First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
Samurai vs. Viking: Who would win?
Posted 4/5/10 , edited 4/5/10

Why the arctic?
if you ask me your giving the vikings more advantage on winning
and you realize that Japanese armour is made of many small brass scales on a silk cloth backings NOT bamboo and It is designed to be as lightweight as possible as the samurai had many tasks including riding a horse and archery in addition to swordsmanship plus Silk clothing was worn under the armour as protection from arrows, trapping the barbs and making it easier for the samurai to pull it out

source from wikipedia
Posted 4/5/10
Vikings are brute force man I'd get scared if a bunch of them came running up a hill screaming with a variety of weapons...I'd be like "shit...too much armour...where can I strike?"

Then again a fully kitted-out samurai also almost impenetrable.

Tough call. Everyone seems to want to match up ancient warriors against the samurai, so what does that tell you?

62537 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / California
Offline
Posted 4/5/10
the samurai has the advantage in distance wise. He can prob kill the viking before he even close enough to throw his axe. Plus, samurai's has fought in cold snowy weather before.
Posted 4/5/10

Rina-San wrote:

Tough call. Everyone seems to want to match up ancient warriors against the samurai, so what does that tell you?



Nice one!
Posted 4/5/10

Moeberry wrote:


Rina-San wrote:

Tough call. Everyone seems to want to match up ancient warriors against the samurai, so what does that tell you?



Nice one!


hehe its true
Ghost Moderator
AHTL 
87723 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / Norway
Online
Posted 4/5/10
Samurai I guess.



Seeing as there are no proper Viking around nowadays.



Anyway, VS thread.
First  Prev  1  2  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.