First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
Octomom
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 3/28/09

mystic17 wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


Well if some of her kids died, then maybe the media would loose interest, right ? It's a compromise.


if that happen, then that will increase her popularity than it already is =(


Well i figure it'll make people say "Well they lasted a little longer than the other times, but in the end they still died" and get bored of the subject matter. That's how I see it.
Posted 3/28/09

Allhailodin wrote:


mystic17 wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


Well if some of her kids died, then maybe the media would loose interest, right ? It's a compromise.


if that happen, then that will increase her popularity than it already is =(


Well i figure it'll make people say "Well they lasted a little longer than the other times, but in the end they still died" and get bored of the subject matter. That's how I see it.


nope if one of her babies died, people will feel sad & wanna help her & give her prizes & stuff
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 3/28/09

mystic17 wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


mystic17 wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


Well if some of her kids died, then maybe the media would loose interest, right ? It's a compromise.


if that happen, then that will increase her popularity than it already is =(


Well i figure it'll make people say "Well they lasted a little longer than the other times, but in the end they still died" and get bored of the subject matter. That's how I see it.


nope if one of her babies died, people will feel sad & wanna help her & give her prizes & stuff


Pshh, if her babies died, which they probally will, i don't know a single person myself included who would do anything for her, they'll just forget about her faster, and besides if the babies live its just more of out taxpayer dollars wasted, so if they die its a win win, we stop seeing her on the news, and she doesn't get any taxpayer money.
Posted 3/28/09 , edited 3/28/09

Allhailodin wrote:


Pshh, if her babies died, which they probally will, i don't know a single person myself included who would do anything for her, they'll just forget about her faster, and besides if the babies live its just more of out taxpayer dollars wasted, so if they die its a win win, we stop seeing her on the news, and she doesn't get any taxpayer money.


....no comment =T
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 3/28/09

mystic17 wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


Pshh, if her babies died, which they probally will, i don't know a single person myself included who would do anything for her, they'll just forget about her faster, and besides if the babies live its just more of out taxpayer dollars wasted, so if they die its a win win, we stop seeing her on the news, and she doesn't get any taxpayer money.


....no comment =T


What ? it's true.
Posted 3/28/09

Allhailodin

Pshh, if her babies died, which they probally will, i don't know a single person myself included who would do anything for her, they'll just forget about her faster, and besides if the babies live its just more of out taxpayer dollars wasted, so if they die its a win win, we stop seeing her on the news, and she doesn't get any taxpayer money.



Or we can grow that child into a cash cow that can produce more profits than it's worth.

You bang heavy on the liberal hammer, don't you?
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 3/28/09

Xtracell wrote:


Allhailodin

Pshh, if her babies died, which they probally will, i don't know a single person myself included who would do anything for her, they'll just forget about her faster, and besides if the babies live its just more of out taxpayer dollars wasted, so if they die its a win win, we stop seeing her on the news, and she doesn't get any taxpayer money.



Or we can grow that child into a cash cow that can produce more profits than it's worth.

You bang heavy on the liberal hammer, don't you?


LIberal hammer ? Nah, I don't care for politics, so i know nothing about em, but all I'm saying is who should we even spending money on the kid at all ? Why can't the mother just get a job and support her family that way, that's the way lots of other people do, why should she be any different ? Why should our tax payer dollars go to someone who doesn't need em ? All she needs to do is get a job, plain and simple. So its better for the tax payer if the kid dies, that way that's one less person our taxpayer dollars are supporting.
Posted 3/28/09

Allhailodin wrote:


Xtracell wrote:


Allhailodin

Pshh, if her babies died, which they probally will, i don't know a single person myself included who would do anything for her, they'll just forget about her faster, and besides if the babies live its just more of out taxpayer dollars wasted, so if they die its a win win, we stop seeing her on the news, and she doesn't get any taxpayer money.



Or we can grow that child into a cash cow that can produce more profits than it's worth.

You bang heavy on the liberal hammer, don't you?


LIberal hammer ? Nah, I don't care for politics, so i know nothing about em, but all I'm saying is who should we even spending money on the kid at all ? Why can't the mother just get a job and support her family that way, that's the way lots of other people do, why should she be any different ? Why should our tax payer dollars go to someone who doesn't need em ? All she needs to do is get a job, plain and simple. So its better for the tax payer if the kid dies, that way that's one less person our taxpayer dollars are supporting.


Yeah, but we're good at suppling funds for unworthy/useless purposes. So I don't think this case will be treated any differently. -_-
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 3/28/09

Xtracell wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


Xtracell wrote:


Allhailodin

Pshh, if her babies died, which they probally will, i don't know a single person myself included who would do anything for her, they'll just forget about her faster, and besides if the babies live its just more of out taxpayer dollars wasted, so if they die its a win win, we stop seeing her on the news, and she doesn't get any taxpayer money.



Or we can grow that child into a cash cow that can produce more profits than it's worth.

You bang heavy on the liberal hammer, don't you?


LIberal hammer ? Nah, I don't care for politics, so i know nothing about em, but all I'm saying is who should we even spending money on the kid at all ? Why can't the mother just get a job and support her family that way, that's the way lots of other people do, why should she be any different ? Why should our tax payer dollars go to someone who doesn't need em ? All she needs to do is get a job, plain and simple. So its better for the tax payer if the kid dies, that way that's one less person our taxpayer dollars are supporting.


Yeah, but we're good at suppling funds for unworthy/useless purposes. So I don't think this case will be treated any differently. -_-


True.
20924 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Singapore
Offline
Posted 3/28/09
she is one crazy witch.....

And thats the truth!
Posted 3/28/09 , edited 3/28/09
It's very obvious why she's doing this. Anyone with a brain can see it.
13326 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Terra
Offline
Posted 3/29/09

darkmagiciangirl911 wrote:

I'm sure all of you have heard about Nadya Suleman so I'll just put a fast point form summary.

- she gave birth to octuplets in January 2009
- controversy: invetro-fertilization, now has 14 kids, on welfare, not working, single mother
- Got help from Dr.Phil
- Got help from Angels in Waiting
- Fired AIW because she found them too controlling
- accused of neglect and only caring about children when media is there

Seen by many as irresponsible for actions and unable to think rationally.
Seen as only wanting media attention and illegibly only caring for children when media is around and not caring for the children properly.
- assumably allowing one of the few living sets of octoplets in history to be exposed to TB and other infectious disease when the first 2 of the multiples were brought home
- did not make any plans for the care and homecoming of the babies herself and did not look grateful when help was given
- lived with parents and not working but continually having children
-having more than advisable embryos implanted at once causing increased risk of multiple births and birth problems

Discuss.


who the heck is that?! and your explanation is blurry...

anyways, 14 kids? some kind of frog?!

dr phil... that bald hypocrite...

angels?! wtf?! u saw one? and she fired them?. nice. so she must be god?

hmm..... what can you expect from 14 kids!? care all 14 at the same time? very nice...

and what can you expect from a woman with 14 kids? is that normal by any chance? if shes a frog, i guess...

1711 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F / Canada
Offline
Posted 3/29/09

o0James0o wrote:


darkmagiciangirl911 wrote:

I'm sure all of you have heard about Nadya Suleman so I'll just put a fast point form summary.

- she gave birth to octuplets in January 2009
- controversy: invetro-fertilization, now has 14 kids, on welfare, not working, single mother
- Got help from Dr.Phil
- Got help from Angels in Waiting
- Fired AIW because she found them too controlling
- accused of neglect and only caring about children when media is there

Seen by many as irresponsible for actions and unable to think rationally.
Seen as only wanting media attention and illegibly only caring for children when media is around and not caring for the children properly.
- assumably allowing one of the few living sets of octoplets in history to be exposed to TB and other infectious disease when the first 2 of the multiples were brought home
- did not make any plans for the care and homecoming of the babies herself and did not look grateful when help was given
- lived with parents and not working but continually having children
-having more than advisable embryos implanted at once causing increased risk of multiple births and birth problems

Discuss.


who the heck is that?! and your explanation is blurry...

anyways, 14 kids? some kind of frog?!

dr phil... that bald hypocrite...

angels?! wtf?! u saw one? and she fired them?. nice. so she must be god?

hmm..... what can you expect from 14 kids!? care all 14 at the same time? very nice...

and what can you expect from a woman with 14 kids? is that normal by any chance? if shes a frog, i guess...



If you can't read point form, you fail. :\
13326 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Terra
Offline
Posted 3/29/09

darkmagiciangirl911 wrote:


o0James0o wrote:


darkmagiciangirl911 wrote:

I'm sure all of you have heard about Nadya Suleman so I'll just put a fast point form summary.

- she gave birth to octuplets in January 2009
- controversy: invetro-fertilization, now has 14 kids, on welfare, not working, single mother
- Got help from Dr.Phil
- Got help from Angels in Waiting
- Fired AIW because she found them too controlling
- accused of neglect and only caring about children when media is there

Seen by many as irresponsible for actions and unable to think rationally.
Seen as only wanting media attention and illegibly only caring for children when media is around and not caring for the children properly.
- assumably allowing one of the few living sets of octoplets in history to be exposed to TB and other infectious disease when the first 2 of the multiples were brought home
- did not make any plans for the care and homecoming of the babies herself and did not look grateful when help was given
- lived with parents and not working but continually having children
-having more than advisable embryos implanted at once causing increased risk of multiple births and birth problems

Discuss.


who the heck is that?! and your explanation is blurry...

anyways, 14 kids? some kind of frog?!

dr phil... that bald hypocrite...

angels?! wtf?! u saw one? and she fired them?. nice. so she must be god?

hmm..... what can you expect from 14 kids!? care all 14 at the same time? very nice...

and what can you expect from a woman with 14 kids? is that normal by any chance? if shes a frog, i guess...



If you can't read point form, you fail. :\


english please
2448 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / NewYork
Offline
Posted 3/29/09
Her uterus should be ripped out.
First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.