First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
What are your opinions on Paparazzi?
5406 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F / NY
Offline
Posted 12/21/10 , edited 12/21/10
In my opinion I think they should be regulated and controlled more to a certain degree in what many of them tend to do. - Stalking.
I mean there's plenty of stories of them stalking celebrities' children. You can argue that celebrities "deserved" the consequences of being famous; having stalkers and the media on them; but seriously. Once you're stalking children who are obviously not going to even help in giving you a scoop in the first place, (and the fact that they are children!) there is something wrong.

Now others may argue, that no one, even a celebrity should not have anyone "legally" stalking them. But then again, some people will say that it could lead to a violation of freedom of speech and press, so they shouldn't be banned.

I wanted to know what other people thought about this. I mean a lot of Paparazzi apparently (Not definitely, I can't be too sure) don't even get background checks. What if one of them is a pedophile or just some real psycho?

Correct me if I have any of this information wrong. Thanks.

(I'm pretty sure someone is going to bring up Princess Diana; but let's keep in mind that it was her drunk driver and the papparazzi's fault and tragic accidents aren't all caused by Paparazzi. Though I do believe that with enough control on anything, you can help prevent some (because you can't possibly hope to prevent all) damages.)

Well, incase anyone missed it, my opinion is that there should be some sort of more regulation once it gets out of hand. Though I wouldn't go as far as to ban them.
Posted 12/21/10

Once you're stalking children who are obviously not going to even help in giving you a scoop in the first place, (and the fact that they are children!) there is something wrong.


But... But... Pedobear approves...

K, enough trolling, serious talk time:

They get annoying, but they have the rights to. But then again, people also have the rights of privacy. If it gets too extreme, then something should be done about it.
871 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / F / U.S.
Offline
Posted 12/21/10
I don't think it's that serious.... I mean. they're not hurting anybody...physically. maybe emotionally
1653 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18
Offline
Posted 12/21/10
I would scar a child's life if I got paid enough for it. ._. So what do you think?
Posted 12/21/10
Lets think about it this way:

Would a baby Whatshisface adopted from some third world shithole, even know what a camera was?
How would they be scarred by paparazzi, when they don't even know what they were?
Posted 12/21/10
Target practice.
Posted 12/21/10
There is no controlling them.

Scum will be scum 0___0
17683 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / Moon
Offline
Posted 12/21/10
they're bad .... the problem is that they exist because most people "enjoy" the dark secrets of celebrities ; how would you like it if i hired somebody and everytime you do something remotely embarrassing he takes shots of it and shares your embarrassing moments with everybody ....
5406 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F / NY
Offline
Posted 12/21/10

GheyDeer wrote:

Lets think about it this way:

Would a baby Whatshisface adopted from some third world shithole, even know what a camera was?
How would they be scarred by paparazzi, when they don't even know what they were?


Does that justify the reason for stalking?
Posted 12/21/10

Godamie wrote:


GheyDeer wrote:

Lets think about it this way:

Would a baby Whatshisface adopted from some third world shithole, even know what a camera was?
How would they be scarred by paparazzi, when they don't even know what they were?


Does that justify the reason for stalking?


And where exactly in my post does it say that?
5406 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / F / NY
Offline
Posted 12/21/10

GheyDeer wrote:


Godamie wrote:


GheyDeer wrote:

Lets think about it this way:

Would a baby Whatshisface adopted from some third world shithole, even know what a camera was?
How would they be scarred by paparazzi, when they don't even know what they were?


Does that justify the reason for stalking?


And where exactly in my post does it say that?


Where exactly in my post does it talk about third world countries?
Posted 12/21/10

Godamie wrote:


GheyDeer wrote:


Godamie wrote:


GheyDeer wrote:

Lets think about it this way:

Would a baby Whatshisface adopted from some third world shithole, even know what a camera was?
How would they be scarred by paparazzi, when they don't even know what they were?


Does that justify the reason for stalking?


And where exactly in my post does it say that?


Where exactly in my post does it talk about third world countries?


Where exactly in my post does it talk about countries
Now if you're talking about shitholes.

When you mentioned children.
Children of celebrities are adopted from third world shit-holes.
Posted 12/21/10 , edited 12/21/10


Godamie, don't feed the troll >.<
754 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / F / Califonia
Offline
Posted 12/21/10
Well I think theres paparazzi cause theres actually people who buy those stupid magazines and people who care about bussiness that have nothing to do with them thats why papparazi works for...
Posted 12/21/10

otaku_125 wrote:



Godamie, don't feed the troll >.<


Well if she's really that half-assed about her argument on this topic, she'll stop feeding.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.