|
|
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
Culture must not change because it is an identity, what needed to change is the life styles. From a sociological perspective, what you're asking is an oxymoron, especially when you consider the psychological abuse of women in China is a cultural trend: Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we
know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation) Now you tell me, just how do you plan on changing the Chinese patriarchal lifestyle of neglecting women? Without yourself first addressing the Chinese cultural lag/tradition as your core identity? Chinese patriarchy refers to the history and prevalence of male dominance in Chinese society and culture. Mencius outlined the Three Subordinations. A woman was to be subordinate to her father in youth, her husband in maturity, and her son in old age. A cliché of classical texts, which is repeated throughout the tradition, is the familiar notion that men govern the outer world, while women govern the home. In the Han dynasty, the female historian Ban Zhao wrote the Lessons for Women, advice on how women should behave. She outlines the Four Virtues women must abide by, proper virtue, proper speech, proper countenance, proper merit. The "three subordinations and the four virtues" is a common four-character phrase throughout the imperial period. As for the historical development of Chinese patriarchy, women's status was highest in the Tang dynasty, when women played sports (polo) and were generally freer in fashion and conduct. Between the Tang and Song dynasties, a fad for little feet arose, and from the Song dynasty onwards footbinding became more and more common for the elite. In the Ming dynasty, a tradition of virtuous widowhood developed. Widows, even if widowed at a young age, would be expected not to remarry. Their virtuous names might be displayed on the arch at the entrance of the village. Symptoms of patriarchy in 20th and 21st century China include the immense pressure on women to get married before the age of 30, and the incidence of female infanticide associated with China's one child policy. However, footbinding has been eradicated and trafficking in women in China has greatly reduced.( citation)
Divorce race [ by husband side ] and rape/sexual abuse crimes are 20 times far lower than in america, so what you said about how there is a "women abuse" culture in China are just nonsense. And are those "psychological abuses"? No? Then what's your point?
My point is there is no "women abuse" culture stuff in China since divorce, rape, sexual abuse happend in all parts of the world. And what do you call these? Your ignorance and denial at work? Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation)
Maybe you have some eye sigh issue since I already said "nonsense" on my previous post. No proof, no reason, no point. Your opinion is thereby rejected as bogus claim in academia study. You amateur.
You claim Chinese have "women abuse" culture while in reality divorce race, rape and sexual abuse crimes in China each year are 20 times far more lower than america. What else do you use to prove the existence of the "women abuse" culture in China you dreaming of, just from a books or word of mouth?
Speaking as a true-blue proud Chinese, yes, 'Female submission' is an intergral part of our culture- Confucius， rather 孔夫子，taught that in the great hierarchy of the world, Men held dominion over their children and their wives, as Emperors held dominion of the men, and Gods held dominion over Emperors and men. The fact that there is less divorce is because of their, until recently, severly totalitarian system and their culture not only frown upon any divorces, but, upon divorce, there is little that a woman can do, being mostly rustic and semi-illiterate, and such. Now, if you cite Taiwan, where Chinese Democracy and Chinese Culture was not obstructed by or controlled by the Communist Party, then, yes, you may have something, but you cite the Mainland, which, like Oceania of Orwell, doesn't really care for the happiness so long as they are together and they have only one child.
All you are saying have no reflection in reality, I would to say the one who have women abuse culture are american by saying american have a very high rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year then I would likely to be believed compared to you or anyone who said China have women abuse culture while China have far less rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year.
Ahem- yes Confucius did teach that women are inferior to men. You can read up on the Analects if you don't believe me.
Second, yes, we have higher rape- that is because more rape is reported and that China have stricter laws on about everything, whereas we feel that while rape is wrong, China's method of working rapist to death seems overkill.In addition, I have watch a Chinese movie where a city girl was captured and raped and forced to be wife with her rapist, and the incompetant officials are completely idiotic and impotent. This is a PRC movie, mind you. Rape is not an American thing or a Chinese thing, there is rape in Japan, France, Great Britain, Canada- and they are significantly higher in those nations because woman are able to report on it, whereas, in China, our culture and the totalitarianism of the PRC prevents woman from speaking out against it. Also, divorce is not a sign of female abuse, rather, it is a sign of Woman empowerment, that woman get to have a say in marriage. So, point is moot. Now, rebutting your petty points, I must question your scource for this information, the PRC is the modern Iron Curtain, how do we really know what goes on it there?
You still don't get it, word and reality are 2 very deferent things, what is the use you say all of those nonsense when in reality Chinese have more respect for females compared to american by looking at rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate of both countries? You only sticking to nonsense or something baseless in reality.
Divorce [ by husband ] side mostly occured because the husband does not love his wife or he want to dump her for another female.
Yes, words and reality are two different things- your words are completely worthless without objective real world data or any form of reasoning.
Divorce, in America, occurs on both side in equal rate- maybe that's why we have a higher divorce rate than poor, patriarchical PRC.
Also, canst thou explain the inequity of the sexes, that men outnumber maidens in post-'One-Child' China, if they be so virtuous and gynephilic as thou claim'st? Did the Faerie-Queen spirit away the maiden-child and leave behind only boys? Or were the Chinese loins like those that King Henry VIII hath wish were his, boy-bearing?
What matter is rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate are 20 times more lower in China than in america that shows Chinese have far more higher respect for females which you accuse have "women abuse culture" compared to america which you claim to respect females.
I already addressed that issue in a previous post that I take you didn't bother to read, being the obstinate and crude fellow you are. We respect woman, that is why we don't abandon girl-children to the shitty orphanages of the state.
What you don't get is you don't really understand the meaning of "word" and "reality".
What is the use you accuse Chinese have "women abuse culture" when in reality Chinese respect females much more better than american, the reality that rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate 20 times more lower in China than in america.
It is like someone saying he is a guy who respect females but in reality he love to abuse females, his action speak louder.
Nothing says 'I love Womankind' more than throwing female babies into adoption houses (if they are lucky), and then hoping for a boy. It is that kind of action that gives China their oh-so-great image of a modern, feminist nation, unstained by chauvinism and, I don't know, aborting babies when they know that it will turn out females. After all, they love girls so much, that, when given a choice of one child, they decided that China is too much of a hell hole for innocent girls to be born into, and choose, instead, little boys.
Yes, actions, actions, actions, they tell you more of your character than your words- aborting female babies based on sex tells us how much you love females, while guarenteeing women the right to vote, free speech, and basically saying in law why women and men are equal in rights is a sign of how great female oppression here in the west. I take everything back- China loves woman so much, that they expect them to be as all liberated women when entering matrimony- submissive to their husband.
If you talk about abortion, abortion in China also far lower than in america, you seems to be the type who believ words than reality more.
Right...my friend (immigrant) was almost not born because his doctor was about to abort him- fortunately, his mother bribed him to look the other way. That, madam, is reality, you don't get a choice in abortion, you just get one kid- otherwise, how else do you explain why there is a disproportional amount of male:female ratio? My words are backed by facts, yours by conjectures and propoganda- whose word should any sane man believe?
中华文化是男人的文化！
1 case vs 1,3 billion?
I don't know what you are typing in Kanji but if you think it will convince peoples of what you said then you are mistaken it.
這
不
是
﹁
か
ん
じ
﹂
，
這
是
漢
字
！
你在那��
Didn't quite catch that- can you rewrite whatever you were planning to write?
What I'm saying is your source are not reliable because it is not directly from the country official source such as government source. When I'm saying american have far more rape case than China, I'm using the source from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/data/table_01.html And yet you didn't provide any "official source" regarding rape data in China from the 国家安全部/ Ministry of State Sercurity of the People's Republic of China(MSS), which is the Chinese equivalent of merging both FBI and CIA. Could it be that you can't even get that information because the MSS crime database isn't even a public domain unlike FBI's? So all this time you're just making bogus claims, when you yourself knew nothing about Chinese government's lack of transparency.
|
|
Banned
749 cr points
Send Message:   26 / M / ASIA - Land Of An...
 Offline
|
The source you claim to be an official source from China are turning out to be rubbish, it is not come from Chinese police or similar department.
|
1982 cr points
Send Message: 22 / M / Guess
Offline
|
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
Culture must not change because it is an identity, what needed to change is the life styles. From a sociological perspective, what you're asking is an oxymoron, especially when you consider the psychological abuse of women in China is a cultural trend: Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we
know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation) Now you tell me, just how do you plan on changing the Chinese patriarchal lifestyle of neglecting women? Without yourself first addressing the Chinese cultural lag/tradition as your core identity? Chinese patriarchy refers to the history and prevalence of male dominance in Chinese society and culture. Mencius outlined the Three Subordinations. A woman was to be subordinate to her father in youth, her husband in maturity, and her son in old age. A cliché of classical texts, which is repeated throughout the tradition, is the familiar notion that men govern the outer world, while women govern the home. In the Han dynasty, the female historian Ban Zhao wrote the Lessons for Women, advice on how women should behave. She outlines the Four Virtues women must abide by, proper virtue, proper speech, proper countenance, proper merit. The "three subordinations and the four virtues" is a common four-character phrase throughout the imperial period. As for the historical development of Chinese patriarchy, women's status was highest in the Tang dynasty, when women played sports (polo) and were generally freer in fashion and conduct. Between the Tang and Song dynasties, a fad for little feet arose, and from the Song dynasty onwards footbinding became more and more common for the elite. In the Ming dynasty, a tradition of virtuous widowhood developed. Widows, even if widowed at a young age, would be expected not to remarry. Their virtuous names might be displayed on the arch at the entrance of the village. Symptoms of patriarchy in 20th and 21st century China include the immense pressure on women to get married before the age of 30, and the incidence of female infanticide associated with China's one child policy. However, footbinding has been eradicated and trafficking in women in China has greatly reduced.( citation)
Divorce race [ by husband side ] and rape/sexual abuse crimes are 20 times far lower than in america, so what you said about how there is a "women abuse" culture in China are just nonsense. And are those "psychological abuses"? No? Then what's your point?
My point is there is no "women abuse" culture stuff in China since divorce, rape, sexual abuse happend in all parts of the world. And what do you call these? Your ignorance and denial at work? Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation)
Maybe you have some eye sigh issue since I already said "nonsense" on my previous post. No proof, no reason, no point. Your opinion is thereby rejected as bogus claim in academia study. You amateur.
You claim Chinese have "women abuse" culture while in reality divorce race, rape and sexual abuse crimes in China each year are 20 times far more lower than america. What else do you use to prove the existence of the "women abuse" culture in China you dreaming of, just from a books or word of mouth?
Speaking as a true-blue proud Chinese, yes, 'Female submission' is an intergral part of our culture- Confucius， rather 孔夫子，taught that in the great hierarchy of the world, Men held dominion over their children and their wives, as Emperors held dominion of the men, and Gods held dominion over Emperors and men. The fact that there is less divorce is because of their, until recently, severly totalitarian system and their culture not only frown upon any divorces, but, upon divorce, there is little that a woman can do, being mostly rustic and semi-illiterate, and such. Now, if you cite Taiwan, where Chinese Democracy and Chinese Culture was not obstructed by or controlled by the Communist Party, then, yes, you may have something, but you cite the Mainland, which, like Oceania of Orwell, doesn't really care for the happiness so long as they are together and they have only one child.
All you are saying have no reflection in reality, I would to say the one who have women abuse culture are american by saying american have a very high rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year then I would likely to be believed compared to you or anyone who said China have women abuse culture while China have far less rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year.
Ahem- yes Confucius did teach that women are inferior to men. You can read up on the Analects if you don't believe me.
Second, yes, we have higher rape- that is because more rape is reported and that China have stricter laws on about everything, whereas we feel that while rape is wrong, China's method of working rapist to death seems overkill.In addition, I have watch a Chinese movie where a city girl was captured and raped and forced to be wife with her rapist, and the incompetant officials are completely idiotic and impotent. This is a PRC movie, mind you. Rape is not an American thing or a Chinese thing, there is rape in Japan, France, Great Britain, Canada- and they are significantly higher in those nations because woman are able to report on it, whereas, in China, our culture and the totalitarianism of the PRC prevents woman from speaking out against it. Also, divorce is not a sign of female abuse, rather, it is a sign of Woman empowerment, that woman get to have a say in marriage. So, point is moot. Now, rebutting your petty points, I must question your scource for this information, the PRC is the modern Iron Curtain, how do we really know what goes on it there?
You still don't get it, word and reality are 2 very deferent things, what is the use you say all of those nonsense when in reality Chinese have more respect for females compared to american by looking at rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate of both countries? You only sticking to nonsense or something baseless in reality.
Divorce [ by husband ] side mostly occured because the husband does not love his wife or he want to dump her for another female.
Yes, words and reality are two different things- your words are completely worthless without objective real world data or any form of reasoning.
Divorce, in America, occurs on both side in equal rate- maybe that's why we have a higher divorce rate than poor, patriarchical PRC.
Also, canst thou explain the inequity of the sexes, that men outnumber maidens in post-'One-Child' China, if they be so virtuous and gynephilic as thou claim'st? Did the Faerie-Queen spirit away the maiden-child and leave behind only boys? Or were the Chinese loins like those that King Henry VIII hath wish were his, boy-bearing?
What matter is rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate are 20 times more lower in China than in america that shows Chinese have far more higher respect for females which you accuse have "women abuse culture" compared to america which you claim to respect females.
I already addressed that issue in a previous post that I take you didn't bother to read, being the obstinate and crude fellow you are. We respect woman, that is why we don't abandon girl-children to the shitty orphanages of the state.
What you don't get is you don't really understand the meaning of "word" and "reality".
What is the use you accuse Chinese have "women abuse culture" when in reality Chinese respect females much more better than american, the reality that rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate 20 times more lower in China than in america.
It is like someone saying he is a guy who respect females but in reality he love to abuse females, his action speak louder.
Nothing says 'I love Womankind' more than throwing female babies into adoption houses (if they are lucky), and then hoping for a boy. It is that kind of action that gives China their oh-so-great image of a modern, feminist nation, unstained by chauvinism and, I don't know, aborting babies when they know that it will turn out females. After all, they love girls so much, that, when given a choice of one child, they decided that China is too much of a hell hole for innocent girls to be born into, and choose, instead, little boys.
Yes, actions, actions, actions, they tell you more of your character than your words- aborting female babies based on sex tells us how much you love females, while guarenteeing women the right to vote, free speech, and basically saying in law why women and men are equal in rights is a sign of how great female oppression here in the west. I take everything back- China loves woman so much, that they expect them to be as all liberated women when entering matrimony- submissive to their husband.
If you talk about abortion, abortion in China also far lower than in america, you seems to be the type who believ words than reality more.
Right...my friend (immigrant) was almost not born because his doctor was about to abort him- fortunately, his mother bribed him to look the other way. That, madam, is reality, you don't get a choice in abortion, you just get one kid- otherwise, how else do you explain why there is a disproportional amount of male:female ratio? My words are backed by facts, yours by conjectures and propoganda- whose word should any sane man believe?
中华文化是男人的文化！
1 case vs 1,3 billion?
I don't know what you are typing in Kanji but if you think it will convince peoples of what you said then you are mistaken it.
這
不
是
﹁
か
ん
じ
﹂
，
這
是
漢
字
！
你在那��
Didn't quite catch that- can you rewrite whatever you were planning to write?
What I'm saying is your source are not reliable because it is not directly from the country official source such as government source. When I'm saying american have far more rape case than China, I'm using the source from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/data/table_01.html
I used the BBC- but if that doesn't do it for you, how about the CNN
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-07-30/world/china.abortions.millions_1_abortions-family-planning-policy-birth-control-method?_s=PM:WORLD
or the People's Daily Online:
http://health.people.com.cn/GB/12832155.html
Yes, the offical Newspaper of the People's Republic- even they- admit this.
1300萬個墮胎手術！
|
|
Banned
749 cr points
Send Message: 26 / M / ASIA - Land Of An...
Offline
|
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
Culture must not change because it is an identity, what needed to change is the life styles. From a sociological perspective, what you're asking is an oxymoron, especially when you consider the psychological abuse of women in China is a cultural trend: Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we
know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation) Now you tell me, just how do you plan on changing the Chinese patriarchal lifestyle of neglecting women? Without yourself first addressing the Chinese cultural lag/tradition as your core identity? Chinese patriarchy refers to the history and prevalence of male dominance in Chinese society and culture. Mencius outlined the Three Subordinations. A woman was to be subordinate to her father in youth, her husband in maturity, and her son in old age. A cliché of classical texts, which is repeated throughout the tradition, is the familiar notion that men govern the outer world, while women govern the home. In the Han dynasty, the female historian Ban Zhao wrote the Lessons for Women, advice on how women should behave. She outlines the Four Virtues women must abide by, proper virtue, proper speech, proper countenance, proper merit. The "three subordinations and the four virtues" is a common four-character phrase throughout the imperial period. As for the historical development of Chinese patriarchy, women's status was highest in the Tang dynasty, when women played sports (polo) and were generally freer in fashion and conduct. Between the Tang and Song dynasties, a fad for little feet arose, and from the Song dynasty onwards footbinding became more and more common for the elite. In the Ming dynasty, a tradition of virtuous widowhood developed. Widows, even if widowed at a young age, would be expected not to remarry. Their virtuous names might be displayed on the arch at the entrance of the village. Symptoms of patriarchy in 20th and 21st century China include the immense pressure on women to get married before the age of 30, and the incidence of female infanticide associated with China's one child policy. However, footbinding has been eradicated and trafficking in women in China has greatly reduced.( citation)
Divorce race [ by husband side ] and rape/sexual abuse crimes are 20 times far lower than in america, so what you said about how there is a "women abuse" culture in China are just nonsense. And are those "psychological abuses"? No? Then what's your point?
My point is there is no "women abuse" culture stuff in China since divorce, rape, sexual abuse happend in all parts of the world. And what do you call these? Your ignorance and denial at work? Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation)
Maybe you have some eye sigh issue since I already said "nonsense" on my previous post. No proof, no reason, no point. Your opinion is thereby rejected as bogus claim in academia study. You amateur.
You claim Chinese have "women abuse" culture while in reality divorce race, rape and sexual abuse crimes in China each year are 20 times far more lower than america. What else do you use to prove the existence of the "women abuse" culture in China you dreaming of, just from a books or word of mouth?
Speaking as a true-blue proud Chinese, yes, 'Female submission' is an intergral part of our culture- Confucius， rather 孔夫子，taught that in the great hierarchy of the world, Men held dominion over their children and their wives, as Emperors held dominion of the men, and Gods held dominion over Emperors and men. The fact that there is less divorce is because of their, until recently, severly totalitarian system and their culture not only frown upon any divorces, but, upon divorce, there is little that a woman can do, being mostly rustic and semi-illiterate, and such. Now, if you cite Taiwan, where Chinese Democracy and Chinese Culture was not obstructed by or controlled by the Communist Party, then, yes, you may have something, but you cite the Mainland, which, like Oceania of Orwell, doesn't really care for the happiness so long as they are together and they have only one child.
All you are saying have no reflection in reality, I would to say the one who have women abuse culture are american by saying american have a very high rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year then I would likely to be believed compared to you or anyone who said China have women abuse culture while China have far less rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year.
Ahem- yes Confucius did teach that women are inferior to men. You can read up on the Analects if you don't believe me.
Second, yes, we have higher rape- that is because more rape is reported and that China have stricter laws on about everything, whereas we feel that while rape is wrong, China's method of working rapist to death seems overkill.In addition, I have watch a Chinese movie where a city girl was captured and raped and forced to be wife with her rapist, and the incompetant officials are completely idiotic and impotent. This is a PRC movie, mind you. Rape is not an American thing or a Chinese thing, there is rape in Japan, France, Great Britain, Canada- and they are significantly higher in those nations because woman are able to report on it, whereas, in China, our culture and the totalitarianism of the PRC prevents woman from speaking out against it. Also, divorce is not a sign of female abuse, rather, it is a sign of Woman empowerment, that woman get to have a say in marriage. So, point is moot. Now, rebutting your petty points, I must question your scource for this information, the PRC is the modern Iron Curtain, how do we really know what goes on it there?
You still don't get it, word and reality are 2 very deferent things, what is the use you say all of those nonsense when in reality Chinese have more respect for females compared to american by looking at rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate of both countries? You only sticking to nonsense or something baseless in reality.
Divorce [ by husband ] side mostly occured because the husband does not love his wife or he want to dump her for another female.
Yes, words and reality are two different things- your words are completely worthless without objective real world data or any form of reasoning.
Divorce, in America, occurs on both side in equal rate- maybe that's why we have a higher divorce rate than poor, patriarchical PRC.
Also, canst thou explain the inequity of the sexes, that men outnumber maidens in post-'One-Child' China, if they be so virtuous and gynephilic as thou claim'st? Did the Faerie-Queen spirit away the maiden-child and leave behind only boys? Or were the Chinese loins like those that King Henry VIII hath wish were his, boy-bearing?
What matter is rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate are 20 times more lower in China than in america that shows Chinese have far more higher respect for females which you accuse have "women abuse culture" compared to america which you claim to respect females.
I already addressed that issue in a previous post that I take you didn't bother to read, being the obstinate and crude fellow you are. We respect woman, that is why we don't abandon girl-children to the shitty orphanages of the state.
What you don't get is you don't really understand the meaning of "word" and "reality".
What is the use you accuse Chinese have "women abuse culture" when in reality Chinese respect females much more better than american, the reality that rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate 20 times more lower in China than in america.
It is like someone saying he is a guy who respect females but in reality he love to abuse females, his action speak louder.
Nothing says 'I love Womankind' more than throwing female babies into adoption houses (if they are lucky), and then hoping for a boy. It is that kind of action that gives China their oh-so-great image of a modern, feminist nation, unstained by chauvinism and, I don't know, aborting babies when they know that it will turn out females. After all, they love girls so much, that, when given a choice of one child, they decided that China is too much of a hell hole for innocent girls to be born into, and choose, instead, little boys.
Yes, actions, actions, actions, they tell you more of your character than your words- aborting female babies based on sex tells us how much you love females, while guarenteeing women the right to vote, free speech, and basically saying in law why women and men are equal in rights is a sign of how great female oppression here in the west. I take everything back- China loves woman so much, that they expect them to be as all liberated women when entering matrimony- submissive to their husband.
If you talk about abortion, abortion in China also far lower than in america, you seems to be the type who believ words than reality more.
Right...my friend (immigrant) was almost not born because his doctor was about to abort him- fortunately, his mother bribed him to look the other way. That, madam, is reality, you don't get a choice in abortion, you just get one kid- otherwise, how else do you explain why there is a disproportional amount of male:female ratio? My words are backed by facts, yours by conjectures and propoganda- whose word should any sane man believe?
中华文化是男人的文化！
1 case vs 1,3 billion?
I don't know what you are typing in Kanji but if you think it will convince peoples of what you said then you are mistaken it.
這
不
是
﹁
か
ん
じ
﹂
，
這
是
漢
字
！
你在那��
Didn't quite catch that- can you rewrite whatever you were planning to write?
What I'm saying is your source are not reliable because it is not directly from the country official source such as government source. When I'm saying american have far more rape case than China, I'm using the source from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/data/table_01.html
I used the BBC- but if that doesn't do it for you, how about the CNN
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-07-30/world/china.abortions.millions_1_abortions-family-planning-policy-birth-control-method?_s=PM:WORLD
or the People's Daily Online:
http://health.people.com.cn/GB/12832155.html
Yes, the offical Newspaper of the People's Republic- even they- admit this.
1300萬個墮胎手術！
Still rubbish source especially from the cnn, mwahahaha
|
1982 cr points
Send Message: 22 / M / Guess
Offline
|
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
Culture must not change because it is an identity, what needed to change is the life styles. From a sociological perspective, what you're asking is an oxymoron, especially when you consider the psychological abuse of women in China is a cultural trend: Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we
know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation) Now you tell me, just how do you plan on changing the Chinese patriarchal lifestyle of neglecting women? Without yourself first addressing the Chinese cultural lag/tradition as your core identity? Chinese patriarchy refers to the history and prevalence of male dominance in Chinese society and culture. Mencius outlined the Three Subordinations. A woman was to be subordinate to her father in youth, her husband in maturity, and her son in old age. A cliché of classical texts, which is repeated throughout the tradition, is the familiar notion that men govern the outer world, while women govern the home. In the Han dynasty, the female historian Ban Zhao wrote the Lessons for Women, advice on how women should behave. She outlines the Four Virtues women must abide by, proper virtue, proper speech, proper countenance, proper merit. The "three subordinations and the four virtues" is a common four-character phrase throughout the imperial period. As for the historical development of Chinese patriarchy, women's status was highest in the Tang dynasty, when women played sports (polo) and were generally freer in fashion and conduct. Between the Tang and Song dynasties, a fad for little feet arose, and from the Song dynasty onwards footbinding became more and more common for the elite. In the Ming dynasty, a tradition of virtuous widowhood developed. Widows, even if widowed at a young age, would be expected not to remarry. Their virtuous names might be displayed on the arch at the entrance of the village. Symptoms of patriarchy in 20th and 21st century China include the immense pressure on women to get married before the age of 30, and the incidence of female infanticide associated with China's one child policy. However, footbinding has been eradicated and trafficking in women in China has greatly reduced.( citation)
Divorce race [ by husband side ] and rape/sexual abuse crimes are 20 times far lower than in america, so what you said about how there is a "women abuse" culture in China are just nonsense. And are those "psychological abuses"? No? Then what's your point?
My point is there is no "women abuse" culture stuff in China since divorce, rape, sexual abuse happend in all parts of the world. And what do you call these? Your ignorance and denial at work? Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation)
Maybe you have some eye sigh issue since I already said "nonsense" on my previous post. No proof, no reason, no point. Your opinion is thereby rejected as bogus claim in academia study. You amateur.
You claim Chinese have "women abuse" culture while in reality divorce race, rape and sexual abuse crimes in China each year are 20 times far more lower than america. What else do you use to prove the existence of the "women abuse" culture in China you dreaming of, just from a books or word of mouth?
Speaking as a true-blue proud Chinese, yes, 'Female submission' is an intergral part of our culture- Confucius， rather 孔夫子，taught that in the great hierarchy of the world, Men held dominion over their children and their wives, as Emperors held dominion of the men, and Gods held dominion over Emperors and men. The fact that there is less divorce is because of their, until recently, severly totalitarian system and their culture not only frown upon any divorces, but, upon divorce, there is little that a woman can do, being mostly rustic and semi-illiterate, and such. Now, if you cite Taiwan, where Chinese Democracy and Chinese Culture was not obstructed by or controlled by the Communist Party, then, yes, you may have something, but you cite the Mainland, which, like Oceania of Orwell, doesn't really care for the happiness so long as they are together and they have only one child.
All you are saying have no reflection in reality, I would to say the one who have women abuse culture are american by saying american have a very high rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year then I would likely to be believed compared to you or anyone who said China have women abuse culture while China have far less rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year.
Ahem- yes Confucius did teach that women are inferior to men. You can read up on the Analects if you don't believe me.
Second, yes, we have higher rape- that is because more rape is reported and that China have stricter laws on about everything, whereas we feel that while rape is wrong, China's method of working rapist to death seems overkill.In addition, I have watch a Chinese movie where a city girl was captured and raped and forced to be wife with her rapist, and the incompetant officials are completely idiotic and impotent. This is a PRC movie, mind you. Rape is not an American thing or a Chinese thing, there is rape in Japan, France, Great Britain, Canada- and they are significantly higher in those nations because woman are able to report on it, whereas, in China, our culture and the totalitarianism of the PRC prevents woman from speaking out against it. Also, divorce is not a sign of female abuse, rather, it is a sign of Woman empowerment, that woman get to have a say in marriage. So, point is moot. Now, rebutting your petty points, I must question your scource for this information, the PRC is the modern Iron Curtain, how do we really know what goes on it there?
You still don't get it, word and reality are 2 very deferent things, what is the use you say all of those nonsense when in reality Chinese have more respect for females compared to american by looking at rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate of both countries? You only sticking to nonsense or something baseless in reality.
Divorce [ by husband ] side mostly occured because the husband does not love his wife or he want to dump her for another female.
Yes, words and reality are two different things- your words are completely worthless without objective real world data or any form of reasoning.
Divorce, in America, occurs on both side in equal rate- maybe that's why we have a higher divorce rate than poor, patriarchical PRC.
Also, canst thou explain the inequity of the sexes, that men outnumber maidens in post-'One-Child' China, if they be so virtuous and gynephilic as thou claim'st? Did the Faerie-Queen spirit away the maiden-child and leave behind only boys? Or were the Chinese loins like those that King Henry VIII hath wish were his, boy-bearing?
What matter is rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate are 20 times more lower in China than in america that shows Chinese have far more higher respect for females which you accuse have "women abuse culture" compared to america which you claim to respect females.
I already addressed that issue in a previous post that I take you didn't bother to read, being the obstinate and crude fellow you are. We respect woman, that is why we don't abandon girl-children to the shitty orphanages of the state.
What you don't get is you don't really understand the meaning of "word" and "reality".
What is the use you accuse Chinese have "women abuse culture" when in reality Chinese respect females much more better than american, the reality that rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate 20 times more lower in China than in america.
It is like someone saying he is a guy who respect females but in reality he love to abuse females, his action speak louder.
Nothing says 'I love Womankind' more than throwing female babies into adoption houses (if they are lucky), and then hoping for a boy. It is that kind of action that gives China their oh-so-great image of a modern, feminist nation, unstained by chauvinism and, I don't know, aborting babies when they know that it will turn out females. After all, they love girls so much, that, when given a choice of one child, they decided that China is too much of a hell hole for innocent girls to be born into, and choose, instead, little boys.
Yes, actions, actions, actions, they tell you more of your character than your words- aborting female babies based on sex tells us how much you love females, while guarenteeing women the right to vote, free speech, and basically saying in law why women and men are equal in rights is a sign of how great female oppression here in the west. I take everything back- China loves woman so much, that they expect them to be as all liberated women when entering matrimony- submissive to their husband.
If you talk about abortion, abortion in China also far lower than in america, you seems to be the type who believ words than reality more.
Right...my friend (immigrant) was almost not born because his doctor was about to abort him- fortunately, his mother bribed him to look the other way. That, madam, is reality, you don't get a choice in abortion, you just get one kid- otherwise, how else do you explain why there is a disproportional amount of male:female ratio? My words are backed by facts, yours by conjectures and propoganda- whose word should any sane man believe?
中华文化是男人的文化！
1 case vs 1,3 billion?
I don't know what you are typing in Kanji but if you think it will convince peoples of what you said then you are mistaken it.
這
不
是
﹁
か
ん
じ
﹂
，
這
是
漢
字
！
你在那��
Didn't quite catch that- can you rewrite whatever you were planning to write?
What I'm saying is your source are not reliable because it is not directly from the country official source such as government source. When I'm saying american have far more rape case than China, I'm using the source from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/data/table_01.html
I used the BBC- but if that doesn't do it for you, how about the CNN
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-07-30/world/china.abortions.millions_1_abortions-family-planning-policy-birth-control-method?_s=PM:WORLD
or the People's Daily Online:
http://health.people.com.cn/GB/12832155.html
Yes, the offical Newspaper of the People's Republic- even they- admit this.
1300萬個墮胎手術！
Still rubbish source especially from the cnn, mwahahaha
Madame， THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, the f*cking People's Daily, the 人民日报, the OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER of the COMMUNIST PARTY OF CHINA, yes, they, the one and only, says that 1300萬 abortions are done each year-
Look at the damn title of the peice:
中国每年有1300万例堕胎手术
Madame, it comes straight out of the horse's mouth, IN CHINESE. Yes, the totalitarian government actually admits to this,in the very same country where Tiananmen square and Dalai Lama are filtered though the Great Firewall of China, they actually published it.
搞錯啊！你笨蛋嗎？
看！看！這是人民日報！這是中華人民共和國官方報紙！
But, your foolishness already shown itself in arguing with two Chinese people over Chinese culture, especially when you know nothing about it yourself.
|
|
Banned
749 cr points
Send Message: 26 / M / ASIA - Land Of An...
Offline
|
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
Culture must not change because it is an identity, what needed to change is the life styles. From a sociological perspective, what you're asking is an oxymoron, especially when you consider the psychological abuse of women in China is a cultural trend: Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we
know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation) Now you tell me, just how do you plan on changing the Chinese patriarchal lifestyle of neglecting women? Without yourself first addressing the Chinese cultural lag/tradition as your core identity? Chinese patriarchy refers to the history and prevalence of male dominance in Chinese society and culture. Mencius outlined the Three Subordinations. A woman was to be subordinate to her father in youth, her husband in maturity, and her son in old age. A cliché of classical texts, which is repeated throughout the tradition, is the familiar notion that men govern the outer world, while women govern the home. In the Han dynasty, the female historian Ban Zhao wrote the Lessons for Women, advice on how women should behave. She outlines the Four Virtues women must abide by, proper virtue, proper speech, proper countenance, proper merit. The "three subordinations and the four virtues" is a common four-character phrase throughout the imperial period. As for the historical development of Chinese patriarchy, women's status was highest in the Tang dynasty, when women played sports (polo) and were generally freer in fashion and conduct. Between the Tang and Song dynasties, a fad for little feet arose, and from the Song dynasty onwards footbinding became more and more common for the elite. In the Ming dynasty, a tradition of virtuous widowhood developed. Widows, even if widowed at a young age, would be expected not to remarry. Their virtuous names might be displayed on the arch at the entrance of the village. Symptoms of patriarchy in 20th and 21st century China include the immense pressure on women to get married before the age of 30, and the incidence of female infanticide associated with China's one child policy. However, footbinding has been eradicated and trafficking in women in China has greatly reduced.( citation)
Divorce race [ by husband side ] and rape/sexual abuse crimes are 20 times far lower than in america, so what you said about how there is a "women abuse" culture in China are just nonsense. And are those "psychological abuses"? No? Then what's your point?
My point is there is no "women abuse" culture stuff in China since divorce, rape, sexual abuse happend in all parts of the world. And what do you call these? Your ignorance and denial at work? Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation)
Maybe you have some eye sigh issue since I already said "nonsense" on my previous post. No proof, no reason, no point. Your opinion is thereby rejected as bogus claim in academia study. You amateur.
You claim Chinese have "women abuse" culture while in reality divorce race, rape and sexual abuse crimes in China each year are 20 times far more lower than america. What else do you use to prove the existence of the "women abuse" culture in China you dreaming of, just from a books or word of mouth?
Speaking as a true-blue proud Chinese, yes, 'Female submission' is an intergral part of our culture- Confucius， rather 孔夫子，taught that in the great hierarchy of the world, Men held dominion over their children and their wives, as Emperors held dominion of the men, and Gods held dominion over Emperors and men. The fact that there is less divorce is because of their, until recently, severly totalitarian system and their culture not only frown upon any divorces, but, upon divorce, there is little that a woman can do, being mostly rustic and semi-illiterate, and such. Now, if you cite Taiwan, where Chinese Democracy and Chinese Culture was not obstructed by or controlled by the Communist Party, then, yes, you may have something, but you cite the Mainland, which, like Oceania of Orwell, doesn't really care for the happiness so long as they are together and they have only one child.
All you are saying have no reflection in reality, I would to say the one who have women abuse culture are american by saying american have a very high rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year then I would likely to be believed compared to you or anyone who said China have women abuse culture while China have far less rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year.
Ahem- yes Confucius did teach that women are inferior to men. You can read up on the Analects if you don't believe me.
Second, yes, we have higher rape- that is because more rape is reported and that China have stricter laws on about everything, whereas we feel that while rape is wrong, China's method of working rapist to death seems overkill.In addition, I have watch a Chinese movie where a city girl was captured and raped and forced to be wife with her rapist, and the incompetant officials are completely idiotic and impotent. This is a PRC movie, mind you. Rape is not an American thing or a Chinese thing, there is rape in Japan, France, Great Britain, Canada- and they are significantly higher in those nations because woman are able to report on it, whereas, in China, our culture and the totalitarianism of the PRC prevents woman from speaking out against it. Also, divorce is not a sign of female abuse, rather, it is a sign of Woman empowerment, that woman get to have a say in marriage. So, point is moot. Now, rebutting your petty points, I must question your scource for this information, the PRC is the modern Iron Curtain, how do we really know what goes on it there?
You still don't get it, word and reality are 2 very deferent things, what is the use you say all of those nonsense when in reality Chinese have more respect for females compared to american by looking at rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate of both countries? You only sticking to nonsense or something baseless in reality.
Divorce [ by husband ] side mostly occured because the husband does not love his wife or he want to dump her for another female.
Yes, words and reality are two different things- your words are completely worthless without objective real world data or any form of reasoning.
Divorce, in America, occurs on both side in equal rate- maybe that's why we have a higher divorce rate than poor, patriarchical PRC.
Also, canst thou explain the inequity of the sexes, that men outnumber maidens in post-'One-Child' China, if they be so virtuous and gynephilic as thou claim'st? Did the Faerie-Queen spirit away the maiden-child and leave behind only boys? Or were the Chinese loins like those that King Henry VIII hath wish were his, boy-bearing?
What matter is rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate are 20 times more lower in China than in america that shows Chinese have far more higher respect for females which you accuse have "women abuse culture" compared to america which you claim to respect females.
I already addressed that issue in a previous post that I take you didn't bother to read, being the obstinate and crude fellow you are. We respect woman, that is why we don't abandon girl-children to the shitty orphanages of the state.
What you don't get is you don't really understand the meaning of "word" and "reality".
What is the use you accuse Chinese have "women abuse culture" when in reality Chinese respect females much more better than american, the reality that rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate 20 times more lower in China than in america.
It is like someone saying he is a guy who respect females but in reality he love to abuse females, his action speak louder.
Nothing says 'I love Womankind' more than throwing female babies into adoption houses (if they are lucky), and then hoping for a boy. It is that kind of action that gives China their oh-so-great image of a modern, feminist nation, unstained by chauvinism and, I don't know, aborting babies when they know that it will turn out females. After all, they love girls so much, that, when given a choice of one child, they decided that China is too much of a hell hole for innocent girls to be born into, and choose, instead, little boys.
Yes, actions, actions, actions, they tell you more of your character than your words- aborting female babies based on sex tells us how much you love females, while guarenteeing women the right to vote, free speech, and basically saying in law why women and men are equal in rights is a sign of how great female oppression here in the west. I take everything back- China loves woman so much, that they expect them to be as all liberated women when entering matrimony- submissive to their husband.
If you talk about abortion, abortion in China also far lower than in america, you seems to be the type who believ words than reality more.
Right...my friend (immigrant) was almost not born because his doctor was about to abort him- fortunately, his mother bribed him to look the other way. That, madam, is reality, you don't get a choice in abortion, you just get one kid- otherwise, how else do you explain why there is a disproportional amount of male:female ratio? My words are backed by facts, yours by conjectures and propoganda- whose word should any sane man believe?
中华文化是男人的文化！
1 case vs 1,3 billion?
I don't know what you are typing in Kanji but if you think it will convince peoples of what you said then you are mistaken it.
這
不
是
﹁
か
ん
じ
﹂
，
這
是
漢
字
！
你在那��
Didn't quite catch that- can you rewrite whatever you were planning to write?
What I'm saying is your source are not reliable because it is not directly from the country official source such as government source. When I'm saying american have far more rape case than China, I'm using the source from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/data/table_01.html
I used the BBC- but if that doesn't do it for you, how about the CNN
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-07-30/world/china.abortions.millions_1_abortions-family-planning-policy-birth-control-method?_s=PM:WORLD
or the People's Daily Online:
http://health.people.com.cn/GB/12832155.html
Yes, the offical Newspaper of the People's Republic- even they- admit this.
1300萬個墮胎手術！
Still rubbish source especially from the cnn, mwahahaha
Madame， THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, the f*cking People's Daily, the 人民日报, the OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER of the COMMUNIST PARTY OF CHINA, yes, they, the one and only, says that 1300萬 abortions are done each year-
Look at the damn title of the peice:
中国每年有1300万例堕胎手术
Madame, it comes straight out of the horse's mouth, IN CHINESE. Yes, the totalitarian government actually admits to this,in the very same country where Tiananmen square and Dalai Lama are filtered though the Great Firewall of China, they actually published it.
搞錯啊！你笨蛋嗎？
看！看！這是人民日報！這是中華人民共和國官方報紙！
Valid net-source info are like this http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/data_stats/index.htm#Abortion
The source said there are 846.181 abortions in america in 2006, a 3% increase from 2005. So the possibility of the number in 2010 increase atleast 14% from 2006 which would be probably around 1,1 millions abortions in 2010 occured in america. And by adding the deference of poulations number which are 1:5, the gross number of abortions in america in 2010 is around 5,5 millions.
|
1982 cr points
Send Message: 22 / M / Guess
Offline
|
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
DomFortress wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
Culture must not change because it is an identity, what needed to change is the life styles. From a sociological perspective, what you're asking is an oxymoron, especially when you consider the psychological abuse of women in China is a cultural trend: Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we
know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation) Now you tell me, just how do you plan on changing the Chinese patriarchal lifestyle of neglecting women? Without yourself first addressing the Chinese cultural lag/tradition as your core identity? Chinese patriarchy refers to the history and prevalence of male dominance in Chinese society and culture. Mencius outlined the Three Subordinations. A woman was to be subordinate to her father in youth, her husband in maturity, and her son in old age. A cliché of classical texts, which is repeated throughout the tradition, is the familiar notion that men govern the outer world, while women govern the home. In the Han dynasty, the female historian Ban Zhao wrote the Lessons for Women, advice on how women should behave. She outlines the Four Virtues women must abide by, proper virtue, proper speech, proper countenance, proper merit. The "three subordinations and the four virtues" is a common four-character phrase throughout the imperial period. As for the historical development of Chinese patriarchy, women's status was highest in the Tang dynasty, when women played sports (polo) and were generally freer in fashion and conduct. Between the Tang and Song dynasties, a fad for little feet arose, and from the Song dynasty onwards footbinding became more and more common for the elite. In the Ming dynasty, a tradition of virtuous widowhood developed. Widows, even if widowed at a young age, would be expected not to remarry. Their virtuous names might be displayed on the arch at the entrance of the village. Symptoms of patriarchy in 20th and 21st century China include the immense pressure on women to get married before the age of 30, and the incidence of female infanticide associated with China's one child policy. However, footbinding has been eradicated and trafficking in women in China has greatly reduced.( citation)
Divorce race [ by husband side ] and rape/sexual abuse crimes are 20 times far lower than in america, so what you said about how there is a "women abuse" culture in China are just nonsense. And are those "psychological abuses"? No? Then what's your point?
My point is there is no "women abuse" culture stuff in China since divorce, rape, sexual abuse happend in all parts of the world. And what do you call these? Your ignorance and denial at work? Psychological Intimate Partner Abuse among Chinese Women: What we know and what we still Need to know
Abstract: Although increasing attention has been given to psychological abuse in intimate partner relationships, relatively little is known about this complex problem among Chinese women. A better understanding of psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships is warranted because Chinese culture is shame-oriented. Women, therefore, may be more susceptible to shameful feelings induced by psychological abuse. This may explain why psychological abuse, in the absence of physical and/or sexual abuse, has such adverse mental health effects on Chinese women. In this paper, what is known about psychological abuse in Chinese intimate relationships and what still needs to be known are highlighted, together with the mental health impact. Implications for future research are also presented.( citation)
Maybe you have some eye sigh issue since I already said "nonsense" on my previous post. No proof, no reason, no point. Your opinion is thereby rejected as bogus claim in academia study. You amateur.
You claim Chinese have "women abuse" culture while in reality divorce race, rape and sexual abuse crimes in China each year are 20 times far more lower than america. What else do you use to prove the existence of the "women abuse" culture in China you dreaming of, just from a books or word of mouth?
Speaking as a true-blue proud Chinese, yes, 'Female submission' is an intergral part of our culture- Confucius， rather 孔夫子，taught that in the great hierarchy of the world, Men held dominion over their children and their wives, as Emperors held dominion of the men, and Gods held dominion over Emperors and men. The fact that there is less divorce is because of their, until recently, severly totalitarian system and their culture not only frown upon any divorces, but, upon divorce, there is little that a woman can do, being mostly rustic and semi-illiterate, and such. Now, if you cite Taiwan, where Chinese Democracy and Chinese Culture was not obstructed by or controlled by the Communist Party, then, yes, you may have something, but you cite the Mainland, which, like Oceania of Orwell, doesn't really care for the happiness so long as they are together and they have only one child.
All you are saying have no reflection in reality, I would to say the one who have women abuse culture are american by saying american have a very high rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year then I would likely to be believed compared to you or anyone who said China have women abuse culture while China have far less rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate each year.
Ahem- yes Confucius did teach that women are inferior to men. You can read up on the Analects if you don't believe me.
Second, yes, we have higher rape- that is because more rape is reported and that China have stricter laws on about everything, whereas we feel that while rape is wrong, China's method of working rapist to death seems overkill.In addition, I have watch a Chinese movie where a city girl was captured and raped and forced to be wife with her rapist, and the incompetant officials are completely idiotic and impotent. This is a PRC movie, mind you. Rape is not an American thing or a Chinese thing, there is rape in Japan, France, Great Britain, Canada- and they are significantly higher in those nations because woman are able to report on it, whereas, in China, our culture and the totalitarianism of the PRC prevents woman from speaking out against it. Also, divorce is not a sign of female abuse, rather, it is a sign of Woman empowerment, that woman get to have a say in marriage. So, point is moot. Now, rebutting your petty points, I must question your scource for this information, the PRC is the modern Iron Curtain, how do we really know what goes on it there?
You still don't get it, word and reality are 2 very deferent things, what is the use you say all of those nonsense when in reality Chinese have more respect for females compared to american by looking at rape, sexual abuse and divorce rate of both countries? You only sticking to nonsense or something baseless in reality.
Divorce [ by husband ] side mostly occured because the husband does not love his wife or he want to dump her for another female.
Yes, words and reality are two different things- your words are completely worthless without objective real world data or any form of reasoning.
Divorce, in America, occurs on both side in equal rate- maybe that's why we have a higher divorce rate than poor, patriarchical PRC.
Also, canst thou explain the inequity of the sexes, that men outnumber maidens in post-'One-Child' China, if they be so virtuous and gynephilic as thou claim'st? Did the Faerie-Queen spirit away the maiden-child and leave behind only boys? Or were the Chinese loins like those that King Henry VIII hath wish were his, boy-bearing?
What matter is rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate are 20 times more lower in China than in america that shows Chinese have far more higher respect for females which you accuse have "women abuse culture" compared to america which you claim to respect females.
I already addressed that issue in a previous post that I take you didn't bother to read, being the obstinate and crude fellow you are. We respect woman, that is why we don't abandon girl-children to the shitty orphanages of the state.
What you don't get is you don't really understand the meaning of "word" and "reality".
What is the use you accuse Chinese have "women abuse culture" when in reality Chinese respect females much more better than american, the reality that rape case, sexual abuse and divorce rate 20 times more lower in China than in america.
It is like someone saying he is a guy who respect females but in reality he love to abuse females, his action speak louder.
Nothing says 'I love Womankind' more than throwing female babies into adoption houses (if they are lucky), and then hoping for a boy. It is that kind of action that gives China their oh-so-great image of a modern, feminist nation, unstained by chauvinism and, I don't know, aborting babies when they know that it will turn out females. After all, they love girls so much, that, when given a choice of one child, they decided that China is too much of a hell hole for innocent girls to be born into, and choose, instead, little boys.
Yes, actions, actions, actions, they tell you more of your character than your words- aborting female babies based on sex tells us how much you love females, while guarenteeing women the right to vote, free speech, and basically saying in law why women and men are equal in rights is a sign of how great female oppression here in the west. I take everything back- China loves woman so much, that they expect them to be as all liberated women when entering matrimony- submissive to their husband.
If you talk about abortion, abortion in China also far lower than in america, you seems to be the type who believ words than reality more.
Right...my friend (immigrant) was almost not born because his doctor was about to abort him- fortunately, his mother bribed him to look the other way. That, madam, is reality, you don't get a choice in abortion, you just get one kid- otherwise, how else do you explain why there is a disproportional amount of male:female ratio? My words are backed by facts, yours by conjectures and propoganda- whose word should any sane man believe?
中华文化是男人的文化！
1 case vs 1,3 billion?
I don't know what you are typing in Kanji but if you think it will convince peoples of what you said then you are mistaken it.
這
不
是
﹁
か
ん
じ
﹂
，
這
是
漢
字
！
你在那��
Didn't quite catch that- can you rewrite whatever you were planning to write?
What I'm saying is your source are not reliable because it is not directly from the country official source such as government source. When I'm saying american have far more rape case than China, I'm using the source from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/data/table_01.html
I used the BBC- but if that doesn't do it for you, how about the CNN
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-07-30/world/china.abortions.millions_1_abortions-family-planning-policy-birth-control-method?_s=PM:WORLD
or the People's Daily Online:
http://health.people.com.cn/GB/12832155.html
Yes, the offical Newspaper of the People's Republic- even they- admit this.
1300萬個墮胎手術！
Still rubbish source especially from the cnn, mwahahaha
Madame， THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, the f*cking People's Daily, the 人民日报, the OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER of the COMMUNIST PARTY OF CHINA, yes, they, the one and only, says that 1300萬 abortions are done each year-
Look at the damn title of the peice:
中国每年有1300万例堕胎手术
Madame, it comes straight out of the horse's mouth, IN CHINESE. Yes, the totalitarian government actually admits to this,in the very same country where Tiananmen square and Dalai Lama are filtered though the Great Firewall of China, they actually published it.
搞錯啊！你笨蛋嗎？
看！看！這是人民日報！這是中華人民共和國官方報紙！
Valid net-source info are like this /url
The source said there are 846.181 abortions in america in 2006, a 3% increase from 2005. So the possibility of the number in 2010 increase atleast 14% from 2006 which would be probably around 1,1 millions abortions in 2010 occured in america. And by adding the deference of poulations number which are 1:5, the gross number of abortions in america in 2010 is around 5,5 millions.
So, to you, valid would be 'if it agrees with my position' and rubbish 'if it disagree with my position'- using you tatics, "Oh noes, boo hoo hoo, it's rubbish, wahh, rubbish.' And, assuming that it is true, 550万 abortions total is nothing compared to 1300万 a year.
Because I am wasting time on such tomfoolery as this, I think I may as well post random Asian things, just to show off my incredible skills in being Asian, something you are probably not.
|
|
Banned
749 cr points
Send Message: 26 / M / ASIA - Land Of An...
Offline
|
A valid source taken from the net about a country is the country official government or similar website, like you see the american government site I'm showing you including this http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/data_stats/index.htm#Abortion |
1982 cr points
Send Message: 22 / M / Guess
Offline
|
So, the People's Daily would still be valid, as it is run by the government. Therefore, you have to accept that there are 1300万 Abortions each year， and that you are completely in the wrong on this one。
Likewise， how can you honestly argue over patriarchy in Chinese culture with two people who are actually, I don't know, Chinese, as in, that is actually our culture, and we have lived through it and are still living through it. Just to show how Asian I am, will continue to post more pictures of Chinese things-
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide
|
|
|
Zen and the art of Trolling,
Right? PAKid?
You had me snickered til I read your thread on exploding vagina's
/bustard
|
|
|
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide longfenglim wrote:
So, the People's Daily would still be valid, as it is run by the government. Therefore, you have to accept that there are 1300万 Abortions each year， and that you are completely in the wrong on this one。
Likewise， how can you honestly argue over patriarchy in Chinese culture with two people who are actually, I don't know, Chinese, as in, that is actually our culture, and we have lived through it and are still living through it. Just to show how Asian I am, will continue to post more pictures of Chinese things-
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide Truth be told, I'm rather ashamed of the poor treatment towards Chinese women in a still patriarchal China. I mean just look at how the lack of proper sexual education is making Chinese women vulnerable from the exploitation of unregulated abortion clinics: 无痛人流不等于无伤害
很多人都会有这样的经历，公交上、路边、网络上，都有过这样的广告： 180秒无痛梦幻人流。
这是一种什么样的人流方法呢？真的是“梦幻”人流吗？
“ 无痛人流不等于无伤害。”沈浣提醒，所谓的无痛梦幻人流，是在麻醉状态下进行的人工流产术，表面上无痛，实际上对子宫依然存在伤害；同时正因为无痛，手术时医生放松了警惕，更容易造成子宫的损伤。
针对无痛人流能减少患者心理负担和手术并发症的说法，沈浣坦言：“手术中无痛，确实会减少患者不愉快的手术经历，但这也对医生的技术和经验提出更高的要求：麻醉，需要专业的麻醉医生以避免麻醉意外；无痛，手术中如果刮伤子宫，患者会无痛疼反应，倘若医生技术不熟练，人不够细心，就很容易忽略手术中的子宫损伤。所以目前北京市对实施无痛人流手术的医院，有级别规定，不是任何一家医院都能开展这个手术。”
沈浣说，正因为如此，为了避免手术时发生残留、子宫穿孔等，目前很多医院选择在超声引导下进行手术操作，这样可以大大降低手术并发症的发生。但这并不是完全避免了并发症。( citation) That "梦幻人流"/fantasy abortion is an Internet scam, DO NOT click on the first Google keyword search result. I learned that lesson the hard way.
"Sex education needs to be strengthened, with universities and our society giving more guidance," Li Ying, a professor at Peking University, told China Daily.
Research from the National Population and Family Planning Commission's technology research center shows nearly half of the women who had abortions had not used any form of contraception, Wu Shangchun, a division director, told the newspaper.
"The challenge of reducing [the number] of women seeking abortions in China is tough," Wu said, according to China Daily.
China has a strict one-child policy, which the government has used to control its population growth. Abortion is legal in China and is widely used as a birth-control method.
The story in state-run media is a rare look into the numbers behind the nation's family planning policy.
The United States with a population roughly a quarter that of China reported less than a 10th of the number of abortions -- 820,151 -- in 2005, the most recent year figures were available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Social changes across the nation have made the task more difficult, Yu Dongyan, a hospital gynecologist, told China Daily.
"Sex is no longer considered taboo among young people today, and they believe they can learn everything they need from the Internet," according to Yu. "But it doesn't mean they've developed a proper understanding or attitude toward it."
Government statistics show that about 62 percent of the women who have abortions are aged between 20 and 29, and most are single.
The actual number of abortions performed is much higher, Wu said, because the figures are collected only from registered medical institutions. Many abortions are performed in unregistered clinics, according to Wu.
Abortions in China cost about 600 yuan, or $88, China Daily reported.
Some family planning advocates have found it difficult to promote sex education in schools because some teachers and parents believe it will encourage sex activity.
Sun Aijun, a gynecologist at Beijing Union Hospital, said many unmarried couples use condoms, but added that some women find it difficult to turn down a partner's request not to use them.( citation) This complete disregard of humanity is due to the rampant culture of bribery and corruption among Chinese authorities: From gift giving to bribery and corruption: present practices within China
Gift giving is one of the most pleasant and also one of the most difficult of Chinese customs to understand; however, the lines between gifts and corruption are often blurred.
Business and political corruption are by no means unique to China (Jacoby et al., 1977; Borrus, 1995; Clarke, 1990; Husted, 1994; Kristoff, 1995; Melloan, 1995; Pearce and Snider, 1995). American business people are often wary, because the U.S. "Foreign Corrupt Practices Act" (FCPA) as well as company codes of conduct often prohibit any exchange of gifts between a company representative and a supplier or customer (Greanis and Windsor, 1982).
Originally set into law in 1977, the FCPA underwent significant legislative changes in 1988 (Bliss and Spak, 1989) in view of the practices of other countries. In 1994 the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) passed its own "Antibribery Recommendation" and urged member states to follow up with appropriate legislation (Earle, 1996).
One of the most famous business ethics cases of the seventies was the Lockheed payments scandal in Japan (Boulton, 1978). It involved major companies as well as political figures in staggering sums of money. Eventually it led to the United States' "Foreign Corrupt Practices Act" (Young, 1978; Greanis and Windsor, 1982) which focused attention on the practice of giving gratuities - a seeming necessity at every level of a transaction if one were to be successful at doing business in Japan.
It is important to realize that the Chinese literature itself is full of condemnations of corruption on the part of officials, where alleged "gifts" are actually forms of extortion and bribery (Cheng, 1994; Kolenda, 1990; Gong, 1993; Hao and Johnston, 1995; Jiang, 1995; Liu, 1995). Chinese culture itself has a sense of proper proportionality and reciprocity between those who exchange gifts (Schwartz, 1985, pp. 109112; 322-327; Rocca, 1992; Legal Research Institute, 1994; Faison, 1995).
Many observers assert that one of the principal motives for the Tiananmen outburst in June, 1989, was the overriding disgust with the corruption of Party officials and their families (Chen, 1995). Since then, the Chinese themselves have been increasingly preoccupied with corruption, internally prosecuting over 167 000 cases from 1993 through September 1995 (Li, 1996; Cao, 1996; Tyler, 1994, 1995). Top officials, including the mayor of Beijing, and their families and cronies have been toppled from power. The word "power" sounds a note of caution, as anti-corruption drives have become intertwined with power struggles among leadership factions following the death of Deng Xiaoping (Barnathan, 1995; Engardio, 1995).
In response to pressure for vast political change, a number of reforms have been introduced to root out corruption and fraud and to stem the widening gap in economic development between the rich and poor (Embassy of the PRC, 1993; Cao, 1996; Kristoff, 1993; Brauchli, 1993a; Barnathan, 1994).
In recent years, according to Chinese sources, the burden of the peasantry has grown to be intolerable and, comparatively speaking, their living standards have declined. A number of issues are involved: rigged prices for agricultural inputs and outputs, corruption of local officials, lack of investment and jobs in the rural sector, and farmers being paid in government "I.O.U.'s" rather than currency (Xinhua Domestic Service, 1993; Brauchli, 1993b; Barnathan, 1993). There are numerous appeals for reform, some from official circles (Xinhua Domestic Service, 1995), some from dissidents (Barme and Jaivin, 1992).( citation)
Another form of evil in Asia that needs a culture change is bullying, or 霸凌 in Chinese. However this was caused by a lack of Chinese societal awareness through cultural lag, when the Chinese word 霸凌 didn't exist in the Taiwanese public school manual until 2004. In fact the Chinese word itself was a vocal transcription of its English counterpart "bully", the two sounded alike and meant the same thing. In other words, irregardless of geographic or ethic differences, the human society is such a system that doesn't know how to respond to certain individual human behaviors, when it doesn't recognize those behaviors because its collective mainstream culture doesn't have a description for them. This is true even for the Western society, when psychological bullying such as alienation, isolation, exploitation, and various other forms of social segregation and manipulation in the market, haven't been recognized by the Western mainstream consumerist culture as bullying.
|
|
Banned
749 cr points
Send Message: 26 / M / ASIA - Land Of An...
Offline
|
longfenglim wrote:
So, the People's Daily would still be valid, as it is run by the government. Therefore, you have to accept that there are 1300万 Abortions each year， and that you are completely in the wrong on this one。
Likewise， how can you honestly argue over patriarchy in Chinese culture with two people who are actually, I don't know, Chinese, as in, that is actually our culture, and we have lived through it and are still living through it. Just to show how Asian I am, will continue to post more pictures of Chinese things-
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide
Nah, there is no concrete evidence that Chinese Peoples Daily newspaper is an official newspaper of China, mwahahaha you just keep making excuse because you can't find any valid source evidence to prove your claim.
Also when you claim as Chinese and using it to prove what you said as the truth only making you look like as a wannabe Chinese, moreover the internet are known to be full of wannabe Asians.
I mean, there is no need tor someone to claim they are part of something except when asked who they are so when they claim they are part of something when nobody asked it are obviously mean they are not part of it.
You see, I never claim as Asian in here when no one asked me.
|
1982 cr points
Send Message: 22 / M / Guess
Offline
|
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
So, the People's Daily would still be valid, as it is run by the government. Therefore, you have to accept that there are 1300万 Abortions each year， and that you are completely in the wrong on this one。
Likewise， how can you honestly argue over patriarchy in Chinese culture with two people who are actually, I don't know, Chinese, as in, that is actually our culture, and we have lived through it and are still living through it. Just to show how Asian I am, will continue to post more pictures of Chinese things-
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide
Nah, there is no concrete evidence that Chinese Peoples Daily newspaper is an official newspaper of China, mwahahaha you just keep making excuse because you can't find any valid source evidence to prove your claim.
Also when you claim as Chinese and using it to prove what you said as the truth only making you look like as a wannabe Chinese, moreover the internet are known to be full of wannabe Asians.
I mean, there is no need tor someone to claim they are part of something except when asked who they are so when they claim they are part of something when nobody asked it are obviously mean they are not part of it.
You see, I never claim as Asian in here when no one asked me.
Google Search: People's Daily
First Result:
People's Daily Online - Home Page - Launched in January 1998, People's Daily Online is a website built by People's Daily, the official newspaper of the Communist Party of China.
english.peopledaily.com.cn/
Wikipedia Article:
The People's Daily (Chinese: 人民日报; pinyin: Rénmín Rìbào), a daily newspaper, is the organ of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC), published worldwide with a circulation of 3 to 4 million. In addition to its main Chinese-language edition, it has editions in English, Japanese, French, Spanish, Russian, and Arabic. As the CPC's mouthpiece, the newspaper generally provides direct information on the policies and viewpoints of the Party. It maintains an online presence, People's Daily Online (人民网).
Enclycopedia Brittanica:
Renmin Ribao, (Chinese: “People’s Daily”) Wade-Giles romanization Jen-min Jih-pao, daily newspaper published in Beijing as the official organ of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. The paper was established in 1948, toward the end of China’s civil war, and has been based in Beijing since 1949.
Renmin Ribao carries serious, politically oriented articles and numerous speeches and reports by government or party leaders. News about these leaders is always carried on the front page. The newspaper’s contents reflect official policy, and it is read throughout China by many times its circulation, which by the end of ...
Baidu:
《人民日报》是 中国共产党中央委员会的机关报，与新华社及中央电视台，并列为中共官方三大喉舌的传媒。
Larousse:
le Quotidien du peuple
en chinois Renmin Ribao
Quotidien chinois créé en 1948.
Il est l'organe du parti communiste chinois.
Secondly, yes I am Chinese- In fact, I am so Chinese, I actually know the difference between 'Kanji' and 'Hanzi', something you were not able to distinguish, so bugger off. Oh, did you know that Koreans also use Chinese characters, they call it 'Hanja'. Indeed, you only list Asia as 'Home to Anime', because that is apperantly the only Asian thing that exist, Anime, god damn'd animes. Hong Kong's got a proud tradition in Comics, producing classics 老夫子, who I have, in fact, grew up reading. So, unless you think Asia is one big Japan, which, for my life, I would never go to, you can't really be proud to be Asian just because you like Japanese shit.
Let me illustrate my point with a map-
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide 
亚洲
日本 Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide
But， I think I will wisen up and stop feeding trolls such as yourself.
|
|
Banned
749 cr points
Send Message: 26 / M / ASIA - Land Of An...
Offline
|
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
So, the People's Daily would still be valid, as it is run by the government. Therefore, you have to accept that there are 1300万 Abortions each year， and that you are completely in the wrong on this one。
Likewise， how can you honestly argue over patriarchy in Chinese culture with two people who are actually, I don't know, Chinese, as in, that is actually our culture, and we have lived through it and are still living through it. Just to show how Asian I am, will continue to post more pictures of Chinese things-
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide
Nah, there is no concrete evidence that Chinese Peoples Daily newspaper is an official newspaper of China, mwahahaha you just keep making excuse because you can't find any valid source evidence to prove your claim.
Also when you claim as Chinese and using it to prove what you said as the truth only making you look like as a wannabe Chinese, moreover the internet are known to be full of wannabe Asians.
I mean, there is no need tor someone to claim they are part of something except when asked who they are so when they claim they are part of something when nobody asked it are obviously mean they are not part of it.
You see, I never claim as Asian in here when no one asked me.
Google Search: People's Daily
First Result:
People's Daily Online - Home Page - Launched in January 1998, People's Daily Online is a website built by People's Daily, the official newspaper of the Communist Party of China.
english.peopledaily.com.cn/
Wikipedia Article:
The People's Daily (Chinese: 人民日报; pinyin: Rénmín Rìbào), a daily newspaper, is the organ of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC), published worldwide with a circulation of 3 to 4 million. In addition to its main Chinese-language edition, it has editions in English, Japanese, French, Spanish, Russian, and Arabic. As the CPC's mouthpiece, the newspaper generally provides direct information on the policies and viewpoints of the Party. It maintains an online presence, People's Daily Online (人民网).
Enclycopedia Brittanica:
Renmin Ribao, (Chinese: “People’s Daily”) Wade-Giles romanization Jen-min Jih-pao, daily newspaper published in Beijing as the official organ of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. The paper was established in 1948, toward the end of China’s civil war, and has been based in Beijing since 1949.
Renmin Ribao carries serious, politically oriented articles and numerous speeches and reports by government or party leaders. News about these leaders is always carried on the front page. The newspaper’s contents reflect official policy, and it is read throughout China by many times its circulation, which by the end of ...
Baidu:
《人民日报》是 中国共产党中央委员会的机关报，与新华社及中央电视台，并列为中共官方三大喉舌的传媒。
Larousse:
le Quotidien du peuple
en chinois Renmin Ribao
Quotidien chinois créé en 1948.
Il est l'organe du parti communiste chinois.
Secondly, yes I am Chinese- In fact, I am so Chinese, I actually know the difference between 'Kanji' and 'Hanzi', something you were not able to distinguish, so bugger off. Oh, did you know that Koreans also use Chinese characters, they call it 'Hanja'. Indeed, you only list Asia as 'Home to Anime', because that is apperantly the only Asian thing that exist, Anime, god damn'd animes. Hong Kong's got a proud tradition in Comics, producing classics 老夫子, who I have, in fact, grew up reading. So, unless you think Asia is one big Japan, which, for my life, I would never go to, you can't really be proud to be Asian just because you like Japanese shit.
Let me illustrate my point with a map-
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide
亚洲
日本 Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide
But， I think I will wisen up and stop feeding trolls such as yourself.
Most of your information source come from western based source, just stop being jealous towards Chinese because in 8 more years Chinese will be the world most powerful nation in economy and military.
And don't blame China for more westerners who losing their jobs too, Chinese just do a more better job.
|
1982 cr points
Send Message: 22 / M / Guess
Offline
|
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
ProudAsianKid wrote:
longfenglim wrote:
So, the People's Daily would still be valid, as it is run by the government. Therefore, you have to accept that there are 1300万 Abortions each year， and that you are completely in the wrong on this one。
Likewise， how can you honestly argue over patriarchy in Chinese culture with two people who are actually, I don't know, Chinese, as in, that is actually our culture, and we have lived through it and are still living through it. Just to show how Asian I am, will continue to post more pictures of Chinese things-
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide
Nah, there is no concrete evidence that Chinese Peoples Daily newspaper is an official newspaper of China, mwahahaha you just keep making excuse because you can't find any valid source evidence to prove your claim.
Also when you claim as Chinese and using it to prove what you said as the truth only making you look like as a wannabe Chinese, moreover the internet are known to be full of wannabe Asians.
I mean, there is no need tor someone to claim they are part of something except when asked who they are so when they claim they are part of something when nobody asked it are obviously mean they are not part of it.
You see, I never claim as Asian in here when no one asked me.
Google Search: People's Daily
First Result:
People's Daily Online - Home Page - Launched in January 1998, People's Daily Online is a website built by People's Daily, the official newspaper of the Communist Party of China.
english.peopledaily.com.cn/
Wikipedia Article:
The People's Daily (Chinese: 人民日报; pinyin: Rénmín Rìbào), a daily newspaper, is the organ of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC), published worldwide with a circulation of 3 to 4 million. In addition to its main Chinese-language edition, it has editions in English, Japanese, French, Spanish, Russian, and Arabic. As the CPC's mouthpiece, the newspaper generally provides direct information on the policies and viewpoints of the Party. It maintains an online presence, People's Daily Online (人民网).
Enclycopedia Brittanica:
Renmin Ribao, (Chinese: “People’s Daily”) Wade-Giles romanization Jen-min Jih-pao, daily newspaper published in Beijing as the official organ of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. The paper was established in 1948, toward the end of China’s civil war, and has been based in Beijing since 1949.
Renmin Ribao carries serious, politically oriented articles and numerous speeches and reports by government or party leaders. News about these leaders is always carried on the front page. The newspaper’s contents reflect official policy, and it is read throughout China by many times its circulation, which by the end of ...
Baidu:
《人民日报》是 中国共产党中央委员会的机关报，与新华社及中央电视台，并列为中共官方三大喉舌的传媒。
Larousse:
le Quotidien du peuple
en chinois Renmin Ribao
Quotidien chinois créé en 1948.
Il est l'organe du parti communiste chinois.
Secondly, yes I am Chinese- In fact, I am so Chinese, I actually know the difference between 'Kanji' and 'Hanzi', something you were not able to distinguish, so bugger off. Oh, did you know that Koreans also use Chinese characters, they call it 'Hanja'. Indeed, you only list Asia as 'Home to Anime', because that is apperantly the only Asian thing that exist, Anime, god damn'd animes. Hong Kong's got a proud tradition in Comics, producing classics 老夫子, who I have, in fact, grew up reading. So, unless you think Asia is one big Japan, which, for my life, I would never go to, you can't really be proud to be Asian just because you like Japanese shit.
Let me illustrate my point with a map-
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide
亚洲
日本 Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide
But， I think I will wisen up and stop feeding trolls such as yourself.
Most of your information source come from western based source, just stop being jealous towards Chinese because in 8 more years Chinese will be the world most powerful nation in economy and military.
And don't blame China for more westerners who losing their jobs too, Chinese just do a more better job.
And, because you can't actually read Chinese, it would be pointless to include Chinese sites- but the People's Daily is based in Beijing and Baidu is what is known as the 'Chinese Wikipedia'. So there, two fucking Chinese scources.
http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2009-08/01/content_1381518.htm
This is the Chinese Government's site.
http://english.gov.cn/2010-11/02/content_1735700.htm
People's Daily reminds Party officials to be aware of the people's interests
GOV.cn Tuesday, November 2, 2010
A signed article to be published on Tuesday's People's Daily, a flagship newspaper of the Communist Party of China (CPC), has reminded Party officials to be mindful of the people's interests.
The article, authored by Zheng Qingyuan, says CPC officials must bear in mind that "no power in the world could replace the power of the people" and "the Party should demonstrate more resolve, wisdom and methods" in solving people's problems and meeting their demands.
The article says CPC officials should "always take into consideration the fundamental interests of the people" and "never do things that waste money and manpower and go against the people's wishes."
"All CPC members must remember that development is for the people and by the people," it says.
The Party will mark its 90th anniversary next year.
The article comes about two weeks after the the CPC Central Committee concluded a key policy-setting meeting on Oct. 18.
Editor: Deng Shasha
Source: Xinhua
Also, two things:
1- They do so well a job, they are poisoning themselves and us with lead, paint-chips, &c. Their product even drives their own citizen mad- yes, and this is from what I heard on CCTV.
2- "And don't blame China for more westerners who losing their jobs too, Chinese just do a more better job"- Idiocy is no excuse for poor grammar and even poor er sentence contruction.
|
