First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
A car that you were very disappointed in.
1425 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / In your pantz
Offline
Posted 2/16/09

brrooEy wrote:



well the hatch has a little better looking back then the 2009 sedan the sedan
looks like an optra !



wow, thats just sad its almost depressing hahaha
36 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / Philadelphia, PA
Offline
Posted 2/19/09
RX-8.... just have one thing to say. watered down rotary.
34 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27
Offline
Posted 2/22/09
lol the new sti looks like a toyota camry...
711 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 2/24/09
evo x....it just looks retarded....i mean why the hell does the body have to look exactly the same as the lancer (yea there are a few cosmetic differences) the only difference is whats INSIDE the car (evo equip.) any person who don't know jack about asian cars would automatically say that its a lancer from almost any view angle...the other evos didn't do that (the idiots can see the difference in prev. evos)

i had a choice to buy the new evo x or the evo ix....i never regret having the ix
209 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 3/22/09

xiongboy wrote:

evo x....it just looks retarded....i mean why the hell does the body have to look exactly the same as the lancer (yea there are a few cosmetic differences) the only difference is whats INSIDE the car (evo equip.) any person who don't know jack about asian cars would automatically say that its a lancer from almost any view angle...the other evos didn't do that (the idiots can see the difference in prev. evos)

i had a choice to buy the new evo x or the evo ix....i never regret having the ix



what does looks matter? as long as the parts are functional, thats all that matters. people dont buy evos for the looks of it, they buy it for the performance, which the evo x delivers, and much better than the previous generations i might add
69247 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / O.K.C.
Offline
Posted 3/29/09
The Lancer is a sleeper. But I'll take the newly redesigned + more hp Ralliart too.
3930 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / cebu
Offline
Posted 3/29/09
nah who cares as long as it can go to 250 km/h
20 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29
Offline
Posted 4/4/09 , edited 4/4/09
the 4b11 is a great fuckin engine and i easily see the new evos having the same legendary reputation as the last. as for the wrx who cares about the looks the improvements over the 08 model are huge and really i hated it at first to but i think the hatches look pretty good now. both these platforms have been out a yr and already have huge aftermarket support and are making great power especially the evos. i dont really see why anyones complaining about either one of them. im partial to hatches though as my avatar shows.
Posted 4/4/09 , edited 4/4/09
the new ferrari 599. It's gearbox is WAAY too jerky. Still fun for paddle shifting. But the car itself is too wide that it feels like you are always going to hit something next to you.
1946 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Oklahoma
Offline
Posted 4/4/09

xiongboy wrote:

evo x....it just looks retarded....i mean why the hell does the body have to look exactly the same as the lancer (yea there are a few cosmetic differences) the only difference is whats INSIDE the car (evo equip.) any person who don't know jack about asian cars would automatically say that its a lancer from almost any view angle...the other evos didn't do that (the idiots can see the difference in prev. evos)

i had a choice to buy the new evo x or the evo ix....i never regret having the ix


It doesn't matter if the Evo shares the same platform as the base model. The Imprezas, Supras, RX7s, Camaros, and the Corvette does it.
711 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 4/5/09

revolutionofone wrote:


xiongboy wrote:

evo x....it just looks retarded....i mean why the hell does the body have to look exactly the same as the lancer (yea there are a few cosmetic differences) the only difference is whats INSIDE the car (evo equip.) any person who don't know jack about asian cars would automatically say that its a lancer from almost any view angle...the other evos didn't do that (the idiots can see the difference in prev. evos)

i had a choice to buy the new evo x or the evo ix....i never regret having the ix


It doesn't matter if the Evo shares the same platform as the base model. The Imprezas, Supras, RX7s, Camaros, and the Corvette does it.


true that...sharing the same platform is something almost all manufacture do but still you gotta look at whats being presented at you
711 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 4/5/09

BoostFedEMII wrote:


xiongboy wrote:

evo x....it just looks retarded....i mean why the hell does the body have to look exactly the same as the lancer (yea there are a few cosmetic differences) the only difference is whats INSIDE the car (evo equip.) any person who don't know jack about asian cars would automatically say that its a lancer from almost any view angle...the other evos didn't do that (the idiots can see the difference in prev. evos)

i had a choice to buy the new evo x or the evo ix....i never regret having the ix



what does looks matter? as long as the parts are functional, thats all that matters. people dont buy evos for the looks of it, they buy it for the performance, which the evo x delivers, and much better than the previous generations i might add


the prev evo's beat all the sti's in every performance aspect....the new one doesn't
209 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 4/5/09

xiongboy wrote:


BoostFedEMII wrote:


xiongboy wrote:

evo x....it just looks retarded....i mean why the hell does the body have to look exactly the same as the lancer (yea there are a few cosmetic differences) the only difference is whats INSIDE the car (evo equip.) any person who don't know jack about asian cars would automatically say that its a lancer from almost any view angle...the other evos didn't do that (the idiots can see the difference in prev. evos)

i had a choice to buy the new evo x or the evo ix....i never regret having the ix



what does looks matter? as long as the parts are functional, thats all that matters. people dont buy evos for the looks of it, they buy it for the performance, which the evo x delivers, and much better than the previous generations i might add


the prev evo's beat all the sti's in every performance aspect....the new one doesn't




I dont know where you get your information from but you have been misinformed.
711 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 4/8/09

BoostFedEMII wrote:


xiongboy wrote:


BoostFedEMII wrote:


xiongboy wrote:

evo x....it just looks retarded....i mean why the hell does the body have to look exactly the same as the lancer (yea there are a few cosmetic differences) the only difference is whats INSIDE the car (evo equip.) any person who don't know jack about asian cars would automatically say that its a lancer from almost any view angle...the other evos didn't do that (the idiots can see the difference in prev. evos)

i had a choice to buy the new evo x or the evo ix....i never regret having the ix



what does looks matter? as long as the parts are functional, thats all that matters. people dont buy evos for the looks of it, they buy it for the performance, which the evo x delivers, and much better than the previous generations i might add


the prev evo's beat all the sti's in every performance aspect....the new one doesn't




I dont know where you get your information from but you have been misinformed.


i hear that the new sti's have a higher top speed than the X....dont know about the MR tho
209 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 4/8/09

xiongboy wrote:


BoostFedEMII wrote:


xiongboy wrote:


BoostFedEMII wrote:


xiongboy wrote:

evo x....it just looks retarded....i mean why the hell does the body have to look exactly the same as the lancer (yea there are a few cosmetic differences) the only difference is whats INSIDE the car (evo equip.) any person who don't know jack about asian cars would automatically say that its a lancer from almost any view angle...the other evos didn't do that (the idiots can see the difference in prev. evos)

i had a choice to buy the new evo x or the evo ix....i never regret having the ix



what does looks matter? as long as the parts are functional, thats all that matters. people dont buy evos for the looks of it, they buy it for the performance, which the evo x delivers, and much better than the previous generations i might add


the prev evo's beat all the sti's in every performance aspect....the new one doesn't




I dont know where you get your information from but you have been misinformed.


i hear that the new sti's have a higher top speed than the X....dont know about the MR tho


So automatically top speed=better car? Motortrend and Car and Driver along with Grassroot racing prefer the new evo x's over the STI. Not only that but so do many auto X'ers and circuit drivers. Although in a straight line its slower (safety=weight), in corners, it KILLS the STI. Not to mention if you take into account a couple of mods, the Evo X responds MUCH better. Bolt on the same mods and let them run each other and the Evo X wil EAT up the STI, in corners AND a straight line.

First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.