Well survival of the fittest can also refer to one intellect and not just the body. a company started by a person and higher people so they can work and take home a pay check. To me the owner is worth more than the works They took the chances of building a business putting everything on the line. Worker generally do not risk anything that do what there told and taught to do the job. In many case worker kill a business through demand even knowing that the demand cannot be kept. Mistletoe kill it's host and union do the same, like a parasite that kills it host not a successful parasite.

I really hate when people trot out Darwin's infamous phrase in a societal context.

They usually make 'Fittest' out to mean 'most entitled due to <insert attribute here>' this is more like the Calvinist concept of 'the elect' than what Darwin meant by that phrase.

The full context describes a situation where the creatures most suited to their environment (ie those who make the closest fit) are the ones most likely to survive. Which is entirely different from the idea that the strong should outlive the weak or the smart should outlive the dumb.

Just so you all know.

(edited for atrocious grammar due to a post entered in haste.)

I guess we are all born with the same rights
but there are exceptions like countries, money and who your family is
But yes I dont think the world has come yet to equality and peace

Humans will never view other humans as their equal. That's all there is to it and that's all there ever will be.

Only because of a bad attitude? You're giving yourself too much credits with insufficient justification, when you didn't even explain how and what caused people to have this attitude, and why. While numerous others had made better counterargument against your claims.

Well find me a case where human's view each other's as equal in the buisness world without an exterior motive. Then we'll talk. Greed, hate, envy, etc. are all primal instincts in all humans. And the truth is being true to the evil or worse instincts are far easier then being true to good ones such as compassion, love, unity, etc.

But hey whatever floats your boat. If you want to think that humans will think of everyone as equals then sure go ahead. And yes my view on the world is negative, but it's also realistic. Cause that's what most of the world is. Bad. Not good like idealistic people would like to think. Bad out weighs good, simply because it's far easier to be bad then it is to be good.

The video points out nothing to me other then helping to prove my point. The whole point of the video is about oppression of women. Which proves my point of unequality.
You don't donate to someone who you see as your equal as that's retarded. You would only donate to someone who was less fortunate then you or therefore not your equal. To anyone who disagrees with that, donate some money to me. Then we'll argue on that point.

I'll find you the neurological proof that's stems from human biological nature, and not the psychopathic fiction of stupidity.

Not only that, your own negative and thereby biased viewpoint wasn't just unrealistic but also wrong. Just like how you would victimize yourself as a retard just to proof how stupid you are. Now that's just plain pathetic.

Ad Hominem look at you last reply on this subject then think about what was just posted.

Yeah I've seen that video. The point of it's not an equal but an empathetic. Those are two different things. Just because your empathetic or feel empathy towards someone doesn't mean you see them as an equal.
As for bias, yes of course my view is biased. IT'S MY VIEW. If it's your opinion then it's obviously going to be biased. Finding someone who has no bias in their opinion in today's society is nearly impossible. And as for the victimizing, I was simply using myself as an example.
How is it unrealistic?
How about you find me some concrete proof/action of people, instead of research and information? Then we can talk.

Think before you speak, for you just missed his contradiction. When he was asking for donation from those he thinks negatively and thereby lesser of. Otherwise, do feel free to report my post to a CR mod, not pretending to correct what's obviously not my mistake. Or have yourself sunk to the point of mindless trolling?

When did I ever say that just because I think negatively of someone they are lesser?
My whole point was that you would not donate to someone who was equal so when I was saying donate I was refering to equals not lesser. That sounded wierd.

Well I screwed up DomFortress I just gotten use to you beating up on people. If you want to bury a hatchet in my think scull please do. Sorry And I do mean it.

No, for what's the point of me showing you the scientific facts of human neurological, biological, and sociological processes? When you'll just deny them in order for yourself to uphold your entitlement claims of total BS. Instead I'll make you eat your own illogical self-contradiction, and thus humiliate yourself even further:But you do think of everyone negatively, yourself included. So by your own reasoning of "you don't donate to someone who you see as your equal as that's retarded", you just subsequently made yourself equally retarded by your own illogical self-contradiction. Because your original point was yourself trying to justified human inequality, but you ended up proving the exact opposite.

zombehs is trolling the shit out of you, Johnny. Though I think you might already know that.

Which is why I've switched tactic, by myself force-feeding him his own contradicting BS troll baits. It's not my fault that he bought into his own BS in the first place.