First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
Internet Personas
Posted 10/19/11 , edited 10/19/11

Aero-Mach wrote:



You made the type.

Labelers

And kinda defeated the point of your post because you just categorized yourself.

Should have chosen Manufacturer, because they Label things.


Sometimes, people will respond to this sort of thing in the fashion I have purely for the irony. That was the entire point.

I recognize that you feel defensive, and I understand that you haven't had a lot of experience yet with sourcing the hidden agendas and motivations that people may have for doing what they do. You are perfectly normal for this stage in your life, in wanting to do this sort of thing. Which is why I can humor it without concern. If you were, say, my age and putting this out in all seriousness, then we'd have an issue.

Hindsight is 20/20, and most of us at the other (older) end can still recall being that know-it-all teenager who thought he/she had everyone and everything figured out. You cannot possibly understand yet, because you haven't gone through the process, but we all remember. You're still learning, and all I can say is a day will come when this type of indulgence will turn around and bite you in the ass at a most inopportune time, and that's actually for the best.




I don't mean to be douche(Unless you are like what I'm suspecting), but you must have fallen into one of those categories, theres no other reason for your comment.


That's a fallacious presumption. I am mostly a pragmatist. I study people often, including myself, and I have been doing so for about 30 years now. There are no foolproof experts in this area, either.

The tendency I have noticed over the years is that the more judging temperaments tend to do this sort of thing you're doing. It isn't necessarily in error to do it to some degree, as long as it isn't your blanket solution for approaching everyone in all situations. People are way too complex for that to work well beyond very superficial and brief interactions.


Aero-Mach wrote:



Most of the time I'm generally nice and start nice conversations, but people like to reply directly to me for some reason which turns me into a partial Dragon.

See..

http://www.crunchyroll.com/forumtopic-737190/love

You'll see why Crunchyroll needs this list more than any other, but that doesn't exclude me, or that 42 Year old trying to start a bandwagon from being part of the list.

It seems I come off way more rude than I actually am?


If you're referring to me, about starting a bandwagon?? Sometimes a quacking bird that waddles is nothing more than a duck. Try not to put your own Agenda Cart ahead of my Opinion Horse.

Coming off more rude than you intend is par for the course for your age. Practice makes grace, so they say.

Posted 10/19/11
I won't pick apart your comment right now, I don't have the time.

I won't say anything about your age, as I never have, I stated your age(Or the one you posted) and that was it, I didn't put you into a type.

It's not hard to see the real point of your comment, and you replied exactly as expected.

I have nothing more to say right now, I'm busy, I'll reply with a wall of text later.

Not right now.
Posted 10/19/11

Aero-Mach wrote:

I won't pick apart your comment right now, I don't have the time.

I won't say anything about your age, as I never have, I stated your age(Or the one you posted) and that was it, I didn't put you into a type.

It's not hard to see the real point of your comment, and you replied exactly as expected.

I have nothing more to say right now, I'm busy, I'll reply with a wall of text later.

Not right now.


I'm not certain why you feel compelled to emphasize how predictable you believe I was - in red lettering no less - or why it is important to our debate here whether or not you placed me into any type, as that wasn't the point of why I offered what I shared with you. You seem to be approaching this from the standpoint that I am somehow attacking you personally, and I'm not. I am only critiquing the reasoning behind your list of "persona" archetypes.

You really should take a deep breath, give your ego a breather and try to remain objective here. I used to participate in debate clubs, and the purpose of such debates isn't to win a pissing match, so much as it is a mental exercise that helps you to think about how how analyze arguments and construct an effective response to them, so that your position is clear.

Take your time.

75083 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / Clan's Village
Offline
Posted 10/19/11
idk which i fit in..Lol xD
75975 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / boku no hero univ...
Offline
Posted 10/19/11
so what would the creator label himself as? innocent question, hah
51593 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M
Offline
Posted 10/19/11
I'm probably part of the Boiled group. This is due to me having a bit of an internet ego, which is due to my subscriber count, which is no longer relevant.
37057 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / on your lap, purring
Offline
Posted 10/19/11
I think you are focusing too much on "negative" personas as opposed to personas in general.

I think specifically you are missing the persona of just the normal quiet person that you rarely see talk much at all. If you've played MMOs before they are usually the person who when first talks in ventrilo or something and everyone goes like "lol wait, who's that?" even though they've been with the guild for a long time. That's just one example.

I suggest lumping some more of these negative personas together and start trying to build some of the more neutral and positive ones. Or just add more neutral or positive characteristics.
Posted 10/19/11

Aero-Mach wrote:


Moeberry wrote:

It seems that I don't fit in any of those on the list.


I don't mean to be a douchebag, but I highly doubt that.



I'm the type of person that post things out of whim.
P.S. what do you call those who have those traits?


Posted 10/19/11
Papa Jack
Posted 10/19/11

Aero-Mach wrote:


Lauriet wrote:

I'm going to regret giving you permission Aero, but enlighten me as to where I fall into this. I see myself practically everywhere that doesn't involve some sort of identity crisis. I'm taking that as a bad sign.


You? You're just good ol' Lauriet: Often found playing Dead Island, no one who met him, lived to document much more.


Cool, I'm my own category. Sweet.

Though when I read the descriptions I went "So I'm a draconic vampire knight. (ಠ_ಠ) Why am I not happy."

8724 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28 / F / kittens ♥
Offline
Posted 10/19/11
wow im an Attention Whore !! never realized that

44628 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / Dallas
Offline
Posted 10/19/11
Sometimes I'm a lady online (like my wow toon).
2490 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / F / Earth
Offline
Posted 10/19/11
im actaully having trouble commenting on this post lol

..........speechless
Posted 10/19/11
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention:
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/

I was once accused of being a Tireless Rebutter.

Posted 10/19/11

meygaera wrote:

I think you are focusing too much on "negative" personas as opposed to personas in general.

I think specifically you are missing the persona of just the normal quiet person that you rarely see talk much at all. If you've played MMOs before they are usually the person who when first talks in ventrilo or something and everyone goes like "lol wait, who's that?" even though they've been with the guild for a long time. That's just one example.

I suggest lumping some more of these negative personas together and start trying to build some of the more neutral and positive ones. Or just add more neutral or positive characteristics.


You're right, I'm actually adding neutral personas right now,

But honestly, can you honestly say someone on the internet isn't a douche bag? :P

But I got neutrals and positives waiting to be posted, I will get to them shortly.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.