First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
The United Nation’s Bias Against Israel
20924 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Singapore
Offline
Posted 8/8/09
I would be surprised if the UN is labeled as anti-semite by ADL
4053 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Yo Mommas House
Offline
Posted 8/8/09

azera wrote:

I would be surprised if the UN is labeled as anti-semite by ADL


Well you know Israel believes waves of anti-semtism is spreading for some odd reason while ignoring their treatment to the Palestinians.
10452 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M
Offline
Posted 8/8/09 , edited 8/8/09

drizza wrote:


azera wrote:

I would be surprised if the UN is labeled as anti-semite by ADL


Well you know Israel believes waves of anti-semtism is spreading for some odd reason while ignoring their treatment to the Palestinians.


Waves of anti-Semitism are spreading, and acknowledging this has nothing to do with Palestine. Keeping the Palestinians as the focus of the conversation is a good tool to distract people from the bias against Israel and the Jews, but just a tool none the less. Rather than focusing on something that has nothing to do with the topic, perhaps you should address the issue at hand and stop dodging to grounds that fit your perspective.

Nobody's talking about the Israel Palestine conflict. That's not what this topic is about. If you want to dwell on that, find one of the fifty topics about that. If you want to be a part of THIS discussion, discuss the topic. because right now your just driving us off topic, which you yourself were mentioning in a negative air not that long ago.
4053 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Yo Mommas House
Offline
Posted 8/8/09 , edited 8/8/09

SeraphAlford wrote:


drizza wrote:


azera wrote:

I would be surprised if the UN is labeled as anti-semite by ADL


Well you know Israel believes waves of anti-semtism is spreading for some odd reason while ignoring their treatment to the Palestinians.


Waves of anti-Semitism are spreading, and acknowledging this has nothing to do with Palestine. Keeping the Palestinians as the focus of the conversation is a good tool to distract people from the bias against Israel and the Jews, but just a tool none the less. Rather than focusing on something that has nothing to do with the topic, perhaps you should address the issue at hand and stop dodging to grounds that fit your perspective.

Nobody's talking about the Israel Palestine conflict. That's not what this topic is about. If you want to dwell on that, find one of the fifty topics about that. If you want to be a part of THIS discussion, discuss the topic. because right now your just driving us off topic, which you yourself were mentioning in a negative air not that long ago.


All I am doing is just responding to others who went off topic whose statements I believe with in short.
636 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Andromeda
Offline
Posted 8/9/09 , edited 8/9/09

SeraphAlford wrote:


Real_ZERO If Israel isn't an innocent state, how would the condemnation of her be a bias? your wonder is why there's always a concern of UN for the situations in Israel/Palestine? in other words, Why does UN focus on Israel? This would be a legitimate question, if there's any other country was established like the way Israel been, I'll have to agree with you that there's a bias against her.


This would be a legitimate question if there’s any other country that has been established the way that Israel has? Zero, what are you talking about? Did you read my post? There have been plenty of nations formed the exact same way as Israel. So, the question is legitimate by your own standard.


Now then, condemning Israel on equal grounds is not a bias. However, the United Nations condemns Israel to a greater degree (read opening post,) for lesser sins. Fostering bomb manufacturing facilities used to attack Israel in Palestinian refugee camps and then condemning Israel for raiding the camps is certainly bias…

Instead of trying to discredit the post, how about you try an honest approach and simply adress the content?

No, I'm not trying to discredit your post, I'm taking it seriously, more I was one of the first readers of your topic, but as you said the UN condemning Israel many times but tell me what actions have been taken till now? almost nothing.

Right, most of what you mentioned in the opening post are all crimes against humanity, need the justice to take its course for the victims, but still no country/state was formed and has devolved on the Israeli manner, also the conflict there is ongoing, hence I think Israel not comparable, the situation in all its dimensions has no alike on the face of the planet, todays.


The other issue is since the establishment of Israel the government is facing allegations of war crimes in Palestine and Lebanon but what the UN has done against Israel so far? passes resolutions, condemns or deplores, no action, no trials for any Israel leader such as Ariel Sharon whom been indicted on war crimes unlike what happened to Milošević or Karadzic - even though it was too late.
Moreover, Israel continues to violate international humanitarian law and human rights law , hasn't fulfilled its obligations, for example; What Israel has done with Resolution 194? Israel accepted it but never implemented despite its reaffirmation by the UN on many occasions, Israel is doing the opposites now in Jerusalem. Many of the UN resolutions were not fulfilled by Israel. However, no steps have been taken by the UN, no sanctions against Israel unlike sanctions against former Yugoslavia.


What about Israel, developing her nuclear weapons, yet the UN has no problem with that, while the sanctions are imposed against Iran. I wonder, where's the UN's bias against Israel?

I'm not here to defend the UN. I already said it is a joke; shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted. About saying this topic is a joke too, I apologise if that disappoints you, but when I read some Israelis write about the UN's bias, in the same manner you wrote I find it's funny because when a criminal who accused of crime replay to the prosecutor: "so-and-so's did such and such crimes too", he actually admitted his crime.
4053 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Yo Mommas House
Offline
Posted 8/9/09 , edited 8/9/09

Real_ZERO wrote:


SeraphAlford wrote:


Real_ZERO If Israel isn't an innocent state, how would the condemnation of her be a bias? your wonder is why there's always a concern of UN for the situations in Israel/Palestine? in other words, Why does UN focus on Israel? This would be a legitimate question, if there's any other country was established like the way Israel been, I'll have to agree with you that there's a bias against her.


This would be a legitimate question if there’s any other country that has been established the way that Israel has? Zero, what are you talking about? Did you read my post? There have been plenty of nations formed the exact same way as Israel. So, the question is legitimate by your own standard.


Now then, condemning Israel on equal grounds is not a bias. However, the United Nations condemns Israel to a greater degree (read opening post,) for lesser sins. Fostering bomb manufacturing facilities used to attack Israel in Palestinian refugee camps and then condemning Israel for raiding the camps is certainly bias…

Instead of trying to discredit the post, how about you try an honest approach and simply adress the content?

No, I'm not trying to discredit your post, I'm taking it seriously, more I was one of the first readers of your topic, but as you said the UN condemning Israel many times but tell me what actions have been taken till now? almost nothing.

Right, most of you mentioned in opening post are all crimes against humanity, all need the justice to take its course for the victims, but still no country/state was formed and has devolved on the Israeli manner, also the conflict there is ongoing, hence I think Israel not comparable, the situation in all its dimensions has no alike on the face of the planet, todays.


The other issue is since the establishment of Israel the government is facing allegations of war crimes in Palestine and Lebanon but what the UN has done against Israel so far? passes resolutions, condemns or deplores, no action, no trials for any Israel leader such as Ariel Sharon whom been indicted on war crimes unlike what happened to Milošević or Karadzic - even though it was too late.
Moreover, Israel continues to violate international humanitarian law and human rights law , hasn't fulfilled its obligations, for example; What Israel has done with Resolution 194? Israel accepted it but never implemented despite its reaffirmation by the UN on many occasions, Israel is doing the opposites now in Jerusalem. Many of the UN resolutions were not fulfilled by Israel. However, no steps have been taken by the UN, no sanctions against Israel unlike sanctions against former Yugoslavia, or Sudan.


What about Israel, developing her nuclear weapons, yet the UN has no problem with that, while the sanctions are imposed against Iran. I wonder, where's the UN's bias against Israel?

I'm not here to defend the UN. I already said it is a joke; shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted. About saying this topic is a joke too, I apologise if that disappoints you, but when I read some Israelis write about the UN's bias, in the same manner you wrote I find it's funny because when a criminal who accused of crime replay to the prosecutor: "so-and-so's did such and such crimes too", he actually admitted his crime.


Thats exactly how I feel about topics like these. You hit the nail on the head on many of what you posted. Everyone just being bias against Israel because they are jews blah blah blah but we simply ignore all the crimes done by Israel left unpunished and many other things. This is why I didn't take this topic seriously and saw it nothing more of as a joke. In this country the only way to defend Israel war crimes is massive propaganda in support of Israel and sympathy for them because of the holocaust. Zionist jews are the only people in the world who try to drag this holocaust incident for so long. They are the only ones crying about a second holocaust coming or some leader forming to kill all jews which hasnt been the case since hitler. Now they trying to say Iran president is the new hitler when he hasnt put any jew in any camp or killing them in his country. In fact there are jews living in his country so how long must Israel keep up with this sympathy game? I can see on this thread and many other forums it is failing the more and more war crimes they commit the more people will finally open their eyes and see that country as the true criminals they really are.
First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.