24656 cr points
Send Message:   F / West
 Offline
|
Grrrrr....you had to slip in a dig at women in there!! 
|
|
Banned
31426 cr points
Send Message: 32 / M / The Universal Con...
Offline
|
The battle between the sexes is total idiocy.
|
55867 cr points
Send Message: 46 / M / Center of the Uni...
Offline
|
CalifCat wrote:
Grrrrr....you had to slip in a dig at women in there!!
Sorry but I am the rare male in an all female environment and generally speaking that is a cultural difference between many men and women.
If a man has a problem he'll get in your face about it, expect you to get in his face about it and then for him, it's over ... here have a beer.
If a woman has a problem with you she'll tell all her friends about it first and it probably won't come out until things come to head and then every sin you've committed against her... EVER... will thrown willy nilly as ammunition against you. And when it's two women fighting, the whole gathering allies and 'did you hear what so and so did/said' stage can be very tense, polarizing... and TIRING when you just want to do your job and go home.
(the above is a simplification and generalization but it's true enough to be a valid and tiresome part of my workplace.)
The above in no way should imply that the man's way is better. (I like it better because I'm lazy and it's less work but. some people enjoy drama)
|
356 cr points
Send Message: M
Offline
|
We are all mankind afterall.
|
55867 cr points
Send Message: 46 / M / Center of the Uni...
Offline
|
Given the content of the OP and the parallel thread 'secrets of women' I believe I am safe in assuming Man and Men are not being used in the inclusive sense of human. While I AM capable of imagining distaffian sewer workers using 'manholes' and believe that a woman has just as much to fear from a 'man eating shark' as any man...
I think it's pretty safe to assume from the context that most of us here are talking about the male of the human species.
|
16273 cr points
Send Message:
Offline
|
papagolfwhiskey wrote:
Sorry but I am the rare male in an all female environment and generally speaking that is a cultural difference between many men and women.
If a man has a problem he'll get in your face about it, expect you to get in his face about it and then for him, it's over ... here have a beer.
If a woman has a problem with you she'll tell all her friends about it first and it probably won't come out until things come to head and then every sin you've committed against her... EVER... will thrown willy nilly as ammunition against you. And when it's two women fighting, the whole gathering allies and 'did you hear what so and so did/said' stage can be very tense, polarizing... and TIRING when you just want to do your job and go home.
(the above is a simplification and generalization but it's true enough to be a valid and tiresome part of my workplace.)
The above in no way should imply that the man's way is better. (I like it better because I'm lazy and it's less work but. some people enjoy drama)
I work with a bunch of women too. Always hate that "gathering allies" part. Gotta step very carefully.
|
8954 cr points
Send Message: 20 / M / San Diego, CA.
Offline
|
Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide papagolfwhiskey wrote:
Given the content of the OP and the parallel thread 'secrets of women' I believe I am safe in assuming Man and Men are not being used in the inclusive sense of human. While I AM capable of imagining distaffian sewer workers using 'manholes' and believe that a woman has just as much to fear from a 'man eating shark' as any man...
I think it's pretty safe to assume from the context that most of us here are talking about the male of the human species.
Women need not fear the 'man eating shark.' That's a good one.
|
|
|
men are confusing
|
808 cr points
Send Message: 36 / M / Charleston, SC
Offline
|
Jdaimond wrote:
diodrin wrote:
Jdaimond wrote:
diodrin wrote:
^ I tried to give a simple explanation papagolfwhiskey. But yeah I'm with ya they need to open a history book!
Read the above post.
EDIT: actually the post on the last page and also, where the hell did you come from. Suddenly poppin up tellin me i need to read a book. Trust me, im more disapointed in my generation than you are.
I come from many places. Here I was coming from the angle that you didn't know where Geneva was, or what the Convention was about. It was disappointing, and surprising. And I seriously doubt you're more disappointed than I am. You didn't know about a world wide agreement concerning armaments and populace treatment. But you responded quickly with anger and profanity. So to answer your question. I come from a generation that thinks knowing about world wide treaties is important.
I was homeschooled so if thats something you learn in school than they must not have taught me in the particular group of books I was using. I never even knew such a thing exsisted so you cant be disapointed in me for that. Im disapointed in you because i bet you dont know what a overwhelming samanuel is.
Do you know what that is?
I dont even know what you are talking about ''angry''. I was never angry. I was defending myself because you were set on trying to make me sound stupid and dont lie, thats the truth.
To tell you the truth, if the rest of your generation acts like you(which they dont) than im glad that we humans are always growing stronger because you are kinda disapointing the human race by trying to make a teen think he is dumb so that you sound smart.
You are a man-child.
Well you're a filthy liar. Your response was angry and so is this one. I know that San Manuel is a place, and that there are varying spellings for "Samuel". But no, I know nothing of "samanuel". I do know how to use bing, and google though, and they know nothing of "samanuel" either. Makes me wonder if you're spouting gibberish in a vain attempt to sound intelligent about....something.
I have no need to make you sound anything. You're quite capable of sounding foolish on your own.
When children act like asses it's up to adults to reign them in. So if you feel dumb then do so. Your time would be better spent going back and reading my short post with a quick explanation of Geneva. The subsequent post agreeing with papgolfwhiskey, and then this one. And look carefully for me calling you stupid in any fashion. you'll be hard pressed to find it. OR you could sack up and drop this silly nonsense and pitiful attempt to "win" the argument.
And if you were home schooled, then who, may I ask, is "they"? "They" being your parents? If I asked them whether or not "they" took the time to explain the Geneva convention, would "they" be disappointed in you?
And thank you for finishing your last post with name calling. It was the perfect example of how NOT to make an intelligent debate point. I will no longer address you at all.
|
10182 cr points
Send Message: 22 / M
Offline
|
Zeta-Nu wrote:
Secrets of Men
5. They don`t care.
4. Has the ability to fake relationship.
3. Spending their time on Gaming.
2. They always cheat.
1. Addicted to Alcohol.
Wow.... i must say 1- I do not drink.... sorry but i dont like alcohol =S!!! and 2- I do not cheat any one ¬¬!
Thx
|
9320 cr points
Send Message: 34 / M / Northern California
Offline
|
Soisan wrote:
Zeta-Nu wrote:
Secrets of Men
5. They don`t care.
4. Has the ability to fake relationship.
3. Spending their time on Gaming.
2. They always cheat.
1. Addicted to Alcohol.
Wow.... i must say 1- I do not drink.... sorry but i dont like alcohol =S!!! and 2- I do not cheat any one ¬¬!
Thx
Given that it was a guy who posted that, and he was trolling, it can (and should) be safely ignored.
|
6624 cr points
Send Message: 16 / M / North Dakota
Offline
|
diodrin wrote:
Jdaimond wrote:
diodrin wrote:
Jdaimond wrote:
diodrin wrote:
^ I tried to give a simple explanation papagolfwhiskey. But yeah I'm with ya they need to open a history book!
Read the above post.
EDIT: actually the post on the last page and also, where the hell did you come from. Suddenly poppin up tellin me i need to read a book. Trust me, im more disapointed in my generation than you are.
I come from many places. Here I was coming from the angle that you didn't know where Geneva was, or what the Convention was about. It was disappointing, and surprising. And I seriously doubt you're more disappointed than I am. You didn't know about a world wide agreement concerning armaments and populace treatment. But you responded quickly with anger and profanity. So to answer your question. I come from a generation that thinks knowing about world wide treaties is important.
I was homeschooled so if thats something you learn in school than they must not have taught me in the particular group of books I was using. I never even knew such a thing exsisted so you cant be disapointed in me for that. Im disapointed in you because i bet you dont know what a overwhelming samanuel is.
Do you know what that is?
I dont even know what you are talking about ''angry''. I was never angry. I was defending myself because you were set on trying to make me sound stupid and dont lie, thats the truth.
To tell you the truth, if the rest of your generation acts like you(which they dont) than im glad that we humans are always growing stronger because you are kinda disapointing the human race by trying to make a teen think he is dumb so that you sound smart.
You are a man-child.
Well you're a filthy liar. Your response was angry and so is this one. I know that San Manuel is a place, and that there are varying spellings for "Samuel". But no, I know nothing of "samanuel". I do know how to use bing, and google though, and they know nothing of "samanuel" either. Makes me wonder if you're spouting gibberish in a vain attempt to sound intelligent about....something.
I have no need to make you sound anything. You're quite capable of sounding foolish on your own.
When children act like asses it's up to adults to reign them in. So if you feel dumb then do so. Your time would be better spent going back and reading my short post with a quick explanation of Geneva. The subsequent post agreeing with papgolfwhiskey, and then this one. And look carefully for me calling you stupid in any fashion. you'll be hard pressed to find it. OR you could sack up and drop this silly nonsense and pitiful attempt to "win" the argument.
And if you were home schooled, then who, may I ask, is "they"? "They" being your parents? If I asked them whether or not "they" took the time to explain the Geneva convention, would "they" be disappointed in you?
And thank you for finishing your last post with name calling. It was the perfect example of how NOT to make an intelligent debate point. I will no longer address you at all.
Im not a liar and I enjoy taking my monthly showers thank you very much. I am not angry, infact, i am excited about the fact that every word coming from your posts is wrong. I read in a ''book'' that a bunch of rich political people brung a idiot to dinner to talk about politics with him and watch as he embarrasses himself. Half way through the dinner the man says that he is stressed about the issue of the overwhelming samanuel. Now the high class havard men dont have what that is and they dont want to embarrass themselves infront of their friends. The ''idiot'' gets to watch all these rich men stumble on their words and he gets to feel the most smart. You wanna know what an overwhelming samanuel is? Its nothing. He made it up from the start just to embarrass them. I used this as a way to embarrass you in many ways; you spent your time searching it and even thought it was a place, I completely demolished your post which told me to read books when it was the very downfall of your ego and the best one of all is i get to come out of this victorious.
Oh, so I look like an ass? Lets not contradict the meaning of ass.
I homeschooled myself when i turned ten. My parents were busy working 8 shifts a week. When i ment ''they'' i meant the series of books. If you want to attempt to call me dumb by me homeschooling myself, i advise not to do that. When i took my CAT, I scored college level on many of the subjects and always higher than my grade on the others. I got my GED when I was 15 and scored high on that as well. It is impossible for my parents to be dissapointed in me. Ask me why and you will be ultimately defeated.
That was actually a lowblow saying that my parents would be dissapointed in me. I didnt say your wife and children would be dissapointed in you for being embarressed by a "ass'' from that little chess move I played on you from the top.
The part in bold is the most pathetic way to end a debate.
Ill prove that i am the most mature of us by ending this argument like a true adult (which you have not been this entire time, hence the ''man-child'') and the opposite of a child(which i stopped being when i turned 12), I wont say thing such as; check mate, This is my win, You have truly lost in the most pathetic way possible in all of mankind, your wife and children would be embarresed by you because that would be the most chicken move. If you agree that my intelligence is greater than that of the normal 16 year-old i will admit that we are even.
|
4244 cr points
Send Message: 25 / M / Arizona
Offline
|
Men are only friends with Women to get with them at some point.
|
24656 cr points
Send Message: F / West
Offline
|
KillerZEK87 wrote:
Men are only friends with Women to get with them at some point.
that's shallow and shady...if it is accurate.
|
4244 cr points
Send Message: 25 / M / Arizona
Offline
|
It's the Truth for most men. I have maybe one lady friend but she's my ex. And sorry to break it to ya that's how men think.
|
