First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next  Last
homophobia
93 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
40 / M
Offline
Posted 6/27/10
I believe the next step on the Homosexual acceptance trail is Man Boy or Woman Girl relations, it may take 25 years after Homosexuality is accepted.
2035 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 6/27/10

DarnellA wrote:

I believe the next step on the Homosexual acceptance trail is Man Boy or Woman Girl relations, it may take 25 years after Homosexuality is accepted.


Homosexuals would be the biggest retards if they start to associate with groups and people trying to legalize pedophilia. They would indorse every rightwinger who ever said they want to rape little boys.

If they don't fight those pedophiles who hide among them and try to use them, then they would just help those who try to criminalize homosexuality. It would be a step backwards if the lose the sympathy of the public.
1394 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M
Offline
Posted 6/27/10

DarnellA wrote:

I believe the next step on the Homosexual acceptance trail is Man Boy or Woman Girl relations, it may take 25 years after Homosexuality is accepted.


Yes, because we all know that all Homosexuals are pederast or otherwise paedophiles--just like those funny men who like to touch little 'nymphet' in their private places, those excellent representatives of the heterosexual community.
5229 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Mammago Garage, Y...
Offline
Posted 6/27/10

DarnellA wrote:

I believe the next step on the Homosexual acceptance trail is Man Boy or Woman Girl relations, it may take 25 years after Homosexuality is accepted.


Of course that will happen, because 25 years after we allowed heterosexual marriage, we encouraged and allowed heterosexual pedophilia as well. So obviously the same thing will happen if we allow homosexual marriage.
2319 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / where the grass i...
Offline
Posted 6/27/10

lalouse wrote:


Alright your putting things together....alright sodomy we left now as for David and Jonathan, back at the time, real close friends (male friends) had oral sex between them =) that's a fact. David and Jonathan were more than "friends" NOW, kings also unsed to have male lovers, it was a common practice, but not anal sex...anal sex was considered to be a crime against the law...so men only had oral sex back then....and I think oral sex between 2 men is a homosexual act :P

NOW I don't care what christians love and what they hate because christianity wasn't even supposed to be religion, Jesus came to spread the word of peace, not to make a new religion.
Now, stole yea christians stole stuff from the jews, the jews stole from the egyptians, and so on...every religion takes certain things from a previous religion. If christians wanna use a sentence that is mentioned in the Jewish bible, then why don't they just remain jewish and believe in the existence of Jesus? ha? :P
Now, jesus didn't mention homosexuality just because he said what you quoted, because he also said
"Because of your hardness of heart, Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way.

"And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery."

The disciples said to him, "If the relationship of the man with his wife is like this, it is better not to marry"

But He said to them, "Not all men can accept this statement, but only those to whom it has been given.

"For there are eunuchs who were born that way from their mother's womb; and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men; and there are also eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to accept this, let him accept it." (Matt 19: 8-12)

Yes, you heard me right Not all men are born to be married....some of them aren't meant to get married, and why? ask your self
I'll say it again jesus never mentioned homosexuals.


ohh
sorry, lalouse. I'll be a little resistant to your post because a.) I haven't read anything about David and Jonathan doing oral sex b.) I haven't read any historical text that homosexuality is practice by kings.

In the past and it is still practiced in asia (even in my province), there is such a thing called "sworn brother". It is calling a male friend brother even if he is not blood related. Usually it is done with an oath or ceremonial ritual but saying to them, " You are a brother to me." is good enough. (side note: south east asia use blood compact for things like this)

well, i would like to correct some things about your concept about Jesus and religion plus the sacred text but I have to drop it. It would make people uncomfortable here.

Anyway, eunuchs are males who swore celibacy (for a certain cause like religion and job) meaning abstaining from sex. It is not about waiving their right to have a woman as wife and substitute a male as a partner.
2319 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / where the grass i...
Offline
Posted 6/27/10

Cuddlebuns wrote:


DarnellA wrote:

I believe the next step on the Homosexual acceptance trail is Man Boy or Woman Girl relations, it may take 25 years after Homosexuality is accepted.


Of course that will happen, because 25 years after we allowed heterosexual marriage, we encouraged and allowed heterosexual pedophilia as well. So obviously the same thing will happen if we allow homosexual marriage.


what country that allows heterosexual pedophilia?
4945 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / France
Offline
Posted 6/28/10 , edited 6/28/10

alupihan45 wrote:


lalouse wrote:


Alright your putting things together....alright sodomy we left now as for David and Jonathan, back at the time, real close friends (male friends) had oral sex between them =) that's a fact. David and Jonathan were more than "friends" NOW, kings also unsed to have male lovers, it was a common practice, but not anal sex...anal sex was considered to be a crime against the law...so men only had oral sex back then....and I think oral sex between 2 men is a homosexual act :P

NOW I don't care what christians love and what they hate because christianity wasn't even supposed to be religion, Jesus came to spread the word of peace, not to make a new religion.
Now, stole yea christians stole stuff from the jews, the jews stole from the egyptians, and so on...every religion takes certain things from a previous religion. If christians wanna use a sentence that is mentioned in the Jewish bible, then why don't they just remain jewish and believe in the existence of Jesus? ha? :P
Now, jesus didn't mention homosexuality just because he said what you quoted, because he also said
"Because of your hardness of heart, Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way.

"And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery."

The disciples said to him, "If the relationship of the man with his wife is like this, it is better not to marry"

But He said to them, "Not all men can accept this statement, but only those to whom it has been given.

"For there are eunuchs who were born that way from their mother's womb; and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men; and there are also eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to accept this, let him accept it." (Matt 19: 8-12)

Yes, you heard me right Not all men are born to be married....some of them aren't meant to get married, and why? ask your self
I'll say it again jesus never mentioned homosexuals.


ohh
sorry, lalouse. I'll be a little resistant to your post because a.) I haven't read anything about David and Jonathan doing oral sex b.) I haven't read any historical text that homosexuality is practice by kings.

In the past and it is still practiced in asia (even in my province), there is such a thing called "sworn brother". It is calling a male friend brother even if he is not blood related. Usually it is done with an oath or ceremonial ritual but saying to them, " You are a brother to me." is good enough. (side note: south east asia use blood compact for things like this)

well, i would like to correct some things about your concept about Jesus and religion plus the sacred text but I have to drop it. It would make people uncomfortable here.

Anyway, eunuchs are males who swore celibacy (for a certain cause like religion and job) meaning abstaining from sex. It is not about waiving their right to have a woman as wife and substitute a male as a partner.


Not my fault you didn't do your homework.
Go do some research and correct what you just said...you made no sense.

1 Samuel 20:41 "After the boy had gone, David got up from the south side of the stone and bowed down before Jonathan three times, with is face to the ground. Then they kissed each other and wept together - but David wept the most."

2 Samuel 1:26
"I grieve for you, Jonathan my brother; you were very dear to me. Your love for me was wonderful, more wonderful than that of women."

1 Samuel 18:3-4
"And Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself. Jonathan took off the robe he was wearing and gave it to David, along with his tunic, and even his sword, his bow and his belt."

Since people in those days did not wear underwear, Jonathan stripped himself naked in front of David. That would be considered extremely unusual behavior (then and now) unless their relationship was sexual in nature.

1 Samuel 18:2
"From that day, Saul kept David with him and did not let him return to his father's house."

David left his parent's home and moved to Saul's where he would be with Jonathan. This is a strong indication that the relationship was extremely close. It echoes the passage marriage passage in Genesis 2:24: "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh."

Is that enough?...David was a king himself, that's 1 king who had homosexual lovers.
You also have Alexander the great with Hephaestion his homosexual lover
You also got the King James of england, oh and let's not forget about some genius people including William shakespears and Leonardo de vinci, and many many more.....
As for the eunuchs your pretty much wrong, read the quote of jesus again, he said "some are born like that from their MOTHERS WOMB, and some of them are made like that from other men".....it's so clear yet you keep hiding it with your none sense and ignorance.
2035 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 6/28/10 , edited 6/28/10
Roman Emperors Hadrian, Commodus, Elagabalus and even Julius Caesar.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Rome

I once heard about ancient chronists calling Julius Caesar a 'faggot' but that could also be an attempt to slander.
5229 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Mammago Garage, Y...
Offline
Posted 6/28/10

alupihan45 wrote:

what country that allows heterosexual pedophilia?


I was using sarcasm to point out the fault in the slippery slope idea that allowing homosexual marriages= allowing homosexual pedophilia. If it were true the heterosexual pedophilia would be acceptable since heterosexual marriage is acceptable.

Although ancient Greece, Rome, and Japan had no problems with pedophilia, and some cultures today still allow older men to have 13 year-old wives.
2319 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / where the grass i...
Offline
Posted 6/28/10

lalouse wrote:


Not my fault you didn't do your homework.
Go do some research and correct what you just said...you made no sense.

1 Samuel 20:41 "After the boy had gone, David got up from the south side of the stone and bowed down before Jonathan three times, with is face to the ground. Then they kissed each other and wept together - but David wept the most."

2 Samuel 1:26
"I grieve for you, Jonathan my brother; you were very dear to me. Your love for me was wonderful, more wonderful than that of women."

1 Samuel 18:3-4
"And Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself. Jonathan took off the robe he was wearing and gave it to David, along with his tunic, and even his sword, his bow and his belt."

Since people in those days did not wear underwear, Jonathan stripped himself naked in front of David. That would be considered extremely unusual behavior (then and now) unless their relationship was sexual in nature.

1 Samuel 18:2
"From that day, Saul kept David with him and did not let him return to his father's house."

David left his parent's home and moved to Saul's where he would be with Jonathan. This is a strong indication that the relationship was extremely close. It echoes the passage marriage passage in Genesis 2:24: "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh."

Is that enough?...David was a king himself, that's 1 king who had homosexual lovers.
You also have Alexander the great with Hephaestion his homosexual lover
You also got the King James of england, oh and let's not forget about some genius people including William shakespears and Leonardo de vinci, and many many more.....
As for the eunuchs your pretty much wrong, read the quote of jesus again, he said "some are born like that from their MOTHERS WOMB, and some of them are made like that from other men".....it's so clear yet you keep hiding it with your none sense and ignorance.






1 Samuel 20:41 "After the boy had gone, David got up from the south side of the stone and bowed down before Jonathan three times, with is face to the ground. Then they kissed each other and wept together - but David wept the most."


Do understand that you are talking about Middle Eastern people here. They greet with a kiss, tough people make fun of it and call it gay.
And crying doesn't make a man a lesser man.


2 Samuel 1:26
"I grieve for you, Jonathan my brother; you were very dear to me. Your love for me was wonderful, more wonderful than that of women."


There is really such thing that is called "sworn brothers". That is what David and Jonathan have. So those who practice "bros before hoes" are gay people?


1 Samuel 18:3-4
"And Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself. Jonathan took off the robe he was wearing and gave it to David, along with his tunic, and even his sword, his bow and his belt."


The exchange of personal belongings is just part of the practice (in sworn brotherhood. Try watching Mischievous Princess and try reading about brother hood with this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_brother ). These practice may be slowly disappearing since the younger generation are not into old culture anymore but there is such thing.

Since you mentioned getting naked in front of other men, err, that made me question my dormitory days- "was it gay that my classmates showered at the same time with me?" y'know dormitories, they have a huge shower room. Of course, playing around with other dudes naked is a different story.


1 Samuel 18:2
"From that day, Saul kept David with him and did not let him return to his father's house."


they are not married and a man cannot never be called a wife (since you used Gensis).

about the eunuch, why call me non sense and ignorant when dictionaries and encyclopedia doesn't describe Eunuchs as homosexual people? If you know what eunuch means, you'll understand what Jesus said.

4945 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / France
Offline
Posted 6/28/10

alupihan45 wrote:


lalouse wrote:


Not my fault you didn't do your homework.
Go do some research and correct what you just said...you made no sense.

1 Samuel 20:41 "After the boy had gone, David got up from the south side of the stone and bowed down before Jonathan three times, with is face to the ground. Then they kissed each other and wept together - but David wept the most."

2 Samuel 1:26
"I grieve for you, Jonathan my brother; you were very dear to me. Your love for me was wonderful, more wonderful than that of women."

1 Samuel 18:3-4
"And Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself. Jonathan took off the robe he was wearing and gave it to David, along with his tunic, and even his sword, his bow and his belt."

Since people in those days did not wear underwear, Jonathan stripped himself naked in front of David. That would be considered extremely unusual behavior (then and now) unless their relationship was sexual in nature.

1 Samuel 18:2
"From that day, Saul kept David with him and did not let him return to his father's house."

David left his parent's home and moved to Saul's where he would be with Jonathan. This is a strong indication that the relationship was extremely close. It echoes the passage marriage passage in Genesis 2:24: "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh."

Is that enough?...David was a king himself, that's 1 king who had homosexual lovers.
You also have Alexander the great with Hephaestion his homosexual lover
You also got the King James of england, oh and let's not forget about some genius people including William shakespears and Leonardo de vinci, and many many more.....
As for the eunuchs your pretty much wrong, read the quote of jesus again, he said "some are born like that from their MOTHERS WOMB, and some of them are made like that from other men".....it's so clear yet you keep hiding it with your none sense and ignorance.






1 Samuel 20:41 "After the boy had gone, David got up from the south side of the stone and bowed down before Jonathan three times, with is face to the ground. Then they kissed each other and wept together - but David wept the most."


Do understand that you are talking about Middle Eastern people here. They greet with a kiss, tough people make fun of it and call it gay.
And crying doesn't make a man a lesser man.


2 Samuel 1:26
"I grieve for you, Jonathan my brother; you were very dear to me. Your love for me was wonderful, more wonderful than that of women."


There is really such thing that is called "sworn brothers". That is what David and Jonathan have. So those who practice "bros before hoes" are gay people?


1 Samuel 18:3-4
"And Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself. Jonathan took off the robe he was wearing and gave it to David, along with his tunic, and even his sword, his bow and his belt."


The exchange of personal belongings is just part of the practice (in sworn brotherhood. Try watching Mischievous Princess and try reading about brother hood with this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_brother ). These practice may be slowly disappearing since the younger generation are not into old culture anymore but there is such thing.

Since you mentioned getting naked in front of other men, err, that made me question my dormitory days- "was it gay that my classmates showered at the same time with me?" y'know dormitories, they have a huge shower room. Of course, playing around with other dudes naked is a different story.


1 Samuel 18:2
"From that day, Saul kept David with him and did not let him return to his father's house."


they are not married and a man cannot never be called a wife (since you used Gensis).

about the eunuch, why call me non sense and ignorant when dictionaries and encyclopedia doesn't describe Eunuchs as homosexual people? If you know what eunuch means, you'll understand what Jesus said.



Wow, you make up things of your own......
kissing as greeting came from Europe not middle eastern people!
and in ancient times men didn't shower together unless they had sexual meaning behind it! were not talking about today's showering!
You go back to that brother hood crap, it existed maybe in Asia, but not in Egypt and Syria and Israel and the middle eastern culture...you put things in the wrong places.
As for the eunuchs your talking about the modern encyclopedia and what the word means today, in ancient times the word homosexual didn't exist, so you need to take the religious meaning of it! GOSH stop making things up and mixing them together! your putting the Asian culture together with the middle eastern...."brotherhood" didn't exist to the middle eastern men, touching a man or bathing with a man or taking your clothes off in a man's house infront of a man was considered to be sexual.....a man was only to be seen naked infront of his wife's eyes.
2305 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M
Offline
Posted 6/28/10
What i don't get is why Christians just can't leave gay people alone. If you think that it's a sin, fine, but don't go affecting their rights to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If there was a true separation of church and state, like there should be, this wouldn't even be an issue, but because Christians wanna bring religion into the government, which was exactly what the Taliban were,( remember them? the guys who we are at war with, the ones who harbored Osama, and people want a government like that) people gotta suffer.
Posted 6/28/10

unLUCKeCHARMS wrote:

What i don't get is why Christians just can't leave gay people alone. If you think that it's a sin, fine, but don't go affecting their rights to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If there was a true separation of church and state, like there should be, this wouldn't even be an issue, but because Christians wanna bring religion into the government, which was exactly what the Taliban were,( remember them? the guys who we are at war with, the ones who harbored Osama, and people want a government like that) people gotta suffer.


The problems with gay people nowadays is that they are also doing what Christians once doing to them before. Instead they force their ideal of homosexuality to others and worse through peer pressure and sometimes through force. If they think a person is hiding his/her sexuality they will persecute him/her. They will victimize the young and turn them into their kind. You people don't realize that these homosexuals too are also promoting a religion of their own.
2035 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M
Offline
Posted 6/28/10

pcekeep wrote:

The problems with gay people nowadays is that they are also doing what Christians once doing to them before. Instead they force their ideal of homosexuality to others and worse through peer pressure and sometimes through force. If they think a person is hiding his/her sexuality they will persecute him/her. They will victimize the young and turn them into their kind. You people don't realize that these homosexuals too are also promoting a religion of their own.


I guess the most of that comment is just trolling, but that much is true. It's really annoying that some people honestly won't accept that not everyone is bisexual.

It's not even meant as a joke. It's the same when feminists declare all men enemies of women or can't accept that most women like the thought of becoming a wife and mother.
2319 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / where the grass i...
Offline
Posted 6/28/10

unLUCKeCHARMS wrote:

What i don't get is why Christians just can't leave gay people alone. If you think that it's a sin, fine, but don't go affecting their rights to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If there was a true separation of church and state, like there should be, this wouldn't even be an issue, but because Christians wanna bring religion into the government, which was exactly what the Taliban were,( remember them? the guys who we are at war with, the ones who harbored Osama, and people want a government like that) people gotta suffer.


CHristians leaves them alone (unless the gay person is a Christian, we care) but we get uncomfortable if they say the Bible sanctions it.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.