First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
The world
Posted 9/16/08 , edited 9/16/08
Do you think the world would be better if we all united under one leader and shared everything?
3996 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / F / Tennessee
Offline
Posted 9/16/08
New World Order you mean?

It depends on how the world were to go about it.
Chances are if it happened right now, it would fail miserably.
Borders are drawn to separate us all into countries for a reason... mankind just doesn't want to agree under one idea.
Too many religions, not enough acceptance of diverse thinking.
2633 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / New York City, NY
Offline
Posted 9/16/08 , edited 9/16/08
Who decides who that leader is?
Why should I share my worldy possessions with individuals who are unwilling to work to acquire theirs?
6717 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Earth
Offline
Posted 9/16/08
Doing that will not lead to utopia, but to dystopia.

An impossible dream is impossible. One man (or a group) can't control the world. A single corruption of a leader will lead to a global problem. A person like Hitler as a leader would be too devastating. And, blah blah blah.
34511 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 9/16/08
just one leader to all people around the world? sounds imaginative but practically nope.that surely impossible and if it is possible then many issues might arise from that. not to tell this cant be happen but consider the background diversity amongst the people all around the world. peoples would not agreed to ideas who outweigh others even they are the same (under same "leader").
1213 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / F / Australia
Offline
Posted 9/17/08
MUST CRUSH FASCISM
757 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / United States
Offline
Posted 9/17/08
No, I prefer a legislative that can present the will of the people
20924 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Singapore
Offline
Posted 9/17/08
Bush rule the world? anyone?
1678 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 9/17/08

wych_elm wrote:

just one leader to all people around the world? sounds imaginative but practically nope.that surely impossible and if it is possible then many issues might arise from that. not to tell this cant be happen but consider the background diversity amongst the people all around the world. peoples would not agreed to ideas who outweigh others even they are the same (under same "leader").


WHAT THE BLOODY FUCK? Someone translate this for me.

One World? I lold hard. Get rid of all the oil, then we'll talk.
34511 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 9/17/08

nobunga wrote:


wych_elm wrote:

just one leader to all people around the world? sounds imaginative but practically nope.that surely impossible and if it is possible then many issues might arise from that. not to tell this cant be happen but consider the background diversity amongst the people all around the world. peoples would not agreed to ideas who outweigh others even they are the same (under same "leader").


WHAT THE BLOODY FUCK? Someone translate this for me.

One World? I lold hard. Get rid of all the oil, then we'll talk.


what do you mean by this?
1187 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Look.... im right...
Offline
Posted 9/17/08
if there is one leader, probably not. But if we shared everything, ofcourse.
4557 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Bermuda Triangle
Offline
Posted 9/17/08
Code Geass anyone? WWIII? Other than what has already been prophesized in books. It may be a good and bad thing. The world is kinda halfway to one-world. Countries depend on international trade so much now that they can't live as an isolationist. The Euro is the first step to a global currency. TEH INTERNET. International cultures are slowing blending all together. And although we are far off from globally speaking one language (English as a second language doesn't count in my opinion) we have the oppertunity to be well versed in other languages.

16324 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Bangalore,India
Offline
Posted 9/17/08
It's a lousy idea. We have too many different religions, languages, cultures, opinions etc. to be united under one nation.
Posted 9/17/08
No thanks. What if the leader is an asshole? And heck, why should I share my possessions with someone else? I am selfish, and I don't want to share my hard earned stuff with some slacker. I'd go amok in no time. *gets rifle*

Floetry~
46535 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 9/17/08

St-Luke wrote:

Do you think the world would be better if we all united under one leader and shared everything?


This would work except for one little thing. Human nature.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.