just because that's how it's always been, despite signs that it's time to let go is kinda silly, don't you think?


You assume that because you can't do one thing at one point in time, you ought to instead do that which is quite possibly completely unintended. What will happen if the population declines? Do people just stop being gay? In my experience, things do return to the way they were initially intended to be, as there is a reason they were intended to be that way in the first place (meaning any other option is NOT the way it is supposed to be.) So, no - I'm not trying to work around an issue if indeed that is what it is.

23158 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F / US
Offline
Posted 8/24/13
Anyone can be whatever they want to be because I am whatever I want to be and no one can tell me otherwise so what right do I have to tell others to be something they don't want to be? tsk tsk
potot2 
9024 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F
Offline
Posted 8/25/13
Personally, I believe that Gays and Lesbians are the same as everyone else. It is a shame that in this day in age we still have to treat this like a special issue. Why is it that everyone is concerned with what other people are doing? If it bothers you if you see two men making out or two women making out, look away. In my opinion, it bothers me when i have to see two straight people making out anyway. People should be able to be whoever they want to be with and marry them too. No one should have the right to make that kind of decision for anyone else. Also, for those who base their opinion off of their religious ideals, you are incredibly small minded. Everyone has their own right to religion (or should have. sorry if you don't. but we do have it in America) so don't go spouting off that it's wrong because your "god" said so in whatever type of religious book you have. Maybe you shouldn't base your whole life and everyone elses lives off of an old book. If your "god" wanted us to be all the same and fit into the same cookie cutter image then he/she/it/whatever wouldn't have created us so different and unique.

For those of you that feel outcast-ed or ashamed, you can come hang with me, i'll accept you.

Also, I'm sorry for those who live in Russia, North Korea, etc. (probably sucks a lot)
7983 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F / Chesapeake, Va
Offline
Posted 9/2/13
I agree that there are too many people in the world anyway so just making a bunch more babies to put up for adoption isn't really beneficial. Lol.

Plus being gay was never really an issue before. It's not like it just suddenly sprouted up recently. I believe it was either Greek or Roman men (can't remember which) had other males the slept with and no one had a problem and it went the same for women and no one really spoke ill of it - or at least not enough to be documented as such. Imo, the only reason it's issue now is that as humans we like to feel like we are better than someone and since we keep making everybody equal we're left with gays to feel empowered over. Lol.

Personally, that all seems like too much work for me. "Ain't nobody got time for that!"
3201 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23
Offline
Posted 9/5/13 , edited 9/5/13
We're really not in danger of going extinct via lack of reproduction, I honestly don't know where people get the idea that homosexuality poses risk of extinction. Homosexuals are only known to be a minority of the population, and homosexuals can have children even without having heterosexual intercourse.
First  Prev  233  234  235  236  237  238  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.