First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
Enjo Kosai
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 7/29/10 , edited 7/29/10
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enjo_k%C5%8Dsai

Enjo Kosai means 'Compensated Dating', where you go on a date with someone / spend time with them in return for material items or money. It may include but does not always include sexual favors.

Would you do this ? Go on a date with someone in return for material goods or money ? Why or why not ? And how do you feel about this practice ?

I'd personally do it, I'm not gonna have sex with you for money / stuff, but I don't mind spending time you with, or going to a movie or something. Single lonely rich people need love too you know.
3498 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Nowheresville, MI
Offline
Posted 7/29/10
Ya' know, I'd probably do it. Even if sexual favor were involved. What the hell, getting laid's getting laid and why not get paid to do it? Yeah, yeah, I know it'd be prostitution. Blah, blah, blah. She gets a need fulfilled, be it spending time with someone or gettin' the high hard one, and I get paid. However, conditions would have to be meet for the sexual favors option to be available.
Posted 7/29/10

Allhailodin wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enjo_k%C5%8Dsai

Enjo Kosai means 'Compensated Dating', where you go on a date with someone / spend time with them in return for material items or money. It may include but does not always include sexual favors.

Would you do this ? Go on a date with someone in return for material goods or money ? Why or why not ? And how do you feel about this practice ?


I'd personally do it, I'm not gonna have sex with you for money / stuff, but I don't mind spending time you with, or going to a movie or something. Single lonely rich people need love too you know.
No, I wouldn't. Because that will just devalue my social self, by me downplaying my emotion and personal conviction about romantic love into something inhumane. It's like I'm an emotionally easy and economically cheap date, and I should feel good about myself being rewarded for just such behavior. Furthermore, this just prove how irrational the human sense of economy is known as "loss aversion". In other words, only those who are emotionally bankrupted sociopaths would disregard their social selves' worth.

Single lonely rich people need love? When the fact is that only married men with high incomes are buying this "social service", just who the hell are you kidding?
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 7/29/10 , edited 7/29/10

DomFortress wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enjo_k%C5%8Dsai

Enjo Kosai means 'Compensated Dating', where you go on a date with someone / spend time with them in return for material items or money. It may include but does not always include sexual favors.

Would you do this ? Go on a date with someone in return for material goods or money ? Why or why not ? And how do you feel about this practice ?


I'd personally do it, I'm not gonna have sex with you for money / stuff, but I don't mind spending time you with, or going to a movie or something. Single lonely rich people need love too you know.
No, I wouldn't. Because that will just devalue my social self, by me downplaying my emotion and personal conviction about romantic love into something inhumane. It's like I'm an emotionally easy and economically cheap date, and I should feel good about myself being rewarded for just such behavior. Furthermore, this just prove how irrational the human sense of economy is known as "loss aversion". In other words, only those who are emotionally bankrupted sociopaths would disregard their social selves' worth.

Single lonely rich people need love? When the fact is that only married men with high incomes are buying this "social service", just who the hell are you kidding?


Oh ? So can you prove that ?
Posted 7/29/10

Allhailodin wrote:


DomFortress wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enjo_k%C5%8Dsai

Enjo Kosai means 'Compensated Dating', where you go on a date with someone / spend time with them in return for material items or money. It may include but does not always include sexual favors.

Would you do this ? Go on a date with someone in return for material goods or money ? Why or why not ? And how do you feel about this practice ?


I'd personally do it, I'm not gonna have sex with you for money / stuff, but I don't mind spending time you with, or going to a movie or something. Single lonely rich people need love too you know.
No, I wouldn't. Because that will just devalue my social self, by me downplaying my emotion and personal conviction about romantic love into something inhumane. It's like I'm an emotionally easy and economically cheap date, and I should feel good about myself being rewarded for just such behavior. Furthermore, this just prove how irrational the human sense of economy is known as "loss aversion". In other words, only those who are emotionally bankrupted sociopaths would disregard their social selves' worth.

Single lonely rich people need love? When the fact is that only married men with high incomes are buying this "social service", just who the hell are you kidding?


Oh ? So can you prove that ?
As in what?
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 7/29/10

DomFortress wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


DomFortress wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enjo_k%C5%8Dsai

Enjo Kosai means 'Compensated Dating', where you go on a date with someone / spend time with them in return for material items or money. It may include but does not always include sexual favors.

Would you do this ? Go on a date with someone in return for material goods or money ? Why or why not ? And how do you feel about this practice ?


I'd personally do it, I'm not gonna have sex with you for money / stuff, but I don't mind spending time you with, or going to a movie or something. Single lonely rich people need love too you know.
No, I wouldn't. Because that will just devalue my social self, by me downplaying my emotion and personal conviction about romantic love into something inhumane. It's like I'm an emotionally easy and economically cheap date, and I should feel good about myself being rewarded for just such behavior. Furthermore, this just prove how irrational the human sense of economy is known as "loss aversion". In other words, only those who are emotionally bankrupted sociopaths would disregard their social selves' worth.

Single lonely rich people need love? When the fact is that only married men with high incomes are buying this "social service", just who the hell are you kidding?


Oh ? So can you prove that ?


As in what?


Single lonely rich people need love? When the fact is that only married men with high incomes are buying this "social service", just who the hell are you kidding?
27 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21
Offline
Posted 7/29/10
What if a spunky 10 year old takes your i pod and wont give it back unless you take him to the park
Posted 7/29/10

Allhailodin wrote:



Single lonely rich people need love? When the fact is that only married men with high incomes are buying this "social service", just who the hell are you kidding?
What? You didn't know that while the Japanese women are actively pursuing those single lonely rich people, the not so rich but equally single and lonely Japanese individuals are not even actively engaging in social activities? Thereby through inductive reasoning, who do you think that are left in the market for "compensated dating"? That's right, attached and rich individuals who are actively seeking younger mates.
Posted 7/29/10
A stupid ploy. Dating doesn't need to cost a dime.
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 7/29/10

DomFortress wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:



Single lonely rich people need love? When the fact is that only married men with high incomes are buying this "social service", just who the hell are you kidding?


What? You didn't know that while the Japanese women are actively pursuing those single lonely rich people, the not so rich but equally single and lonely Japanese individuals are not even actively engaging in social activities? Thereby through inductive reasoning, who do you think that are left in the market for "compensated dating"? That's right, attached and rich individuals who are actively seeking younger mates.


That's is not adequate proof. As this phenomenon occurs in other countries besides Japan.

So show me solid factual proof that not a single person other than wealthy married persons in any country has paid anyone anywhere for a date.
Posted 7/29/10

Allhailodin wrote:


DomFortress wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:



Single lonely rich people need love? When the fact is that only married men with high incomes are buying this "social service", just who the hell are you kidding?


What? You didn't know that while the Japanese women are actively pursuing those single lonely rich people, the not so rich but equally single and lonely Japanese individuals are not even actively engaging in social activities? Thereby through inductive reasoning, who do you think that are left in the market for "compensated dating"? That's right, attached and rich individuals who are actively seeking younger mates.


That's is not adequate proof. As this phenomenon occurs in other countries besides Japan.

So show me solid factual proof that not a single person other than wealthy married persons in any country has paid anyone anywhere for a date.
Because in everywhere else this is called an "escort service".
10513 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / In your room stea...
Offline
Posted 7/29/10

DomFortress wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


DomFortress wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:



Single lonely rich people need love? When the fact is that only married men with high incomes are buying this "social service", just who the hell are you kidding?


What? You didn't know that while the Japanese women are actively pursuing those single lonely rich people, the not so rich but equally single and lonely Japanese individuals are not even actively engaging in social activities? Thereby through inductive reasoning, who do you think that are left in the market for "compensated dating"? That's right, attached and rich individuals who are actively seeking younger mates.


That's is not adequate proof. As this phenomenon occurs in other countries besides Japan.

So show me solid factual proof that not a single person other than wealthy married persons in any country has paid anyone anywhere for a date.


Because in everywhere else this is called an "escort service".


Irrelevant, Changing the name of something does not change what it is. My point still stands.
Posted 7/29/10

Allhailodin wrote:


DomFortress wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:


DomFortress wrote:


Allhailodin wrote:



Single lonely rich people need love? When the fact is that only married men with high incomes are buying this "social service", just who the hell are you kidding?


What? You didn't know that while the Japanese women are actively pursuing those single lonely rich people, the not so rich but equally single and lonely Japanese individuals are not even actively engaging in social activities? Thereby through inductive reasoning, who do you think that are left in the market for "compensated dating"? That's right, attached and rich individuals who are actively seeking younger mates.


That's is not adequate proof. As this phenomenon occurs in other countries besides Japan.

So show me solid factual proof that not a single person other than wealthy married persons in any country has paid anyone anywhere for a date.


Because in everywhere else this is called an "escort service".


Irrelevant, Changing the name of something does not change what it is. My point still stands.
As in you don't have proof for your claim? Whereas I OTOH had simply eliminated all other options via inductive reasoning, thereby my proof is my reasoning via system of additional information. And that's a standard practice accepted everywhere in a court of laws.

Also, it's still only your hypothesis of "a single person other than wealthy married persons in any country has paid anyone anywhere for a date". Thereby the burden of proof is solely onto your shoulders, not mine.
Posted 7/29/10
Don't you have a thread like this in the General Discussion section?
_____

My answer is still the same, no.
Posted 7/29/10

mystic17 wrote:

Don't you have a thread like this in the General Discussion section?
_____

My answer is still the same, no.
Good for you!
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.