Jung vs Freud
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08
^Lol at sky2high for coming to a completely ridiculous conclusion, shitty grammar, and an overall lack of observance.


magnus102 wrote:


skygod333 wrote:


magnus102 wrote:


skygod333 wrote:


nosuchname wrote:


skygod333 wrote:

Leave already you retarded ass.

~Killed.


*left ~♥*


Not you, the creator.


Skygod do you dislike discussions about things other than ones where you can go ahahahhaha moron this is a duplicate thread or something?


syndicate wrote:

Long Live the Oedipus Complex. (:


Well I quite enjoy Sophocles I remain unconvinced this is as prevalent as Freud claimed


Ok dumbass. There is a philosophy questions thread. Do some fucking research you air-headed egomaniac. Secondly, I have found and founded more interesting conversations than you can imagine. Thirdly, you are as trite as a piece of wood. Your threads amount to nothing but stupid random thoughts. Fourthly, oedipus syndrome is sick. Fifthly, do not insult my friend, Ezgi.


First off this is not a thread dedicated to philosophy as psychology is not philosophy so that thread is not the same as this one. Also I am against the Oedipus complex as well since you know that was Freud and I stated in the first post I am Jungian.


Psychology is one of the branches of philosophy I believe. In any case, this is a versus thread. Surely if you had this supposed genius level IQ, you'd read the rules and figure that there are no versus threads. But since you didn't, you must be one of those sub-normal shits I yell at every day.
1403 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / California
Offline
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08

skygod333 wrote:

^Lol at sky2high for coming to a completely ridiculous conclusion, shitty grammar, and an overall lack of observance.


my ridiculous conclusion is completely right though. you dont insult people with the intent of them not responding, you insult them with the intent that they'll get mad and respond angrily, where you (hope to) prove them wrong, and then look superior. ya, my conclusion is pretty much true. "an overall lack of observance" nice way to use a very vague statement about me to make yourself feel superior, without giving any reason at all for why you said that.

because of your horrible personality, you have to use alternative methods to get peoples attention and cause conflicts with them to feel good. i know how good it feels to win an argument, so i cant criticize you for that, but whats pathetic is that you disguise it behind that "im just a dark person" bullshit to hide your desperate need for attention.
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08

sky2high wrote:


skygod333 wrote:

^Lol at sky2high for coming to a completely ridiculous conclusion, shitty grammar, and an overall lack of observance.


my ridiculous conclusion is completely right though. you dont insult people with the intent of them not responding, you insult them with the intent that they'll get mad and respond angrily, where you (hope to) prove them wrong, and then look superior. ya, my conclusion is pretty much true. "an overall lack of observance" nice way to use a very vague statement about me to make yourself feel superior, without giving any reason at all for why you said that.

because of your horrible personality, you have to use alternative methods to get peoples attention and cause conflicts with them to feel good. i know how good it feels to win an argument, so i cant criticize you for that, but whats pathetic is that you disguise it behind that "im just a dark person" bullshit to hide your desperate need for attention.


You amuse me as ever. Shall I recall the PM you sent me where you basically said you'd been victimized? The one where you said "Wahhh!! take me off your hate list!!"? I need attention? You fail to notice my GB which, if you'd followed, would reveal that I do not want it. You utterly fail. Why would I care about looking superior? I don't care if you want to say x, y or z, I'm just out to prove you wrong. I don't care about being better, which I'm not. I believe in equality.

I do believe you just posted this to get my attention, have me repost angrily, make yourself look and feel superior. Well, unfortunately, you failed. I am not angry. Your post and stupidity made me laugh. And as for the dark person thing, I'm just a jerk. Deal with it, ass fuck.

As for Magnus, this air-headed sophitcate wannabe, it's still a versus thread. It went nowhere. At all. You failed. You two ought to make a group. The failures club.
273 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / F / San Diego, CA
Offline
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08

magnus102 wrote:

Out of the two who do you feel came closer to truly understanding the nature of the human mind? I prefer Jung and disagree with some of Freuds assertions. Frankly I consider many of his ideas on the life and death drive to be laughable. Thantos especially fits the bill of pseudo scientific intellectual vomit.


Woah. Psychology discussion on Crunchroll. Interesting. However, the theories of both Jung and Freud and been found to be fundamentally flawed presently, have they not?
1200 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / sydney, australia
Offline
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08

hespernhu wrote:


magnus102 wrote:

Out of the two who do you feel came closer to truly understanding the nature of the human mind? I prefer Jung and disagree with some of Freuds assertions. Frankly I consider many of his ideas on the life and death drive to be laughable. Thantos especially fits the bill of pseudo scientific intellectual vomit.


Woah. Psychology discussion on Crunchroll. Interesting. However, the theories of both Jung and Freud and been found to be fundamentally flawed presently, have they not?


that's what i've been told as well. they're apparently not very credible by today’s standards
3077 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / F / USA
Offline
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08

magnus102 wrote:

Out of the two who do you feel came closer to truly understanding the nature of the human mind? I prefer Jung and disagree with some of Freuds assertions. Frankly I consider many of his ideas on the life and death drive to be laughable. Thantos especially fits the bill of pseudo scientific intellectual vomit.


uhmm...sorry to say but we are not as intellectual as you are and if you want people to participate here i suggest you put some description on who they are and links to some of their works. don't get me wrong i'm not hating you or anything of that sort. it would really help many to learn more of what you know and we would appreciate it if you could make it easier for us to understand..
2081 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
31 / F / philippines
Offline
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08

magnus102 wrote:

Out of the two who do you feel came closer to truly understanding the nature of the human mind? I prefer Jung and disagree with some of Freuds assertions. Frankly I consider many of his ideas on the life and death drive to be laughable. Thantos especially fits the bill of pseudo scientific intellectual vomit.




uhmm..who are they??

12887 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Through the looki...
Offline
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08
Personally I like bits of both Jung and Freud, but I am not quite sure that I can agree with either of them whole-heartedly. I must admit though that like most people who will respond in this thread, I have not read nearly enough by or about either to come to a fully developed conclusion...

Note: To all flaming in this thread *Cough*skygodd333*Cough* *Cough*sky2high*Cough* *Cough*magnus102*Cough* it is 1) out of line, 2) against forum rules, and 3) has been reported.
7801 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
34 / M / Pinsnotch2
Offline
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08
brain fart...
1403 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / California
Offline
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08

skygod333 wrote:
You amuse me as ever.

trying to show superiority again (sigh...)

skygod333 wrote:
Shall I recall the PM you sent me where you basically said you'd been victimized? The one where you said "Wahhh!! take me off your hate list!!"?

yeah, why would you have a hate list in the first place? to go with your narcissistic image that you want to convey along with your badass pictures of fire and description on your profile "im a hothead". your image is everything to you on here, you hope to be "the bad boy" of crunchyroll. instead you're a fucking retard, trying to get peoples attention for anger.

skygod333 wrote:
I need attention? You fail to notice my GB which, if you'd followed, would reveal that I do not want it.

yes, you need attention, without it youd probably be just another asshole on crunchyroll, not "the asshole" of crunchyroll. deny it all you want, the way you act proves it whether you admit it or not.

skygod333 wrote:
You utterly fail.

nice. real smart thar.

skygod333 wrote:
Why would I care about looking superior? I don't care if you want to say x, y or z, I'm just out to prove you wrong. I don't care about being better, which I'm not. I believe in equality.

yet you always insult people, and cant take insults towards yourself. this is a sign that you think your superior, always calling people idiots or leaving mean comments(of course for attention). the way you pointed out my grammar, and always try to use correct grammar shows that you have a severe superiority complex.(was that freud?) you probably try to be superior in whatever you can be, so you be sure to type perfectly, thus your typing is superior. (they really need /pwnt tags in CR)

skygod333 wrote:
I do believe you just posted this to get my attention, have me repost angrily, make yourself look and feel superior. Well, unfortunately, you failed. I am not angry. Your post and stupidity made me laugh. And as for the dark person thing, I'm just a jerk. Deal with it, ass fuck.

i did post it to get your attention, so i could put another lame superiority complex having mf in his place. unfortunately for you, i did not fail, because i didnt want to get you angry, i wanted to let everyone see what an idiot you were, and it worked as someone even laughed at my comment about you. as for the dark person thing, yeah you think you look cool by acting narcissistic like i said before. of course, like all internet assholes, you have to insert an insult somewhere in there, nice, i hope that makes you feel better about having a lousy personality.

skygod333 wrote:
As for Magnus, this air-headed sophitcate wannabe, it's still a versus thread. It went nowhere. At all. You failed. You two ought to make a group. The failures club.

whoops, almost forgot this part. yeah, magnus is right, not all versus threads are to be deleted.
1200 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / sydney, australia
Offline
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08
i wasn't claiming that their ideas are wrong i was just saying from conversations i've had with psychology students that these two men aren't very credible
4082 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / USA
Offline
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08
Wha? o.o
28685 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / F / Michigan, USA
Offline
Posted 1/6/08 , edited 4/18/08

magnus102 wrote:

Out of the two who do you feel came closer to truly understanding the nature of the human mind? I prefer Jung and disagree with some of Freuds assertions. Frankly I consider many of his ideas on the life and death drive to be laughable. Thantos especially fits the bill of pseudo scientific intellectual vomit.

This could have been a good thread if people had:

1. Been mature
2. Made longer posts that actually said something. Not just sarcastic oneliners about Freud.

~ Locked, next time you try to make an intelligent thread don't encourage people to mess it up by responding to their flaming.
You must be logged in to post.