First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
Men as an afterthought?
Posted 1/1/08

jesusosorio wrote:


torerling wrote:


jesusosorio wrote:

She is right, our species only perseveres because of both genders live together in co-existence out of the will to survive . I can understand your way of thinking, "Who came first?" is interesting, but does it really matter. If a person thinks they are more important than someone else just because of gender they need a reality check.

? I'm a bit confused by what you said.

I'd even use occhams razor and just say of you think that you are more important than someone else you need a reality check ;)



to quote wikipedia (I know I am a lazy bastard :P)
Occam's razor (sometimes spelled Ockham's razor) is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham. The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. The principle is often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae ("law of parsimony" or "law of succinctness"): "entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem", or "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity".

This is often paraphrased as "All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best." In other words, when multiple competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood.

Originally a tenet of the reductionist philosophy of nominalism, it is more often taken today as a heuristic maxim (rule of thumb) that advises economy, parsimony, or simplicity, often or especially in scientific theories.
18587 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / F
Offline
Posted 1/1/08

projectcedric wrote:

Yea, I'd say that's probably the only reason why we have nipples


AND also, some women like to feel her man's nipples. I still can't imagine men without nipples.

About whether women came first or not, it's interesting to know because it's hard to imagine a woman was born from two monkeys and they this woman had sex with a male monkey and then they had a man. that's how i imagine how men were created
Posted 1/1/08

torerling wrote:


jesusosorio wrote:


torerling wrote:


jesusosorio wrote:

She is right, our species only perseveres because of both genders live together in co-existence out of the will to survive . I can understand your way of thinking, "Who came first?" is interesting, but does it really matter. If a person thinks they are more important than someone else just because of gender they need a reality check.

? I'm a bit confused by what you said.

I'd even use occhams razor and just say of you think that you are more important than someone else you need a reality check ;)



to quote wikipedia (I know I am a lazy bastard :P)
Occam's razor (sometimes spelled Ockham's razor) is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham. The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. The principle is often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae ("law of parsimony" or "law of succinctness"): "entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem", or "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity".

This is often paraphrased as "All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best." In other words, when multiple competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood.

Originally a tenet of the reductionist philosophy of nominalism, it is more often taken today as a heuristic maxim (rule of thumb) that advises economy, parsimony, or simplicity, often or especially in scientific theories.


Thanks for the knowledge, you taught me about something I never even existed.
Posted 1/1/08

jesusosorio wrote:
Thanks for the knowledge, you taught me about something I never even existed.


It was a pleasure heh

back to topic yeah nipples are good for foreplay
3229 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 1/1/08

FateT wrote:

I kinda always wondered if men were just an afterthought on the path of evolution. For instance, females seem to be techincally the ones that are self sufficient, they can reproduce, feed their young, and even fend for themselves since they have a similar body type t men. Also to note, that men were born with these useless nipples. They dont really do anything, nothing comes out of it, why is it there? I would much likely believe that man was first if for example something manly came out of our nipples, like Beer or Gatorade or even ammo( lets really hope not) . Another point to consider in this question is the clitoris, which is analogus to the penis, which came first? If i look at it from this view, it seems that women came first since the penis does nothing but is a DNA deilvery system, futher boosting the fact that women actually "really" come first.

Anyone else here thinks that women were the ones that really came first? Or do u believe in parallel evolution, such that we both man and woman evolved to what we are today at the same time?


Not really into equality are ya??
Posted 1/1/08

openmindedatheist wrote:


FateT wrote:

I kinda always wondered if men were just an afterthought on the path of evolution. For instance, females seem to be techincally the ones that are self sufficient, they can reproduce, feed their young, and even fend for themselves since they have a similar body type t men. Also to note, that men were born with these useless nipples. They dont really do anything, nothing comes out of it, why is it there? I would much likely believe that man was first if for example something manly came out of our nipples, like Beer or Gatorade or even ammo( lets really hope not) . Another point to consider in this question is the clitoris, which is analogus to the penis, which came first? If i look at it from this view, it seems that women came first since the penis does nothing but is a DNA deilvery system, futher boosting the fact that women actually "really" come first.

Anyone else here thinks that women were the ones that really came first? Or do u believe in parallel evolution, such that we both man and woman evolved to what we are today at the same time?


Not really into equality are ya??

Try to read the 4 other peoples post that already asked this and then his answers before posting your "unique" and smartypants post..
3229 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 1/1/08

torerling wrote:


openmindedatheist wrote:


FateT wrote:

I kinda always wondered if men were just an afterthought on the path of evolution. For instance, females seem to be techincally the ones that are self sufficient, they can reproduce, feed their young, and even fend for themselves since they have a similar body type t men. Also to note, that men were born with these useless nipples. They dont really do anything, nothing comes out of it, why is it there? I would much likely believe that man was first if for example something manly came out of our nipples, like Beer or Gatorade or even ammo( lets really hope not) . Another point to consider in this question is the clitoris, which is analogus to the penis, which came first? If i look at it from this view, it seems that women came first since the penis does nothing but is a DNA deilvery system, futher boosting the fact that women actually "really" come first.

Anyone else here thinks that women were the ones that really came first? Or do u believe in parallel evolution, such that we both man and woman evolved to what we are today at the same time?


Not really into equality are ya??

Try to read the 4 other peoples post that already asked this and then his answers before posting your "unique" and smartypants post..


Sorry man. I'm didn't read anything. "smartypants"??? How so?? > (Rhetorical).
688 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Northern Hemosphe...
Offline
Posted 1/1/08
i am a man for one but i like how this topic is it actually gets you to think
i guess you can say good things and bad things come out it
Its a question of how open minded you are yes men don't have organs to make milk come from nipples But i don't think the evolution chain can be dramatically changed to the point were women can Asexually reproduce so in a matter of speaking women cannot survive without men unless they did somekind of cloning process which i doubt anyone would try
190 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / F / Kentucky,
Offline
Posted 1/1/08
Women are superior because all evidence points that we came first apparently, now if only we had bullet shooting nipples... instead of just breasts.
Posted 1/1/08
which come first: egg or chicken?
4707 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / F / Philippines
Offline
Posted 1/1/08

joukaka wrote:

which come first: egg or chicken?


chicken.. cuz wen God created the world He does not mention the egg but animals in the 7 days of creation
949 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / Sweating it here...
Offline
Posted 1/1/08

HanaxSuki wrote:

Women are superior because all evidence points that we came first apparently, now if only we had bullet shooting nipples... instead of just breasts.


LOL, if that happens I just hope they start making bras out of Kevlar!
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.