First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
Who voted YES on Prop 8?
2910 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / With in the light
Offline
Posted 11/5/08 , edited 3/5/09
i missed my chance to vote that yes on prop 8
it's banning of same sex marriage.

edit: thank you for voting yes on it.
edit: did anyone go out to protest since passed.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/01/08/BAF915651F.DTL&type=politics
"Prop. 8 supporters want donors anonymous"


"Anti-Gay Marriage Donors Fear Increased Threats After California Judge's Disclosure Ruling"
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,485967,00.html

follow up reading about pop 8 3-4-09
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-prop8-supreme-court6-2009mar06,0,798075.story
3549 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
76
Offline
Posted 11/5/08
:/ I'm not eligible to vote.
But I would vote No on 8 if I had a chance.
Guardian of A/M/P
65278 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Yo Mama's House
Offline
Posted 11/5/08
This one just made me "LAWL."
1493 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / Australia
Offline
Posted 11/5/08
Even though I'm not in America, why the hell would you restrict gay people from marrying? It is not hurting anyone and just because it offends your beliefs, it does not give you the right to restrict other people.
Guardian of A/M/P
65278 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Yo Mama's House
Offline
Posted 11/5/08

mikejacobs wrote:

Even though I'm not in America, why the hell would you restrict gay people from marrying? It is not hurting anyone and just because it offends your beliefs, it does not give you the right to restrict other people.


Well, it is just right wing fundamentalist that is mainly causing this problem. Personally, even though I am a person of faith, I don't really care about this prop on being passed or not. It is just getting so annoying on how some people are picketing outside of markets about this.

There is only one group in America that will never get their rights recognized.
NAMBLA

"LAWL"
2910 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / With in the light
Offline
Posted 11/5/08 , edited 11/5/08

mikejacobs wrote:

Even though I'm not in America, why the hell would you restrict gay people from marrying? It is not hurting anyone and just because it offends your beliefs, it does not give you the right to restrict other people.


hmm it seem like u like to wear 2x left or 2xright shoes.
for normal people it's 1left and one right


courtknee wrote:

:/ I'm not eligible to vote.
But I would vote No on 8 if I had a chance.


luck u r not old enough
j/k

so far it's 53.1% yes
46.9% no
wsj.com
19849 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
69 / M / Limbo
Offline
Posted 11/5/08
^ Wow... congratulations. You're the dumbest piece of shit I've seen today.
4333 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M
Offline
Posted 11/5/08 , edited 11/5/08

setyouback wrote:


mikejacobs wrote:

Even though I'm not in America, why the hell would you restrict gay people from marrying? It is not hurting anyone and just because it offends your beliefs, it does not give you the right to restrict other people.


hmm it seem like u like to wear 2x left or 2xright shoes.
for normal people it's 1left and one right



are you just retarted or just looking for a fight?

what makes love different?

A man and woman whom fall in love, get married, have children whatever, they love each other, they want to be together, are you going to come in and clamp down on them and say they're no longer allowed to get married because its you belief that they shouldn't?

The nazi killings of the Jewish people was justified by the words Quote Hitler "The Necessary Extermination of a difference in belief" and look where that led. 6 million jewish people dead. 20 million germans dead. 25 million russians dead. and 14 million americans. not to mention the 35 million civilians, and 1 million gays.

What you are saying is that because you believe that they should not be allowed to love and get married their partnership should be shunned and non-accepted.

In many species of animals there are homosexual couples. These couples are not shunned by the rest of their kind, they are just as accepted as any other couple. There are homosexual lions, Wolves, Turtles, Cats, and Whales, to mention a few.

You're ignorance and stupidity lies in your intolerance for a difference in love.

I hope you learned something.
Posted 11/5/08 , edited 11/5/08
Wow, you religious people really are cold heartless bastards aren't you? Have you ever heard of freedom? Why do you want people to not have a freaking title? It's a name. It's a legal formality and yet for some reason you think it's inappropriate for two people of the same sex to have a certain title.
1493 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / Australia
Offline
Posted 11/5/08

setyouback wrote:


mikejacobs wrote:

Even though I'm not in America, why the hell would you restrict gay people from marrying? It is not hurting anyone and just because it offends your beliefs, it does not give you the right to restrict other people.


hmm it seem like u like to wear 2x left or 2xright shoes.
for normal people it's 1left and one right


You know, you spit on the name of liberty and equality itself, no offense, but you do.
Posted 11/5/08

setyouback wrote:


mikejacobs wrote:

Even though I'm not in America, why the hell would you restrict gay people from marrying? It is not hurting anyone and just because it offends your beliefs, it does not give you the right to restrict other people.


hmm it seem like u like to wear 2x left or 2xright shoes.
for normal people it's 1left and one right


Are shoes sentient? Do shoes have feelings? Do they have aspirations? Love? Sadness? Pain? Do they feel oppressed by the fact that you won't wear 2 of the same orientation? Do they despise you for not letting them be together? Do they suffer in their loneliness all because of you?
Posted 11/5/08 , edited 11/5/08
hmm i'm too young to vote but any way, let them do whatever they want.
Just ask them not do be too free on the streets.
Posted 11/5/08

kiwisushi wrote:

hmm i'm too young to vote but any way, let them do whatever they want.
Just ask them not do be too free on the streets.


Are you saying they should be any less free than the other humans around them? Humans. I hope you all realize that you are no better than racists.
Posted 11/5/08

booyadude wrote:


kiwisushi wrote:

hmm i'm too young to vote but any way, let them do whatever they want.
Just ask them not do be too free on the streets.


Are you saying they should be any less free than the other humans around them? Humans. I hope you all realize that you are no better than racists.


i shall highlight the TOO. and i meant they dont make out...not as in not go out in the streets..
they can be free but sex and touching should be done in their house since their married.
=D
I'm really irritated you compare me with racists.

Posted 11/5/08

kiwisushi wrote:


booyadude wrote:


kiwisushi wrote:

hmm i'm too young to vote but any way, let them do whatever they want.
Just ask them not do be too free on the streets.


Are you saying they should be any less free than the other humans around them? Humans. I hope you all realize that you are no better than racists.


i shall highlight the TOO. and i meant they dont make out...not as in not go out in the streets..
they can be free but sex and touching should be done in their house since their married.
=D
I'm really irritated you compare me with racists.



You can be compared with a racist since you are performing baseless discrimination. What I am asking is, are you saying that a gay married couple should have to be any less open in public than a straight married couple? You see them making out in public, thus if you think that gays shouldn't be able to, then you are discriminating against them.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.