Remove this ad
First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
What happened to the communist party outside Soviet Union
Posted 6/8/10


I think she meant to say is that we have the best "care" in the world but you better be damn sure to have insurance, I mean we have cured many diseases and made a lot of great health advances but we only care about money here. I have a lot going right now so I will not add anymore.
2319 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / M / where the grass i...
Offline
Posted 6/8/10

Aztecnology wrote:


TheAncientOne wrote:


Aztecnology wrote:

There are still some parts of Russia embracing communism. China is the only communist nation left on Earth.

I believe Cuba also qualifies.



Indeed, sir. Yet, we can mostly ignore them. Fidel is gone and no one else will match his insolence.


count in, north korea.
Posted 6/8/10

alupihan45 wrote:


Aztecnology wrote:


TheAncientOne wrote:


Aztecnology wrote:

There are still some parts of Russia embracing communism. China is the only communist nation left on Earth.

I believe Cuba also qualifies.



Indeed, sir. Yet, we can mostly ignore them. Fidel is gone and no one else will match his insolence.


count in, north korea.


Ah, yes. Without Kim in office over there, it's just another flash in the pan.
53796 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
51 / F / Atlanta GA
Offline
Posted 6/9/10
No I do not, I see so called poor get the best of care using Medicaid Not Medicare. If you get bad off and loose everything because of no insurance that that person own fault. Insurance law need to change but the government in many case will not let it happen. Each sate has it own regulation and the buddy system is in play. You can get rid of all the insurance companies and corruption will sky rocket politician what power and money not just money like insurance companies do having lost everything and rebuild is a part of life.
Posted 6/9/10

tarakelly wrote:

No I do not, I see so called poor get the best of care using Medicaid Not Medicare. If you get bad off and loose everything because of no insurance that that person own fault. Insurance law need to change but the government in many case will not let it happen. Each sate has it own regulation and the buddy system is in play. You can get rid of all the insurance companies and corruption will sky rocket politician what power and money not just money like insurance companies do having lost everything and rebuild is a part of life.


I don't want to hear you bullshit, we should have had health care system for people that are unemployed or people that can't afford even they fucking work. My uncle is going to die, you hear me die because he worked is his whole life but could never afford to get insurance, so when he had a stroke recently the found out that he had cancer and it is so far gone that there is nothing they do. It's just like saying sorry we only care if your rich or so forth, My uncle was always in good health until then but with out this shit he couldn't have known he had cancer for years. So yeah it's is fucking fault that he will die, no it's not his ifs the greed of this god damn countries fault.
1718 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
63 / M / Croatia
Offline
Posted 6/9/10
In most ex-communist countries the same people that were part of communist party just joined some other party with "social" prefix. Bunch of them turned the coats and became members of democratic party. But that is normal, since those people were only professional politicians, and what is more important, only experienced diplomats ex-communist countries had. So in most of the countries democracy only meant "more place for some new people and parties on political scene", for good or bad. And what is more important, most of the citizens in communist countries were members of a communist party, since com. party was more like huge movement with tons of ranks and branches, then party like you find in democratic systems. So when you are talking about "those people who were communists", you are talking about whole nations, not individuals.
53796 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
51 / F / Atlanta GA
Offline
Posted 6/9/10
One day you may grow up into the late 1930's heath was not expected by work's. Like I ripped this on off before Liberalism is a Mental disorder. Being liberal buy itself is not bad wanting other to pay you way well salt or slug bait may wok. If he went to any emergency room you even went to county clinic he could have gotten help. If it was prostrate cancer you can live twenty or more years with it found to late your dead. That has just been being pushed the Last 6 or so years and allot of men will not have it done. seeing people die of cancer sucks black lung friends stroking out. You can still see doctors and if you do not make it clear whats going on it will probably get missed. With O'bama care it almost a guaranty miss. he want to test of one thing at a time saying it will save money. This multiple test are cheaper in long run plus they may show a doctor that something is causing a problem. doing one test at a time would make more job cost increase. Got any bright ideals to correct this. as you get older you may understand even when somebody ill they wont see a doctor until it to late. Talk to some people in there sixties I bet they will back up what I am saying. Sorry about your uncle you have my condolence.
Posted 6/9/10

tarakelly wrote:

One day you may grow up into the late 1930's heath was not expected by work's. Like I ripped this on off before Liberalism is a Mental disorder. Being liberal buy itself is not bad wanting other to pay you way well salt or slug bait may wok. If he went to any emergency room you even went to county clinic he could have gotten help. If it was prostrate cancer you can live twenty or more years with it found to late your dead. That has just been being pushed the Last 6 or so years and allot of men will not have it done. seeing people die of cancer sucks black lung friends stroking out. You can still see doctors and if you do not make it clear whats going on it will probably get missed. With O'bama care it almost a guaranty miss. he want to test of one thing at a time saying it will save money. This multiple test are cheaper in long run plus they may show a doctor that something is causing a problem. doing one test at a time would make more job cost increase. Got any bright ideals to correct this. as you get older you may understand even when somebody ill they wont see a doctor until it to late. Talk to some people in there sixties I bet they will back up what I am saying. Sorry about your uncle you have my condolence.


sigh i am sorry I took it out on you i am just going through a hard time right now... even the hospital doesn't care me about right now. My uncle couldn't do anything about it since well of child support and all he would clear each week would be 67 bucks even though he worked 40 hours a week. I feel like there is nothing I could have done to help. Also I think we should have a Japanese health plan where we pay for 30% of the bill and the government/taxpayers pick up the rest. this way at least money is going into the system but well I am not sure i am just a follower not a leader. The kind of cancer he has is stomach cancer, in which he really didn't have way of knowing, again I am sorry for biting your head off. He only found out that he had cancer because of the stroke he had.
1288 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
A small place in...
Offline
Posted 6/9/10

tarakelly wrote:

One day you may grow up into the late 1930's heath was not expected by work's. Like I ripped this on off before Liberalism is a Mental disorder. Being liberal buy itself is not bad wanting other to pay you way well salt or slug bait may wok. If he went to any emergency room you even went to county clinic he could have gotten help. If it was prostrate cancer you can live twenty or more years with it found to late your dead. That has just been being pushed the Last 6 or so years and allot of men will not have it done. seeing people die of cancer sucks black lung friends stroking out. You can still see doctors and if you do not make it clear whats going on it will probably get missed. With O'bama care it almost a guaranty miss. he want to test of one thing at a time saying it will save money. This multiple test are cheaper in long run plus they may show a doctor that something is causing a problem. doing one test at a time would make more job cost increase. Got any bright ideals to correct this. as you get older you may understand even when somebody ill they wont see a doctor until it to late. Talk to some people in there sixties I bet they will back up what I am saying. Sorry about your uncle you have my condolence.


Some of the things you say Tarakelly doesn't make any sense or contradict everything else you say.

You once said that government run health care or universal care sounds like communism but doesn't that make countries like Britain, France, Canada, Israel and Japan where government role in healthcare is significant, communist in your book. Maybe we should start dropping them as our allies, after all ACCORDING TO YOU they are communist thus they must surely be inherently evil.

You also said that Liberalism is a mental disorder and even told me in a past post to read the constitution and the bill of rights. Thats funny and contradictory coming from you, there are so many aspects of liberalism in this constitution, have you bother to read it in the first place. Liberalism means freedom and equality, the rights to a fair trial, basic human rights, rights of minorities or women to vote, rights of workers for better working conditions, accountability even from our leaders.

I am always amazed that people who don't understand topic will revert back to the defence of ' Hey you don't know what got America into this mess and go and read the constitution. "

If you ask me, I think this is just an attempt by Tarakelly to paint Liberalism as Communism.
53796 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
51 / F / Atlanta GA
Offline
Posted 6/10/10
Let keep this simple one this from was just to ask where did the communist in this country. The point I was making at is they moved into the other groups such as environmental group. Crippling an economy will set off political movements. Some did join the democrats there your far left types. The more freedom you give to the government the less control over one own life. Yes the Constitution is a fair document and the bill of rights. But it does not guarantee happiness just the pursuit of it. Nor does it say anything on free or government health care. Know maybe just because England and other nation made this mistake does not mean we should too. Asking a silly question about there statues as allies and should we dump them (Silly Rabbit Trix are For Kids) The French will sell out and anyone and do not trust them. Again the more power you give a government the less you have and becoming a Socialist state or communist state going down that road is silly.
1288 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
A small place in...
Offline
Posted 6/10/10

tarakelly wrote:

Let keep this simple one this from was just to ask where did the communist in this country. The point I was making at is they moved into the other groups such as environmental group. Crippling an economy will set off political movements. Some did join the democrats there your far left types. The more freedom you give to the government the less control over one own life. Yes the Constitution is a fair document and the bill of rights. But it does not guarantee happiness just the pursuit of it. Nor does it say anything on free or government health care. Know maybe just because England and other nation made this mistake does not mean we should too. Asking a silly question about there statues as allies and should we dump them (Silly Rabbit Trix are For Kids) The French will sell out and anyone and do not trust them. Again the more power you give a government the less you have and becoming a Socialist state or communist state going down that road is silly.

So now its not liberalism which is a mental disorder but environmentalism? I would have never figure it out from the past few posts or the topic question being asked. If that is true, you will love living in London, 1952 before they turn communist and imposed all those government regulation for cleaner air.

BBC 1952 The Great London Smog- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/2545759.stm
Documentary Killer Fog [part 1] - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUQ9tPc8YbM&feature=related
53796 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
51 / F / Atlanta GA
Offline
Posted 6/10/10 , edited 6/10/10
Look, I really don’t get why you read the topic of the post and now, now you what to play word games so I hope this will clear the air. The more you rely on government the less right of oneself you have on your own future simple, YES? Being Liberal is not bad on social issue. Being a Liberal and wanting other to pay for it is flat-out wrong Do you understand so far? A lot of die hard communist in this country joined other groups the environment movement being the hardest hit. If you can tie up development up with law suits the project will not get through just do to time. New Orleans needed new and better dikes according to the core of army engineers. The environmentalist stopped every attempt and when approved funds were not evadible any more. So if you want to interrupt my statement as Liberalism =Communism= Socialism go ahead that what your implying personally I do not care. By the way malaria is coming back with a vengeance and million will die chauk that up to environmentalist, after the ban on DDT they found out it was a parasite killing the bird. More often environmentalist is wrong more than right.
1288 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
A small place in...
Offline
Posted 6/10/10

tarakelly wrote:

Look, I really don’t get why you read the topic of the post and now, now you what to play word games so I hope this will clear the air. The more you rely on government the less right of oneself you have on your own future simple, YES? Being Liberal is not bad on social issue. Being a Liberal and wanting other to pay for it is flat-out wrong Do you understand so far? A lot of die hard communist in this country joined other groups the environment movement being the hardest hit. If you can tie up development up with law suits the project will not get through just do to time. New Orleans needed new and better dikes according to the core of army engineers. The environmentalist stopped every attempt and when approved funds were not evadible any more. So if you want to interrupt my statement as Liberalism =Communism= Socialism go ahead that what your implying personally I do not care. By the way malaria is coming back with a vengeance and million will die chauk that up to environmentalist, after the ban on DDT they found out it was a parasite killing the bird. More often environmentalist is wrong more than right.


"Being a Liberal and wanting other to pay for it is flat-out wrong Do you understand so far? A lot of die hard communist in this country joined other groups the environment movement being the hardest hit."- Tarakelly

Such a general statement, this has been said out a lot irresponsibly that a simple check would do. Where is your proof? Who is this communists who have joined environmental movement? Give me names and the communist parties they were affiliated with before they join environmental group? Last I check communist Russia or communist platform weren't into environmentalism at all.

"By the way malaria is coming back with a vengeance and million will die chauk that up to environmentalist, after the ban on DDT they found out it was a parasite killing the bird. More often environmentalist is wrong more than right." - Tarakelly

Hearing you said this, I have already figured out pretty much which news media you are into and I pity you for it. It has made you ignorant.
Have you heard or read Silent Spring by Rachel Carson who has been credited to the growth of the environmental movement who released the book warning of the potential hazard of DDT. That news media, scientist working for industrial lobbyists will tell you, that this book has cause the complete ban of DDT and there are no side effects of the use of DDT, a hinder to progress and that malaria is coming back rampantly especially in Africa and somehow environmentalist is stopping such actions. The fact that you believe this lie meant that you never bothered to read 'Silent Spring' nor find out the actual message that Rachel Carson was trying to convey.

Here is advice for everyone, don't take my word for it, ask your grandparents or look for any old videos of America after the war, and you will be surprised at what you see. The 1960s proved an agricultural boom as DDT killed insects by suffocating them which meant increase crop yield. The Americans were so fallen to it, they spray DDT on everything, everywhere and every person, in picnics, in churches where there were people, in swimming pools where people were swimming in and even in hospital on newborn babies,

And that is why Rachel Carson released the book, she was NOT against DDT usage to combat malaria, she was FOR RESPONSIBLE USAGE OF DDT. We all know of DDT effect on the environment and its impact up to the food chain, DDT was known to have almost led to the extinction of the bald eagle, the American symbol. The use of DDT is not completely banned worldwide especially in developing countries but limited by a 2004 Stockholm treaty for cases such as vector control.

For people who insist on RAMPANT use of DDT without heed of consequences in the name of progress, think this through. "Who needs Malaria when you can have blue baby syndrome".

Read the book 'Silent Spring' in the library.
Documentary Rachel Carson Silent Spring [part 1] - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-NAUkyIg-M
Documentary Killer Fog [part 1] - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUQ9tPc8YbM&feature=related
53796 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
51 / F / Atlanta GA
Offline
Posted 6/11/10
weve have gotten way off course so that all
Posted 6/11/10

tarakelly wrote:

weve have gotten way off course so that all
That's only because you kept mislabeling this so-called "communists" to just about anyone that you don't like. It's as if you were some half-baked politician with a tendency to apply "hot topic" without proper justification based on factual evidence. When one being irresponsible and unaccountable with baseless claims is the sociological prescription for fear tactic.
First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.