First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
Post Reply Ruling The World!
Member
2760 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Purgatory & Georgia
Offline
Posted 11/13/08
Absolute Power Currupts Absolutely!!


You learn this from the fall of the fall of communism and Animal Farm.
Member
2760 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Purgatory & Georgia
Offline
Posted 11/13/08

Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


I think i psyched you out at my last post. Because I never received a reply. haha. I think it would be very very hard to rule the world for anyone.


No you didn't I worked for half an hour on my reply then my computer restarted itself! >_< Then I said forget it it's not worth it, I'll get back to you don't worry....


lol aww that sucks!!. I hate when that happens too. I would have done the same thing, I hate to work on something and then its gone and I just really cant repeat what i said because I've lost the desire. lol. i understand fully. Get back to me when you can.
Posted 11/13/08

KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


I think i psyched you out at my last post. Because I never received a reply. haha. I think it would be very very hard to rule the world for anyone.


No you didn't I worked for half an hour on my reply then my computer restarted itself! >_< Then I said forget it it's not worth it, I'll get back to you don't worry....


lol aww that sucks!!. I hate when that happens too. I would have done the same thing, I hate to work on something and then its gone and I just really cant repeat what i said because I've lost the desire. lol. i understand fully. Get back to me when you can.


I love Animal Farm! The ending was sad though, the whole book was sad infact TT_TT

But let's see I'll do this slowly, one at a time.

1: Well it'll be time for them to learn to deal with it. Most likely I would ban weapons from whatever country they're in, and incur heavy fines and lots of jailtime for those shipping weapons into the country and/or selling them to citizens. Second I know that the possibility of makeshift weapons such as IED's exist, so I suppose I'll need to have a small brigade of troops stationed in each major city; and a small band in small ones. Not bothering civilians of course just keeping watch. And of course I'd be sure to know whether they don't listen to orders or not, try and get an informant in every town where troops are stationed. I think I win the first question! ^_^
Member
2760 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Purgatory & Georgia
Offline
Posted 11/13/08 , edited 11/13/08

Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


I think i psyched you out at my last post. Because I never received a reply. haha. I think it would be very very hard to rule the world for anyone.


No you didn't I worked for half an hour on my reply then my computer restarted itself! >_< Then I said forget it it's not worth it, I'll get back to you don't worry....


lol aww that sucks!!. I hate when that happens too. I would have done the same thing, I hate to work on something and then its gone and I just really cant repeat what i said because I've lost the desire. lol. i understand fully. Get back to me when you can.


I love Animal Farm! The ending was sad though, the whole book was sad infact TT_TT

But let's see I'll do this slowly, one at a time.

1: Well it'll be time for them to learn to deal with it. Most likely I would ban weapons from whatever country they're in, and incur heavy fines and lots of jailtime for those shipping weapons into the country and/or selling them to citizens. Second I know that the possibility of makeshift weapons such as IED's exist, so I suppose I'll need to have a small brigade of troops stationed in each major city; and a small band in small ones. Not bothering civilians of course just keeping watch. And of course I'd be sure to know whether they don't listen to orders or not, try and get an informant in every town where troops are stationed. I think I win the first question! ^_^


Humans are not subtle to accept changes.you may say they will deal with it but you have no plausable reason as to why they would accept it. They most likely wont accept it or even you for that matter. It goes back to your ethnicity to. They will be biased no matter what ethnicity you are. banning weapons is against even the US constitution [2nd amendment]. you cant do something for one country and not all of them. thats biased and if one country realizes this then your screwed and you are susceptible to a large revolt against yourself. Who will be in your troops. where will you get your troops? Other countries will have many more troops then you and can overturn you anytime. You have to emasculate them with troops bigger then theirs. and to do that and have such leverage in countries you need a LARGE ammount of trooops consisting of about 30 million to handle 6 billion people. What type of government will you use to rule these people?

to me you have won nothing because you have no proof of why and you havent finished explaining. =]
Posted 11/13/08

KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


I think i psyched you out at my last post. Because I never received a reply. haha. I think it would be very very hard to rule the world for anyone.


No you didn't I worked for half an hour on my reply then my computer restarted itself! >_< Then I said forget it it's not worth it, I'll get back to you don't worry....


lol aww that sucks!!. I hate when that happens too. I would have done the same thing, I hate to work on something and then its gone and I just really cant repeat what i said because I've lost the desire. lol. i understand fully. Get back to me when you can.


I love Animal Farm! The ending was sad though, the whole book was sad infact TT_TT

But let's see I'll do this slowly, one at a time.

1: Well it'll be time for them to learn to deal with it. Most likely I would ban weapons from whatever country they're in, and incur heavy fines and lots of jailtime for those shipping weapons into the country and/or selling them to citizens. Second I know that the possibility of makeshift weapons such as IED's exist, so I suppose I'll need to have a small brigade of troops stationed in each major city; and a small band in small ones. Not bothering civilians of course just keeping watch. And of course I'd be sure to know whether they don't listen to orders or not, try and get an informant in every town where troops are stationed. I think I win the first question! ^_^


Humans are not subtle to accept changes.you may say they will deal with it but you have no plausable reason as to why they would accept it. They most likely wont accept it or even you for that matter. It goes back to your ethnicity to. They will be biased no matter what ethnicity you are. banning weapons is against even the US constitution [2nd amendment]. you cant do something for one country and not all of them. thats biased and if one country realizes this then your screwed and you are susceptible to a large revolt against yourself. Who will be in your troops. where will you get your troops? Other countries will have many more troops then you and can overturn you anytime. You have to emasculate them with troops bigger then theirs. and to do that and have such leverage in countries you need a LARGE ammount of trooops consisting of about 30 million to handle 6 billion people. What type of government will you use to rule these people?


I hate you for poking holes in my logic -_- Alright not ban weapons, but perhaps ban explosives round the globe. Except for fireworks cause they're awesome. Now I would however make sure all weapons sales are registered, and people have a lot of training in gun safety. Hopefully that'll help some. Also, I would at least give out rewards (like bounty hunting!) for the capture of radicals that bring harm to the community. And for government perhaps, Communism(It faild due to human error or greed realize that) and perhaps a democratic monarchy? Does that exist? If they're contradicting let me know.
Member
2760 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Purgatory & Georgia
Offline
Posted 11/13/08

Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


I think i psyched you out at my last post. Because I never received a reply. haha. I think it would be very very hard to rule the world for anyone.


No you didn't I worked for half an hour on my reply then my computer restarted itself! >_< Then I said forget it it's not worth it, I'll get back to you don't worry....


lol aww that sucks!!. I hate when that happens too. I would have done the same thing, I hate to work on something and then its gone and I just really cant repeat what i said because I've lost the desire. lol. i understand fully. Get back to me when you can.


I love Animal Farm! The ending was sad though, the whole book was sad infact TT_TT

But let's see I'll do this slowly, one at a time.

1: Well it'll be time for them to learn to deal with it. Most likely I would ban weapons from whatever country they're in, and incur heavy fines and lots of jailtime for those shipping weapons into the country and/or selling them to citizens. Second I know that the possibility of makeshift weapons such as IED's exist, so I suppose I'll need to have a small brigade of troops stationed in each major city; and a small band in small ones. Not bothering civilians of course just keeping watch. And of course I'd be sure to know whether they don't listen to orders or not, try and get an informant in every town where troops are stationed. I think I win the first question! ^_^


Humans are not subtle to accept changes.you may say they will deal with it but you have no plausable reason as to why they would accept it. They most likely wont accept it or even you for that matter. It goes back to your ethnicity to. They will be biased no matter what ethnicity you are. banning weapons is against even the US constitution [2nd amendment]. you cant do something for one country and not all of them. thats biased and if one country realizes this then your screwed and you are susceptible to a large revolt against yourself. Who will be in your troops. where will you get your troops? Other countries will have many more troops then you and can overturn you anytime. You have to emasculate them with troops bigger then theirs. and to do that and have such leverage in countries you need a LARGE ammount of trooops consisting of about 30 million to handle 6 billion people. What type of government will you use to rule these people?


I hate you for poking holes in my logic -_- Alright not ban weapons, but perhaps ban explosives round the globe. Except for fireworks cause they're awesome. Now I would however . Hopefully that'll help some. Also, I would at least give out rewards (like bounty hunting!) . And for government perhaps, Communism(It faild due to human error or greed realize that) and perhaps a democratic monarchy? Does that exist? If they're contradicting let me know.





but perhaps ban explosives round the globe


we have been trying this have we not? with the war in Iraq and then North Korea. its not working all it brings is war, war and more war. are you trying to bring out bush policies again!?


make sure all weapons sales are registered, and people have a lot of training in gun safety

we've been doing this for years already!. The government cant stress it anymore or else it will go into dictatorship.


for the capture of radicals that bring harm to the community

this is the same as the police force, but even worse this system of bounty hunters is risky, unrestricted and a potential danger to thousands of innocents. Bounty hunter slay for money, not the good of the people!!!

There is a thing such as a democratic monarchy but the idea of people who are noble class has been destroyed!. such a thing shouldnt exist. Nobles feel they are higher then everyone by special means and money. that isnt fair.that means drug lords can be nobles. does that seem right to you? And be minded that now-a-days absolutist would get assasinated. when ruling sucha diverse set of people you cant put yourself in a place where you are higher then others.if you become a noble and are higher then everyone else, the whole hispanic community will feel they are nobles because they are "related" to you and then you creat a whole another system of social classes based on race. And then that will cause racism! And then revolt among the asians, whites, and blacks and middle easterners. then world war over race. Basically you would restart racism and destroy all that the world has fought to end.


You have lost on this one my friend. =]
Posted 11/13/08

KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


I think i psyched you out at my last post. Because I never received a reply. haha. I think it would be very very hard to rule the world for anyone.


No you didn't I worked for half an hour on my reply then my computer restarted itself! >_< Then I said forget it it's not worth it, I'll get back to you don't worry....


lol aww that sucks!!. I hate when that happens too. I would have done the same thing, I hate to work on something and then its gone and I just really cant repeat what i said because I've lost the desire. lol. i understand fully. Get back to me when you can.


I love Animal Farm! The ending was sad though, the whole book was sad infact TT_TT

But let's see I'll do this slowly, one at a time.

1: Well it'll be time for them to learn to deal with it. Most likely I would ban weapons from whatever country they're in, and incur heavy fines and lots of jailtime for those shipping weapons into the country and/or selling them to citizens. Second I know that the possibility of makeshift weapons such as IED's exist, so I suppose I'll need to have a small brigade of troops stationed in each major city; and a small band in small ones. Not bothering civilians of course just keeping watch. And of course I'd be sure to know whether they don't listen to orders or not, try and get an informant in every town where troops are stationed. I think I win the first question! ^_^


Humans are not subtle to accept changes.you may say they will deal with it but you have no plausable reason as to why they would accept it. They most likely wont accept it or even you for that matter. It goes back to your ethnicity to. They will be biased no matter what ethnicity you are. banning weapons is against even the US constitution [2nd amendment]. you cant do something for one country and not all of them. thats biased and if one country realizes this then your screwed and you are susceptible to a large revolt against yourself. Who will be in your troops. where will you get your troops? Other countries will have many more troops then you and can overturn you anytime. You have to emasculate them with troops bigger then theirs. and to do that and have such leverage in countries you need a LARGE ammount of trooops consisting of about 30 million to handle 6 billion people. What type of government will you use to rule these people?


I hate you for poking holes in my logic -_- Alright not ban weapons, but perhaps ban explosives round the globe. Except for fireworks cause they're awesome. Now I would however . Hopefully that'll help some. Also, I would at least give out rewards (like bounty hunting!) . And for government perhaps, Communism(It faild due to human error or greed realize that) and perhaps a democratic monarchy? Does that exist? If they're contradicting let me know.





but perhaps ban explosives round the globe


we have been trying this have we not? with the war in Iraq and then North Korea. its not working all it brings is war, war and more war. are you trying to bring out bush policies again!?


make sure all weapons sales are registered, and people have a lot of training in gun safety

we've been doing this for years already!. The government cant stress it anymore or else it will go into dictatorship.


for the capture of radicals that bring harm to the community

this is the same as the police force, but even worse this system of bounty hunters is risky, unrestricted and a potential danger to thousands of innocents. Bounty hunter slay for money, not the good of the people!!!

There is a thing such as a democratic monarchy but the idea of people who are noble class has been destroyed!. such a thing shouldnt exist. Nobles feel they are higher then everyone by special means and money. that isnt fair.that means drug lords can be nobles. does that seem right to you? And be minded that now-a-days absolutist would get assasinated. when ruling sucha diverse set of people you cant put yourself in a place where you are higher then others.if you become a noble and are higher then everyone else, the whole hispanic community will feel they are nobles because they are "related" to you and then you creat a whole another system of social classes based on race. And then that will cause racism! And then revolt among the asians, whites, and blacks and middle easterners. then world war over race. Basically you would restart racism and destroy all that the world has fought to end.


You have lost on this one my friend. =]


Nevah!! Ok first, Bush's policies? I don't exactly know them But apparently banning explosives is a bad idea. So I lost on that point.
Then a dictatorship it shall be! MUHAHAHAHA [/Messed up joke] Well it just seems well have to stop building weapons,that I suppose would be the best solution. Perhaps go back to a barter system? That would be awesome. The simplest government should be the least corrupt, correct?
Nah bounty hunters shall not kill, that would be law. You bring them in and thats all your allowed, lest you be put in jail in their stead.
Ah I never said what type of democratic monarchy. Most likely I'd go for something like Parliament, elected representatives; and with me and my family line as permanent kings/queen. Of course they'd have the ability to veto my propositions and such like congress, that would work wouldn't it? Oh and how would it begin racism? Just because the king is hispanic doesn't automatically make hispanics all-powerful. There are a variety of races in representatives, so people couldn't assume that one race is the most important. 3 representatives to a country!
Member
2760 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Purgatory & Georgia
Offline
Posted 11/13/08

Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


KiluAnne wrote:


Lieon22 wrote:


I think i psyched you out at my last post. Because I never received a reply. haha. I think it would be very very hard to rule the world for anyone.


No you didn't I worked for half an hour on my reply then my computer restarted itself! >_< Then I said forget it it's not worth it, I'll get back to you don't worry....


lol aww that sucks!!. I hate when that happens too. I would have done the same thing, I hate to work on something and then its gone and I just really cant repeat what i said because I've lost the desire. lol. i understand fully. Get back to me when you can.


I love Animal Farm! The ending was sad though, the whole book was sad infact TT_TT

But let's see I'll do this slowly, one at a time.

1: Well it'll be time for them to learn to deal with it. Most likely I would ban weapons from whatever country they're in, and incur heavy fines and lots of jailtime for those shipping weapons into the country and/or selling them to citizens. Second I know that the possibility of makeshift weapons such as IED's exist, so I suppose I'll need to have a small brigade of troops stationed in each major city; and a small band in small ones. Not bothering civilians of course just keeping watch. And of course I'd be sure to know whether they don't listen to orders or not, try and get an informant in every town where troops are stationed. I think I win the first question! ^_^


Humans are not subtle to accept changes.you may say they will deal with it but you have no plausable reason as to why they would accept it. They most likely wont accept it or even you for that matter. It goes back to your ethnicity to. They will be biased no matter what ethnicity you are. banning weapons is against even the US constitution [2nd amendment]. you cant do something for one country and not all of them. thats biased and if one country realizes this then your screwed and you are susceptible to a large revolt against yourself. Who will be in your troops. where will you get your troops? Other countries will have many more troops then you and can overturn you anytime. You have to emasculate them with troops bigger then theirs. and to do that and have such leverage in countries you need a LARGE ammount of trooops consisting of about 30 million to handle 6 billion people. What type of government will you use to rule these people?


I hate you for poking holes in my logic -_- Alright not ban weapons, but perhaps ban explosives round the globe. Except for fireworks cause they're awesome. Now I would however . Hopefully that'll help some. Also, I would at least give out rewards (like bounty hunting!) . And for government perhaps, Communism(It faild due to human error or greed realize that) and perhaps a democratic monarchy? Does that exist? If they're contradicting let me know.





but perhaps ban explosives round the globe


we have been trying this have we not? with the war in Iraq and then North Korea. its not working all it brings is war, war and more war. are you trying to bring out bush policies again!?


make sure all weapons sales are registered, and people have a lot of training in gun safety

we've been doing this for years already!. The government cant stress it anymore or else it will go into dictatorship.


for the capture of radicals that bring harm to the community

this is the same as the police force, but even worse this system of bounty hunters is risky, unrestricted and a potential danger to thousands of innocents. Bounty hunter slay for money, not the good of the people!!!

There is a thing such as a democratic monarchy but the idea of people who are noble class has been destroyed!. such a thing shouldnt exist. Nobles feel they are higher then everyone by special means and money. that isnt fair.that means drug lords can be nobles. does that seem right to you? And be minded that now-a-days absolutist would get assasinated. when ruling sucha diverse set of people you cant put yourself in a place where you are higher then others.if you become a noble and are higher then everyone else, the whole hispanic community will feel they are nobles because they are "related" to you and then you creat a whole another system of social classes based on race. And then that will cause racism! And then revolt among the asians, whites, and blacks and middle easterners. then world war over race. Basically you would restart racism and destroy all that the world has fought to end.


You have lost on this one my friend. =]


Nevah!! Ok first, Bush's policies? I don't exactly know them But apparently banning explosives is a bad idea. So I lost on that point.
Then a dictatorship it shall be! MUHAHAHAHA [/Messed up joke] Well it just seems well have to stop building weapons,that I suppose would be the best solution. Perhaps go back to a barter system? That would be awesome. The simplest government should be the least corrupt, correct?
Nah bounty hunters shall not kill, that would be law. You bring them in and thats all your allowed, lest you be put in jail in their stead.
Ah I never said what type of democratic monarchy.and with me and my family line as permanent kings/queen. Of course they'd have the ability to veto my propositions and such like congress, that would work wouldn't it? Oh and how would it begin racism? Just because the king is hispanic doesn't automatically make hispanics all-powerful. There are a variety of races in representatives, so people couldn't assume that one race is the most important. 3 representatives to a country!



Then a dictatorship it shall be! MUHAHAHAHA [/Messed up joke] Well it just seems well have to stop building weapons,

dictation only results in revolution. i said it before. absolute power currupts absolutely







Nah bounty hunters shall not kill, that would be law

cant control these people. if you send them after radicals most likely they will kill. they are up against some tough guys.





concerning weapons..you cant enforce it because of illegal smuggling.







Most likely I'd go for something like Parliament, elected representatives;

as to the past would define it. parliament means there is no monarch with power. thats if you know your english history.



Just because the king is hispanic doesn't automatically make hispanics all-powerful. There are a variety of races in representatives, so people couldn't assume that one race is the most important.

you cant control what people will think. You are hispanic and you are above everyone else as a royal monarch and ruler of the world. to be ruler of the world you must be better then everyone else. And hispanics have a sense of dominance all the time. so your wrong.! it will make it seem that all hispanics are powerful especially since you will have a councel of a variety of people and YOU are above them. YOU control them. the answer to YOU. you dont get it. you are above everyone. the hispanics will have a big ego about it. they will be proud that one of their own can rule the world because hes special., and with spanish blood he's got so much ability.

Member
4095 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Los Angeles, Cali...
Offline
Posted 11/17/08
once i took over the world, i'd partition it all away. theres no way i'd want to deal with that mess. the conquering would be fun but the cleanup would be hell. it wouldn't be long before revolts broke up the country anyways, we humans are just too fragmented to be friends with everyone.

if i had to rule the world, i'd probably keep it decentralized, maybe a federal system, with states ruling themselves and and a federal govt controlling the military, the borders, and the direction of the world on a global scale.

as far as legislation is concerned, i'm okay with a representative democracy for something like a senate, but i would have undefeatable veto power, and have the power to introduce bills to be voted on immediately.

i would bring back judicial duels, just for the hell of it. if, in a court case, there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty, but not enough to prove them truly innocent, it would be judicial duel time, and Tyr would decide who is correct
Member
32393 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / SFC forums(under...
Offline
Posted 11/20/08
Ruling the world would be too troublesome, too much responsibility. I'd probably just give the power to the highest bidder and take a rocket to the moon, with a few friends.Then, I'd probably press a button that cause all the nuclear explosives to go off and destroy the world.
Owner
4444 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / In your dreams...
Offline
Posted 11/21/08

Key_Of_Destiny wrote:

Ruling the world would be too troublesome, too much responsibility. I'd probably just give the power to the highest bidder and take a rocket to the moon, with a few friends.Then, I'd probably press a button that cause all the nuclear explosives to go off and destroy the world.


I agree.

By the way; Shining Force rules! I used to play that when I was younger all the time.
Member
32393 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / SFC forums(under...
Offline
Posted 11/22/08

Ice_Blue_Eyes wrote:


Key_Of_Destiny wrote:

Ruling the world would be too troublesome, too much responsibility. I'd probably just give the power to the highest bidder and take a rocket to the moon, with a few friends.Then, I'd probably press a button that cause all the nuclear explosives to go off and destroy the world.


I agree.

By the way; Shining Force rules! I used to play that when I was younger all the time.


Which part do yoiu agree with?

If you're still a fan of Shining Force, you can go to ShiningForceCentral.com if you haven't already. There are alot fans and forums for that series there.(Sorry, that's off-topic but I figure the more folks who know about it, the more members there will be)
Owner
4444 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / In your dreams...
Offline
Posted 11/22/08 , edited 11/22/08

Key_Of_Destiny wrote:


Ice_Blue_Eyes wrote:


Key_Of_Destiny wrote:

Ruling the world would be too troublesome, too much responsibility. I'd probably just give the power to the highest bidder and take a rocket to the moon, with a few friends.Then, I'd probably press a button that cause all the nuclear explosives to go off and destroy the world.


I agree.

By the way; Shining Force rules! I used to play that when I was younger all the time.


Which part do yoiu agree with?

If you're still a fan of Shining Force, you can go to ShiningForceCentral.com if you haven't already. There are alot fans and forums for that series there.(Sorry, that's off-topic but I figure the more folks who know about it, the more members there will be)


I agree to the notion that ruling the world would be too tedious and cumbersome a position for one person in account for sovereign.

As for the nukes and all that lot, I would probably settle down someplace high up with a nice bottle of Pernod Fils absinthe and watch the world burn.
Member
32393 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / SFC forums(under...
Offline
Posted 11/22/08

Ice_Blue_Eyes wrote:


Key_Of_Destiny wrote:


Ice_Blue_Eyes wrote:


Key_Of_Destiny wrote:

Ruling the world would be too troublesome, too much responsibility. I'd probably just give the power to the highest bidder and take a rocket to the moon, with a few friends.Then, I'd probably press a button that cause all the nuclear explosives to go off and destroy the world.


I agree.

By the way; Shining Force rules! I used to play that when I was younger all the time.


Which part do yoiu agree with?

If you're still a fan of Shining Force, you can go to ShiningForceCentral.com if you haven't already. There are alot fans and forums for that series there.(Sorry, that's off-topic but I figure the more folks who know about it, the more members there will be)


I agree to the notion that ruling the world would be too tedious and cumbersome a position for one person in account for sovereign.

As for the nukes and all that lot, I would probably settle down someplace high up with a nice bottle of Pernod Fils absinthe and watch the world burn.


Well the moon is pretty high and, from what i've seen and heard, it has a good view of the Earth.
Member
189 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Texas
Offline
Posted 12/3/08
hmmmm (btw sry for the punctuation and just errors in general)
i think i would make it so that it is impossible for someone to usurp power
and i will, the first thing, do is i will make a squadron of personal guards. Since ethnicity is still a problem i think i should have a few guards from major countries and i want to end up having about 15-20 loyal guards
the second thing is to focus 65% of the worlds scientists on the energy crisis and also offer a reward to the group or person to solve it.
Then i will begin to help end wars
and then
ensign a benefit to vegetarians or octo-lavo vegetarians (me being a vegetarian)
oh also make a new world currency
i will let the nations rule their own for the time being
then
I will begin my efforts in breaking barriers
religion
race
language
those to me are the biggest barriers
even though i do follow a religion i tend to think like an atheist
also at the same time
we will use the worlds food reserves to help feed under nourished people
rather yet
i would like to be a sort of figure head
and
when they(the actual government) does something bad
ill step in
oh and hopefully once the energy crisis is done and gone
we will focus our attention on diseases
completely wiping them off the face of the earth
also at the same time i will support conservation efforts
First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.