First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
RPG lineup!
Posted 7/24/08

jette1221 wrote:

F@#$ Symphonia @#$%^&^& Wii.... I want retribution!!!!


Well the other Systems are getting there own Tales games...well...nvm the PS3 isn't : (
Posted 7/24/08

Incontrovertible wrote:



Fable 2? I might buy a 360 to play a few games. Still debating on whether I really want one or not.


Well, the 360's RPG future is looking good so if you like RPG's you should, but if you like FPS or something then I would recommend PC.
Posted 7/24/08

dmitsuki wrote:


jette1221 wrote:

F@#$ Symphonia @#$%^&^& Wii.... I want retribution!!!!


Well the other Systems are getting there own Tales games...well...nvm the PS3 isn't : (


That just made my day...... Worst....
Posted 7/24/08

jette1221 wrote:


dmitsuki wrote:


jette1221 wrote:

F@#$ Symphonia @#$%^&^& Wii.... I want retribution!!!!


Well the other Systems are getting there own Tales games...well...nvm the PS3 isn't : (


That just made my day...... Worst....


Eh...sorry...look on the bright side, it could be ported like Eternal Sonata is getting ported, and you get to play Disgaea 3, if I had 400 bucks I would go buy a PS3 right now just to play that game!
2634 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 7/24/08 , edited 7/24/08

dmitsuki wrote:


Incontrovertible wrote:



Fable 2? I might buy a 360 to play a few games. Still debating on whether I really want one or not.


Well, the 360's RPG future is looking good so if you like RPG's you should, but if you like FPS or something then I would recommend PC.


Wow I'm amazed you said something like that. 360 is known for its shooters. I like RPGs, just not ARPGs which is basically almost every single new RPG coming out. Its pretty damn annoying since I liked the more traditional ones. Now it just feels like Ninja Gaiden without the combos and a few more spell moves.

I like the 360 somewhat, but idk I bought an original xbox when I still had a ps2 and I really regret it. I might just buy a PS3 and this $300 steering wheel instead of a 360 ._.

I also find it funny how the most talked about 360 games are all published by Microsoft.
Posted 7/24/08

dmitsuki wrote:


jette1221 wrote:


dmitsuki wrote:


jette1221 wrote:

F@#$ Symphonia @#$%^&^& Wii.... I want retribution!!!!


Well the other Systems are getting there own Tales games...well...nvm the PS3 isn't : (


That just made my day...... Worst....


Eh...sorry...look on the bright side, it could be ported like Eternal Sonata is getting ported, and you get to play Disgaea 3, if I had 400 bucks I would go buy a PS3 right now just to play that game!


NO... NO... NO... I want my effing 'Tale' on PS3, since it'll be the only one staying the moment I went back home...
Posted 7/24/08

Incontrovertible wrote:


dmitsuki wrote:


Incontrovertible wrote:



Fable 2? I might buy a 360 to play a few games. Still debating on whether I really want one or not.


Well, the 360's RPG future is looking good so if you like RPG's you should, but if you like FPS or something then I would recommend PC.


Wow I'm amazed you said something like that. 360 is known for its shooters. I like RPGs, just not ARPGs which is basically almost every single new RPG coming out. Its pretty damn annoying since I liked the more traditional ones. Now it just feels like Ninja Gaiden without the combos and a few more spell moves.

I like the 360 somewhat, but idk I bought an original xbox when I still had a ps2 and I really regret it. I might just buy a PS3 and this $300 steering wheel instead of a 360 ._.

I also find it funny how the most talked about 360 games are all published by Microsoft.


I'm not some MS fanboy, the orginal Xbox was crap IMO and I only got this one because of the good RPG's that are coming out and RE5. FPS games, and RTS games, are superior on the PC, the controller doesn't come close to keyboard and mouse, thats just a fact. There are a lot of different type of games coming out on the 360, the most hyped are just FPS, and there are more traditional experinces on the 360, Blue Dragon, Eternal Sonata, and Lost Odyssey.

The PS3 is NOTHING like the PS2, the PS2 was awesome, it had a ton of RPG's, all different kinds of RPG's, all different kinds of games period, and delivered the best console experince last gen. The PS3 has a ton of shooting games with some action games thrown in there, most of which are available on the 360.

I am holding off on buying a PS3 until it actually improves its library, I have played enough action games and the PS3 doesn't have enough RPG games to fill my need.
Posted 7/24/08 , edited 7/24/08
I honestly did not enjoy Cross. Heck, I thought Radical Dreamers was a better game (at least in keeping my interest a bit longer).

Anyways, I think there are enough decent RPGs from the last generation to keep people busy without having to worry about a lack of new releases.





1637 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Croatia
Offline
Posted 7/24/08 , edited 7/24/08
You forgot the new and improved Enhanced Edition of The Witcher that's creeping up on us:
4436 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Port of Coimbra
Offline
Posted 7/24/08

dmitsuki wrote:


ralvyn wrote:

my bad, it's supposed to be..

"chrono cross is a semi sequel to trigger, not prequel"

things that have happened in trigger came first ofcourse, in cross it happened after porre invaded guardia if my memory serves my right.. and after lucca found schala's clone (baby kid)

meh, i go online these past few years though..


Really though, how can events where they traveled forward and back in time of happened before or after events where people are going forward and back in time. Saying CT happened before is saying that somehow CC happened in a time after CT even though in CT they traveled through the future.

Just be careful what you say dude, you can get game overs from creating time paradox's.


have you played Chrono Cross or Chrono Trigger alone? there are many things to cite an example that scenarios from Chrono Trigger happened before Chrono Cross.. it's not a case if Crono and his gang went to Robo's time line, that didn't change one fact that they did it before scenarios from Chrono Cross happened.. even if they change the future it's useless if someone tinkered the past nor the present.

in Chronopolis (Chrono Cross), you could see the place where Crono had the race from the future - it's in ruins, meaning the future from Chrono Trigger happened before Chrono Cross..
Epoch, that thing which Chrono trigger use to travel time is hidden under the secret room under Viper Manor, it's broken

all of the things that happened were specifically conducted by the prophet of time - Belthazar in order for them to rescue Schala..

but meh, there's more in which i could apparently tell which is which.. i don't care whatever you reply, i already made my point, there's no use convincing you..
Posted 7/24/08

jandarujora wrote:

I honestly did not enjoy Cross. Heck, I thought Radical Dreamers was a better game (at least in keeping my interest a bit longer).

Anyways, I think there are enough decent RPGs from the last generation to keep people busy without having to worry about a lack of new releases.







Theres a ton of new release's though lol.

Posted 7/24/08

ralvyn wrote:


dmitsuki wrote:


ralvyn wrote:

my bad, it's supposed to be..

"chrono cross is a semi sequel to trigger, not prequel"

things that have happened in trigger came first ofcourse, in cross it happened after porre invaded guardia if my memory serves my right.. and after lucca found schala's clone (baby kid)

meh, i go online these past few years though..


Really though, how can events where they traveled forward and back in time of happened before or after events where people are going forward and back in time. Saying CT happened before is saying that somehow CC happened in a time after CT even though in CT they traveled through the future.

Just be careful what you say dude, you can get game overs from creating time paradox's.


have you played Chrono Cross or Chrono Trigger alone? there are many things to cite an example that scenarios from Chrono Trigger happened before Chrono Cross.. it's not a case if Crono and his gang went to Robo's time line, that didn't change one fact that they did it before scenarios from Chrono Cross happened.. even if they change the future it's useless if someone tinkered the past nor the present.

in Chronopolis (Chrono Cross), you could see the place where Crono had the race from the future - it's in ruins, meaning the future from Chrono Trigger happened before Chrono Cross..
Epoch, that thing which Chrono trigger use to travel time is hidden under the secret room under Viper Manor, it's broken

all of the things that happened were specifically conducted by the prophet of time - Belthazar in order for them to rescue Schala..

but meh, there's more in which i could apparently tell which is which.. i don't care whatever you reply, i already made my point, there's no use convincing you..


I'm speaking more about time in general, you see with time travel it would be impossible to follow a timeline because the events that happened don't happen in a chronilogical order, in other words Chrono would be doing something AFTER whoever else would be doing something....


Then again, its a video game, I shouldn't look to much into it.
4436 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Port of Coimbra
Offline
Posted 7/24/08
you didn't look much into it that's why you don't know much about it..
2634 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 7/24/08

dmitsuki wrote:


Incontrovertible wrote:


dmitsuki wrote:


Incontrovertible wrote:



Fable 2? I might buy a 360 to play a few games. Still debating on whether I really want one or not.


Well, the 360's RPG future is looking good so if you like RPG's you should, but if you like FPS or something then I would recommend PC.


Wow I'm amazed you said something like that. 360 is known for its shooters. I like RPGs, just not ARPGs which is basically almost every single new RPG coming out. Its pretty damn annoying since I liked the more traditional ones. Now it just feels like Ninja Gaiden without the combos and a few more spell moves.

I like the 360 somewhat, but idk I bought an original xbox when I still had a ps2 and I really regret it. I might just buy a PS3 and this $300 steering wheel instead of a 360 ._.

I also find it funny how the most talked about 360 games are all published by Microsoft.


I'm not some MS fanboy, the orginal Xbox was crap IMO and I only got this one because of the good RPG's that are coming out and RE5. FPS games, and RTS games, are superior on the PC, the controller doesn't come close to keyboard and mouse, thats just a fact. There are a lot of different type of games coming out on the 360, the most hyped are just FPS, and there are more traditional experinces on the 360, Blue Dragon, Eternal Sonata, and Lost Odyssey.

The PS3 is NOTHING like the PS2, the PS2 was awesome, it had a ton of RPG's, all different kinds of RPG's, all different kinds of games period, and delivered the best console experince last gen. The PS3 has a ton of shooting games with some action games thrown in there, most of which are available on the 360.

I am holding off on buying a PS3 until it actually improves its library, I have played enough action games and the PS3 doesn't have enough RPG games to fill my need.


Lies. The PS3 is shiny ._. and... Shiny ._. LOL Idk I'm not a fan of FPS or action games really. Come to think of it I think I only play racing, rpgs, srpgs, fighting games, and I bought a few action games which kinda suck. I might play Killer 7 since this one guy liked it a lot.

PS3 wins in about 1/2 of the types I just labeled. I'd say RPGs, racing, and SRPGs PS3 wins.

Fighting Games and for now RPGs are excelling on the 360.

RE5 lol... I can't play any of those games. I think the N64 one scarred me for life. Shit was so scary >.>

I feel like if I buy a 360 they'll just come out with some new and better really soon, so yeah ._. Thats normally how the case is especially with Nintendo >.>
Posted 7/24/08 , edited 7/24/08

ralvyn wrote:

you didn't look much into it that's why you don't know much about it..


Trust me, I know about the game, I'm speaking of time travel in general, I could start with some whole long lecture on the properties of time to show why your wrong, but I'll just say "your right" and leave it at that.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.