First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
Moon Landing
2035 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 7/14/09

welook wrote:

The Moon landing, was it real? 2 sites listed about it. Each side of the argunment is listed under

Hoax:http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html

not hoax:http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/

Ive read both of these and still have some doubts though. What do you think?
please no flaming people.

EDIT: atleast read the articles before posting......


I think the NASA is putting up quite some effort to convince everyone that only the most stupid dumbasses doubt that they sent astronauts to the moon. --------->>>ufos-aliens<<<-----------

obvious staged act is just obvious. And you took the bait.
_________________________

You would have to be a totally stupid dumbass to actually believe the landing on the moon was real.



Just think about it! rofl
Posted 7/14/09
honestly, it doesnt matter to me either way
Posted 7/14/09 , edited 7/14/09
Anybody knows who started this hoax thing? Because living in post-commie country I doubt about everything. It was a huge race between USSR and USA back then so both of us were talking about this "they lie" bollocks. When two super-countries start such race it's hard to believe/not believe in anything. Maybe Gagarin wasn't first in space as well. Because of such shitty political things we ask ours if anything was true in history of XX century.
10694 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 7/14/09
the moon landing was real. we have moon rock samples to prove it. if you want to argue that then at least get a degree in geology before you start talking bullshit out of your ass. though i'm pretty sure you won't get anywhere because pretty much every geologist out there agrees on the fact that the moon rocks collected from the apollo missions are from the moon. also the idea of the moon landing being a hoax is an insult to all those that worked for a decade just so we could land on the moon first. one of john f. kennedy's goals was to land on the moon before the end of the 60's. the people at NASA worked their ass off to achieve that.
2035 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 7/14/09

azn099 wrote:

...get a degree in geology...

...talking bullshit...

...out of your ass...


I pity you.


azn099 wrote:

though i'm pretty sure you won't get anywhere because pretty much every geologist out there agrees on the fact that the moon rocks collected from the apollo missions are from the moon.


I kind of doubt that. They actually know pitbulls like you, who jump at their throat the moment they articulate any doubt. Also you don't need a maned lander to get some matter from the surface of the moon[try get a DEGREE in whatever you like]. ;-)


azn099 wrote:

also the idea of the moon landing being a hoax is an insult to all those that worked for a decade just so we could land on the moon first. one of john f. kennedy's goals was to land on the moon before the end of the 60's. the people at NASA worked their ass off to achieve that.


I'm sorry but I guess I have to tell you that they failed. Not one single man was ever on the surface of the moon and I don't care if they feel insulted.

[TRYING TO EVADE SHITSTORM: I'M NO COMMIE! I'M NO CREATIONIST! I'M NO RACIST! I'M NO NAZI! I'M NO MUSLIM! AND I'M QUITE EDUCATED! I'M ON MY WAY TO A SCIENCEDEGREE, BUT I CARE MORE ABOUT CHEMISTRY THAN GEOLOGY! ;-)]

Posted 7/14/09 , edited 7/14/09
HypnoSindba-d, man, you forgot to say you aren't anti-cozmic too though in your past life you burnt Bruno and about 100 of his followers who tried to proof such bullshit as gravity and Earth as sphere (stupid barbarians even didn't know we live on three ninja turtles and one elephant-man jeeez)
10694 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 7/14/09

sindba-d wrote:


azn099 wrote:

...get a degree in geology...

...talking bullshit...

...out of your ass...


I pity you.


azn099 wrote:

though i'm pretty sure you won't get anywhere because pretty much every geologist out there agrees on the fact that the moon rocks collected from the apollo missions are from the moon.


I kind of doubt that. They actually know pitbulls like you, who jump at their throat the moment they articulate any doubt. Also you don't need a maned lander to get some matter from the surface of the moon[try get a DEGREE in whatever you like]. ;-)


azn099 wrote:

also the idea of the moon landing being a hoax is an insult to all those that worked for a decade just so we could land on the moon first. one of john f. kennedy's goals was to land on the moon before the end of the 60's. the people at NASA worked their ass off to achieve that.


I'm sorry but I guess I have to tell you that they failed. Not one single man was ever on the surface of the moon and I don't care if they feel insulted.

[TRYING TO EVADE SHITSTORM: I'M NO COMMIE! I'M NO CREATIONIST! I'M NO RACIST! I'M NO NAZI! I'M NO MUSLIM! AND I'M QUITE EDUCATED! I'M ON MY WAY TO A SCIENCEDEGREE, BUT I CARE MORE ABOUT CHEMISTRY THAN GEOLOGY! ;-)]



not even antarctica has the 840 lbs of moon rocks collected during the apollo missions. don't give me all your bullshit.
Posted 7/14/09
I think it is real. That it is possible. That it did happen.
1232 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / F / cawifonia california
Offline
Posted 7/14/09
i believe it was filmed in a Hollywood studio. No jk lol, but it makes sense to say that it was fake, especially after watching the you tube videos about it being fake. and thats probably why they didnt show us the video at all in school.
2035 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 7/14/09

azn099 wrote:

not even antarctica has the 840 lbs of moon rocks collected during the apollo missions. don't give me all your bullshit.


The continent or was there a mission named antarctica!?!

Ever heard of something called unmanned probes? There was a popular one on Mars, just recently.

Who has had the chance to confirm the amount of matter possesed by NASA? I also heard all their original documents on the landing vanished miraculously. How come?
Posted 7/14/09




Who has had the chance to confirm the amount of matter possesed by NASA? I also heard all their original documents on the landing vanished miraculously. How come?


My dog ate em when I was in the Nasa museum
47831 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Massachusetts
Offline
Posted 7/14/09
I don't care about space. I'll never go there, and I'm too scared to.
10694 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 7/14/09
the continent antarctica is where the most moon meteorites have been found on earth.

the apollo missions were at the end of the 60's and beginning of the 70's. unmanned probes could not carry more than a pound or less of moon rocks at a time. even the luna program developed by russia which used unmaned probes only brought back a total of a few pounds of moon rocks. it would be impossible for unmanned probes to bring back over 800 pounds of moon rocks. only a human would be able to do that and over the course of several missions which is what the apollo program did.

most of the moon rocks are stored in the johnson space center.

i don't know why, and it doesn't matter. that doesn't change that we landed on the moon before.
2032 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / somewhere hiding
Offline
Posted 7/14/09 , edited 7/14/09
after watching the documentary years before and read the article in wikipedia... i wonder when you're on the moon.. is there any possibilities that you cannot spotted a single star in a place where there's no sky and atmosphere, even in daylight? it is acceptable that a camera used cant captured stars for low resolution-capturing problems...but for a astronaut to tell that there's no stars in moon...that wonders me a lot... great alibi though
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.