First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
Winston Churchill is NOT a Hero!
3929 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / My body lives in...
Offline
Posted 6/18/08

NewSoul wrote:

Seriously, you have to stop creating pointless threads... Are you just after the title of Most Created Threads by a user? If you are, then you win the Most Pointless Threads Created By a User


do you have a double?
Posted 6/18/08
Cool!
3342 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / Phoenix, Arizona
Offline
Posted 6/18/08

chinky_sonny wrote:


NewSoul wrote:

Seriously, you have to stop creating pointless threads... Are you just after the title of Most Created Threads by a user? If you are, then you win the Most Pointless Threads Created By a User


do you have a double?


No, but this thread is not needed -.-
Posted 6/18/08
her threads are much more interesting than the standard: `what color socks do you wear?` that you see here.
1490 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M
Offline
Posted 6/18/08
My my, children arguing about historical accuracy. You do realize the pathetic aspect of learning something as ambiguous as that from wikipedia? Other than that, your point is incorrect for several reasons, and the question of morality is not the only one. Even assuming (it was NOT the case, as you are thinking), that Hitler ultimately wanted to ally with the UK, not only would the UK be party to a murderous regime disliked by all but it might well have been expunged from the face of this planet for participating in the affair. It got off more than happily: party to secret economic compromises with the US, without doing or losing a fraction of what Russia did and lost in the war. You are ignorant ignorant people. Yawn.
5463 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Los Angeles
Offline
Posted 6/18/08

anvoice wrote:

My my, children arguing about historical accuracy. You do realize the pathetic aspect of learning something as ambiguous as that from wikipedia? Other than that, your point is incorrect for several reasons, and the question of morality is not the only one. Even assuming (it was NOT the case, as you are thinking), that Hitler ultimately wanted to ally with the UK, not only would the UK be party to a murderous regime disliked by all but it might well have been expunged from the face of this planet for participating in the affair. It got off more than happily: party to secret economic compromises with the US, without doing or losing a fraction of what Russia did and lost in the war. You are ignorant ignorant people. Yawn.


You talk like a Mandarin Chinaman.

I doubt England would have been removed from the world. England could fight in Canada and India and Australia, multiple nations would have to rise up to get rid of England. England was barely King of the World in World War 2.
5463 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Los Angeles
Offline
Posted 6/18/08

asamiueto wrote:

her threads are much more interesting than the standard: `what color socks do you wear?` that you see here.


Sieg Heil Baby.

You like the Nazis anyway or you have to much of that German pride in you.
1490 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M
Offline
Posted 6/18/08 , edited 6/18/08

Sulla wrote:
I doubt England would have been removed from the world. England could fight in Canada and India and Australia, multiple nations would have to rise up to get rid of England. England was barely King of the World in World War 2.


The mandarin chinaman comment (and I am not one) is particularly apropos and has convicted me of your inate wisdom and logic... (not).

And I don't suppose you actually know much history to speak of. If you do, you hide it quite well. I am not being biased in any way, but the only reason England was not completely overrun was the La Manche and the presence of Russia.

Oh and I would much rather be a mandarin (chinaman seems kind of redundant) than an ignoramus.
5463 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Los Angeles
Offline
Posted 6/18/08

anvoice wrote:


Sulla wrote:
I doubt England would have been removed from the world. England could fight in Canada and India and Australia, multiple nations would have to rise up to get rid of England. England was barely King of the World in World War 2.


The mandarin chinaman comment (and I am not one) is particularly apropos and has convicted me of your inate wisdom and logic... (not).

And I don't suppose you actually know much history to speak of. If you do, you hide it quite well. I am not being biased in any way, but the only reason England was not completely overrun was the La Manche and the presence of Russia.

Oh and I would much rather be a mandarin (chinaman seems kind of redundant) than an ignoramus.


The Germans had the same problem the French had 140 years earlier, they did not have enough Navy to invade England. The Germans also worried about US intervention. The Germans could have attacked England during the peace treaty with Russia.
7375 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / The World That Wa...
Offline
Posted 6/18/08 , edited 6/18/08
UK offered Germany many chances, they turned a blind eye to Hitler and the Nazi's stomping over europe, not only reoccupying lands they lost due to the treaty of versailles, such as the Rhinelands, but also places they didn't originally own. Appeasing Germany obviously wasn't going to work, and where I don't believe Churchill was any hero either for the acts he pulled, I definitely don't think that Nazi Germany was a victim in this tragedy.
1477 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / new zealand
Offline
Posted 6/18/08
hmm, ill never say that fighting hitler was a bad thing.
Posted 6/18/08

Raikuga wrote:

Im winston churchill

Im winston churchill

Im winston churchill

Im winston churchill

Im winston churchill

Im winston churchill

Im winston churchill

Im winston churchill


i'm emperor hirohito.
wanna fight?


1490 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M
Offline
Posted 6/18/08

Sulla wrote:
The Germans had the same problem the French had 140 years earlier, they did not have enough Navy to invade England. The Germans also worried about US intervention. The Germans could have attacked England during the peace treaty with Russia.


And if they did London would be Untermenschenburg today. Well I'm kidding the UK would have been liberated eventually, but if Germany attacked it would go down. Germany expended most of its resources on the war with Russia, and, having plan Barbarosa fail, it lost the war. Not only were most of its forces engages elsewhere, but it had to construct tanks for the land war instead of destroyers and similar ships. Still, its navy crippled the allied fleets, and Britain, for its part, was not doing much except trying to survive the Luftwaffa.

And before you annoy me again with your lack of knowledge at least take a damn look at the war statistics.
Posted 6/18/08
Just who the fuck is he anyway? No one's my fucking hero.
5463 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Los Angeles
Offline
Posted 6/18/08

anvoice wrote:


Sulla wrote:
The Germans had the same problem the French had 140 years earlier, they did not have enough Navy to invade England. The Germans also worried about US intervention. The Germans could have attacked England during the peace treaty with Russia.


And if they did London would be Untermenschenburg today. Well I'm kidding the UK would have been liberated eventually, but if Germany attacked it would go down. Germany expended most of its resources on the war with Russia, and, having plan Barbarosa fail, it lost the war. Not only were most of its forces engages elsewhere, but it had to construct tanks for the land war instead of destroyers and similar ships. Still, its navy crippled the allied fleets, and Britain, for its part, was not doing much except trying to survive the Luftwaffa.

And before you annoy me again with your lack of knowledge at least take a damn look at the war statistics.

[
b]You Mandarin ,you did not address the power of the British Fleet.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.