First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
Gundams
Posted 11/12/08

gadeel wrote:


jennifer_a_yoo wrote:

to me i prefer gundam seed, gundam seed destiny, gundam seed 00, and gundam seed 00 season 2. and i prefer to have a nuclear jammer cancler with the GN particles. it is a lot more effective. watch the newer shows and it has them together. PEACE!


Nuclear Jammers and/or Cancellers do nothing with GN technology, as GN Drives are solar furnaces and the energy is acquired by harnessing the discharges of decayed matter instead of by a nuclear reaction.


Maou068 wrote:


Agreed.




9383 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / LuzViMinda
Offline
Posted 11/12/08 , edited 11/13/08

BlazingRb wrote:


gadeel wrote:


jennifer_a_yoo wrote:

to me i prefer gundam seed, gundam seed destiny, gundam seed 00, and gundam seed 00 season 2. and i prefer to have a nuclear jammer cancler with the GN particles. it is a lot more effective. watch the newer shows and it has them together. PEACE!


Nuclear Jammers and/or Cancellers do nothing with GN technology, as GN Drives are solar furnaces and the energy is acquired by harnessing the discharges of decayed matter instead of by a nuclear reaction.


Maou068 wrote:


Agreed.






176 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
48
Offline
Posted 11/12/08


This is more efficient.
6695 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
33 / M / canada, holy brit...
Offline
Posted 11/12/08
will you put the zero system in a GN powered gundam


or in a n-jammer canceller powered gundam


choose wisely...
33940 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / Ocean..ia
Offline
Posted 11/12/08
Well for me the application of the economics of physics is more evident in the use of GN particles; since the energy source (solar energy) is more abundant than the latter's(nuclear energy), deploying therefore becomes more efficient. Therefore yeah i prefer GN particle drives over the Nuclear jammer cancellers .
180 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / California, USA
Offline
Posted 11/12/08
I liked the original gundams....I remember back when I was little making those gundam models with hot glue....
3324 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / CA
Offline
Posted 11/12/08

FangNThunder wrote:


jennifer_a_yoo wrote:

to me i prefer gundam seed, gundam seed destiny, gundam seed 00, and gundam seed 00 season 2. and i prefer to have a nuclear jammer cancler with the GN particles. it is a lot more effective. watch the newer shows and it has them together. PEACE!



In my personal opinion Seed was the worst gundam series ever, right after SD.

Gundam U.C. is the first and the best.

Sieg Zeon.


How about Gundam Seed Stargrazer?
33940 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / Ocean..ia
Offline
Posted 11/12/08 , edited 11/12/08

xMiyoko wrote:



This is more efficient.


Less lines.
392 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M
Offline
Posted 11/12/08

bustword wrote:


FangNThunder wrote:


jennifer_a_yoo wrote:

to me i prefer gundam seed, gundam seed destiny, gundam seed 00, and gundam seed 00 season 2. and i prefer to have a nuclear jammer cancler with the GN particles. it is a lot more effective. watch the newer shows and it has them together. PEACE!



In my personal opinion Seed was the worst gundam series ever, right after SD.

Gundam U.C. is the first and the best.

Sieg Zeon.


How about Gundam Seed Stargrazer?


Gundam Seed wasnt too bad. But they did screw up Destiny a bit and ruined the entire series. Stargazer, in my opinion was also a waste of time.

Now back to the original question: I'd take N-Cancellers over GN.

242 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M
Offline
Posted 11/12/08


Superior to...



and this is



superior to all these...



The Ultracompact Minovsky Fusion Reactor of U.C. is superior to all to provides radar jamming, high output and manuveravility, and may be used for extended periods of time. Also the Zero System only adquires battle data and delivers tactical information and all possible outcomes of battle direcly into the users brain, nothing else special. The N-Jammer Canceller only allows uclear reactor use for extended MS usage not necesarily performance since that is detemined by the MS' specs.
Posted 11/12/08 , edited 11/12/08

riku911 wrote:

i prefer normal mobile suit since both of those thing made them look overpower


It's not as overpowered as the Turn A Gundam's Moonlight Butterfly system, which is a powerful attack that unleashed nanomachines across the world and turned all technology to sand, and at maximum effective range the attack can reach from Earth to as far as Jupiter. Now that's cheap!

297 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 11/12/08


Gn particles for me and make that two

i love the 00 gundam's Twin Drive


9383 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / LuzViMinda
Offline
Posted 11/12/08 , edited 11/12/08

DomFortress wrote:


riku911 wrote:

i prefer normal mobile suit since both of those thing made them look overpower


It's not as overpowered as the Turn A Gundam's Moonlight Butterfly system, which is a powerful attack that unleashed nanomachines across the world and turned all technology to sand, and at maximum effective range the attach can reach from Earth to as far as Jupiter. Now that's cheap!


Wasn't that the principle behind the Stargazer as well? The Voiture Lumiere is theoretically able to achieve infinite acceleration as it travels between planets.

It also has a nanomachine repair system... which means it's just a battery-powered Turn A rip-off. Without the nukes.
420 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32
Offline
Posted 11/12/08
Since they are all fictional science based power sources, I'll stick with a Minovsky type ultracompact fusion reactor from the UC timeline. Those pretty much work with everything with the right power out put and little talk about radiation.

Posted 11/12/08

gadeel wrote:


DomFortress wrote:


riku911 wrote:

i prefer normal mobile suit since both of those thing made them look overpower


It's not as overpowered as the Turn A Gundam's Moonlight Butterfly system, which is a powerful attack that unleashed nanomachines across the world and turned all technology to sand, and at maximum effective range the attach can reach from Earth to as far as Jupiter. Now that's cheap!


Wasn't that the principle behind the Stargazer as well? The Voiture Lumiere is theoretically able to achieve infinite acceleration as it travels between planets.

It also has a nanomachine repair system... which means it's just a battery-powered Turn A rip-off. Without the nukes.


Suddenly, my mind flashed me an image of Turn A and Stargazer on an endless case of cat-and-mouse. Sad.


Noir_Son_Wells wrote:

Since they are all fictional science based power sources, I'll stick with a Minovsky type ultracompact fusion reactor from the UC timeline. Those pretty much work with everything with the right power out put and little talk about radiation.



Until you score a direct hit on the Minovsky type ultracompact fusion reactor itself, then it's sweet Christmas!
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.