First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
America is Going to Bomb the Moon
Posted 10/9/09

Akisame-sama wrote:

Reminds me of that old show movie thing, where the moon is in pieces. And if they actually did this, they do realize the serious repercussions that will occur, right?


you are referring to the time machine
17488 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
17 / F / Los Angeles
Offline
Posted 10/9/09
I am angry that they spend billions of dollars on this.. but then again it's NASA what do you expect??
17894 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
34 / M / Small Wooded town...
Offline
Posted 10/9/09

shirayukiIce wrote:

I am angry that they spend billions of dollars on this.. but then again it's NASA what do you expect??


NASA budget is less than it use to be.

Anyhow Spreading out seeking new mineral deposits is very important. The amount of money this project could save us a lot of money, and bring i a lot of money from new sources of resources. But then your not looking at the big picture, your just looking at saving a pennies, that could have been used to invest in your future and well being. What for if we do not invest in NASA where will are money go?

We already spend more money on are military than the rest of the world put together. Plus we allow are government to over spend on things for them selves and not for the people. Yet you wanna cut NASA small budget, wen NASA is needed for a future well being! YOUR NUTS!
17488 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
17 / F / Los Angeles
Offline
Posted 10/9/09

Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


shirayukiIce wrote:

I am angry that they spend billions of dollars on this.. but then again it's NASA what do you expect??


NASA budget is less than it use to be.

Anyhow Spreading out seeking new mineral deposits is very important. The amount of money this project could save us a lot of money, and bring i a lot of money from new sources of resources. But then your not looking at the big picture, your just looking at saving a pennies, that could have been used to invest in your future and well being. What for if we do not invest in NASA where will are money go?

We already spend more money on are military than the rest of the world put together. Plus we allow are government to over spend on things for them selves and not for the people. Yet you wanna cut NASA small budget, wen NASA is needed for a future well being! YOUR NUTS!


I'm not trying to cut NASA short I'm just saying at this state of time it's not the best time to spend that kind of money.
17894 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
34 / M / Small Wooded town...
Offline
Posted 10/9/09 , edited 10/9/09

shirayukiIce wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


shirayukiIce wrote:

I am angry that they spend billions of dollars on this.. but then again it's NASA what do you expect??


NASA budget is less than it use to be.

Anyhow Spreading out seeking new mineral deposits is very important. The amount of money this project could save us a lot of money, and bring i a lot of money from new sources of resources. But then your not looking at the big picture, your just looking at saving a pennies, that could have been used to invest in your future and well being. What for if we do not invest in NASA where will are money go?

We already spend more money on are military than the rest of the world put together. Plus we allow are government to over spend on things for them selves and not for the people. Yet you wanna cut NASA small budget, wen NASA is needed for a future well being! YOUR NUTS!


I'm not trying to cut NASA short I'm just saying at this state of time it's not the best time to spend that kind of money.


Then we should cut the military budget in half, doing that alone we be able to pay back are debts to china and the rest of the world.

We should invest into things for are future like NASA. Wile eliminating things we are over spending on like the Drug war, that we spend 100 times more on then NASA yet we get nothing good from it.
17488 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
17 / F / Los Angeles
Offline
Posted 10/9/09

If we do that then the military might be outraged, have to send some back, and mabey to lack of money and supplies thaey would have to bring them all back.
They might even throw the bucket... you like Rome..

17894 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
34 / M / Small Wooded town...
Offline
Posted 10/9/09

shirayukiIce wrote:


If we do that then the military might be outraged, have to send some back, and mabey to lack of money and supplies thaey would have to bring them all back.
They might even throw the bucket... you like Rome..


'Rome failed and was torn apart do to spreading out to wide a lot like America is doing know. It would be a good thing for America to pull back and regroup. concentrate there troupes in places instead of spreading them selves out thin. It does not take a Military master mind to see how America is weakening there forces by spreading them selves out so thinly. No matter how much money and tech your invest into your army, if there spread out to thin to be any help to them selves.
1178 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M / Everywhere
Offline
Posted 10/9/09

CecilTheDarkKnight_234 wrote:


Akisame-sama wrote:

Reminds me of that old show movie thing, where the moon is in pieces. And if they actually did this, they do realize the serious repercussions that will occur, right?


you are referring to the time machine


No, it was some really horrible ABC family show. Moon was in three pieces for some reason.
17488 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
17 / F / Los Angeles
Offline
Posted 10/9/09

Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


shirayukiIce wrote:


If we do that then the military might be outraged, have to send some back, and mabey to lack of money and supplies thaey would have to bring them all back.
They might even throw the bucket... you like Rome..


'Rome failed and was torn apart do to spreading out to wide a lot like America is doing know. It would be a good thing for America to pull back and regroup. concentrate there troupes in places instead of spreading them selves out thin. It does not take a Military master mind to see how America is weakening there forces by spreading them selves out so thinly. No matter how much money and tech your invest into your army, if there spread out to thin to be any help to them selves.

Well that is true but still.. if they take them out the enemy country is most likely to attack.. and how did we get off the subject??

Posted 10/9/09

Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


shirayukiIce wrote:


If we do that then the military might be outraged, have to send some back, and mabey to lack of money and supplies thaey would have to bring them all back.
They might even throw the bucket... you like Rome..


'Rome failed and was torn apart do to spreading out to wide a lot like America is doing know. It would be a good thing for America to pull back and regroup. concentrate there troupes in places instead of spreading them selves out thin. It does not take a Military master mind to see how America is weakening there forces by spreading them selves out so thinly. No matter how much money and tech your invest into your army, if there spread out to thin to be any help to them selves.


to be honest i hope amercia does fall and we do get what we deserve for being the "liberators and saviors of the world" etc
17894 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
34 / M / Small Wooded town...
Offline
Posted 10/9/09

shirayukiIce wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


shirayukiIce wrote:


If we do that then the military might be outraged, have to send some back, and mabey to lack of money and supplies thaey would have to bring them all back.
They might even throw the bucket... you like Rome..


'Rome failed and was torn apart do to spreading out to wide a lot like America is doing know. It would be a good thing for America to pull back and regroup. concentrate there troupes in places instead of spreading them selves out thin. It does not take a Military master mind to see how America is weakening there forces by spreading them selves out so thinly. No matter how much money and tech your invest into your army, if there spread out to thin to be any help to them selves.

Well that is true but still.. if they take them out the enemy country is most likely to attack.. and how did we get off the subject??



SO your saying that the world is are enemy? By consecrating troupes where there needed at times, we are able to do far more and keep damage to are own side to a minimum. What would you fear more, a single snarling dog? Or a huge Pack of snarling Dogs. What one do you think have less chance of being hurt by what it is hunting? Why do you think Wolfs hunt in packs. Its safer and they can do more.

'us moving are armies out of places there not needed and place them where they can be of more help. Defending are country, or for a show of great force where there needed in a hostile area. Instead we have small groups being over whelmed by people with stone aged weapons compared to the Americans yet being over whelm non the less do to lack of the needed numbers.


5229 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Mammago Garage, Y...
Offline
Posted 10/10/09 , edited 10/10/09

Real_ZERO wrote:

If they found water, water pipelines would be extended from the moon to Africa's poor, let's be more patient!




The moon is not stationary, so building pipes connecting it to the Earth is impossible because it is always moving. Even if we attempted that, all of that added mass would no doubt seriously affect it's orbit and may even cause it to slow down enough to crash into the Earth. Even if we didn't have to worry about that, building a pipe from the Earth to the moon would be so insanely expensive that it would make much more sense to simply use all of that money to filter the sea water and polluted water and distribute that to not only Africa, but the entire world. There's so much water here that there's no need to bring any down from the moon, especially since we have no idea what is in the water on the moon, so it could be even more toxic than the dirty water that many people unfortunately have to live with today.

Finding water on the moon will not directly affect anyone on Earth.


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:

Anyhow Spreading out seeking new mineral deposits is very important. The amount of money this project could save us a lot of money, and bring i a lot of money from new sources of resources. But then your not looking at the big picture, your just looking at saving a pennies, that could have been used to invest in your future and well being.


You're not looking at the entire picture either. Do you realize we'd be creating a whole new world of issues by excavating the moon? I realize that there may be beneficial resources on there, but the main problem is, who owns those resources? Who owns the moon? What gives anyone any right to own the moon? This issue would no doubt cause many more wars, perhaps even another world war, since the moon arguably belongs to the entire world (it is in everyone's territory at some point in the day), and if one or a few nations decided to start exploiting it, then they'd technically be invading everyone's land. Then because we're violent and greedy we'd waste even more money developing weapons that can be used on the moon and training soldiers to fight on the moon, so all of that money earned from the moon's resources will just go to waste and create more problems than it solves (which is none).




What for if we do not invest in NASA where will are money go?


I'm all for supporting NASA, but I think that their projects should focus on benefiting people on Earth, whether it be something practical or simply pursuing knowledge about our universe. I don't think preparing to colonize the moon is going to benefit anyone, as I already explained earlier. It would be nice if all nations could cooperate and make use of the moon's resources together, but we know that won't happen.

If we stopped funding NASA (and I'm not saying we should), that money could go towards feeding and sheltering the millions of people who are suffering under our feet. But I know that since we're America that money would just go to the military.
636 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Andromeda
Offline
Posted 10/10/09

Cuddlebuns wrote:


Real_ZERO wrote:

If they found water, water pipelines would be extended from the moon to Africa's poor, let's be more patient!




The moon is not stationary, so building pipes connecting it to the Earth is impossible because it is always moving. Even if we attempted that, all of that added mass would no doubt seriously affect it's orbit and may even cause it to slow down enough to crash into the Earth. Even if we didn't have to worry about that, building a pipe from the Earth to the moon would be so insanely expensive that it would make much more sense to simply use all of that money to filter the sea water and polluted water and distribute that to not only Africa, but the entire world. There's so much water here that there's no need to bring any down from the moon, especially since we have no idea what is in the water on the moon, so it could be even more toxic than the dirty water that many people unfortunately have to live with today.

Finding water on the moon will not directly affect anyone on Earth.


What about pipeless like wireless? :P
Indeed, you are right. I was just being sarcastic.
5229 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Mammago Garage, Y...
Offline
Posted 10/10/09

Real_ZERO wrote:


Cuddlebuns wrote:


Real_ZERO wrote:

If they found water, water pipelines would be extended from the moon to Africa's poor, let's be more patient!




The moon is not stationary, so building pipes connecting it to the Earth is impossible because it is always moving. Even if we attempted that, all of that added mass would no doubt seriously affect it's orbit and may even cause it to slow down enough to crash into the Earth. Even if we didn't have to worry about that, building a pipe from the Earth to the moon would be so insanely expensive that it would make much more sense to simply use all of that money to filter the sea water and polluted water and distribute that to not only Africa, but the entire world. There's so much water here that there's no need to bring any down from the moon, especially since we have no idea what is in the water on the moon, so it could be even more toxic than the dirty water that many people unfortunately have to live with today.

Finding water on the moon will not directly affect anyone on Earth.


What about pipeless like wireless? :P
Indeed, you are right. I was just being sarcastic.


Well that's a relief. I had lost a little bit more faith in humanity after reading that, but I guess it's back now.
17488 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
17 / F / Los Angeles
Offline
Posted 10/10/09

Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


shirayukiIce wrote:


Darkphoenix3450 wrote:


shirayukiIce wrote:


If we do that then the military might be outraged, have to send some back, and mabey to lack of money and supplies thaey would have to bring them all back.
They might even throw the bucket... you like Rome..


'Rome failed and was torn apart do to spreading out to wide a lot like America is doing know. It would be a good thing for America to pull back and regroup. concentrate there troupes in places instead of spreading them selves out thin. It does not take a Military master mind to see how America is weakening there forces by spreading them selves out so thinly. No matter how much money and tech your invest into your army, if there spread out to thin to be any help to them selves.

Well that is true but still.. if they take them out the enemy country is most likely to attack.. and how did we get off the subject??



SO your saying that the world is are enemy? By consecrating troupes where there needed at times, we are able to do far more and keep damage to are own side to a minimum. What would you fear more, a single snarling dog? Or a huge Pack of snarling Dogs. What one do you think have less chance of being hurt by what it is hunting? Why do you think Wolfs hunt in packs. Its safer and they can do more.

'us moving are armies out of places there not needed and place them where they can be of more help. Defending are country, or for a show of great force where there needed in a hostile area. Instead we have small groups being over whelmed by people with stone aged weapons compared to the Americans yet being over whelm non the less do to lack of the needed numbers.



Yes the world is in fact everyone's enemy, I don't get it when you start explaining that whole 'Wolf' thing but anyway.. when you said "'us moving are armies out of places there not needed and place them where they can be of more help." didn't I already say that that was bad to move the armies out??
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.