Post Reply
Monarchy, should we have a king?
|
Nope it's bad enough in the U.S. God only knows how bad it would be with a monarch. Most people still think Obama's a Muslim and a Marxist, imagine if he was "ordained by god" like most kings are.... batshit crazy to the 10th power....
|
|
We might of been born yesterday friends but we've been up all night....
|
|
|
moneygrip3030 wrote: Nope it's bad enough in the U.S. God only knows how bad it would be with a monarch. Most people still think Obama's a Muslim and a Marxist, imagine if he was "ordained by god" like most kings are.... batshit crazy to the 10th power.... Funny how many elected officials seem to think they are so "ordained." Well, sad, actually. . . |
|
just wandering about...
|
|
|
yes because brings trade and terrorism no mater how much power they have
|
|
|
|
|
|
monarchy exists in the form of those with money as they buy our presidents
|
|
i love anime and video games
|
|
|
Banned
|
This. I am Amun Ra the Egyptian God. |
|
I can already control reality with my mind, banning me is pointless.
|
|
|
I'm all for it.
one of my main reasons for saying this being the fact that Democracy is already at it's last stages. in it's final days, full of corruption. as some guy long ago said, "Even a katana left for too long becomes a rusted blade". |
|
I have no regrets. This is the only path.
|
|
|
lordseth23 wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide longfenglim wrote: Lordseth23 says the following in response to the statement that a single gene does not have a one to one corrolation to a single trait, and changing it may actually be for the worse, because it may make one lose certain traits that are beneficial, or to add traits that would, indeed, be harmful. Then we change the traits for the better, whether it be through education or genetics. Aside from the sheer absurdity on the face of it, as in 'we have the ability to conquer nature' and 'we need to teach people the traits which would provide them with intelligence', How are these statements absurd? the fact that we do not have the ability to conquer nature so long as we are bound by its omnipresent and unbreakable laws, We have been conquering nature ever since our inception. Technology is the method by which we do so. or that traits and genetics cannot be 'taught to people' simply doesn't register in his head, Then we change our traits and genetics for the better through technological means. Since we will eventually be able to manipulate the genes of babies, I propose that we alter genetics in such a way that all children will be inherently intelligent. Once this occurs, there is no need to change governing practices, since everyone will be equally intelligent and will act in the best interests of all other people. Therefore, all forms of government would be sensible, not just a Monarchy. It is an outlandish statement, which all current data does not support, and so is scientifically unfounded, and is simply a dumb idea. How is it a dumb idea? I promised myself that I would not be drawn into Lordseth23's trolling, but this is too much. We conquered nature with technology? I suppose that would mean Airplanes fly through Witchcraft and Musicplayers play music via socery, and that launching a rocket into space requires no science at all, and, therefore, is perfectly unnatural, and not determined, at all, by natural laws. Indeed, automobiles' locomotion, unaided by horses and other cart animals as it is, is 'Wizardry'. We should give up all pursuit of science, instead, turning to the Arcane arts, because, apperantly, that is what technology is, not a manipulation of natural laws for our benefit, but conquering nature by some arcane means., |
|
|
|
|
As far as Germany goes, it's fair to say most of that resentment was fostered due to the heavy reparations from WWI, and was then compounded by the economic chaos the rest of the world was facing. In terms of how much they had to pay, they would still have been paying through the 1990s, if not up through the present day, at their rate of reconstruction and economic growth at the time. The Nazis simply turned this fear and bitterness into an opportunistic anger, and made quite a few scapegoats in the process.
People who are already fearful tend to rally against things they believe they should be fearful of...even if there is no apparent threat. Or worse, if it's acting against their own best interest. As proof of this concept, insurance companies bused Medicare recipients to anti-healthcare reform rallies. These elderly people held signs that read, "Keep your government hands off our Medicare!" That these people were fearful of losing their coverage is very understandable. What is far less understandable is that the very people who bused them to that rally would provide them with fewer services, at higher cost, if they could get away with it...and those they were rallying against were the ones trying to increase availability and reduce costs. |
|
"Sometimes it comes with a shove, when you fall in love."
|
|
|
longfenglim wrote: lordseth23 wrote: Spoiler Alert! Click to show or hide longfenglim wrote: Lordseth23 says the following in response to the statement that a single gene does not have a one to one corrolation to a single trait, and changing it may actually be for the worse, because it may make one lose certain traits that are beneficial, or to add traits that would, indeed, be harmful. Then we change the traits for the better, whether it be through education or genetics. Aside from the sheer absurdity on the face of it, as in 'we have the ability to conquer nature' and 'we need to teach people the traits which would provide them with intelligence', How are these statements absurd? the fact that we do not have the ability to conquer nature so long as we are bound by its omnipresent and unbreakable laws, We have been conquering nature ever since our inception. Technology is the method by which we do so. or that traits and genetics cannot be 'taught to people' simply doesn't register in his head, Then we change our traits and genetics for the better through technological means. Since we will eventually be able to manipulate the genes of babies, I propose that we alter genetics in such a way that all children will be inherently intelligent. Once this occurs, there is no need to change governing practices, since everyone will be equally intelligent and will act in the best interests of all other people. Therefore, all forms of government would be sensible, not just a Monarchy. It is an outlandish statement, which all current data does not support, and so is scientifically unfounded, and is simply a dumb idea. How is it a dumb idea? I promised myself that I would not be drawn into Lordseth23's trolling, but this is too much. We conquered nature with technology? Please don't put words into my mouth, I specifically said that we are conquering nature, I did not say we conquered it. I suppose that would mean Airplanes fly through Witchcraft and Musicplayers play music via socery, and that launching a rocket into space requires no science at all, and, therefore, is perfectly unnatural, and not determined, at all, by natural laws. Why are you making the assumption that technology does not require science? It is through science and our knowledge of the natural world that makes technology possible. Once we understand a particular natural law well enough, we can impose our will on nature, despite that law being a constraint we have to overcome. There are many technologies that require a certain amount of knowledge of multiple natural laws, but once we obtain that knowledge, we are able to implement that technology if we have the necessary resources available. |
|
FOR EMPATHY!!!
|
|
|
Bah, I laugh at your space needle. I plan to rule from one of the orbital weapons platforms. I shall reign fire down on all who oppose me.
|
|
吾輩は怪物である。
|
|
|
It's hard to say. While I'd like to say that so long as the king/queen were just in their actions, I wouldn't mind that, I know it isn't possible. There would be something they did I wouldn't agree with, that much I can rest assured of, and there are many, many bad rulers out there.
Despite that, there have been good rulers, and I wouldn't mind bringing some of them back from the grave. |
|
So many anime, I can't choose what to watch!
|
|
|
Banned
|
I am Amun Ra. I am all Pharaohs. All Pharaohs are embodiments of me. Yes, a monarchy can work if the King or Queen are just. Look at the Egyptian Empire and Sumerian Empire. Their monarchies worked for thousands of years.
|
|
I can already control reality with my mind, banning me is pointless.
|
|
Popular Shows |
Platforms and Devices |
Premium MembershipsLanguage
|
Support |
Crunchyroll |