First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next  Last
Otaku Demand Right to Wed 2D Characters
welook 
17497 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / havent u noticed...
Offline
Posted 10/30/08

LemonyPanda wrote:


what its their preference, according to pro gay marriage people, you are denying their rights.




People are entitled to no rights what so ever



Posted 10/30/08

Sunnyxx wrote:


LemonyPanda wrote:


what its their preference, according to pro gay marriage people, you are denying their rights.




I get a very anti-gay vibe from your posts


LemonyPanda wrote:

If you can marry your same sex, when you cant even produce children, then its pointless, just like how when you marry 2d characters you can't produce children so thats pointless too.




Oh and yah btw. Lesbians can has babeez. Srsly. Sperm from bone marrow. Wtf.

Don't they have mutant babies?
4295 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Youtube!
Offline
Posted 10/30/08
No idea.... I just read the thread on CR ages ago
6598 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / F / Colorado
Offline
Posted 10/30/08
Wow.
One small step for man....a giant leap for weirdness.
21506 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M
Offline
Posted 10/30/08
I have gotten to the point that stupidity like this does nothing to me...people are so fucking stupid
1704 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / California
Offline
Posted 10/30/08

LemonyPanda wrote:
ok

Explin to me why banning marrige of 2d characters isn't an infringment of basic human rights. You can't..

Explain to me why you feel those nerds aren't human and thus don't fall under thte protection of basic human rights. You can't.

If you can marry your same sex, when you cant even produce children, then its pointless, just like how when you marry 2d characters you can't produce children so thats pointless too.

So let me explain to you what I'm saying--you're a retarded bigot, and you should probably get an education, which might or might not help you.




Trying to be clever or simply unable to form an original response? I notice you dodge my points completely, leaving my conclusion to be true. Now let me expose how deep your retardation runs, because I actually can knock down your stupid assertions.

Marriage to a 2D character isn't banned so much as not recognized. Not much difference in terms of results, but an important distinction. Also, 2D characters are imaginary; they have no will or self-consciousness (note; ability to consent). Not to mention, they aren't human, and thus have no human rights to have infringed.

As for "those nerds", did I ever assert they were not human and/or to be denied human rights? No. But as opposed to gay marriage, which is between two competent and consenting adults, marriage between some dude and his imaginary girlfriend would literally consist of him essentially making stuff up, and having done so, asking the government to legally recognize it. Not only would this be a waste of time and money on the government's part, it would be completely pointless.

But you make a good point! I didn't realize marriage was solely for the purpose of producing children. We should go force all the childless married couples in the United States to get a divorce.

Oh wait, that's unreasonable and illogical, probably 'cause you're a retard.

(By the way, try looking up what bigot means before you use the word.)
4295 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Youtube!
Offline
Posted 10/30/08

DKangN3 wrote:

Trying to be clever or simply unable to form an original response? I notice you dodge my points completely, leaving my conclusion to be true. Now let me expose how deep your retardation runs, because I actually can knock down your stupid assertions.

Marriage to a 2D character isn't banned so much as not recognized. Not much difference in terms of results, but an important distinction. Also, 2D characters are imaginary; they have no will or self-consciousness (note; ability to consent). Not to mention, they aren't human, and thus have no human rights to have infringed.

As for "those nerds", did I ever assert they were not human and/or to be denied human rights? No. But as opposed to gay marriage, which is between two competent and consenting adults, marriage between some dude and his imaginary girlfriend would literally consist of him essentially making stuff up, and having done so, asking the government to legally recognize it. Not only would this be a waste of time and money on the government's part, it would be completely pointless.

But you make a good point! I didn't realize marriage was solely for the purpose of producing children. We should go force all the childless married couples in the United States to get a divorce.

Oh wait, that's unreasonable and illogical, probably 'cause you're a retard.

(By the way, try looking up what bigot means before you use the word.)



I like this guy.
698 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / F / It's not heaven
Offline
Posted 10/30/08
I am actually not shocked by this at all it's pretty pathetic but I was sure it would happen sooner or later...
133 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Arizona, United S...
Offline
Posted 10/30/08

DKangN3 wrote:


LemonyPanda wrote:
ok

Explin to me why banning marrige of 2d characters isn't an infringment of basic human rights. You can't..

Explain to me why you feel those nerds aren't human and thus don't fall under thte protection of basic human rights. You can't.

If you can marry your same sex, when you cant even produce children, then its pointless, just like how when you marry 2d characters you can't produce children so thats pointless too.

So let me explain to you what I'm saying--you're a retarded bigot, and you should probably get an education, which might or might not help you.




Trying to be clever or simply unable to form an original response? I notice you dodge my points completely, leaving my conclusion to be true. Now let me expose how deep your retardation runs, because I actually can knock down your stupid assertions.

Marriage to a 2D character isn't banned so much as not recognized. Not much difference in terms of results, but an important distinction. Also, 2D characters are imaginary; they have no will or self-consciousness (note; ability to consent). Not to mention, they aren't human, and thus have no human rights to have infringed.

As for "those nerds", did I ever assert they were not human and/or to be denied human rights? No. But as opposed to gay marriage, which is between two competent and consenting adults, marriage between some dude and his imaginary girlfriend would literally consist of him essentially making stuff up, and having done so, asking the government to legally recognize it. Not only would this be a waste of time and money on the government's part, it would be completely pointless.

But you make a good point! I didn't realize marriage was solely for the purpose of producing children. We should go force all the childless married couples in the United States to get a divorce.

Oh wait, that's unreasonable and illogical, probably 'cause you're a retard.

(By the way, try looking up what bigot means before you use the word.)



Wow thank you I think you covered it all I was just about to post something like this but you did it much better than I could of... For you idiots who support this read his post it insults you...

9980 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
116 / M / Earth
Offline
Posted 10/30/08

mikomiko123 wrote:

I believed that there was a limit to weirdness. This thing just broke the barrier of that limit.


just who the f*** would like a 2d character... a real one is a way better...
1102 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / Animalia
Offline
Posted 10/30/08 , edited 10/30/08


I applaud thee. Trying to add more to this would probably end up being nothing more than a failed attempt at trying be smart.

*fails* (me, not you)

There is absolutely nothing wrong with loving someone who loves you in return and wanting to marry them. Isn't that the whole point? Animals can't love humans the way we do, and an inanimate object sure as hell can't either.
7442 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F / Tampa, FL
Offline
Posted 10/30/08
Ehh...well, I suppose let the people do as they wish...although, getting married to an imaginary character seems like a waste of time...
Posted 10/30/08
...



this is why I like asian dramas more than anime.
14437 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
71
Offline
Posted 10/30/08
Its a joke. They are probably trying to make a political statement...either about the marriage system or the legitimacy of anime...That or cheat their way out of some taxes.
I have trouble believing anyone could really mean that...I mean...I have enough trouble believing furries really believe in...whatever they believe.
59156 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F / ♥┼◙┼♥...............
Offline
Posted 10/30/08
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.