First  Prev  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  Next  Last
Post Reply Animes Where the boy ends up with sister
1398 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
CALI!
Offline
Posted 8/24/13

thaspectre wrote:

You people are crazy why is something like being related enough to make two people who love each other hated by the world? What's the difference? If two people who were brother and sister got together but didn't know it would you hate them? how is a title enough to stop love?
I dont think it's disgusting its not as if when they kiss and baby dies or their kids are zombies. Love is Love doesn't matter who its with


HOW can THIS be legalized? Let's then legalize necrophilia, pedophilia, zoophilia. And if they had kids Otherwise, genetic consequences could be disastrous. Since it`s title can A man be married to a chicken or a goat "Animal is just a title" Just the same as a 20 Year old dating a 5 year old "Age is just a title"
11646 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / South Carolina
Online
Posted 8/24/13

Dayummy wrote:


thaspectre wrote:

You people are crazy why is something like being related enough to make two people who love each other hated by the world? What's the difference? If two people who were brother and sister got together but didn't know it would you hate them? how is a title enough to stop love?
I dont think it's disgusting its not as if when they kiss and baby dies or their kids are zombies. Love is Love doesn't matter who its with


HOW can THIS be legalized? Let's then legalize necrophilia, pedophilia, zoophilia. And if they had kids Otherwise, genetic consequences could be disastrous. Since it`s title can A man be married to a chicken or a goat "Animal is just a title" Just the same as a 20 Year old dating a 5 year old "Age is just a title"


I think your comparisons are a little flawed... (No offense or anything!) The whole siblings thing deals with two adult individuals who can rationally make the decision to be together. Necrophilia is dealing with someone who is no longer living, zoophilia is dealing with an animal that can't make decisions, and pedophilia is dealing with someone who is well under the age of making rational decisions with stuff like that.

If it's two adult people who understand what they're getting into, then fine. Can't really help who you're into, and it doesn't affect me personally if someone decides to date their sibling. I may find it pretty gross, but I wouldn't condemn them for it or anything.
1398 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
CALI!
Offline
Posted 8/24/13 , edited 8/24/13

Narukamiyu wrote:


Dayummy wrote:


thaspectre wrote:

You people are crazy why is something like being related enough to make two people who love each other hated by the world? What's the difference? If two people who were brother and sister got together but didn't know it would you hate them? how is a title enough to stop love?
I dont think it's disgusting its not as if when they kiss and baby dies or their kids are zombies. Love is Love doesn't matter who its with


HOW can THIS be legalized? Let's then legalize necrophilia, pedophilia, zoophilia. And if they had kids Otherwise, genetic consequences could be disastrous. Since it`s title can A man be married to a chicken or a goat "Animal is just a title" Just the same as a 20 Year old dating a 5 year old "Age is just a title"


I think your comparisons are a little flawed... (No offense or anything!) The whole siblings thing deals with two adult individuals who can rationally make the decision to be together. Necrophilia is dealing with someone who is no longer living, zoophilia is dealing with an animal that can't make decisions, and pedophilia is dealing with someone who is well under the age of making rational decisions with stuff like that.

If it's two adult people who understand what they're getting into, then fine. Can't really help who you're into, and it doesn't affect me personally if someone decides to date their sibling. I may find it pretty gross, but I wouldn't condemn them for it or anything.


Yes, but what Narukamiyu said was That is just a "Title" and I responded , Saying what is the extent of a title? So I replied by saying age is just a "title" zoophillia is just a "title" necrophilia is just a "title" and he said how can a title stop love. I responded with those answers those are titles that break his definition of "Love". You`r response had nothing to do with what I was trying to prove. I Was merely saying he is wrong about the definition of love and titles. I responded about how his post is wrong but you decided to get on my case about something I have not yet brought up, Sure I don`t agree with incest but I haven`t yet to bring up anything for you to start debating with me. I Am not trying to offend you in anyway.
9992 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
16 / Demacia
Offline
Posted 8/24/13


You seem a little bit upset
21894 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F / US
Offline
Posted 8/24/13
Incest is about any family member, imagine yourself having sex with your mom or dad! no, it's not ok. There are millions of people out there, why getting it on with your mom/dad/sister/brother?....disgusting.
18193 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
16 / F
Offline
Posted 8/24/13
I like it only when it is twincest between guys. hehe! Ouran high school host club
17735 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / San Francisco Bay...
Offline
Posted 8/24/13

Watashination wrote:

This thread is proof that most anime watchers only score around 3 on the Kohlberg scale. No wonder why shit like SAO is popular while Texhnolyze isn't.

Maintaining the social order does NOT include 100% conformity to it. If anything, it falls into the 6th category on the Kohlberg scale, and the idea that laws are valid only insofar as they are grounded in justice and should otherwise be peacefully resisted.
1398 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
CALI!
Offline
Posted 8/24/13

thaspectre wrote:



You seem a little bit upset

Seems like thats all you can say huh.
19392 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / NJ
Offline
Posted 8/24/13

Dayummy wrote:


Narukamiyu wrote:


Dayummy wrote:


thaspectre wrote:

You people are crazy why is something like being related enough to make two people who love each other hated by the world? What's the difference? If two people who were brother and sister got together but didn't know it would you hate them? how is a title enough to stop love?
I dont think it's disgusting its not as if when they kiss and baby dies or their kids are zombies. Love is Love doesn't matter who its with


HOW can THIS be legalized? Let's then legalize necrophilia, pedophilia, zoophilia. And if they had kids Otherwise, genetic consequences could be disastrous. Since it`s title can A man be married to a chicken or a goat "Animal is just a title" Just the same as a 20 Year old dating a 5 year old "Age is just a title"


I think your comparisons are a little flawed... (No offense or anything!) The whole siblings thing deals with two adult individuals who can rationally make the decision to be together. Necrophilia is dealing with someone who is no longer living, zoophilia is dealing with an animal that can't make decisions, and pedophilia is dealing with someone who is well under the age of making rational decisions with stuff like that.

If it's two adult people who understand what they're getting into, then fine. Can't really help who you're into, and it doesn't affect me personally if someone decides to date their sibling. I may find it pretty gross, but I wouldn't condemn them for it or anything.


Yes, but what Narukamiyu said was That is just a "Title" and I responded , Saying what is the extent of a title? So I replied by saying age is just a "title" zoophillia is just a "title" necrophilia is just a "title" and he said how can a title stop love. I responded with those answers those are titles that break his definition of "Love". You`r response had nothing to do with what I was trying to prove. I Was merely saying he is wrong about the definition of love and titles. I responded about how his post is wrong but you decided to get on my case about something I have not yet brought up, Sure I don`t agree with incest but I haven`t yet to bring up anything for you to start debating with me. I Am not trying to offend you in anyway.


Whatever point you were trying to prove is completely lost in your incoherent ramblings. You took a single word he used, twisted it in the dumbest way possible, then blew it completely out of proportion to make a point that makes no sense. Incest is considered "wrong" because the social stigma attached to it and the "title" of an "incestuous relationship". Everything you mentioned is wrong because it involves a party incapable of giving consent.

If a 40 year old father has sex with his 12 year old Daughter the biggest issue there is not that they are related. Not by a mile.
1398 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
CALI!
Offline
Posted 8/24/13

hyjinx17 wrote:


Dayummy wrote:


Narukamiyu wrote:


Dayummy wrote:


thaspectre wrote:

You people are crazy why is something like being related enough to make two people who love each other hated by the world? What's the difference? If two people who were brother and sister got together but didn't know it would you hate them? how is a title enough to stop love?
I dont think it's disgusting its not as if when they kiss and baby dies or their kids are zombies. Love is Love doesn't matter who its with


HOW can THIS be legalized? Let's then legalize necrophilia, pedophilia, zoophilia. And if they had kids Otherwise, genetic consequences could be disastrous. Since it`s title can A man be married to a chicken or a goat "Animal is just a title" Just the same as a 20 Year old dating a 5 year old "Age is just a title"


I think your comparisons are a little flawed... (No offense or anything!) The whole siblings thing deals with two adult individuals who can rationally make the decision to be together. Necrophilia is dealing with someone who is no longer living, zoophilia is dealing with an animal that can't make decisions, and pedophilia is dealing with someone who is well under the age of making rational decisions with stuff like that.

If it's two adult people who understand what they're getting into, then fine. Can't really help who you're into, and it doesn't affect me personally if someone decides to date their sibling. I may find it pretty gross, but I wouldn't condemn them for it or anything.


Yes, but what Narukamiyu said was That is just a "Title" and I responded , Saying what is the extent of a title? So I replied by saying age is just a "title" zoophillia is just a "title" necrophilia is just a "title" and he said how can a title stop love. I responded with those answers those are titles that break his definition of "Love". You`r response had nothing to do with what I was trying to prove. I Was merely saying he is wrong about the definition of love and titles. I responded about how his post is wrong but you decided to get on my case about something I have not yet brought up, Sure I don`t agree with incest but I haven`t yet to bring up anything for you to start debating with me. I Am not trying to offend you in anyway.


Whatever point you were trying to prove is completely lost in your incoherent ramblings. You took a single word he used, twisted it in the dumbest way possible, then blew it completely out of proportion to make a point that makes no sense. Incest is considered "wrong" because the social stigma attached to it and the "title" of an "incestuous relationship". Everything you mentioned is wrong because it involves a party incapable of giving consent.

If a 40 year old father has sex with his 12 year old Daughter the biggest issue there is not that they are related. Not by a mile.


I Guess if you didn`t understand me I`ll restate it again? I Was saying he basically said "Family" is just a title and love is all that matters who cares if they were related. And I replied by saying okay is zoophillia etc, etc just a title? I Guess it was incoherent to you because you can`t comprehend what i was proving. Im not sure why you are bringing up "If a 40 year old father has sex with his 12 year old Daughter the biggest issue there is not that they are related. Not by a mile." And in reply to that it just makes matters worse a father raping his 12 year old daughter, that`s really disgusting and horrible. There are two big "ass" issues now, he raped his OWN "Daughter" and especially she was underage. You`re basically saying you wouldn`t think that her father raped her as a important thing. That`s not what court would say.
wfg
1178 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M
Offline
Posted 8/27/13
as long as its consensual. sometimes people are so harsh at judging others, not everyone is the same or wants to be.

sure it may not be "natural." neither is homosexual love. 2 of the same gender that can't even breed is about as un-natural as it gets. that doesn't make it right or wrong, its simply a choice.

the way i see it there are people that are happy and people that are miserable. if two siblings can be happier together than i have with previous women then they get my nod.
First  Prev  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.