First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
Is the existence of racial genetic superiority substantiated?
24223 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / woods
Offline
Posted 1/26/09

AleeceNoTenshi wrote:


japanese_christmas wrote:

i personally beleive its all down to genetics. the worlds top minds are currently in india home of many many people with many mixed genetics. the better the gentics the better you are in a certain field. beautiful people have good genetics as they are not fuzzed or muddled by mutation due to bad genes. i.e if you slept with your sister and had a child your child could be disfigured and be below average intellegence. it happens in the animal kingdom and it happens within our human society. not that being ugly and stupid is wrong or bad in any way. im just glad that i am not either of those two things.


So the uglier you are, the dumber you become 0.0

So I guess the whole 'dumb blond' statement goes out the window.... funny that the smartest people I can think of weren't exactly... 'pretty'


no one is automagically smart, if you work at it you can be, your genetics is what helps in the learning process. different people are better at different things.

the whole dumb blonde thing stems from a ridiculously fucked up american culture where boobs and money can get you all you need. if you don't try then you can't achieve.

some of the most intelligent people i know are intensley attractive. but beauty is in the eye of the beholder i guess...

1186 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F / Leading your nigh...
Offline
Posted 1/26/09

japanese_christmas wrote:


AleeceNoTenshi wrote:


japanese_christmas wrote:

i personally beleive its all down to genetics. the worlds top minds are currently in india home of many many people with many mixed genetics. the better the gentics the better you are in a certain field. beautiful people have good genetics as they are not fuzzed or muddled by mutation due to bad genes. i.e if you slept with your sister and had a child your child could be disfigured and be below average intellegence. it happens in the animal kingdom and it happens within our human society. not that being ugly and stupid is wrong or bad in any way. im just glad that i am not either of those two things.


So the uglier you are, the dumber you become 0.0

So I guess the whole 'dumb blond' statement goes out the window.... funny that the smartest people I can think of weren't exactly... 'pretty'


no one is automagically smart, if you work at it you can be, your genetics is what helps in the learning process. different people are better at different things.

the whole dumb blonde thing stems from a ridiculously fucked up american culture where boobs and money can get you all you need. if you don't try then you can't achieve.

some of the most intelligent people i know are intensley attractive. but beauty is in the eye of the beholder i guess...




the whole dumb blonde thing stems from a ridiculously fucked up american culture where boobs and money can get you all you need. if you don't try then you can't achieve.


Agreed

--------

I see what you're getting at, but for me, the smartest people I know aren't very beautiful, in fact most of the 'geniuses' known by society aren't exactly pretty either.

Looks don't play a role at all in how intelligent we are, if that was the case, then my schools average would be 90%

I understand what you said about being messed because of deformities, but remember, deformities are also enlightening. It's like suffering (not saying that being deformed means that suffer), when you suffer you learn, if we never felt pain, or never felt suffering, then wouldn't the majority of what is known as 'logic' mean nothing to humans, or not even be something that is emphasized in our world.

I think what you said apply's mostly to the opposite, yes we are affected by these deformities, but we are also enlightened because we have been able to experience more 'suffering' more differences, isn't that how we evolve as humans?
24223 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / woods
Offline
Posted 1/26/09

AleeceNoTenshi wrote:


japanese_christmas wrote:


AleeceNoTenshi wrote:


japanese_christmas wrote:

i personally beleive its all down to genetics. the worlds top minds are currently in india home of many many people with many mixed genetics. the better the gentics the better you are in a certain field. beautiful people have good genetics as they are not fuzzed or muddled by mutation due to bad genes. i.e if you slept with your sister and had a child your child could be disfigured and be below average intellegence. it happens in the animal kingdom and it happens within our human society. not that being ugly and stupid is wrong or bad in any way. im just glad that i am not either of those two things.


So the uglier you are, the dumber you become 0.0

So I guess the whole 'dumb blond' statement goes out the window.... funny that the smartest people I can think of weren't exactly... 'pretty'


no one is automagically smart, if you work at it you can be, your genetics is what helps in the learning process. different people are better at different things.

the whole dumb blonde thing stems from a ridiculously fucked up american culture where boobs and money can get you all you need. if you don't try then you can't achieve.

some of the most intelligent people i know are intensley attractive. but beauty is in the eye of the beholder i guess...




the whole dumb blonde thing stems from a ridiculously fucked up american culture where boobs and money can get you all you need. if you don't try then you can't achieve.


Agreed

--------

I see what you're getting at, but for me, the smartest people I know aren't very beautiful, in fact most of the 'geniuses' known by society aren't exactly pretty either.

Looks don't play a role at all in how intelligent we are, if that was the case, then my schools average would be 90%

I understand what you said about being messed because of deformities, but remember, deformities are also enlightening. It's like suffering (not saying that being deformed means that suffer), when you suffer you learn, if we never felt pain, or never felt suffering, then wouldn't the majority of what is known as 'logic' mean nothing to humans, or not even be something that is emphasized in our world.

I think what you said apply's mostly to the opposite, yes we are affected by these deformities, but we are also enlightened because we have been able to experience more 'suffering' more differences, isn't that how we evolve as humans?


right then third times the charm. this is the 3rd time i've had to type this so i totally don't even care about anything in the world right now...


I see what you're getting at, but for me, the smartest people I know aren't very beautiful, in fact most of the 'geniuses' known by society aren't exactly pretty either.

Looks don't play a role at all in how intelligent we are, if that was the case, then my schools average would be 90%


i didn't actually say that looks where in any way related to intelligence - i proposed that bad genes could cause low intelligence and that beauty is the result of good genes and that beauty is also in the eye of the beholder and also that if you try, you can achieve!

which was my probably too rash, unthoughtout, half asleep, monday morning response to:

"Browsing across the net I came up on a Nordicism site. Naturally they were advocating for racial supremacy, however they were not using some warped psycho-social reasoning. Their arguments had evolved or mutated to the point where scientific justification, they insinuated, formed a solid basis upon which there beliefs could be vindicated.

Naturally superior being a subjective term, it for the most part dwells in the realms of relativity and hence boundaries must be set to confine it to some point of objectivity.
However through what process does one proceed to determine racial genetic superiority?
As, is prominent in nature each race of a particular specie possess individual distinguishing attributes that essentially makes it superior to the other and humans are no exception. So how does one go about attempting to derive from a predominantly nebulous and subjective concept such as this, a general answer (not an absolute one)?

The term superior is an infinitely broad concept, hence specific examples must be identified and then perhaps accumulated and the analysed for one to arrive at an over all conclusion............I suppose. But then there are a seemingly infinite occasions in which superiority can be perceived.

At this point in time I'm in a conundrum

What are your views on the matter?"

PS!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Vorderman/



65 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
47 / M
Offline
Posted 1/26/09

loz0ot wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

When it comes down to it, races(as in colors) have their own advantage. Blacks (yes, with black skin) for example. Studies show that they are more resistant to skin cancer compared to Whites and Browns.
But if by supremacy you mean a race that rules the others or is the best of all, that is more of an opinion than that of genetics. Humans have identical set of chromosomes and genomes(unless of course mutation happened to them) so there is almost no significant difference on their make ups that makes them superior to others. They are pretty much equal.
So racial superiority is quite possibly only an agenda to have power over others, or just one of the social bigotry. Or just wanting to be better than someone else, which is more on the biased side than the genetic side of it.


so what your saying is that different races are better suited for certain tasks than the other races would be? cuz i totaly agree, black people and mexicans have more melonin in their skin, so they can safely stay out in the sun to farm w/o running the risk of getting cancer. mean-while, the fairer races(white people and asians) are forced to stay and read books/ further the world of science


4294 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
forgot where
Offline
Posted 4/3/09

Okazu606 wrote:

Uhm, the only "superior" race I can think of, would be black people in America. Due to the slavery, the strongest black people would be the ones with the greatest chance of survival (duh, it is/was like this in nature as well, but due to the circumstances, this case is quite extreme and would really put survivability to the test).
That's why black americans are doing so well in sports and are proving superior to most other nations in the olympic games for instance.

Furthermore, scientists have found african women resistant to HIV/AIDS, and as far as I know, only black women... But, that might be more of a coincidence due to the circumstances with HIV/AIDS in Africa, rather than the Africans being more resistant to HIV/AIDS.

In general there's probably no real superior race. Surely you'll find that white people will be more tolerate to something, blakc people to something else and asians to a third thing. But that's probably only because of the surroundings and what the races have been exposed to in their natural environment.

..Bottomline, we're probably all more or less the same.


um....no. humans share 99.9% of the same gene. 7 out of 22000 genes r different from one white man to one colored man. thats a genetic sunburn.
Black people were forced to be slaves, not bred, so your "survival" thoery goes out the window.
sports and games have nothing to do with racial serperiority.They play well because they practice a lot. They traitionaly grow up in ghettos where they do nothing but play sports.Sports become a way for them to pass the time, rather then going to school in some cases.All im saying is training makes people do good in sports, not some genetic advantage. if that were true, i would be the greatest fighter in the world.You use the same arguement like many racist do, but you fail to have a clear understanding of statistics and science. peace over war
4294 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
forgot where
Offline
Posted 4/3/09
4294 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
forgot where
Offline
Posted 4/3/09

loz0ot wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

When it comes down to it, races(as in colors) have their own advantage. Blacks (yes, with black skin) for example. Studies show that they are more resistant to skin cancer compared to Whites and Browns.
But if by supremacy you mean a race that rules the others or is the best of all, that is more of an opinion than that of genetics. Humans have identical set of chromosomes and genomes(unless of course mutation happened to them) so there is almost no significant difference on their make ups that makes them superior to others. They are pretty much equal.
So racial superiority is quite possibly only an agenda to have power over others, or just one of the social bigotry. Or just wanting to be better than someone else, which is more on the biased side than the genetic side of it.


so what your saying is that different races are better suited for certain tasks than the other races would be? cuz i totaly agree, black people and mexicans have more melonin in their skin, so they can safely stay out in the sun to farm w/o running the risk of getting cancer. mean-while, the fairer races(white people and asians) are forced to stay and read books/ further the world of science


thats one way to look at it, but race is no longer a factor in the American Government as far as the constitution is concerned. Those with low education generally get the high labor jobs, and those with high education genrally get the high paying jobs. So get a good job, or prepare to be working out in the sun- btw, white or black, suntan lotion will help either skin color.peace over war
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 4/3/09 , edited 4/3/09

LamiaZlogonje wrote:

racial genetic superiority itself sounds odd to me. But I guess I could give it a try. First of all we were all thrown on this earth equal, then we were made different and mankind enslaved one another. Giving different 'races' as mankind sooner then later called it these attributes. But most of this is based on religious thoughts (not my own).
I don't believe that you can actually find that racial genetic superiority, there is too much to take a look at. Science has a hard enough time trying to understand the soul and free will. Science doesn't nearly cover and or understand the humans (animals/nature) enough to answer that question. (I believe)


Science doesn't understand the soul, because there is no such thing as a soul. And free will comes from the 400 trillion chemical synapses in your brain. simple enough, but on a genetic level, humans are inferior to lots of other animals. We just about have the lowest, if not the lowest genetic diversity levels of any animal. We don't have as many genetic mutations as we should be having. Were a genetic failure basically. Even tho we all came from the same animal in the first place, our genetic diversity levels is too small.
99577 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F / Charlotte
Offline
Posted 4/3/09

Allhailodin wrote:


LamiaZlogonje wrote:

racial genetic superiority itself sounds odd to me. But I guess I could give it a try. First of all we were all thrown on this earth equal, then we were made different and mankind enslaved one another. Giving different 'races' as mankind sooner then later called it these attributes. But most of this is based on religious thoughts (not my own).
I don't believe that you can actually find that racial genetic superiority, there is too much to take a look at. Science has a hard enough time trying to understand the soul and free will. Science doesn't nearly cover and or understand the humans (animals/nature) enough to answer that question. (I believe)


Science doesn't understand the soul, because there is no such thing as a soul. And free will comes from the 400 trillion chemical synapses in your brain. simple enough, but on a genetic level, humans are inferior to lots of other animals. We just about have the lowest, if not the lowest genetic diversity levels of any animal. We don't have as many genetic mutations as we should be having. Were a genetic failure basically. Even tho we all came from the same animal in the first place, our genetic diversity levels is too small.


There is a soul and I believe that even scientologits not saying that your'e one, believe that there is a soul in the body. And free will is a thign in the mind that allows you to do whatever the hell you want and if some reason if you're fucked up then you're just fucked up due to the way you grew up. Not because a 400 trillion chemical synapses in someone's brain. Not simple enough on a genetic level, you're looking into it way too deeply. We did have genetic mutations, if we didn't have genetic mutations then we'd look like monkey since we are in relation to them so much. Wer'e not a genetic failure, why because basically we've dominated every other mamel and animal out there in the world not including the dinasour because they're already extinct. We have control over this earth and how it ahppens, which means the human race is not a genetic failure, we're just a screwed up (mind related) genetic sucess. Our genetic diversity may be small but it makes us different from everyone else.
4294 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
forgot where
Offline
Posted 4/3/09

Narc_7 wrote:

Browsing across the net I came up on a Nordicism site. Naturally they were advocating for racial supremacy, however they were not using some warped psycho-social reasoning. Their arguments had evolved or mutated to the point where scientific justification, they insinuated, formed a solid basis upon which there beliefs could be vindicated.

Naturally superior being a subjective term, it for the most part dwells in the realms of relativity and hence boundaries must be set to confine it to some point of objectivity.
However through what process does one proceed to determine racial genetic superiority?
As, is prominent in nature each race of a particular specie possess individual distinguishing attributes that essentially makes it superior to the other and humans are no exception. So how does one go about attempting to derive from a predominantly nebulous and subjective concept such as this, a general answer (not an absolute one)?

The term superior is an infinitely broad concept, hence specific examples must be identified and then perhaps accumulated and the analysed for one to arrive at an over all conclusion............I suppose. But then there are a seemingly infinite occasions in which superiority can be perceived.

At this point in time I'm in a conundrum

What are your views on the matter?


reguardless of how u define racail superiority, genetics/ science play no part.Race within the human race is a concept created by europeans.Which is why they r ALWAYS on the top of the lists, and blacks r ALWAYS on the bottom.humans share 99.9% of genetics. 7 out of 22000 genes r different in a white man and any other man. thats a genetic sunburn. truly, only as shallow as the color of the skin.

all these Ku klu klan, Nordicism, nazi and all that crap, take a look at thier history. Look at the methods Hitler used to prove his thoery, look at thier methods. its all scientificly flawed, misused statistics, and down right lies in most cases.Thier "scientific proof" is not valid and thier statistic and charts and graphs r mis leading.

Edit- i think i know what your trying to say now...but it still cant be done. how do u define serperiority? str? intelligence? speed? skill? and whereever you look thier is always an exception.So certainly ovservational studies cant do u ne good. and science has proven serperiority to be a myth. peace over war
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 4/3/09 , edited 4/3/09

LamiaZlogonje wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


LamiaZlogonje wrote:

racial genetic superiority itself sounds odd to me. But I guess I could give it a try. First of all we were all thrown on this earth equal, then we were made different and mankind enslaved one another. Giving different 'races' as mankind sooner then later called it these attributes. But most of this is based on religious thoughts (not my own).
I don't believe that you can actually find that racial genetic superiority, there is too much to take a look at. Science has a hard enough time trying to understand the soul and free will. Science doesn't nearly cover and or understand the humans (animals/nature) enough to answer that question. (I believe)


Science doesn't understand the soul, because there is no such thing as a soul. And free will comes from the 400 trillion chemical synapses in your brain. simple enough, but on a genetic level, humans are inferior to lots of other animals. We just about have the lowest, if not the lowest genetic diversity levels of any animal. We don't have as many genetic mutations as we should be having. Were a genetic failure basically. Even tho we all came from the same animal in the first place, our genetic diversity levels is too small.


There is a soul and I believe that even scientologits not saying that your'e one, believe that there is a soul in the body. And free will is a thign in the mind that allows you to do whatever the hell you want and if some reason if you're fucked up then you're just fucked up due to the way you grew up. Not because a 400 trillion chemical synapses in someone's brain. Not simple enough on a genetic level, you're looking into it way too deeply. We did have genetic mutations, if we didn't have genetic mutations then we'd look like monkey since we are in relation to them so much. Wer'e not a genetic failure, why because basically we've dominated every other mamel and animal out there in the world not including the dinasour because they're already extinct. We have control over this earth and how it ahppens, which means the human race is not a genetic failure, we're just a screwed up (mind related) genetic sucess. Our genetic diversity may be small but it makes us different from everyone else.


Soul = something humans invented to feel better about the concept of death. And those 400 trillion chemical synapses make up your brain / mind, without them you'd have the intelligence and free will of a rock. Thus those 400 trillion synapse give you your free will, motor functions, a higher reasoning ability then the other animals. And yes we are genetically inferior to lots of other animals, and the reason for that is white people generally breed with white people, mexicans generally breed with mexicans, africans with africans, asians with asians, if more white people bred with black people, and if more mexicans bred with asian people, and so on the genetic diversity would increase, but since humans only like to breed with humans from their race, our genetic diversity is inferior to most other animals, and humans and certian monkeys are only 2% apart on a genetic level, mainly because we came from a kind of prehistoric monkey, that existed before modern primates.
99577 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F / Charlotte
Offline
Posted 4/3/09

Allhailodin wrote:


LamiaZlogonje wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


LamiaZlogonje wrote:

racial genetic superiority itself sounds odd to me. But I guess I could give it a try. First of all we were all thrown on this earth equal, then we were made different and mankind enslaved one another. Giving different 'races' as mankind sooner then later called it these attributes. But most of this is based on religious thoughts (not my own).
I don't believe that you can actually find that racial genetic superiority, there is too much to take a look at. Science has a hard enough time trying to understand the soul and free will. Science doesn't nearly cover and or understand the humans (animals/nature) enough to answer that question. (I believe)


Science doesn't understand the soul, because there is no such thing as a soul. And free will comes from the 400 trillion chemical synapses in your brain. simple enough, but on a genetic level, humans are inferior to lots of other animals. We just about have the lowest, if not the lowest genetic diversity levels of any animal. We don't have as many genetic mutations as we should be having. Were a genetic failure basically. Even tho we all came from the same animal in the first place, our genetic diversity levels is too small.


There is a soul and I believe that even scientologits not saying that your'e one, believe that there is a soul in the body. And free will is a thign in the mind that allows you to do whatever the hell you want and if some reason if you're fucked up then you're just fucked up due to the way you grew up. Not because a 400 trillion chemical synapses in someone's brain. Not simple enough on a genetic level, you're looking into it way too deeply. We did have genetic mutations, if we didn't have genetic mutations then we'd look like monkey since we are in relation to them so much. Wer'e not a genetic failure, why because basically we've dominated every other mamel and animal out there in the world not including the dinasour because they're already extinct. We have control over this earth and how it ahppens, which means the human race is not a genetic failure, we're just a screwed up (mind related) genetic sucess. Our genetic diversity may be small but it makes us different from everyone else.


Soul = something humans invented to feel better about the concept of death. And those 400 trillion chemical synapses make up your brain / mind, without them you'd have the intelligence and free will of a rock. Thus those 400 trillion synapse give you your free will, motor functions, a higher reasoning ability then the other animals. And yes we are genetically inferior to lots of other animals, and the reason for that is white people generally breed with white people, mexicans generally breed with mexicans, africans with africans, asians with asians, if more white people bred with black people, and if more mexicans bred with asian people, and so on the genetic diversity would increase, but since humans only like to breed with humans from their race, our genetic diversity is inferior to most other animals, and humans and certian monkeys are only 2% apart on a genetic level, mainly because we came from a kind of prehistoric monkey, that existed before modern primates.


We didn't invent it a higher being did, we just didn't appear here, humans and beings and such just didn't appear, they were put here by a higher being. Doesn't matter who the higher being was, he and or she put us on this earth. These 400 trillion chemical s. are just what scientists have named. Scientists have just thrown names in and got theories that obviously can not be proven. No we are not genetically inferior, its only because of the past the we have been brought up with. And we are not genetically inferior just because of that, that's got to be a very low concept that you've brought into this conversation. We are all humans we just have different skin color. If you put it like that then zebras are also genetically inferior because their stripes are not all the same. Or as you could say birds, they have different colors and such. WOW, are you seriously aruging about this is sort of sounds as if you're racist. Not labling or anything but are you really goign to arugue with me on this conept here???"
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 4/3/09 , edited 4/3/09

LamiaZlogonje wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


LamiaZlogonje wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


LamiaZlogonje wrote:

racial genetic superiority itself sounds odd to me. But I guess I could give it a try. First of all we were all thrown on this earth equal, then we were made different and mankind enslaved one another. Giving different 'races' as mankind sooner then later called it these attributes. But most of this is based on religious thoughts (not my own).
I don't believe that you can actually find that racial genetic superiority, there is too much to take a look at. Science has a hard enough time trying to understand the soul and free will. Science doesn't nearly cover and or understand the humans (animals/nature) enough to answer that question. (I believe)


Science doesn't understand the soul, because there is no such thing as a soul. And free will comes from the 400 trillion chemical synapses in your brain. simple enough, but on a genetic level, humans are inferior to lots of other animals. We just about have the lowest, if not the lowest genetic diversity levels of any animal. We don't have as many genetic mutations as we should be having. Were a genetic failure basically. Even tho we all came from the same animal in the first place, our genetic diversity levels is too small.


There is a soul and I believe that even scientologits not saying that your'e one, believe that there is a soul in the body. And free will is a thign in the mind that allows you to do whatever the hell you want and if some reason if you're fucked up then you're just fucked up due to the way you grew up. Not because a 400 trillion chemical synapses in someone's brain. Not simple enough on a genetic level, you're looking into it way too deeply. We did have genetic mutations, if we didn't have genetic mutations then we'd look like monkey since we are in relation to them so much. Wer'e not a genetic failure, why because basically we've dominated every other mamel and animal out there in the world not including the dinasour because they're already extinct. We have control over this earth and how it ahppens, which means the human race is not a genetic failure, we're just a screwed up (mind related) genetic sucess. Our genetic diversity may be small but it makes us different from everyone else.


Soul = something humans invented to feel better about the concept of death. And those 400 trillion chemical synapses make up your brain / mind, without them you'd have the intelligence and free will of a rock. Thus those 400 trillion synapse give you your free will, motor functions, a higher reasoning ability then the other animals. And yes we are genetically inferior to lots of other animals, and the reason for that is white people generally breed with white people, mexicans generally breed with mexicans, africans with africans, asians with asians, if more white people bred with black people, and if more mexicans bred with asian people, and so on the genetic diversity would increase, but since humans only like to breed with humans from their race, our genetic diversity is inferior to most other animals, and humans and certian monkeys are only 2% apart on a genetic level, mainly because we came from a kind of prehistoric monkey, that existed before modern primates.


We didn't invent it a higher being did, we just didn't appear here, humans and beings and such just didn't appear, they were put here by a higher being. Doesn't matter who the higher being was, he and or she put us on this earth. These 400 trillion chemical s. are just what scientists have named. Scientists have just thrown names in and got theories that obviously can not be proven. No we are not genetically inferior, its only because of the past the we have been brought up with. And we are not genetically inferior just because of that, that's got to be a very low concept that you've brought into this conversation. We are all humans we just have different skin color. If you put it like that then zebras are also genetically inferior because their stripes are not all the same. Or as you could say birds, they have different colors and such. WOW, are you seriously aruging about this is sort of sounds as if you're racist. Not labling or anything but are you really goign to arugue with me on this conept here???"


No higher being put homo-sapiens here on earth, homo-spaiens evolved from a less intelligent animal over millions of years, into the intelligent animals we are now, And these 400 trillion chemical synapse have been proven to exist, we know they exist as a fact, you cannot disprove the chemical synapse in the human and all other animals brains. We are not simply all humans, different races and tribes have different traits and features special to that race / tribe, just like the different breeds of dogs each have specific traits special to only that breed of dog, its the same concept in humans. And its because these various races and tribes don't breed with each other very often that were genetically inferior to other animals. It's not racist. And there is no such thing as "All zebras" or "All birds" there are 3 different kinds of zebra and many different species of birds, each with their own unique traits and features. You can't group them all into 1. Doesn't work.
Posted 4/3/09

treasonirish wrote:


Narc_7 wrote:

Browsing across the net I came up on a Nordicism site. Naturally they were advocating for racial supremacy, however they were not using some warped psycho-social reasoning. Their arguments had evolved or mutated to the point where scientific justification, they insinuated, formed a solid basis upon which there beliefs could be vindicated.

Naturally superior being a subjective term, it for the most part dwells in the realms of relativity and hence boundaries must be set to confine it to some point of objectivity.
However through what process does one proceed to determine racial genetic superiority?
As, is prominent in nature each race of a particular specie possess individual distinguishing attributes that essentially makes it superior to the other and humans are no exception. So how does one go about attempting to derive from a predominantly nebulous and subjective concept such as this, a general answer (not an absolute one)?

The term superior is an infinitely broad concept, hence specific examples must be identified and then perhaps accumulated and the analysed for one to arrive at an over all conclusion............I suppose. But then there are a seemingly infinite occasions in which superiority can be perceived.

At this point in time I'm in a conundrum

What are your views on the matter?


why is it black people on hear always make threads attacking white people and try to demonize them, u think asians are stupid or something you think we dont see what your doing . hhmmm

i would like to see some links to this site. or is there a site?? lets wait and see.

why dont you talk about the black panthers who want to kill everyone except black people you want to talk about them to dude.


What the fuck are you talking about?
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 4/3/09

Gaia93 wrote:


treasonirish wrote:


Narc_7 wrote:

Browsing across the net I came up on a Nordicism site. Naturally they were advocating for racial supremacy, however they were not using some warped psycho-social reasoning. Their arguments had evolved or mutated to the point where scientific justification, they insinuated, formed a solid basis upon which there beliefs could be vindicated.

Naturally superior being a subjective term, it for the most part dwells in the realms of relativity and hence boundaries must be set to confine it to some point of objectivity.
However through what process does one proceed to determine racial genetic superiority?
As, is prominent in nature each race of a particular specie possess individual distinguishing attributes that essentially makes it superior to the other and humans are no exception. So how does one go about attempting to derive from a predominantly nebulous and subjective concept such as this, a general answer (not an absolute one)?

The term superior is an infinitely broad concept, hence specific examples must be identified and then perhaps accumulated and the analysed for one to arrive at an over all conclusion............I suppose. But then there are a seemingly infinite occasions in which superiority can be perceived.

At this point in time I'm in a conundrum

What are your views on the matter?


why is it black people on hear always make threads attacking white people and try to demonize them, u think asians are stupid or something you think we dont see what your doing . hhmmm

i would like to see some links to this site. or is there a site?? lets wait and see.

why dont you talk about the black panthers who want to kill everyone except black people you want to talk about them to dude.


What the fuck are you talking about?


Hes a retard spouting crap.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.