First  Prev  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next  Last
Proof about gays
4295 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Youtube!
Offline
Posted 5/29/09

Fightingmonkey wrote:


JoeLovesCake wrote:

Ignorant!

This is not "proof!"
This is your OPINION not PROOF.
Get it straight, asshole.


I'm pro choice but do you actually have anything constructive to add to the discussion? If not then I suggest you hold your tongue.

Oh and ad hominem doesn't count.


A. Pro choice? Wtf.

B. You can't say it wasn't constructive really. Wasn't the most constructive thing I've ever read but there was a point to it.

C. Honest question, don't get all up in arms about it. But what do you mean by ad hominem?
553 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / New Zealand
Offline
Posted 5/29/09

Sunnyxx wrote:


Fightingmonkey wrote:


JoeLovesCake wrote:

Ignorant!

This is not "proof!"
This is your OPINION not PROOF.
Get it straight, asshole.


I'm pro choice but do you actually have anything constructive to add to the discussion? If not then I suggest you hold your tongue.

Oh and ad hominem doesn't count.


A. Pro choice? Wtf.

B. You can't say it wasn't constructive really. Wasn't the most constructive thing I've ever read but there was a point to it.

C. Honest question, don't get all up in arms about it. But what do you mean by ad hominem?


Pro choice means I really don't give a fuck if they want to take it up the arse or not and I doubt that gays really make a decisive impact on the population of a society.

Rhetoric IS opinion in rhetoric your job is to convince the opposition that your opinion is correct while substanciating it with proof. I assume that he is against OP but I (in all my importance *rolls eyes*) believe that he should also add to the discussion at hand -it's easier to disprove something than support a side of the convo with concrete information.

Ad hominem is when someone makes a personal attack on someone rather than discussing the topic at hand.
(if instead of answering your question I replied "fuck off you dumb bitch I wasn't talking to you" that would be an example of ad hominem. Note: the quote wasn't a reflection of my opinions it was merely an example; if you still don't understand then I suggest you wiki the term.
4295 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Youtube!
Offline
Posted 5/30/09 , edited 5/30/09

Fightingmonkey wrote:

Pro choice means I really don't give a fuck if they want to take it up the arse or not and I doubt that gays really make a decisive impact on the population of a society.

Rhetoric IS opinion in rhetoric your job is to convince the opposition that your opinion is correct while substanciating it with proof. I assume that he is against OP but I (in all my importance *rolls eyes*) believe that he should also add to the discussion at hand -it's easier to disprove something than support a side of the convo with concrete information.

Ad hominem is when someone makes a personal attack on someone rather than discussing the topic at hand.
(if instead of answering your question I replied "fuck off you dumb bitch I wasn't talking to you" that would be an example of ad hominem. Note: the quote wasn't a reflection of my opinions it was merely an example; if you still don't understand then I suggest you wiki the term.

Yea, I get it, making things personal. Haha.

Anyway, I would add to the discussion but I think I wrote a small essay on the other page... or that could have been the gay marriage thread. I forget.

Also sorry if I came across as cold or w/e. It's 8 in the morning over here and I haven't been able to sleep. Hope you'll forgive me for not thinking at 100%

Edit: It was here actually. Page 14 if anyone's interested. lol
Posted 5/30/09

Fightingmonkey wrote:


JoeLovesCake wrote:

Ignorant!

This is not "proof!"
This is your OPINION not PROOF.
Get it straight, asshole.


I'm pro choice but do you actually have anything constructive to add to the discussion? If not then I suggest you hold your tongue.

Oh and ad hominem doesn't count.


Whatever?
Just stating what's true. You don't have to have a lengthy discussion about this crap, What I said is only obvious.
Posted 5/30/09 , edited 5/30/09

JoeLovesCake wrote:


Fightingmonkey wrote:


JoeLovesCake wrote:

Ignorant!

This is not "proof!"
This is your OPINION not PROOF.
Get it straight, asshole.


I'm pro choice but do you actually have anything constructive to add to the discussion? If not then I suggest you hold your tongue.

Oh and ad hominem doesn't count.


Whatever?
Just stating what's true. You don't have to have a lengthy discussion about this crap, What I said is only obvious.


I understand that you disagree which is fair. Personally I also disagree to a certain extent, from what little knowledge I have I believe they are born gay. But there is controversy surrounding it so I wouldn't argue my opinion too strongly until I've looked into it further. On another note, I am also pro gay/bi without being one myself, and would be happy to challenge people who disagree. Just getting that out of the way so you know I'm not trying to argue :)
Anyway, I have to agree, what you posted didn't exactly belong in the extended discussion (not that you're the only one who posts like this). Feel free to post your opinion, but I think people prefer it when you give your reasoning, or any proof or examples you may have as well. It doesn't have to be lengthy, but it is 'extended'. However you interpret that I suppose
Posted 5/30/09

cerisey wrote:


JoeLovesCake wrote:


Fightingmonkey wrote:


JoeLovesCake wrote:

Ignorant!

This is not "proof!"
This is your OPINION not PROOF.
Get it straight, asshole.


I'm pro choice but do you actually have anything constructive to add to the discussion? If not then I suggest you hold your tongue.

Oh and ad hominem doesn't count.


Whatever?
Just stating what's true. You don't have to have a lengthy discussion about this crap, What I said is only obvious.


I understand that you disagree which is fair. Personally I also disagree to a certain extent, from what little knowledge I have I believe they are born gay. But there is controversy surrounding it so I wouldn't argue my opinion too strongly until I've looked into it further. On another note, I am also pro gay/bi without being one myself, and would be happy to challenge people who disagree. Just getting that out of the way so you know I'm not trying to argue :)
Anyway, I have to agree, what you posted didn't exactly belong in the extended discussion (not that you're the only one who posts like this). Feel free to post your opinion, but I think people prefer it when you give your reasoning, or any proof or examples you may have as well. It doesn't have to be lengthy, but it is 'extended'. However you interpret that I suppose


You have a point, but I just had to say it :] a discussion on something totally biased will never end...so it is "extended".. but pretty much not worth the time
but most people will get their personality and way of showing emotion from their genes. Like, some people are just born jerks. lol.
And i think sexuality is like that too.
2799 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M / Canada
Offline
Posted 6/3/09

Cuddlebuns wrote:

The Bible also suggests that it's ok for me to screw my mom and my sister. Do you think that makes it right?


umm, could you point out when this happened?
1220 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Canada
Offline
Posted 6/3/09

CorynARC wrote:


Cuddlebuns wrote:

The Bible also suggests that it's ok for me to screw my mom and my sister. Do you think that makes it right?


umm, could you point out when this happened?


Yes, I have studied the bible extensively with (other than revelations) and don't recall that part.
2799 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M / Canada
Offline
Posted 6/3/09

Droodika wrote:


CorynARC wrote:


Cuddlebuns wrote:

The Bible also suggests that it's ok for me to screw my mom and my sister. Do you think that makes it right?


umm, could you point out when this happened?


Yes, I have studied the bible extensively with (other than revelations) and don't recall that part.


:O
You again1
You spend way too much time in extended forums
1220 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Canada
Offline
Posted 6/3/09 , edited 6/3/09

CorynARC wrote:


Droodika wrote:


CorynARC wrote:


Cuddlebuns wrote:

The Bible also suggests that it's ok for me to screw my mom and my sister. Do you think that makes it right?


umm, could you point out when this happened?


Yes, I have studied the bible extensively with (other than revelations) and don't recall that part.


:O
You again1
You spend way too much time in extended forums :P


There is nothing on TV and I don't really feel like starting a new series, I suppose I could be working on my writing rather than waxing philosophical with what is clearly the A team of thinkers on the interwebs :P
2799 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M / Canada
Offline
Posted 6/3/09

l'm getting a headache just talking with you ><
Can't you talk normal english? :O
1220 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Canada
Offline
Posted 6/3/09

CorynARC wrote:


l'm getting a headache just talking with you ><
Can't you talk normal english? :O


No.
Posted 6/3/09
The bible states that it is ok to kill a person who divorce and remarry. If you think that's ok then you got a hell of a problem.
2799 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M / Canada
Offline
Posted 6/3/09 , edited 6/3/09

Droodika wrote:


CorynARC wrote:


l'm getting a headache just talking with you ><
Can't you talk normal english? :O


No.





Rebanex wrote:

The bible states that it is ok to kill a person who divorce and remarry. If you think that's ok then you got a hell of a problem.


Agh when does it say that???

5229 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Mammago Garage, Y...
Offline
Posted 6/3/09

Droodika wrote:


CorynARC wrote:


Cuddlebuns wrote:

The Bible also suggests that it's ok for me to screw my mom and my sister. Do you think that makes it right?


umm, could you point out when this happened?


Yes, I have studied the bible extensively with (other than revelations) and don't recall that part.


Adam and Eve most likely had sex with their kids in order to populate the earth, and if they didn't then their kids definintely had sex with each other. But someone else earlier already explained to me why the Bible says that we aren't supposed to committ incest anymore, although it doesn't make much sense to me.

Also, since we are all supposedly descendants of Adam and Eve, then techincally we committ incest no matter who we have sex with, so it shouldn't matter if it's with a sibling or a random stranger.
First  Prev  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.