First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
The Sun
Posted 4/13/09

-Khiel- wrote:


iHeartzMusic wrote:

Now everyone knows that the Sun is important. :blush:


It gives us energy, and it gives the Earth's most brilliant end.(Which kinda suck when it doesn't turn to a black hole, I wanna see the solar system be sucked by a fucking humungus black hole. )


Black Hole. :)
Now someone tells me... Bleeh
1846 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Davis, California
Offline
Posted 4/14/09

Allhailodin wrote:


digs wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Well, actually, as of now, the only planet with life is Earth, based on our current knowledge. Other planets that are capable of supporting life with life are not found yet. Water is theoretically the main requirement of life (as seen on Earth), "terrestrial" goes hand in hand with "aquatic."

The whole asteroid belt is terrestrial too if we just go by the land masses that is distinguishable from water, though, they only have frozen water, maybe no water but they probably do.


The kupier belt has frozen water, blocks of it, and there are some moons that have frozen water too, but water isn't nessassarily a requirment for life, it is for us, but that doesn't mean it is for all life out there, there are plenty of other chemicals that an organism could use to live.


All of those organisms alive on Earth actually has access to water. They do have different source of energy but the one thing they have in common is water. A source of water. Liquid water actually. Which is of course the reason why we pretty much look for water as it is the basis of life based on our current science.


As far as I know not all lifeforms need water, some bacteria and other various single celled life doesn't nessassarily need water or oxygen, they can survive on other things such as arsenic for example. There are some bacteria that "breathe" arsenic and use it to break down nutrients and release energy much the same way humans use oxygen. So on other planets it's perfectly possible that a multi-celled evolved lifeform uses arsenic as a source of life the same as we use water for life, hell it could even breathe hydrogen. Life on earth isn't a standard for all universal life.


I guess it would depend on how the organism participated in cellular respiration. Plants use CO2 and most animals use Oxygen. Some bacteria are anaerobic and don't use oxygen. Theoretically if the organism had a completely different form of cellular respiration then it could breath whatever worked within that form, of course they would also have to store energy completely differently and have organelles that used the energy differently.


Well like i said some bacteria use arsenic for food and air and to break down nutrients and all that good stuff, so its perfectly plausable that another organism on another planet could do the same, or even use something different like nitrogen or helium, our scientists are fucking idiots if they think all life needs "Earth like" conditions, thats retarded, while yes thats how it happened for us, it doesn't mean it's a universal standard. there could be life on planets that are - 200 degrees and survive by drinking liquid nitrogen and we'd never fi nd it because we'd never look, its stupid to think that all life needs earth like conditions.


. I myself have thought of this very same thing.
1846 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Davis, California
Offline
Posted 4/14/09

Allhailodin wrote:


macphapie wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


I thought earth was the only terrestrial planet? o.O


Nah, mars is a terrestrial planet, so is venus, and mercury too, basically any planet that is not a gas giant (juipter, saturn, and further) is a rocky planet. there are other rocky planets all over the universe and in our galaxy, and some of them have life on em too, earth isn't the only planet with life.


Really? I always thought that Mar is the only other terrestrial plant considering that Venus is too hot to to inhabit or that Mercury is too close to the sun(Though some scientists proposed that man can land safely on the far side of Mercury)
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 4/14/09

QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


macphapie wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


I thought earth was the only terrestrial planet? o.O


Nah, mars is a terrestrial planet, so is venus, and mercury too, basically any planet that is not a gas giant (juipter, saturn, and further) is a rocky planet. there are other rocky planets all over the universe and in our galaxy, and some of them have life on em too, earth isn't the only planet with life.


Really? I always thought that Mar is the only other terrestrial plant considering that Venus is too hot to to inhabit or that Mercury is too close to the sun(Though some scientists proposed that man can land safely on the far side of Mercury)


No mars is not the only terrestrial planet, if its solid and made of rock its a terrestrial planet, you live on one.
13676 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / on earth....
Offline
Posted 4/15/09 , edited 4/15/09
i agree. the sun keeps is alive. i also read on some website that as time passes the sun will become smaller and will be unable to support life.... that's what my dad told me too... but i don't know... it might be that it will be smaller or that it will become bigger and evaporate all water on earth....

well, that's just what i know and heard.... ^_^
1846 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Davis, California
Offline
Posted 4/15/09

Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


macphapie wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


I thought earth was the only terrestrial planet? o.O


Nah, mars is a terrestrial planet, so is venus, and mercury too, basically any planet that is not a gas giant (juipter, saturn, and further) is a rocky planet. there are other rocky planets all over the universe and in our galaxy, and some of them have life on em too, earth isn't the only planet with life.


Really? I always thought that Mar is the only other terrestrial plant considering that Venus is too hot to to inhabit or that Mercury is too close to the sun(Though some scientists proposed that man can land safely on the far side of Mercury)


No mars is not the only terrestrial planet, if its solid and made of rock its a terrestrial planet, you live on one.


Oh. I was thinking of the word "hospitable." Mars is the only other hospitable planet besides Earth in our Solar System(Assuming that the scientists theory on only exploring the dark side of Mercury doesn't work). So my mistake. haha,

Random question: Do you think the moon landings were faked by NASA?
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 4/15/09

QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


macphapie wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


I thought earth was the only terrestrial planet? o.O


Nah, mars is a terrestrial planet, so is venus, and mercury too, basically any planet that is not a gas giant (juipter, saturn, and further) is a rocky planet. there are other rocky planets all over the universe and in our galaxy, and some of them have life on em too, earth isn't the only planet with life.


Really? I always thought that Mar is the only other terrestrial plant considering that Venus is too hot to to inhabit or that Mercury is too close to the sun(Though some scientists proposed that man can land safely on the far side of Mercury)


No mars is not the only terrestrial planet, if its solid and made of rock its a terrestrial planet, you live on one.


Oh. I was thinking of the word "hospitable." Mars is the only other hospitable planet besides Earth in our Solar System(Assuming that the scientists theory on only exploring the dark side of Mercury doesn't work). So my mistake. haha,

Random question: Do you think the moon landings were faked by NASA?


mars isn't human hospitable, it doesn't have liquid water or oxygen, humans need both of those.
18663 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
36 / M / Small Wooded town...
Offline
Posted 4/15/09

Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


macphapie wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


I thought earth was the only terrestrial planet? o.O


Nah, mars is a terrestrial planet, so is venus, and mercury too, basically any planet that is not a gas giant (juipter, saturn, and further) is a rocky planet. there are other rocky planets all over the universe and in our galaxy, and some of them have life on em too, earth isn't the only planet with life.


Really? I always thought that Mar is the only other terrestrial plant considering that Venus is too hot to to inhabit or that Mercury is too close to the sun(Though some scientists proposed that man can land safely on the far side of Mercury)


No mars is not the only terrestrial planet, if its solid and made of rock its a terrestrial planet, you live on one.


Oh. I was thinking of the word "hospitable." Mars is the only other hospitable planet besides Earth in our Solar System(Assuming that the scientists theory on only exploring the dark side of Mercury doesn't work). So my mistake. haha,

Random question: Do you think the moon landings were faked by NASA?


mars isn't human hospitable, it doesn't have liquid water or oxygen, humans need both of those.


We can have closed dome buildings, Air can be created in air factory. We can live in a dome! You don't think that would work? Because we have the tech needed to do that already.

10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 4/15/09 , edited 4/15/09

Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


macphapie wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


I thought earth was the only terrestrial planet? o.O


Nah, mars is a terrestrial planet, so is venus, and mercury too, basically any planet that is not a gas giant (juipter, saturn, and further) is a rocky planet. there are other rocky planets all over the universe and in our galaxy, and some of them have life on em too, earth isn't the only planet with life.


Really? I always thought that Mar is the only other terrestrial plant considering that Venus is too hot to to inhabit or that Mercury is too close to the sun(Though some scientists proposed that man can land safely on the far side of Mercury)


No mars is not the only terrestrial planet, if its solid and made of rock its a terrestrial planet, you live on one.


Oh. I was thinking of the word "hospitable." Mars is the only other hospitable planet besides Earth in our Solar System(Assuming that the scientists theory on only exploring the dark side of Mercury doesn't work). So my mistake. haha,

Random question: Do you think the moon landings were faked by NASA?


mars isn't human hospitable, it doesn't have liquid water or oxygen, humans need both of those.


We can have closed dome buildings, Air can be created in air factory. We can live in a dome! You don't think that would work? Because we have the tech needed to do that already.



Water ? Electricity ? And human breathable air isn't that easy to create, you'd have to chemically make all the gasses that make up air, which i believe is over 14 different gasses, mix them and release them into the bio-dome. and you'd have to have a recycler to convert the C02 breathed out by people back into 02 people need to breathe in. I guess electricity could be nuclear and solar, but wheres the water gonna come from ?
1846 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Davis, California
Offline
Posted 4/15/09

Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


macphapie wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


I thought earth was the only terrestrial planet? o.O


Nah, mars is a terrestrial planet, so is venus, and mercury too, basically any planet that is not a gas giant (juipter, saturn, and further) is a rocky planet. there are other rocky planets all over the universe and in our galaxy, and some of them have life on em too, earth isn't the only planet with life.


Really? I always thought that Mar is the only other terrestrial plant considering that Venus is too hot to to inhabit or that Mercury is too close to the sun(Though some scientists proposed that man can land safely on the far side of Mercury)


No mars is not the only terrestrial planet, if its solid and made of rock its a terrestrial planet, you live on one.


Oh. I was thinking of the word "hospitable." Mars is the only other hospitable planet besides Earth in our Solar System(Assuming that the scientists theory on only exploring the dark side of Mercury doesn't work). So my mistake. haha,

Random question: Do you think the moon landings were faked by NASA?


mars isn't human hospitable, it doesn't have liquid water or oxygen, humans need both of those.


Erm...........I mean "hospitable" in the sense that it's completely explorable and can be inhabited for a period of time(e.g. Man can land safely on the moon and live for a short period of time as opposed to planets like Venus where its too hot for man to explore and live for a period of time or Jupiter where the gravity is too strong).

You can read about it here in order for you to get my point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_of_Mars#Terraforming_of_Mars

10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 4/15/09

QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


macphapie wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


I thought earth was the only terrestrial planet? o.O


Nah, mars is a terrestrial planet, so is venus, and mercury too, basically any planet that is not a gas giant (juipter, saturn, and further) is a rocky planet. there are other rocky planets all over the universe and in our galaxy, and some of them have life on em too, earth isn't the only planet with life.


Really? I always thought that Mar is the only other terrestrial plant considering that Venus is too hot to to inhabit or that Mercury is too close to the sun(Though some scientists proposed that man can land safely on the far side of Mercury)


No mars is not the only terrestrial planet, if its solid and made of rock its a terrestrial planet, you live on one.


Oh. I was thinking of the word "hospitable." Mars is the only other hospitable planet besides Earth in our Solar System(Assuming that the scientists theory on only exploring the dark side of Mercury doesn't work). So my mistake. haha,

Random question: Do you think the moon landings were faked by NASA?


mars isn't human hospitable, it doesn't have liquid water or oxygen, humans need both of those.


Erm...........I mean "hospitable" in the sense that it's completely explorable and can be inhabited for a period of time(e.g. Man can land safely on the moon and live for a short period of time as opposed to planets like Venus where its too hot for man to explore and live for a period of time or Jupiter where the gravity is too strong).

You can read about it here in order for you to get my point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_of_Mars#Terraforming_of_Mars



You wanna teraform mars, rofl, that takes centuries, it'd be far easier to put up bio-domes, and put cities inside the bio-domes, dunno where liquid water is gonna come from tho, because water is important for human life, earth got teraformed , took centuries tho, lots of centuries. teraforming mars would take forever and be expensive as fuck, and it still doesn't solve that water issue.
1846 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Davis, California
Offline
Posted 4/15/09

Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


macphapie wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


I thought earth was the only terrestrial planet? o.O


Nah, mars is a terrestrial planet, so is venus, and mercury too, basically any planet that is not a gas giant (juipter, saturn, and further) is a rocky planet. there are other rocky planets all over the universe and in our galaxy, and some of them have life on em too, earth isn't the only planet with life.


Really? I always thought that Mar is the only other terrestrial plant considering that Venus is too hot to to inhabit or that Mercury is too close to the sun(Though some scientists proposed that man can land safely on the far side of Mercury)


No mars is not the only terrestrial planet, if its solid and made of rock its a terrestrial planet, you live on one.


Oh. I was thinking of the word "hospitable." Mars is the only other hospitable planet besides Earth in our Solar System(Assuming that the scientists theory on only exploring the dark side of Mercury doesn't work). So my mistake. haha,

Random question: Do you think the moon landings were faked by NASA?


mars isn't human hospitable, it doesn't have liquid water or oxygen, humans need both of those.


Erm...........I mean "hospitable" in the sense that it's completely explorable and can be inhabited for a period of time(e.g. Man can land safely on the moon and live for a short period of time as opposed to planets like Venus where its too hot for man to explore and live for a period of time or Jupiter where the gravity is too strong).

You can read about it here in order for you to get my point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_of_Mars#Terraforming_of_Mars



You wanna teraform mars, rofl, that takes centuries, it'd be far easier to put up bio-domes, and put cities inside the bio-domes, dunno where liquid water is gonna come from tho, because water is important for human life, earth got teraformed , took centuries tho, lots of centuries. teraforming mars would take forever and be expensive as fuck, and it still doesn't solve that water issue.


haha. Well yes, "natural" terraforming would takes centuries to do and I don't think an artificial method would exist in our lifetime. Stephen Hawking proposed that it will be one way to deal with the overpopulation issue here on earth by terraforming mars then inhabiting it.Then again, an ideal is just an ideal. Obviously, he doesn't know the first thing about money or economics. Oh well. I guess we can't all be polymaths. haha.
18663 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
36 / M / Small Wooded town...
Offline
Posted 4/16/09

Allhailodin wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


macphapie wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


I thought earth was the only terrestrial planet? o.O


Nah, mars is a terrestrial planet, so is venus, and mercury too, basically any planet that is not a gas giant (juipter, saturn, and further) is a rocky planet. there are other rocky planets all over the universe and in our galaxy, and some of them have life on em too, earth isn't the only planet with life.


Really? I always thought that Mar is the only other terrestrial plant considering that Venus is too hot to to inhabit or that Mercury is too close to the sun(Though some scientists proposed that man can land safely on the far side of Mercury)


No mars is not the only terrestrial planet, if its solid and made of rock its a terrestrial planet, you live on one.


Oh. I was thinking of the word "hospitable." Mars is the only other hospitable planet besides Earth in our Solar System(Assuming that the scientists theory on only exploring the dark side of Mercury doesn't work). So my mistake. haha,

Random question: Do you think the moon landings were faked by NASA?


mars isn't human hospitable, it doesn't have liquid water or oxygen, humans need both of those.


We can have closed dome buildings, Air can be created in air factory. We can live in a dome! You don't think that would work? Because we have the tech needed to do that already.



Water ? Electricity ? And human breathable air isn't that easy to create, you'd have to chemically make all the gasses that make up air, which i believe is over 14 different gasses, mix them and release them into the bio-dome. and you'd have to have a recycler to convert the C02 breathed out by people back into 02 people need to breathe in. I guess electricity could be nuclear and solar, but wheres the water gonna come from ?



SO you don't think people can't bring plants to mars with them, in a closed dome. SOmething like a park could be built with millions of trees, water? Mars has water, most of its water is located under ground but it does have water.
'Building a mining base, would be one of the first jobs on mars, other than the researchers that is. '
7269 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / south east asia..^^
Offline
Posted 4/16/09

Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 4/16/09

Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


QuasimodoSunday wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


macphapie wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


jewishplayer wrote:

Or humans will be extinct as the latest information about Mars only shows millennial? water cycle (and it is only a theory backed by spherical rocks, canyons, and some iron reactions only possible with water). Besides, the sun will start to produce iron (after carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc, following their atomic masses and ends at iron (NOVA)) and expand in the process so Mars will also be dead.
And based on your statistics, the million years might mean that we already moved out to space, which is not going to be Mars as that one is on almost the same range as Earth when it comes to the point where water exists as liquid.

Maybe the last satellite (can't remember it's name) will find an Earth-like environment in a new star since the universe has a lot of elements (from Hydrogen to Iron are produced by stars) that supports life. Or maybe Earth is unique that our Sun is the beginning and end of life?

Or maybe we just do not know.


25 to 30 light years away there is another Earth like planet. So finding planets like earth is not that big of a pain, we already able to.


I thought earth was the only terrestrial planet? o.O


Nah, mars is a terrestrial planet, so is venus, and mercury too, basically any planet that is not a gas giant (juipter, saturn, and further) is a rocky planet. there are other rocky planets all over the universe and in our galaxy, and some of them have life on em too, earth isn't the only planet with life.


Really? I always thought that Mar is the only other terrestrial plant considering that Venus is too hot to to inhabit or that Mercury is too close to the sun(Though some scientists proposed that man can land safely on the far side of Mercury)


No mars is not the only terrestrial planet, if its solid and made of rock its a terrestrial planet, you live on one.


Oh. I was thinking of the word "hospitable." Mars is the only other hospitable planet besides Earth in our Solar System(Assuming that the scientists theory on only exploring the dark side of Mercury doesn't work). So my mistake. haha,

Random question: Do you think the moon landings were faked by NASA?


mars isn't human hospitable, it doesn't have liquid water or oxygen, humans need both of those.


We can have closed dome buildings, Air can be created in air factory. We can live in a dome! You don't think that would work? Because we have the tech needed to do that already.



Water ? Electricity ? And human breathable air isn't that easy to create, you'd have to chemically make all the gasses that make up air, which i believe is over 14 different gasses, mix them and release them into the bio-dome. and you'd have to have a recycler to convert the C02 breathed out by people back into 02 people need to breathe in. I guess electricity could be nuclear and solar, but wheres the water gonna come from ?



SO you don't think people can't bring plants to mars with them, in a closed dome. SOmething like a park could be built with millions of trees, water? Mars has water, most of its water is located under ground but it does have water.
'Building a mining base, would be one of the first jobs on mars, other than the researchers that is. '


Mars's water is frozen tho. I don't think plants can absorb ice.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.