First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
How Do You Want The World To End?
Posted 5/31/12
World War III or Zombie Apocalypse.
Posted 5/31/12 , edited 5/31/12
It's ended already, no point.
43921 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / UK
Offline
Posted 5/31/12 , edited 5/31/12
I want the world to end when we've inhabited a few other worlds (robot invasion, with me in control of the robots).
74624 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
33 / F / U
Offline
Posted 5/31/12



I do not know what weapons World War III will be fought with, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.

-Albert Einstein
44941 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Michigan
Offline
Posted 5/31/12
I want Chise to end it
pi5678 
50071 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
49 / F / Las Vegas
Offline
Posted 5/31/12
a supernova creates an eco-apocalypse. with limited resources/food supply, world war III happens. warring nations using robot s to kill. in the end, when there's nothing left, the few stragglers...the living dead...will gnaw the world into oblivion.

argh...cant place aliens in the picture...




This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.

The Hollow Men by T. S. Eliot
51455 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / Missouri, United...
Offline
Posted 5/31/12
This should have been a poll. oh well, I choose a zombie apocalypse at least I might get my revenge on whatever destroyed the world before it destroys me.
30495 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / New Hampshire
Offline
Posted 5/31/12

EvilBunnyFluff wrote:




I do not know what weapons World War III will be fought with, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.

-Albert Einstein


LOL very true no one can tell the future but if we all continue to destroy each other to the point of extinction then the next dominate species will be the ones to continue the bloodshed.
Posted 5/31/12 , edited 5/31/12

Maxmattsmith wrote:


EvilBunnyFluff wrote:




I do not know what weapons World War III will be fought with, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.

-Albert Einstein


LOL very true no one can tell the future but if we all continue to destroy each other to the point of extinction then the next dominate species will be the ones to continue the bloodshed.


dan dan danda dandandandnandandndandandan


















































batmaaaaaaaaaaaaaan


You imbecile. Einstein was joking.
30495 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / New Hampshire
Offline
Posted 5/31/12

Coffeebot wrote:


Maxmattsmith wrote:

infantry soldiers are just numbers when it comes to war the ones who matter are the ones with a decent rank. Soldiers don't question orders they follow them. Just because a nuke is used doesn't mean it's going to be where the battle is. A nuke is a good show of power and it would most likely be attached to a missile or dropped from a plane and used in major cites to decrease moral. If they did that they wouldn't even need to send troops to those areas the radiation would do the job for them. The soldiers would most likely be fighting other soldiers not taking cities. But if a country with a nuke thinks they will be nuked during a war they won't hesitate to retaliate and take the other out with them. during peace they will put thought into a assumed nuke attack we had several cases in the past where a computer error almost caused this to happen but do to it the fact that we were not at war more thought went into the decision to retaliate. If ww3 were to happen countries would use anything in their possession to win. During WW2 the All the allies were competing in a show of power it was a good chance to show their weapon superiority and their armed forces strength. don't get me wrong they still worked together as allies. If ww3 were to happen countries would most likely use nukes as a first move to decrease the solider out put radiation can not only cause death but it also affects the birthing process using a nuke as a first move in a highly populated cities will cause extremely low moral and the cause a huge decrease in people who would be able to fight in the war.


Hmm, I gather that I didn't quite make myself clear, what I was trying to say is that there is no advantage to using a nuke because it will destroy everything that a war would be fought over, as most wars are fought over land, power, wealth or ideology. The problem is the fact that using a nuke, either as retaliation or a preemptive strike, WILL (as you stated) cause other countries to retaliate with their own nukes, the end result is the entire world being fucked because of radiation and that benefits no one.

Basically, nukes shouldn't be used by any countries that have at least someone who is capable of thinking a couple of weeks into the future, either way, WW3 is more likely to see a large volume of thermobaric explosives deployed, as they will cause demoralization and destruction without causing the land to be useless and no chance of radioactive debris landing in your own country.


Yes but what you don't understand is that the aggressors are the ones who seek to gain something from it. Other countries who have nukes won't necessarily side with the aggressors leaving them to use nukes against the aggressor and their allies. If nukes are heading your way it's pretty much over and sending nuke in return insures that you take the others with you. Don't forget in WW2 Russia went from siding with Germany to siding with the Germany's enemies. Today's enemies are tomorrows allies and vice versa.
74624 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
33 / F / U
Offline
Posted 5/31/12

underlock wrote:

You imbecile. Einstein was joking.



Energy doesn't really equal mass times the speed of light in a vacuum squared anyway.
30495 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / New Hampshire
Offline
Posted 5/31/12

underlock wrote:


Maxmattsmith wrote:


EvilBunnyFluff wrote:




I do not know what weapons World War III will be fought with, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.

-Albert Einstein


LOL very true no one can tell the future but if we all continue to destroy each other to the point of extinction then the next dominate species will be the ones to continue the bloodshed.


dan dan danda dandandandnandandndandandan


















































batmaaaaaaaaaaaaaan


You imbecile. Einstein was joking.

Einstein was a pacifist. Also It's not a joke it's a witty remark to a question he was asked also I wasn't being serous either I was just adding to the remark. I knew Einstein wasn't serous hence the "lol" This is why I hate chatting on the web it's full of people who spew shit they know nothing about and criticize others or and try and start fights . And use it to bully others to relieve their own stress.This was a peaceful debate and you had to come and turn it into a fight by calling people names.
Posted 5/31/12

Maxmattsmith wrote:

Einstein was a pacifist. Also It's not a joke it's a witty remark to a question he was asked also I wasn't being serous either I was just adding to the remark. I knew Einstein wasn't serous hence the "lol" This is why I hate chatting on the web it's full of people who spew shit they know nothing about and criticize others or and try and start fights . And use it to bully others to relieve their own stress.This was a peaceful debate and you had to come and turn it into a fight by calling people names.


John Jessica Luke Carl Stephen.

Take that you son of a bitch.
74624 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
33 / F / U
Offline
Posted 5/31/12

underlock wrote:


John Jessica Luke Carl Stephen.

Take that you son of a bitch.


See, you call it a fight, ^ but that shit really made me laugh.

Why is the internet the only place in the world where it's not acceptable to laugh at the class clowns?? No, here we call them trolls and exile them under a bridge.

Lighten up people. It's an internet forum.

And I brought it right back to Batman for you there.
Posted 5/31/12 , edited 5/31/12
If the world not ending is considered an ending
That'd be it
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.