First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
Internet Personas
Posted 10/19/11
Yes, I always knew there were only bad types of persona on the web.
Posted 10/19/11

underlock wrote:

Yes, I always knew there were only bad types of persona on the web.


Fortune Hunters Aren't bad, they just wanna fit in.

If everyone was nice they'd be nice too.
Posted 10/19/11

Aero-Mach wrote:


underlock wrote:

Yes, I always knew there were only bad types of persona on the web.


Fortune Hunters Aren't bad, they just wanna fit in.

If everyone was nice they'd be nice too.


Question...which label do you fit under anyway?
Posted 10/19/11

Han_Solo wrote:


Aero-Mach wrote:


underlock wrote:

Yes, I always knew there were only bad types of persona on the web.


Fortune Hunters Aren't bad, they just wanna fit in.

If everyone was nice they'd be nice too.


Question...which label do you fit under anyway?


Is there an underhand reason you asked that question?
Posted 10/19/11

Aero-Mach wrote:


Han_Solo wrote:


Aero-Mach wrote:


underlock wrote:

Yes, I always knew there were only bad types of persona on the web.


Fortune Hunters Aren't bad, they just wanna fit in.

If everyone was nice they'd be nice too.


Question...which label do you fit under anyway?


Is there an underhand reason you asked that question?


I'm curious. You created this list assuming each one of us fits under a label. So what label do you think fits you? It's an honest question.
35796 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Stoke, England
Offline
Posted 10/19/11

Aero-Mach wrote:


Han_Solo wrote:


Aero-Mach wrote:


underlock wrote:

Yes, I always knew there were only bad types of persona on the web.


Fortune Hunters Aren't bad, they just wanna fit in.

If everyone was nice they'd be nice too.


Question...which label do you fit under anyway?


Is there an underhand reason you asked that question?


Don't you go under the arrogant nerd label which I made but you didn't add? It fits you perfectly.
Posted 10/19/11 , edited 10/19/11

I'm curious. You created this list assuming each one of us fits under a label. So what label do you think fits you? It's an honest question.


I share the most in common with a Raider, although I lack the Tag Team part.

Most of the time I'm generally nice and start nice conversations, but people like to reply directly to me for some reason which turns me into a partial Dragon.

See..

http://www.crunchyroll.com/forumtopic-737190/love

You'll see why Crunchyroll needs this list more than any other, but that doesn't exclude me, or that 42 Year old trying to start a bandwagon from being part of the list.

It seems I come off way more rude than I actually am?
Posted 10/19/11 , edited 10/19/11

Aero-Mach wrote:


I'm curious. You created this list assuming each one of us fits under a label. So what label do you think fits you? It's an honest question.


I share the most in common with a Raider, although I lack the Tag Team part.

Most of the time I'm generally nice and start nice conversations, but people like to reply directly to me for some reason which turns me into a partial Dragon.

See..

http://www.crunchyroll.com/forumtopic-737190/love

You'll see why Crunchyroll needs this list more than any other, but that doesn't exclude me, or that 42 Year old trying to start a bandwagon from being part of the list.

It seems I come off way more rude than I actually am?


But do you honestly think people will changer after reading this list? Maybe their personas are a result from what they're actually like IRL (I just dunno). I consider your list just a theory and nothing more. My opinion is you should be clear on what's the purpose of this list. I thought it's actually an interesting list but you've sparked a lot of negative reaction. So I think it's best to just elaborate on why you made it in order to minimise this reaction.

I don't think you're being rude. But I do think you thought there was a high certainty this topic will turn into a shitstorm since you're the one labeling people and some of the labels aren't very "nice".

Oh yeah to make things clear I'm not out to provoke you or anything.
Posted 10/19/11

But do you honestly think people will changer after reading this list? Maybe their personas are a result from what they're actually like IRL (I just dunno). I consider your list just a theory and nothing more. My opinion is you should be clear on what's the purpose of this list. I thought it's actually an interesting list but you've sparked a lot of negative reaction. So I think it's best to just elaborate on why you made it in order to minimise this reaction.

I don't think you're being rude. But I do think you thought there was a high certainty this topic will turn into a shitstorm since you're the one labeling people and some of the labels aren't very "nice".

Oh yeah to make things clear I'm not out to provoke you or anything.


"Just and theory and nothing more." The "Just" part already made what you were trying to say. "Nothing more" Was slightly overkill. Anyway, you said this list is an theory, and that's just it, with people admitting to their similarities to these "Labels" I take pride in fact that it's accurate enough for even anonymous members can admit too.

Crunchyroll users love to judge, a lot, actually a bit too much and it will run the site into the ground eventually the same way YoyoGames did, it was so bad, they hid the comment sections and the forums, hell, the forums are technically under a different domain.

Crunchyroll chat was closed(Not sure why though).

This list isn't what anyone thinks it is for, since no matter what I say, it will be blotted out by whatever people want to think it's for, but what is it for?

Not everyone fits in these categories, but I will continually add more.

I find it strange why I need a purpose of this thread, it's just a list of Internet Personas.

If you look at this list and are able to tie it too people(And yourself), I think you'll clearly see why this thread was made.

Posted 10/19/11
I really didn't view the creation of this thread as anything other than boredom and just a little fun. In my opinion the personas were just mildly interesting and entertaining. I don't see why any negativity really has to come from this thread. It isn't like there was a big list of users' names under each one saying that was what they are. I guess there isn't much helping it though. With things the way they are I suppose I will just wait for another interesting thread to come up.
Posted 10/19/11 , edited 10/19/11
Okay this is my last response since I am up to my neck with work and this was s'posed to be a short break. (But you should totally PM me if you have anything further to say)


Aero-Mach wrote:


"Just and theory and nothing more." The "Just" part already made what you were trying to say. "Nothing more" Was slightly overkill. Anyway, you said this list is an theory, and that's just it, with people admitting to their similarities to these "Labels" I take pride in fact that it's accurate enough for even anonymous members can admit too.



You got me there. What I said was overkill and I should have highlighted the positive results of your theory. You should post this on different forums (if you haven't already) and see if you gain similar results.




Crunchyroll users love to judge, a lot, actually a bit too much and it will run the site into the ground eventually the same way YoyoGames did, it was so bad, they hid the comment sections and the forums, hell, the forums are technically under a different domain.


Oh yeah CR users (including me) like to judge a lot. (But I try not to forget to look at myself first). Never heard of YoyoGames but I can't say I'm surprised something like that happend.




I find it strange why I need a purpose of this thread, it's just a list of Internet Personas.


You said CR needed this thread so I assumed there was a reason behind it.



If you look at this list and are able to tie it too people(And yourself), I think you'll clearly see why this thread was made.

*scratches my head* I just thought it was just an idea you wanted to share with people. But that was until you said "You'll see why Crunchyroll needs this list more than any other" so like I said I assumed there was a reason behind it e.g like to change them or just make people evaluate themselves. I guess both of my examples are the case...right? (Oh yeah and to stop CR running to the ground, but I don't see much of a problem on this site anyway but I only hang about the general discussion area)
38071 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / BREAK INTO INSAINTY
Offline
Posted 10/19/11
i like it alot :p
Posted 10/19/11
I am none of those.
48494 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / ar away
Offline
Posted 10/19/11
I think the list covers a lot of people I know online.
I'm a princess btw.
Also I see that the persona types are exclusive of gender. Or can be in most cases.
There are people who are actually female but have such a male persona online that they match a persona that anyone would normally associate with guys.
And guys can have female-like persona too.
Posted 10/19/11

JustineKo2 wrote:

I think the list covers a lot of people I know online.
I'm a princess btw.
Also I see that the persona types are exclusive of gender. Or can be in most cases.
There are people who are actually female but have such a male persona online that they match a persona that anyone would normally associate with guys.
And guys can have female-like persona too.


I know, I seen it happen before in an MMO once.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.