First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
Solution to End all World Wars
490 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 4/20/09 , edited 4/20/09
Gender solution for end all war

the topic starter disregarded many things think a minute and ask your self what was the start of the war, the psychology of the leader is he ambitious, weak minded, simple minded, want glory, what kind of person is he, the environment he live in, what time it was the norms, the needs and the wants, the people that live in that country how’s the literacy rate, are they govern by tradition or region. What is there belief?

In the past a women has little freedom and men govern them (please don’t get angry at me I’m just stating the facts) but now it is different they have equal rights even though you replace all leaders with women it will not change a thing because they are still human in my country the president is a woman (from the Philippines) almost everyone hates they wanted to impeach her many times already, from the poor to the rich people hey hated her students rally the streets even soldiers cou-de- ta(is my spelling correct) still she wont go down in my countries history she is the most corrupt. That was an example that even though that a women is a leader of a country it will not change the fact that she is still a human they feel supreme bliss in others happiness they feel supreme bliss in others unhappiness this is what the so called humans are they only think of themselves


A person is smart can accept but people are dumb it is said before being born humans are already evil/sinned and on but he/she has embodiment of evil but human become good or evil though learning a certain scripture mentions that humans are superior beings to angels why because there are people who know of evil but do not become evil its different of angels who only know of good since birth have evil, but can live as good so they are superior to angels who only know of good at the same time there are rare moments of goodwill shown by evil men. There are bad intentions shown on a whim by saints. That’s the contradiction the coexistence of good and evil living is a crime by itself and there are punishment because we are alive good exist with life and evil exist in life therefore one cannot inquire about being evil one who has not yet born

Knowing pain means understanding others people pains there are many people that say this but nobody would go ahead and experience that pain it’s only natural to run away from pain they say you cant be a good person by experiencing only happiness. People know that. Ye they don’t want anything bad happening to them ad wish for their happiness to continue. Isn’t that what normal people wish for? I’ve had many misfortunes already so I can wish for happiness form now on right? But what kind of happiness can I obtain now happiness is limited there are people that say people can become happier the more misfortune they experincethosepeople are irresponsible an excuses from the weak can sound like a sound of argument in many different ways but the fact that people or trying to make a lot of sound argument must mean there are more weak people than strong ones can people views change so much when their standpoint is different have you grown up to notice such things? Or are you wanting to join the weak and thinks that way

WORDS DO NOT TIE ONESELF BUT THEY TIE DOWN OTHERS.


because we are humans we are imperfect

the best solution is to wipe us all out and become extinct
kill all word war III

nuke the north pole and Antarctica melt the ice flood us all to death nuke the moon and make tsunamis
____________________________________________________________________________________________

How to rule the world for dummies

1) destroy all communications
2) destroy all fuel supply
3) destroy all transportation
4) destroy all food supply
5) destroy the hope of people
cant think any more some one add some more!!1

1404 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / in a house
Offline
Posted 5/20/09
Wars will never end because they think they are gods.
1220 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Canada
Offline
Posted 5/20/09
That is the dumbest thing I have ever read. As if women are incapable of malice.

Good grief this topic is so stupid I won't even go into further detail to refute this.
3066 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
76 / M
Offline
Posted 5/20/09 , edited 5/20/09

LemonyPanda wrote:

Im studying the Cold War right now in history so I studied WWII recently. One thing I noticed was that during this time, all of the world's leaders were male. I mean seriously though, what is world politics? It simply comes down to just a handful of people. People are ruled by their emotions. Do you get where I'm going with this? Males tend to be more dominant, more agressive, and more prone to killing. On top of that, they are more proud. Look at the cause of WWII. Germany, a proud country was embrassd by the treaty of versailles allowing a dictator like Hitler to rise up. Hitler wanting dominance and pride for his country started another world war. Same with Japan, Japan with hirohito as their emperor wanted pride for their country, they showed lots of agression especially in the eastern part of he world. Now America isnt completely at fault either. After they dropped the atomic bomb, America should have stopped its production, not try to make a world monopoly of atomic bombs. A woman in power would be like this bomb is too dangerous we should not make these ever again (they would have never made it in the first place) Then that whole arms race would never have started and there would never be a cold war.

So what's the solution? replace all world leaders with women. Isnt it time you let a woman have some rights anyway? How long is the world going to allow men to rule and plunge the earth into chaos and war?

highly doubt this would ever happen but its interesting to think about it

EDIT: ok so female leaders acted violent in certain times. But you have to remember, most of the other leaders were male as well, and on top of that they had lead a country that had most of its past leaders as males, so they had to in a way carry on the tradition of agressiveness.


and someone mentioned hillary clinton. Yeah, she never got to be president did she? Just got to be one of the cabinet members.


Based on your previous stupid posts based off of a K-12 education, I'd be confident to say this is not a troll.

Let me break this down in a couple of pointers:
1. You're dumb. Stop trying to analyze things with a mere high school text book education.
2. Opinions are only valid if you are properly educated, despite the "free speech" rhetoric.
3. You can't, and shouldn't, create an opinion with limited hindsight of only patriarchal societies.
4. You're dumb.
2048 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / California
Offline
Posted 5/20/09
human extinction
13258 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / O.C. So.Cal
Offline
Posted 5/20/09

makix wrote:


LemonyPanda wrote:

Im studying the Cold War right now in history so I studied WWII recently. One thing I noticed was that during this time, all of the world's leaders were male. I mean seriously though, what is world politics? It simply comes down to just a handful of people. People are ruled by their emotions. Do you get where I'm going with this? Males tend to be more dominant, more agressive, and more prone to killing. On top of that, they are more proud. Look at the cause of WWII. Germany, a proud country was embrassd by the treaty of versailles allowing a dictator like Hitler to rise up. Hitler wanting dominance and pride for his country started another world war. Same with Japan, Japan with hirohito as their emperor wanted pride for their country, they showed lots of agression especially in the eastern part of he world. Now America isnt completely at fault either. After they dropped the atomic bomb, America should have stopped its production, not try to make a world monopoly of atomic bombs. A woman in power would be like this bomb is too dangerous we should not make these ever again (they would have never made it in the first place) Then that whole arms race would never have started and there would never be a cold war.

So what's the solution? replace all world leaders with women. Isnt it time you let a woman have some rights anyway? How long is the world going to allow men to rule and plunge the earth into chaos and war?

highly doubt this would ever happen but its interesting to think about it

EDIT: ok so female leaders acted violent in certain times. But you have to remember, most of the other leaders were male as well, and on top of that they had lead a country that had most of its past leaders as males, so they had to in a way carry on the tradition of agressiveness.


and someone mentioned hillary clinton. Yeah, she never got to be president did she? Just got to be one of the cabinet members.


Based on your previous stupid posts based off of a K-12 education, I'd be confident to say this is not a troll.

Let me break this down in a couple of pointers:
1. You're dumb. Stop trying to analyze things with a mere high school text book education.
2. Opinions are only valid if you are properly educated, despite the "free speech" rhetoric.
3. You can't, and shouldn't, create an opinion with limited hindsight of only patriarchal societies.
4. You're dumb.


why thank you you just totally convinced me that im wrong *sarcasm*
4557 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Bermuda Triangle
Offline
Posted 5/20/09
The UN, least that's what it's supposed to do.
3066 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
76 / M
Offline
Posted 5/20/09 , edited 5/20/09


why thank you you just totally convinced me that im wrong *sarcasm*


BTW, acting retarded on the internet is one thing, but may I suggest that you hold your opinions from other public institutions and spheres.
I'm suggesting this to you for your own good.


EDIT: Have you heard of Queen Elizabeth I of England?
65319 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
32 / M / Atlanta, GA
Offline
Posted 5/20/09 , edited 5/21/09
It's kind of funny that this thread opened the way it did. The solution was ridiculous. Still, it presents all of us with an opportunity to ask an important question.

Why are there wars? Why do people fight at all?

For example, you don't know me. You know nothing about me. So what if I bumped into you on the bus? Would you be mad? What if I spit on you for no reason (or because I thought it was funny)? Would you be pissed then? Some people would probably hit me at that point. People are pretty likely to fight when they feel like they've been insulted or affronted. At the same time, a lot of people are just jerks. For most of us, it's a mixture of both of these things that'll cause us to fight.

I think wars are started for the same reason. We have a really hard time getting along with each other. Hell, we need laws which say "if you fight with each other, you will be punished" to make society work. We need a great power to ensure stability in our societies. But there's no greater power to enforce rules between sovereign nations. Just the idea that we should remain "civil" and work together like with the UN. It's interesting how that's working out.

On a more positive note, at least we still have globalization to look forward to. Maybe we can finally get along with each other when the world is truly integrated (and communication occurs between more people than just a few powerful people).
16 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
33 / M
Offline
Posted 5/20/09
how to end all World War, well we only got 2, in 100 years, and thx to nuclear weapon today a world war is kinda low risk to happen, and second war has change, mostly because technology and thinking, a war today (real war between 2 country) last 9 day... About a nuclear war, if happen, well you got a couple of hour to live. about UN it look good (in the front) but it is pretty useless. UN never stop a war, or reduce it, still control by a few, not all country. (UN = Allied Nation). Humanity will all time at war, or prepare to it. This is how humans is and will still be for a long way.
13258 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / O.C. So.Cal
Offline
Posted 5/21/09

makix wrote:



why thank you you just totally convinced me that im wrong *sarcasm*


BTW, acting retarded on the internet is one thing, but may I suggest that you hold your opinions from other public institutions and spheres.
I'm suggesting this to you for your own good.


EDIT: Have you heard of Queen Elizabeth I of England?


I'm talking about normal women, not women of royalty. Thas 300 years ago where people were more prone to killing (and btw even Queen Elizabeth knew there was pointless fighting over catholics and protestants, which was why she created the church of england, to stop further massacres of innocent people) . I'm talking about common motherly woman, with at least a decent education. How many women like that do you know would mercilessly send thousands of troops and billions of dollars on a war that has no end? (this is why LBJ is one of my favorite presidents, he was the only modern president willing to help out for the civil rights with full support and even though he couldn't do much about the vietnam war he felt so guilty sending troops he went to a church every night in private and he refused to go for his second term) We need presidents that shows their humane side, one that would be willing to discuss these world politics with a cup of tea. Negotiating without direct contact just creates more hostility on both sides and by that simple fact alone, thousands of lives and billions of dollars are wasted.
Posted 5/21/09
Leaders don't have to be male or female. The fate of our world depends on WHO is leading us. Gender doesn't matter.
18691 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Singapore
Offline
Posted 5/21/09
Both men and women are capable of vices.Are you sure that by having female leaders war won't break out?Is everlasting peace assured because of this shift?

As long as we exist,we will compete,disagree and succumb to the lust for power.Humanity's will is far from being united,with the current state of the world.But of course that does not mean all humans should be exterminated.If we were to become extinct,what is the point of acheiving this peace?
3066 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
76 / M
Offline
Posted 5/21/09 , edited 5/21/09

LemonyPanda wrote:


makix wrote:



why thank you you just totally convinced me that im wrong *sarcasm*


BTW, acting retarded on the internet is one thing, but may I suggest that you hold your opinions from other public institutions and spheres.
I'm suggesting this to you for your own good.


EDIT: Have you heard of Queen Elizabeth I of England?


I'm talking about normal women, not women of royalty. Thas 300 years ago where people were more prone to killing (and btw even Queen Elizabeth knew there was pointless fighting over catholics and protestants, which was why she created the church of england, to stop further massacres of innocent people) . I'm talking about common motherly woman, with at least a decent education. How many women like that do you know would mercilessly send thousands of troops and billions of dollars on a war that has no end? (this is why LBJ is one of my favorite presidents, he was the only modern president willing to help out for the civil rights with full support and even though he couldn't do much about the vietnam war he felt so guilty sending troops he went to a church every night in private and he refused to go for his second term) We need presidents that shows their humane side, one that would be willing to discuss these world politics with a cup of tea. Negotiating without direct contact just creates more hostility on both sides and by that simple fact alone, thousands of lives and billions of dollars are wasted.


A leader being an un-militaristic leader has very little to do with gender; it has all to do with the society and the consistent foreign policy that a nation upholds.
38425 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / Maui
Offline
Posted 5/21/09
wow....i really dunno what to say. i thought that i come up with dumb threads but this guy is on another level. atleast i know my place. this guy thinks he's a genius or something. i think i just became dumber by reading the first post.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.