First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
A car that you were very disappointed in.
Posted 2/9/09 , edited 2/9/09
I'm sure of ya'll, had, seen, heard, of a car that you that was great or interesting, but the truth finally came out. What made you disappointed in this new car, or design, or whatever? Something that your weren't really expecting.
387 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Somewhere in euro...
Offline
Posted 2/9/09
Yes a '94 Frenchy 306. Hate it, despise it, curse it, and throw it away if u get hold of one. WHY? unreliable, it likes to piss out OIL, Anti-freeze, expensive to maintain and worse ever, ever exprience....so far
13258 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / O.C. So.Cal
Offline
Posted 2/9/09
the evo X

i mean i like the new design and all, and sure all those new gadgets are pretty nice, but the evo was supposed to be a rally car. now they are marketing the car to a more general population as a luxury sports car type of thing which is nice, but not what it was originally made to do

the new subaru wrx sti kinda disapointed me too, i mean wtf is with the new look, it looks like a family station wagon
Posted 2/9/09

LemonyPanda wrote:

the evo X

i mean i like the new design and all, and sure all those new gadgets are pretty nice, but the evo was supposed to be a rally car. now they are marketing the car to a more general population as a luxury sports car type of thing which is nice, but not what it was originally made to do

the new subaru wrx sti kinda disapointed me too, i mean wtf is with the new look, it looks like a family station wagon


i think the new design looks much better than all the previous evos..eccept for the 6. you need to peel your eyes out for the FQ400 once thats out...a real beast!
5099 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
33 / M
Offline
Posted 2/10/09
Styling: Ford Mustang, current.
Why? It looks great from the front. Seriously, has menace to it. But the back? It looks bloated, fat, and just....falls apart. I mean, yes, there are greater blunders (Current Impreza...), but the design has so much promise only to be dragged down by that ass end!

Over all however? I'm disappointed by the New Dodge Challenger most of all.

I have absolutely, and utterly no problem with the design of the car. My problem is the fact that, historically speaking, the Pony cars, were Trans-Am racers. The Challenger, the Camaro, Firebird, Mustang, they were the Trans-Am racers. They were pretty light weight for their time, and they had some capability to handle.

The New Challenger is based on a heavy, long, luxury based chassis. 4100 lbs? That's just pathetic.

Sure it has a great, stupid amount of horse power....but the performance figures don't line up. This car deserves to drop 500-600 pounds. If not more.
1946 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Oklahoma
Offline
Posted 2/10/09

LemonyPanda wrote:

the evo X

i mean i like the new design and all, and sure all those new gadgets are pretty nice, but the evo was supposed to be a rally car. now they are marketing the car to a more general population as a luxury sports car type of thing which is nice, but not what it was originally made to do

the new subaru wrx sti kinda disapointed me too, i mean wtf is with the new look, it looks like a family station wagon


Rally cars and road cars are two different things. A road car can be converted into a rally car.
Ex. Ford Focus hatch, it was converted into AWD and was quite a serious contender in it's group.
And all the luxuries will be removed for rallying anyway. In the end, it's still going to be a rally machine.


2009 911 GT3 RS ( http://www.leftlanenews.com/porsche-911-gt3-rs.html )
This RS version of the standard GT3 version drops 44 lbs in total weight, a single-mass flywheel, and a roll cage. However the car itself features the same suspension, brakes, and engine. In other words, you're paying more, for less. But other options such as high performance brakes are optional.
Posted 2/11/09
Hot wheels.
482 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / San Francisco, Ca...
Offline
Posted 2/12/09
my little firetruck that lost a wheel
Posted 2/13/09
Nissan R33.The R32 and 34 were much more powerful.
Posted 2/13/09
The R32 produced around 320hp.R33 only produced 280hp.I also think the R32 looks better.
6499 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Minnesota
Offline
Posted 2/15/09
the new sti
-_- i miss the old look
and now i have to deal with a
family grocery go getter
2678 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 2/15/09 , edited 2/15/09
i agree with the above IMPREZA

2006





2009 wtf!!!!!!!!!!




why did you fcuk it up!!

NOTE: this isn't an STI
521 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
49 / M / oakland
Offline
Posted 2/16/09
EVo X is great n everything but i still perfer the previous evo
1425 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / In your pantz
Offline
Posted 2/16/09

brrooEy wrote:

i agree with the above IMPREZA

2006





2009 wtf!!!!!!!!!!




why did you fcuk it up!!

NOTE: this isn't an STI


haha, whats worse is the new sti is a station wagon with ground effects, and you can only get it in the *station wagon* form, why subaru? youve had a monster of a car since the early 90's and you come out and make the newest model looks like a pos!? sure its fast but i wouldn't drive it....the new evo X is nice too, but its just doesnt have that evo feel.

2678 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 2/16/09 , edited 2/16/09


well the hatch has a little better looking back then the 2009 sedan the sedan
looks like an optra !

First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.