First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
14yo Girl Charged With Consensual Sex Under Sharia Law
Posted 8/20/10

Sunnyxx wrote:

What angers me about this situation is indeed, not how it's being dealt with but rather that a girl would lie about being raped to get herself out of trouble.
There's evidence pointing against her, for example messages, and yet she continues to blame an apparently innocent man.
Objection!

Can you proof his innocent? When he's fully aware of the fact that it was his 28 years old dick inside her underage pussy. Or are you going to proof that he's a retard? When the maturation of the human's brain continues beyond age 20.
4295 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Youtube!
Offline
Posted 8/20/10 , edited 8/20/10

DomFortress wrote:



Objection!

Can you proof his innocent? When he's fully aware of the fact that it was his 28 years old dick inside her underage pussy. Or are you going to proof that he's a retard? When the maturation of the human's brain continues beyond age 20.


i was deliberately careful with my wording cause I saw this coming.
It says RAPE at the start not statutory rape, which are kind of different things tbh.
Key words; "a" rather than "the" implying it's not just this case
"apparently" means i can't prove it but it sure as hell looks that way.
But seriously, why would she be sending him texts anyway? Something about that would be real fishy if she really was raped.

Shit I need more caffeine. *headdesk*
174 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F / la la land
Offline
Posted 8/20/10

DomFortress wrote:


Sunnyxx wrote:

What angers me about this situation is indeed, not how it's being dealt with but rather that a girl would lie about being raped to get herself out of trouble.
There's evidence pointing against her, for example messages, and yet she continues to blame an apparently innocent man.
Objection!

Can you proof his innocent? When he's fully aware of the fact that it was his 28 years old dick inside her underage pussy. Or are you going to proof that he's a retard? When the maturation of the human's brain continues beyond age 20.


Sorry for this but I suck at quoting things so I'm gonna post a picture instead.



Anyway, there is absolutely no evidence that the girl did. in fact, get raped so I'm inclined to believe that this was all fabricated bullshit.

Posted 8/20/10 , edited 8/20/10

Sunnyxx wrote:


DomFortress wrote:



Objection!

Can you proof his innocent? When he's fully aware of the fact that it was his 28 years old dick inside her underage pussy. Or are you going to proof that he's a retard? When the maturation of the human's brain continues beyond age 20.


i was deliberately careful with my wording cause I saw this coming.
It says RAPE at the start not statutory rape, which are kind of different things tbh.
Key words; "a" rather than "the" implying it's not just this case
"apparently" means i can't prove it but it sure as hell looks that way.
But seriously, why would she be sending him texts anyway? Something about that would be real fishy if she really was raped.


Shit I need more caffeine. *headdesk*
Objection caffeine rush!(latest evidence against caffeine)

The fact still remains that the physically and mentally more matured man agreed to have sex with an unequally less matured woman. Thereby I don't think the man was ever taken advantaged by the obviously less informed woman.

Finally, you should read and study the Brazilian laws under sexual offense, where it clearly states that it's an honest woman's duty to pursuit justice within the Brazilian legal system. In other words, the Brazilian laws value honesty in women above all else, yet it let's dishonest men getting away with sexual offense.


kauaimore wrote:


Sorry for this but I suck at quoting things so I'm gonna post a picture instead.



Anyway, there is absolutely no evidence that the girl did. in fact, get raped so I'm inclined to believe that this was all fabricated bullshit.
See my above reply in bold for my critical analysis on gender inequality within the Brazilian laws under sexual offense.
4295 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Youtube!
Offline
Posted 8/20/10 , edited 8/20/10

DomFortress wrote:

Objection caffeine rush!(latest evidence against caffeine)

The fact still remains that the physically and mentally more matured man agreed to have sex with an unequally less matured woman. Thereby I don't think the man was ever taken advantaged by the obviously less informed woman.

Finally, you should read and study the Brazilian laws under sexual offense, where it clearly states that it's an honest woman's duty to pursuit justice within the Brazilian legal system. In other words, the Brazilian laws value honesty in women above all else, yet it let's dishonest men getting away with sexual offense.


We have established that he's a creep, but the fact remains that she knew what she was doing at the time (she's 14, not 4) and due to this she shouldn't go back on that, and try to shift ALL the blame on to him. She may be less informed and less mature but she still had a hand in it.
I don't even pretend to know anything about Brazilian law, and I never brought it up. I was giving my opinion on what she did rather than how the legal system was handling it.

Edit; Lol at the article.
I only had a latte anyway. Mmm. Don't tell me it's fattening, I know. I'm allowed cause I'm skinny anyway. :3
And left handed, so according to that site, I'm better at video games than you. (considering you're right handed, at least..)
Posted 8/20/10

Sunnyxx wrote:


DomFortress wrote:

Objection caffeine rush!(latest evidence against caffeine)

The fact still remains that the physically and mentally more matured man agreed to have sex with an unequally less matured woman. Thereby I don't think the man was ever taken advantaged by the obviously less informed woman.

Finally, you should read and study the Brazilian laws under sexual offense, where it clearly states that it's an honest woman's duty to pursuit justice within the Brazilian legal system. In other words, the Brazilian laws value honesty in women above all else, yet it let's dishonest men getting away with sexual offense.


We have established that he's a creep, but the fact remains that she knew what she was doing at the time (she's 14, not 4) and due to this she shouldn't go back on that, and try to shift ALL the blame on to him. She may be less informed and less mature but she still had a hand in it.
I don't even pretend to know anything about Brazilian law, and I never brought it up. I was giving my opinion on what she did rather than how the legal system was handling it.
But the fact still remains that it was the "creepy" man who agreed/consented upon the act, while this couldn't have happened when either one of the girl's parents were at home. In other words, he still took advantage on the situation of him praying on the relatively innocent girl. While your opinion only on what the girl did doesn't count, because you cannot speak on her behave when you aren't her.
4295 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Youtube!
Offline
Posted 8/20/10

DomFortress wrote:

But the fact still remains that it was the "creepy" man who agreed/consented upon the act, while this couldn't have happened when either one of the girl's parents were at home. In other words, he still took advantage on the situation of him praying on the relatively innocent girl. While your opinion only on what the girl did doesn't count, because you cannot speak on her behave when you aren't her.


Then don't speak on my caffeine behaviour when you're not me.



My brain isn't fried... i hope.
Posted 8/20/10

Sunnyxx wrote:


DomFortress wrote:

But the fact still remains that it was the "creepy" man who agreed/consented upon the act, while this couldn't have happened when either one of the girl's parents were at home. In other words, he still took advantage on the situation of him praying on the relatively innocent girl. While your opinion only on what the girl did doesn't count, because you cannot speak on her behave when you aren't her.


Then don't speak on my caffeine behaviour when you're not me.



My brain isn't fried... i hope.
When you didn't even acknowledge your own contradicting statement regarding your faulty assumption towards my lifestyle as a fitness trainer? I doubt it.
4295 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Youtube!
Offline
Posted 8/20/10

DomFortress wrote:

When you didn't even acknowledge your own contradicting statement regarding your faulty assumption towards my lifestyle as a fitness trainer? I doubt it.


So... if i read that right, being a fitness trainer makes you an ace at video games?
I didn't mention sports because i KNOW i'm terrible at them.

... i'm just hoping i read that right because atm my brain is doing that thing where i read, but can't visualize it.
(Maybe my brain is fried... buttttt what was the need to comment on it? (besides that only really happens when i'm tired..) :3 )
Posted 8/20/10

Sunnyxx wrote:


DomFortress wrote:

When you didn't even acknowledge your own contradicting statement regarding your faulty assumption towards my lifestyle as a fitness trainer? I doubt it.


So... if i read that right, being a fitness trainer makes you an ace at video games?
I didn't mention sports because i KNOW i'm terrible at them.

... i'm just hoping i read that right because atm my brain is doing that thing where i read, but can't visualize it.
(Maybe my brain is fried... buttttt what was the need to comment on it? (besides that only really happens when i'm tired..) :3 )
It means that while I continuously stimulating my brain with real mental and physical activities, you OTOH are being sociologically processed by games.
4295 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Youtube!
Offline
Posted 8/20/10 , edited 8/20/10

DomFortress wrote:

It means that while I continuously stimulating my brain with real mental and physical activities, you OTOH are being sociologically processed by games.


You're rather hypocritical at times, are you not?
You go on about me assuming what your lifestyle is like, and you assume I actually play loads of games.
just sayin the website said I should be better And I'm not as bad at them as I am at sport... but I never said I was any good. And why keep up something you're absolutely pants at?

(I think we've gotten a bit off topic though.. )
Posted 8/20/10 , edited 8/20/10

Sunnyxx wrote:


DomFortress wrote:

It means that while I continuously stimulating my brain with real mental and physical activities, you OTOH are being sociologically processed by games.


You're rather hypocritical at times, are you not?
You go on about me assuming what your lifestyle is like, and you assume I actually play loads of games.
just sayin the website said I should be better And I'm not as bad at them as I am at sport... but I never said I was any good. And why keep up something you're absolutely pants at?

(I think we've gotten a bit off topic though.. )
At what? Your own natural human irrationalities known as "loss aversion", "confirmation bias", and "representativeness"? You didn't even establish a fact that I was indeed right-handed, when you still just assumed that I was. While I don't care about how good you are at gaming, when I can tell from your initial expression that you used gaming as a "red herring" political fallacy.

Finally, if you haven't notice it by now, I've been coining your fallacies in accordance to your lack of independent critical thinking and subsequently your poor individual judgment.
174 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F / la la land
Offline
Posted 8/20/10 , edited 8/20/10

DomFortress wrote:


Sunnyxx wrote:


DomFortress wrote:



Objection!

Can you proof his innocent? When he's fully aware of the fact that it was his 28 years old dick inside her underage pussy. Or are you going to proof that he's a retard? When the maturation of the human's brain continues beyond age 20.


i was deliberately careful with my wording cause I saw this coming.
It says RAPE at the start not statutory rape, which are kind of different things tbh.
Key words; "a" rather than "the" implying it's not just this case
"apparently" means i can't prove it but it sure as hell looks that way.
But seriously, why would she be sending him texts anyway? Something about that would be real fishy if she really was raped.


Shit I need more caffeine. *headdesk*
Objection caffeine rush!(latest evidence against caffeine)

The fact still remains that the physically and mentally more matured man agreed to have sex with an unequally less matured woman. Thereby I don't think the man was ever taken advantaged by the obviously less informed woman.

Finally, you should read and study the Brazilian laws under sexual offense, where it clearly states that it's an honest woman's duty to pursuit justice within the Brazilian legal system. In other words, the Brazilian laws value honesty in women above all else, yet it let's dishonest men getting away with sexual offense.


kauaimore wrote:


Sorry for this but I suck at quoting things so I'm gonna post a picture instead.



Anyway, there is absolutely no evidence that the girl did. in fact, get raped so I'm inclined to believe that this was all fabricated bullshit.
See my above reply in bold for my critical analysis on gender inequality within the Brazilian laws under sexual offense.


Call me dense but I honestly have no Idea why you're bringing up Brazilian laws. The trial is being done on Abu Dhabi, no? Why would Brazil's law matter here? Please elaborate.

Whoops, Quick edit here.
I just realized that the articles title is (now?) "Accused girl, 14, denies incident with bus driver ever took place".
Take that as you will, but I personally think that it backs up my claim that absolutely nothing happened between the two of them. Like, at all.
4295 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Youtube!
Offline
Posted 8/20/10

DomFortress wrote:

At what? Your own natural human irrationalities known as "loss aversion", "confirmation bias", and "representativeness"? You didn't even establish a fact that I was indeed right-handed, when you still just assumed that I was. While I don't care about how good you are at gaming, when I can tell from your initial expression that you used gaming as a "red herring" political fallacy.

Finally, if you haven't notice it by now, I've been coining your fallacies in accordance to your lack of independent critical thinking and subsequently your poor individual judgment.


Oh leave me alone. XP
I got 4 hours sleep last night and can barely read.
That and I really cba with this anymore. You took an off the cuff comment on something not directed at you as srs bsns, and I'm not really up for debate over my personal life at this point.
So I'll finish with this;

umad?
Posted 8/20/10

kauaimore wrote:



Call me dense but I honestly have no Idea why you're bringing up Brazilian laws. The trial is being done on Abu Dhabi, no? Why would Brazil's law matter here? Please elaborate.
Isn't the girl Brazilian according to her nationality? And if you wanna argue how Sharia law is equally gender biased, you're more than welcome to try.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.