|
gal69lag wrote: DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: DomFortress wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide gal69lag wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: Actually, I think it's because of how much good looks are advertised these days. You open your TV, and the screen is flooded by images of people with either angelic faces or toned bodies. In TV Shows, the good-looking guy always has his eyes on the sexy girl. How often have you seen (in Shows/Movies) a good-looking guy going gaga over someone intellectual? (minus Twilight. Not only is she not sexy, she isn't intellectual either. Special case, special case :P) Even in the music business, looks seem to go so much further than talent. Everything is autotuned, and the main focus would be how less the artist is wearing and how much body they're showing, and how much makeup they're wearing. Male artists only sing about "that girl is fine, that girl is sexy. Oh she's undressing blabla etcetc". Not often do they sing about personality. And even in some cases such as work! Don't good-looking people sometimes get away with things just because they're so 'dashing'? Since the media is such a big influence on a teenager's life that we just digest all this information and spend more time worrying about looks. Eventually though, I'm sure everyone matures, but vanity still plays a huge role in a teenager's life. Do you do this on purpose? Quote me 'cuz perhaps you don't like me or something? Honestly I thought I was the one who was 16 =/ But anyways, I don't see how what I've said is wrong. No where have I spoken of the 'deification of youth' normalizing beauty and maturity. Heck, it isn't the youth that started it. Do you deny that James Bond movies will always have a sex icon as the leading lady? And the James Bond himself has to be unbelievably handsome, even if his acting talents are below par? I don't see how these guys are youthful as some of them are way in their forties. The youth has simply followed the trend, which I don't like anyway? Lahk, srsly, I'm only saying how teenagers are influenced by TV, and here you are talking about the youth being deified. Haha, well then I wasn't asking for your TV role model neither was I assuming what your TV role model would be. Simply saying that anyone in Bond movies can't be counted as "youth" and those movies are an example of the 'glorifying' of good looks. Psh. You're just not getting the point here. I'm saying, teenagers such as myself, value good looks (which was the original question) because we are influenced by the media. Now what I think about how media portrays good looks is something completely different. So often have I seen teenagers not that good-looking being put down and insulted by other teenagers just because of that. The youth, like you said, is inexperienced and immature. I myself value good looks, but I'm sick and tired of how majestic a character is portrayed just because they were blessed by good-looks, and someone who was less fortunate is expressed as a loner. Teenagers pick this up and the ones that see themselves as 'good-looking' force their authority on others and the ones that think of themselves as ugly dig themselves into a hole. It has even led to suicide in some cases. I just wish the media could for once express that looks isnt everything. Now can you truly see just how foolish it is to objectify real beauty without good health? When looking beautifully is subjective to change, based on whatever that's culturally defined as the social norms. Yeah okay, Star Trek is from what century? What teenager watches that anymore (except for some)? And then there's the new Star Trek where, again, the cast is full of beautiful people. We watch what's on TV and all that's on TV is shows and movies about high school drama and whatnot. That's why I said that even though we value looks so much during our high school years, as the years go on we grow out of that phase. 'Beautiful' is subjective to change, but whatever is accepted as beautiful will be put up on a pedestal time and time again. And YOU are not GETTING it. I'm not 'sick and tired' of what's beautiful, I'm sick and tired of the media's portrayal of beauty. Superficial beauty and not inner beauty. |
|
|
Strong enough for men, made for women. Anything less will be uncivilized.
|
|
|
DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: DomFortress wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide gal69lag wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: Actually, I think it's because of how much good looks are advertised these days. You open your TV, and the screen is flooded by images of people with either angelic faces or toned bodies. In TV Shows, the good-looking guy always has his eyes on the sexy girl. How often have you seen (in Shows/Movies) a good-looking guy going gaga over someone intellectual? (minus Twilight. Not only is she not sexy, she isn't intellectual either. Special case, special case :P) Even in the music business, looks seem to go so much further than talent. Everything is autotuned, and the main focus would be how less the artist is wearing and how much body they're showing, and how much makeup they're wearing. Male artists only sing about "that girl is fine, that girl is sexy. Oh she's undressing blabla etcetc". Not often do they sing about personality. And even in some cases such as work! Don't good-looking people sometimes get away with things just because they're so 'dashing'? Since the media is such a big influence on a teenager's life that we just digest all this information and spend more time worrying about looks. Eventually though, I'm sure everyone matures, but vanity still plays a huge role in a teenager's life. Do you do this on purpose? Quote me 'cuz perhaps you don't like me or something? Honestly I thought I was the one who was 16 =/ But anyways, I don't see how what I've said is wrong. No where have I spoken of the 'deification of youth' normalizing beauty and maturity. Heck, it isn't the youth that started it. Do you deny that James Bond movies will always have a sex icon as the leading lady? And the James Bond himself has to be unbelievably handsome, even if his acting talents are below par? I don't see how these guys are youthful as some of them are way in their forties. The youth has simply followed the trend, which I don't like anyway? Lahk, srsly, I'm only saying how teenagers are influenced by TV, and here you are talking about the youth being deified. Haha, well then I wasn't asking for your TV role model neither was I assuming what your TV role model would be. Simply saying that anyone in Bond movies can't be counted as "youth" and those movies are an example of the 'glorifying' of good looks. Psh. You're just not getting the point here. I'm saying, teenagers such as myself, value good looks (which was the original question) because we are influenced by the media. Now what I think about how media portrays good looks is something completely different. So often have I seen teenagers not that good-looking being put down and insulted by other teenagers just because of that. The youth, like you said, is inexperienced and immature. I myself value good looks, but I'm sick and tired of how majestic a character is portrayed just because they were blessed by good-looks, and someone who was less fortunate is expressed as a loner. Teenagers pick this up and the ones that see themselves as 'good-looking' force their authority on others and the ones that think of themselves as ugly dig themselves into a hole. It has even led to suicide in some cases. I just wish the media could for once express that looks isnt everything. Now can you truly see just how foolish it is to objectify real beauty without good health? When looking beautifully is subjective to change, based on whatever that's culturally defined as the social norms. Yeah okay, Star Trek is from what century? What teenager watches that anymore (except for some)? And then there's the new Star Trek where, again, the cast is full of beautiful people. We watch what's on TV and all that's on TV is shows and movies about high school drama and whatnot. That's why I said that even though we value looks so much during our high school years, as the years go on we grow out of that phase. 'Beautiful' is subjective to change, but whatever is accepted as beautiful will be put up on a pedestal time and time again. And YOU are not GETTING it. I'm not 'sick and tired' of what's beautiful, I'm sick and tired of the media's portrayal of beauty. Superficial beauty and not inner beauty. What makes you think my religion regulates my social life? I follow my religion but its not like everything I do or say has something to do with my religion. |
|
Gazetto PWNS!
|
|
|
gal69lag wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: DomFortress wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide gal69lag wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide DomFortress wrote: gal69lag wrote: Actually, I think it's because of how much good looks are advertised these days. You open your TV, and the screen is flooded by images of people with either angelic faces or toned bodies. In TV Shows, the good-looking guy always has his eyes on the sexy girl. How often have you seen (in Shows/Movies) a good-looking guy going gaga over someone intellectual? (minus Twilight. Not only is she not sexy, she isn't intellectual either. Special case, special case :P) Even in the music business, looks seem to go so much further than talent. Everything is autotuned, and the main focus would be how less the artist is wearing and how much body they're showing, and how much makeup they're wearing. Male artists only sing about "that girl is fine, that girl is sexy. Oh she's undressing blabla etcetc". Not often do they sing about personality. And even in some cases such as work! Don't good-looking people sometimes get away with things just because they're so 'dashing'? Since the media is such a big influence on a teenager's life that we just digest all this information and spend more time worrying about looks. Eventually though, I'm sure everyone matures, but vanity still plays a huge role in a teenager's life. Do you do this on purpose? Quote me 'cuz perhaps you don't like me or something? Honestly I thought I was the one who was 16 =/ But anyways, I don't see how what I've said is wrong. No where have I spoken of the 'deification of youth' normalizing beauty and maturity. Heck, it isn't the youth that started it. Do you deny that James Bond movies will always have a sex icon as the leading lady? And the James Bond himself has to be unbelievably handsome, even if his acting talents are below par? I don't see how these guys are youthful as some of them are way in their forties. The youth has simply followed the trend, which I don't like anyway? Lahk, srsly, I'm only saying how teenagers are influenced by TV, and here you are talking about the youth being deified. Haha, well then I wasn't asking for your TV role model neither was I assuming what your TV role model would be. Simply saying that anyone in Bond movies can't be counted as "youth" and those movies are an example of the 'glorifying' of good looks. Psh. You're just not getting the point here. I'm saying, teenagers such as myself, value good looks (which was the original question) because we are influenced by the media. Now what I think about how media portrays good looks is something completely different. So often have I seen teenagers not that good-looking being put down and insulted by other teenagers just because of that. The youth, like you said, is inexperienced and immature. I myself value good looks, but I'm sick and tired of how majestic a character is portrayed just because they were blessed by good-looks, and someone who was less fortunate is expressed as a loner. Teenagers pick this up and the ones that see themselves as 'good-looking' force their authority on others and the ones that think of themselves as ugly dig themselves into a hole. It has even led to suicide in some cases. I just wish the media could for once express that looks isnt everything. Now can you truly see just how foolish it is to objectify real beauty without good health? When looking beautifully is subjective to change, based on whatever that's culturally defined as the social norms. Yeah okay, Star Trek is from what century? What teenager watches that anymore (except for some)? And then there's the new Star Trek where, again, the cast is full of beautiful people. We watch what's on TV and all that's on TV is shows and movies about high school drama and whatnot. That's why I said that even though we value looks so much during our high school years, as the years go on we grow out of that phase. 'Beautiful' is subjective to change, but whatever is accepted as beautiful will be put up on a pedestal time and time again. And YOU are not GETTING it. I'm not 'sick and tired' of what's beautiful, I'm sick and tired of the media's portrayal of beauty. Superficial beauty and not inner beauty. |
|
|
Strong enough for men, made for women. Anything less will be uncivilized.
|
|
|
-_-; i love how the two of you are talking about religion even in an area that is concerned about "young people and their body image".
anyways................ via a study that i read a while ago; it states that women are happiest and believe they look the prettiest around early 30s (and in love). (why? 'cause they're now more mature, more confident in themselves and with the person they love telling them they're beautiful; they will feel and start to look more beautiful.) But; to be on topic; "Why do young people place so much value on looks?" answer: It's hard to say. First of all; it's not ONLY young people who place value on looks --- if only young people gave a damn; then plastic surgery would be out of business; 'cause clearly; as a young person; we don't have that kind of money to get plastic surgery. (damn rich kids excluded.) and factually; the better you look; the easier it is for you to get jobs; and the easier it is for you to get higher pay. So, the better question to ask is... who don't place value on looks? Answer: No body. Even babies; naturally; they have the tendency to like prettier people more. So it is only fair; and normal for young people to place "value" (the words "So much" is a bit...of a weasel-term.) on looks. -- just like everyone else. but i will admit; sometimes; some of us, young people, do get out of control. even myself; 5'9 and 130 pounds is concerned about my weight and would LOVE to lose that ten pounds. (>.>; though that would put me under weight.) We're young. We make mistakes. And with the cultural (western) influences and media and even social expectations...--- all of those things and more; kicking us every step that we walk and urging us every moment of our lives to be: Skinny, beautiful, and smart. It's hard. Our value on looks is passed down by adults; placed there by others; placed their by ourselves; and -- it'll stay here with us. |
|
To, get married with the love of my life. (when i find her).
|
|
|
Omok wrote: -_-; i love how the two of you are talking about religion even in an area that is concerned about "young people and their body image". anyways................ via a study that i read a while ago; it states that women are happiest and believe they look the prettiest around early 30s (and in love). (why? 'cause they're now more mature, more confident in themselves and with the person they love telling them they're beautiful; they will feel and start to look more beautiful.) But; to be on topic; "Why do young people place so much value on looks?" answer: It's hard to say. First of all; it's not ONLY young people who place value on looks --- if only young people gave a damn; then plastic surgery would be out of business; 'cause clearly; as a young person; we don't have that kind of money to get plastic surgery. (damn rich kids excluded.) and factually; the better you look; the easier it is for you to get jobs; and the easier it is for you to get higher pay. So, the better question to ask is... who don't place value on looks? Answer: No body. Even babies; naturally; they have the tendency to like prettier people more. So it is only fair; and normal for young people to place "value" (the words "So much" is a bit...of a weasel-term.) on looks. -- just like everyone else. but i will admit; sometimes; some of us, young people, do get out of control. even myself; 5'9 and 130 pounds is concerned about my weight and would LOVE to lose that ten pounds. (>.>; though that would put me under weight.) We're young. We make mistakes. And with the cultural (western) influences and media and even social expectations...--- all of those things and more; kicking us every step that we walk and urging us every moment of our lives to be: Skinny, beautiful, and smart. It's hard. Our value on looks is passed down by adults; placed there by others; placed their by ourselves; and -- it'll stay here with us. |
|
|
Strong enough for men, made for women. Anything less will be uncivilized.
|
|
|
Well looks have to do with a lot of things. The way people perceive you and the way that you perceive yourself deals with your looks, actions and intelligence. Example: If you had blue eyes when people talk to you they are more likely to be kind toward you no matter what. This is because it is easy to see the pupil of a person with blue eyes. So that person feels more relax and secure. That person will feel less likely to be disrespected and manipulated by you. All of these actions are processed by the unconscious mind of a human.
If you didn't like the previous example or it was unclear then this might suffice. If you others think that you are beautiful then you will most likely feel the exact same way. This will also give you more confidence when approaching others because one might think "How could a person dislike one as beautiful as I" or "I will definitely be able to obtain this guy's heart because he won't be able to resist my good looks". The point that I am trying to get across to everyone is that questions like this one just have to many factors involved. Not everyone bases everything on looks because they want to or not, but their unconscious mind often does look for physical traits first. Unfortunately it is just natural human behavior and unless there is some other factor at play like emotions or environment then you yourself and many others will probably fall victim to you unconscious mind. I do realize that there are a lot of people that just focus on looks because that how they are, but you may put many people in their category that shouldn't be because of what I explained in the previous texts. Hope this was some what helpful. -Jamil Johnson |
|
You see the true colors of people when death stares them in the face.
|
|
|
Ah; only if everyone can follow that model you have proposed. Much easier said than done.
Ideologies are always great on paper. |
|
To, get married with the love of my life. (when i find her).
|
|
|
Omok wrote: Ah; only if everyone can follow that model you have proposed. Much easier said than done. Ideologies are always great on paper. |
|
|
Strong enough for men, made for women. Anything less will be uncivilized.
|
|
|
and clearly with the history that we have with these social mechanism; they seem to have worked very well, eh? |
|
To, get married with the love of my life. (when i find her).
|
|
|
Omok wrote: and clearly with the history that we have with these social mechanism; they seem to have worked very well, eh? DomFortress wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide quintus_fontane wrote: It makes me angry, it really, really does. Not Islam, not terrorism, not the wars, but the ignorance that infects almost all people on all sides of this brewing religious shitstorm. People forming well-entrenched opinions even though they haven't looked at both sides, the Chinese whispers that start in regards to a news story, and people's plain, straight-up refusal to listen to reason, regardless of the source. Also how easily people are swayed by the media. Has anyone else noticed how quickly our reason for invading Iraq changed from "Oh crap they've got WMD's" to "Liberating the Iraqi people"? And no one bats an eyelid, they just soak it up like a sponge, and prepare some more wild patriotism and blind faith in their government, with the image of the twin towers and London bombings burned into their minds. "If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." - John Adams, 2nd US President. Here in the north west of England, we have a fairly high percentage of muslim folk, have done since the 60's. We've had riots, demonstrations, random beatings and revenge attacks in the street (Of which I myself have been on the recieving end of a couple of times), yet this is nothing compared to what will come unless people start to form some balanced opinions. It's a prime case of ignorance meeting ignorance head on, with everyone else, Muslim and otherwise, in the middle just trying to bloody get on with their lives. We have the chav problem, predominantly whites, who attack people and property for no reason other than prejudice and that they can. I myself lost a very good friend to them, and needless to say these are the epitome of 'Ignorant whites' here. I have quite a few muslim mates from both school and ones i've made since, and this is what people just don't understand. A lot of them are scared. Scared of the constant media barrage that tars them all with the same brush, scared of how people soak up what they see on TV, scared of the ignorance displayed by both a minority from their culture and some whites, and definately scared of what's coming next. As a result, very few from Britain's Muslim communities are willing to speak out, and this is a crying shame because that is precisely what we need right now: Normal British Muslims standing up and saying "Now hang on a minute, this tool who just blew himself up in no way represents the rest of us", and even if they did, people here are so wrapped up in their own misgivings and prejudice i'm not even sure they'd listen. The best and most recent examples of ignorance at play on a grand scale are the New York mosque and Quran burning fiascos. There are still many, many people who actually think the plan was to build the mosque on top of the bloody rubble. There are also a lot of folk who firmly believe it's their right to burn the Quran, and don't understand why they're so upset about the prospect of it, and also don't see the ramifications of it. People have already bloody DIED because of it, and none have even been burned! And at the last, not only is there the ignorance, the willful ignorance here, but there's also the inability to understand why we're being attacked by minority terrorist groups in the first place. You see it every day on forums both here on CR and on various other sites, people saying without a hint of doubt that invading a nation in response to a terrorist attack is justified. Take the probable causes of the terrorism in the first place, the interference, the meddling, the butting our collective western noses into their business, extortion, gunboat diplomacy and the threat of it, exploitation, not really a small, insignificant list all told. It doesn't warrant killing innocent people over, but welcome to humanity; some of us are dicks. Take that to one side, just put it on the sideboard for a minute. Imagine if ten years ago a group of 20-30 Americans went to Dubai and bombed some religious buildings. Imagine it. Then imagine waking up one morning in your cosy little house in England or the US, looking out your window and seeing Saudi tanks rolling past your house. Would you be pleased to see them? Would you care that they say they're there to eradicate the subversive cells of extremists and to free you from your oppressive government? Would you? If you said yes, then you're either painfully naive or lying. Add to that even more Chinese whispers, and what starts out as an accident turns into a NATO led massacre by the time the news has reached 10 villages away. Add in some ignorance and anger, anger at foreign troops on your streets, anger at western meddling in your affairs, anger that your uncle was accidentally killed by an airstrike. Yeah you're pretty pissed right now, so pissed in fact you take up an AK at the gentle urgings of an extremist Imam and join the 'resistance'. It's human nature, despite what some people may say, to want to defend your home, and this makes you extremely susceptible to persuasion and being coerced into doing things you otherwise wouldn't do. No one is willing to try and see things from any perspective but their own, and this situation the world is being flung into now is only going to get worse. Afghanistan is unwinnable for the simple reason that we're fighting an endless army. For every accident, for every action, for every month that our troops are over there we simply push more and more impressionable young Muslims all round the world over the threshold into extremism, and contrary to popular belief this war will not make things better, it will only increase the likelihood that you or your children or your friends will be killed on day when you're out shopping by some pissed off, disillusioned young Muslim who was vulnerable to being 'turned'. And it will be our own fault. I don't care if you don't follow their religion. I don't care if you don't understand it. I don't care if you hate middle eastern bloody cooking or the clothes they wear. You don't have to do anything other than calm the fuck down. Mohammed in your local gas station is not about to murder your children, he's just a dude trying to get on with his life, same as you. We can't help who we're born as, but we can change who we become. No matter your race, colour or creed, people are just people. We're good, bad, and most often, somewhere in between. People the world over need to grow some perspective or remove themselves from everyone elses affairs entirely, otherwise we're all going to find ourselves in a world of shit, far, far sooner than we think. This cultural mirror will demonstrate how my theory works. EDIT: As an afterthought(been getting quite of those as of late), what I've theorized is the sociological design for a vicious cycle. And it can be the start of just about any kind of social movement, that will result in the change of the societal status quote. In other words, this function is itself neither good or bad, because good things such as the civil rights movement, the gay marriage movement, and the environmentalist, sustainability and conservation movements are all the changes-in-progress, that's making our global society as a whole a much better place. And to do that this wanton self-denial about the fact of reality has got to stop. For true courage is the realization that failure is always an option, when nature itself consists of randomness, uncertainty, complexity, and chaos. But a fear of failure is an excuse for us to hold onto unrealistic expectations, obligations, traditions, and subsequently obstructing our opportunity for real change. |
|
|
Strong enough for men, made for women. Anything less will be uncivilized.
|
|
|
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide DomFortress wrote: Omok wrote: and clearly with the history that we have with these social mechanism; they seem to have worked very well, eh? DomFortress wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide quintus_fontane wrote: It makes me angry, it really, really does. Not Islam, not terrorism, not the wars, but the ignorance that infects almost all people on all sides of this brewing religious shitstorm. People forming well-entrenched opinions even though they haven't looked at both sides, the Chinese whispers that start in regards to a news story, and people's plain, straight-up refusal to listen to reason, regardless of the source. Also how easily people are swayed by the media. Has anyone else noticed how quickly our reason for invading Iraq changed from "Oh crap they've got WMD's" to "Liberating the Iraqi people"? And no one bats an eyelid, they just soak it up like a sponge, and prepare some more wild patriotism and blind faith in their government, with the image of the twin towers and London bombings burned into their minds. "If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." - John Adams, 2nd US President. Here in the north west of England, we have a fairly high percentage of muslim folk, have done since the 60's. We've had riots, demonstrations, random beatings and revenge attacks in the street (Of which I myself have been on the recieving end of a couple of times), yet this is nothing compared to what will come unless people start to form some balanced opinions. It's a prime case of ignorance meeting ignorance head on, with everyone else, Muslim and otherwise, in the middle just trying to bloody get on with their lives. We have the chav problem, predominantly whites, who attack people and property for no reason other than prejudice and that they can. I myself lost a very good friend to them, and needless to say these are the epitome of 'Ignorant whites' here. I have quite a few muslim mates from both school and ones i've made since, and this is what people just don't understand. A lot of them are scared. Scared of the constant media barrage that tars them all with the same brush, scared of how people soak up what they see on TV, scared of the ignorance displayed by both a minority from their culture and some whites, and definately scared of what's coming next. As a result, very few from Britain's Muslim communities are willing to speak out, and this is a crying shame because that is precisely what we need right now: Normal British Muslims standing up and saying "Now hang on a minute, this tool who just blew himself up in no way represents the rest of us", and even if they did, people here are so wrapped up in their own misgivings and prejudice i'm not even sure they'd listen. The best and most recent examples of ignorance at play on a grand scale are the New York mosque and Quran burning fiascos. There are still many, many people who actually think the plan was to build the mosque on top of the bloody rubble. There are also a lot of folk who firmly believe it's their right to burn the Quran, and don't understand why they're so upset about the prospect of it, and also don't see the ramifications of it. People have already bloody DIED because of it, and none have even been burned! And at the last, not only is there the ignorance, the willful ignorance here, but there's also the inability to understand why we're being attacked by minority terrorist groups in the first place. You see it every day on forums both here on CR and on various other sites, people saying without a hint of doubt that invading a nation in response to a terrorist attack is justified. Take the probable causes of the terrorism in the first place, the interference, the meddling, the butting our collective western noses into their business, extortion, gunboat diplomacy and the threat of it, exploitation, not really a small, insignificant list all told. It doesn't warrant killing innocent people over, but welcome to humanity; some of us are dicks. Take that to one side, just put it on the sideboard for a minute. Imagine if ten years ago a group of 20-30 Americans went to Dubai and bombed some religious buildings. Imagine it. Then imagine waking up one morning in your cosy little house in England or the US, looking out your window and seeing Saudi tanks rolling past your house. Would you be pleased to see them? Would you care that they say they're there to eradicate the subversive cells of extremists and to free you from your oppressive government? Would you? If you said yes, then you're either painfully naive or lying. Add to that even more Chinese whispers, and what starts out as an accident turns into a NATO led massacre by the time the news has reached 10 villages away. Add in some ignorance and anger, anger at foreign troops on your streets, anger at western meddling in your affairs, anger that your uncle was accidentally killed by an airstrike. Yeah you're pretty pissed right now, so pissed in fact you take up an AK at the gentle urgings of an extremist Imam and join the 'resistance'. It's human nature, despite what some people may say, to want to defend your home, and this makes you extremely susceptible to persuasion and being coerced into doing things you otherwise wouldn't do. No one is willing to try and see things from any perspective but their own, and this situation the world is being flung into now is only going to get worse. Afghanistan is unwinnable for the simple reason that we're fighting an endless army. For every accident, for every action, for every month that our troops are over there we simply push more and more impressionable young Muslims all round the world over the threshold into extremism, and contrary to popular belief this war will not make things better, it will only increase the likelihood that you or your children or your friends will be killed on day when you're out shopping by some pissed off, disillusioned young Muslim who was vulnerable to being 'turned'. And it will be our own fault. I don't care if you don't follow their religion. I don't care if you don't understand it. I don't care if you hate middle eastern bloody cooking or the clothes they wear. You don't have to do anything other than calm the fuck down. Mohammed in your local gas station is not about to murder your children, he's just a dude trying to get on with his life, same as you. We can't help who we're born as, but we can change who we become. No matter your race, colour or creed, people are just people. We're good, bad, and most often, somewhere in between. People the world over need to grow some perspective or remove themselves from everyone elses affairs entirely, otherwise we're all going to find ourselves in a world of shit, far, far sooner than we think. This cultural mirror will demonstrate how my theory works. EDIT: As an afterthought(been getting quite of those as of late), what I've theorized is the sociological design for a vicious cycle. And it can be the start of just about any kind of social movement, that will result in the change of the societal status quote. In other words, this function is itself neither good or bad, because good things such as the civil rights movement, the gay marriage movement, and the environmentalist, sustainability and conservation movements are all the changes-in-progress, that's making our global society as a whole a much better place. And to do that this wanton self-denial about the fact of reality has got to stop. For true courage is the realization that failure is always an option, when nature itself consists of randomness, uncertainty, complexity, and chaos. But a fear of failure is an excuse for us to hold onto unrealistic expectations, obligations, traditions, and subsequently obstructing our opportunity for real change. It's only due to a lack of true courage that things didn't turn out so well in the past for us, IMHO: There is an explanation to go around almost everything. Proclaiming that there's only 'one' thing we need to change or obtain and then we, as mankind, can rise above all that have came before us, and change ourselves to a new...thing. i suppose. Is not practical. We are shaped by others. We shape others; others shape us. we cannot, through courage (or whatever else), drop all the expectations we hold for ourselves and all the expectations that others hold for us -- hence why young people put such an emphasis on their looks. Like i've said; ideologies always sound great on paper; it seems to make some degree of sense; but it cannot be obtainable; it is merely an ideology. -- Our differences, that each and every single one of us hold in our Genes, will always prevent us from reaching some kind of 'level' or degree, as an uniformed body; together; and solve all the shit in the world. -- it just wouldn't happen, because we're all different. |
|
To, get married with the love of my life. (when i find her).
|
|
|
Omok wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide DomFortress wrote: Omok wrote: and clearly with the history that we have with these social mechanism; they seem to have worked very well, eh? DomFortress wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide quintus_fontane wrote: It makes me angry, it really, really does. Not Islam, not terrorism, not the wars, but the ignorance that infects almost all people on all sides of this brewing religious shitstorm. People forming well-entrenched opinions even though they haven't looked at both sides, the Chinese whispers that start in regards to a news story, and people's plain, straight-up refusal to listen to reason, regardless of the source. Also how easily people are swayed by the media. Has anyone else noticed how quickly our reason for invading Iraq changed from "Oh crap they've got WMD's" to "Liberating the Iraqi people"? And no one bats an eyelid, they just soak it up like a sponge, and prepare some more wild patriotism and blind faith in their government, with the image of the twin towers and London bombings burned into their minds. "If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." - John Adams, 2nd US President. Here in the north west of England, we have a fairly high percentage of muslim folk, have done since the 60's. We've had riots, demonstrations, random beatings and revenge attacks in the street (Of which I myself have been on the recieving end of a couple of times), yet this is nothing compared to what will come unless people start to form some balanced opinions. It's a prime case of ignorance meeting ignorance head on, with everyone else, Muslim and otherwise, in the middle just trying to bloody get on with their lives. We have the chav problem, predominantly whites, who attack people and property for no reason other than prejudice and that they can. I myself lost a very good friend to them, and needless to say these are the epitome of 'Ignorant whites' here. I have quite a few muslim mates from both school and ones i've made since, and this is what people just don't understand. A lot of them are scared. Scared of the constant media barrage that tars them all with the same brush, scared of how people soak up what they see on TV, scared of the ignorance displayed by both a minority from their culture and some whites, and definately scared of what's coming next. As a result, very few from Britain's Muslim communities are willing to speak out, and this is a crying shame because that is precisely what we need right now: Normal British Muslims standing up and saying "Now hang on a minute, this tool who just blew himself up in no way represents the rest of us", and even if they did, people here are so wrapped up in their own misgivings and prejudice i'm not even sure they'd listen. The best and most recent examples of ignorance at play on a grand scale are the New York mosque and Quran burning fiascos. There are still many, many people who actually think the plan was to build the mosque on top of the bloody rubble. There are also a lot of folk who firmly believe it's their right to burn the Quran, and don't understand why they're so upset about the prospect of it, and also don't see the ramifications of it. People have already bloody DIED because of it, and none have even been burned! And at the last, not only is there the ignorance, the willful ignorance here, but there's also the inability to understand why we're being attacked by minority terrorist groups in the first place. You see it every day on forums both here on CR and on various other sites, people saying without a hint of doubt that invading a nation in response to a terrorist attack is justified. Take the probable causes of the terrorism in the first place, the interference, the meddling, the butting our collective western noses into their business, extortion, gunboat diplomacy and the threat of it, exploitation, not really a small, insignificant list all told. It doesn't warrant killing innocent people over, but welcome to humanity; some of us are dicks. Take that to one side, just put it on the sideboard for a minute. Imagine if ten years ago a group of 20-30 Americans went to Dubai and bombed some religious buildings. Imagine it. Then imagine waking up one morning in your cosy little house in England or the US, looking out your window and seeing Saudi tanks rolling past your house. Would you be pleased to see them? Would you care that they say they're there to eradicate the subversive cells of extremists and to free you from your oppressive government? Would you? If you said yes, then you're either painfully naive or lying. Add to that even more Chinese whispers, and what starts out as an accident turns into a NATO led massacre by the time the news has reached 10 villages away. Add in some ignorance and anger, anger at foreign troops on your streets, anger at western meddling in your affairs, anger that your uncle was accidentally killed by an airstrike. Yeah you're pretty pissed right now, so pissed in fact you take up an AK at the gentle urgings of an extremist Imam and join the 'resistance'. It's human nature, despite what some people may say, to want to defend your home, and this makes you extremely susceptible to persuasion and being coerced into doing things you otherwise wouldn't do. No one is willing to try and see things from any perspective but their own, and this situation the world is being flung into now is only going to get worse. Afghanistan is unwinnable for the simple reason that we're fighting an endless army. For every accident, for every action, for every month that our troops are over there we simply push more and more impressionable young Muslims all round the world over the threshold into extremism, and contrary to popular belief this war will not make things better, it will only increase the likelihood that you or your children or your friends will be killed on day when you're out shopping by some pissed off, disillusioned young Muslim who was vulnerable to being 'turned'. And it will be our own fault. I don't care if you don't follow their religion. I don't care if you don't understand it. I don't care if you hate middle eastern bloody cooking or the clothes they wear. You don't have to do anything other than calm the fuck down. Mohammed in your local gas station is not about to murder your children, he's just a dude trying to get on with his life, same as you. We can't help who we're born as, but we can change who we become. No matter your race, colour or creed, people are just people. We're good, bad, and most often, somewhere in between. People the world over need to grow some perspective or remove themselves from everyone elses affairs entirely, otherwise we're all going to find ourselves in a world of shit, far, far sooner than we think. This cultural mirror will demonstrate how my theory works. EDIT: As an afterthought(been getting quite of those as of late), what I've theorized is the sociological design for a vicious cycle. And it can be the start of just about any kind of social movement, that will result in the change of the societal status quote. In other words, this function is itself neither good or bad, because good things such as the civil rights movement, the gay marriage movement, and the environmentalist, sustainability and conservation movements are all the changes-in-progress, that's making our global society as a whole a much better place. And to do that this wanton self-denial about the fact of reality has got to stop. For true courage is the realization that failure is always an option, when nature itself consists of randomness, uncertainty, complexity, and chaos. But a fear of failure is an excuse for us to hold onto unrealistic expectations, obligations, traditions, and subsequently obstructing our opportunity for real change. It's only due to a lack of true courage that things didn't turn out so well in the past for us, IMHO: There is an explanation to go around almost everything. Proclaiming that there's only 'one' thing we need to change or obtain and then we, as mankind, can rise above all that have came before us, and change ourselves to a new...thing. i suppose. Is not practical. We are shaped by others. We shape others; others shape us. we cannot, through courage (or whatever else), drop all the expectations we hold for ourselves and all the expectations that others hold for us -- hence why young people put such an emphasis on their looks. Like i've said; ideologies always sound great on paper; it seems to make some degree of sense; but it cannot be obtainable; it is merely an ideology. -- Our differences, that each and every single one of us hold in our Genes, will always prevent us from reaching some kind of 'level' or degree, as an uniformed body; together; and solve all the shit in the world. -- it just wouldn't happen, because we're all different. And last but not least, we humans put emphasis on look because we are pattern-seeking visual specie. So that ideas based on us observing the laws of nature are in fact the reality, otherwise we humans as a specie couldn't fly if not for the existence of birds, that led to the discovery of aerodynamics. |
|
|
Strong enough for men, made for women. Anything less will be uncivilized.
|
|
|
"But wouldn't that created the unique opportunity that our individual difference makes us capable of solving different problems as a specie striving for survival?"
we're CAPABLE of solving all the problems in the world --- just like how we created most of them in the first place. But we're INCAPABLE to actually achieve those things because we are humans. - we are greedy. we're self-obsessed. and our own profits will over rule all other factors. (Don't gimme the speech saying that we can CHANGE. The fact is; our greediness and self-absorbedness is something that drives our world. It will always be something that governs us as a species; else we would not have survived for this long.) What we perceive as pretty or beautiful is also in-part, dictated by our natural instincts. By looks; (before plastic surgery), we assess every person we meet using different senses, (whether we're conscious of those senses or not is another story). -- For a wonderful example; men, biologically driven, likes women with big breasts? Why? 'cause that's a signal that she is more fertile. -- Can produce good babies. (Of course; when people jump in to be together nowadays, what's on their conscious mind is probably ANYTHING but kids. -- but offsprings is probably on the top of the list in our unconscious mind.) |
|
To, get married with the love of my life. (when i find her).
|
|
|
Omok wrote: "But wouldn't that created the unique opportunity that our individual difference makes us capable of solving different problems as a specie striving for survival?" we're CAPABLE of solving all the problems in the world --- just like how we created most of them in the first place. But we're INCAPABLE to actually achieve those things because we are humans. - we are greedy. we're self-obsessed. and our own profits will over rule all other factors. (Don't gimme the speech saying that we can CHANGE. The fact is; our greediness and self-absorbedness is something that drives our world. It will always be something that governs us as a species; else we would not have survived for this long.) What we perceive as pretty or beautiful is also in-part, dictated by our natural instincts. By looks; (before plastic surgery), we assess every person we meet using different senses, (whether we're conscious of those senses or not is another story). -- For a wonderful example; men, biologically driven, likes women with big breasts? Why? 'cause that's a signal that she is more fertile. -- Can produce good babies. (Of course; when people jump in to be together nowadays, what's on their conscious mind is probably ANYTHING but kids. -- but offsprings is probably on the top of the list in our unconscious mind.) And speaking of human nature, the only healthy indications of a woman that's fertile are her strong legs and hips. Finally, our unconsciousness/subconsciousness is driven by our emotions. So even if we have negative emotions towards children, that still doesn't discourage us from having sex. Ignorance only creates more problem by us not acknowledge that there's a problem in the first place. |
|
|
Strong enough for men, made for women. Anything less will be uncivilized.
|
|
|
DomFortress wrote: Omok wrote: "But wouldn't that created the unique opportunity that our individual difference makes us capable of solving different problems as a specie striving for survival?" we're CAPABLE of solving all the problems in the world --- just like how we created most of them in the first place. But we're INCAPABLE to actually achieve those things because we are humans. - we are greedy. we're self-obsessed. and our own profits will over rule all other factors. (Don't gimme the speech saying that we can CHANGE. The fact is; our greediness and self-absorbedness is something that drives our world. It will always be something that governs us as a species; else we would not have survived for this long.) What we perceive as pretty or beautiful is also in-part, dictated by our natural instincts. By looks; (before plastic surgery), we assess every person we meet using different senses, (whether we're conscious of those senses or not is another story). -- For a wonderful example; men, biologically driven, likes women with big breasts? Why? 'cause that's a signal that she is more fertile. -- Can produce good babies. (Of course; when people jump in to be together nowadays, what's on their conscious mind is probably ANYTHING but kids. -- but offsprings is probably on the top of the list in our unconscious mind.) And speaking of human nature, the only healthy indications of a woman that's fertile are her strong legs and hips. Finally, our unconsciousness/subconsciousness is driven by our emotions. So even if we have negative emotions towards children, that still doesn't discourage us from having sex. Ignorance only creates more problem by us not acknowledge that there's a problem in the first place. erm....psychopaths are people we cannot feel sympathy for others; who cannot feel guilt. they do not need a rational to do anything 'bad' to others. They often do whatever bad things that they do, because they WANT to, or that thing will benefit them. --- no rational required. -__-; -__-; as for what governs our unconscious subconscious, I'll leave that part out for the millions of psychologists who came before and after Freud that tried/trying to solve it. Do you even know about the existence of the mirror neurons and how they work? I don't; and i haven't got the need to. thankyouverymuch. How our social selves couldn't have existed if it wasn't for our empathetic nature? Correct; and that is why; only roughly 1/100 persons are psychopaths! (depends on what country you're looking at and what study.) Ignorance only creates more problem by us not acknowledge that there's a problem in the first place. Correct; but sadly; ignorance exists in every one of us. - Whether it be ignorance of ourselves; knowledge; others. Whatever it may be. It is because we have ignorance, that drives us, humans, to seek out the truth and dump that ignorance. -- if we weren't ignorant in the first place; there would be no drive to improve society/world/ourselves; 'cause that would imply that we already KNOW everything there is to know. |
|
To, get married with the love of my life. (when i find her).
|
|
Popular Shows |
Platforms and Devices |
Premium MembershipsLanguage
|
Support |
Crunchyroll |