http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2013/02/breaking-news-u-s-federal-court-hits-president-barack-hussein-obama-with-three-charges-of-abuse-of-office-2455332.html

U.S. Federal Court hits President Barack Hussein Obama with three charges of abuse of office. The charges present…ed are detailed and damning. The indictments assert that President Obama “acted as a dictator” to exceed his powers of office to appoint officials behind the back of Congress during a recess period.

Via: Diana Nottingham In a staggering announcement an Associated Press report declared: “President Barack Obama violated the Constitution when he bypassed the Senate last year to appoint three members of the National Labor Relations Board, a federal appeals court ruled Friday.”

Mr. Lyndon Larouche, a well-connected journalist and political activist characterized the court’s assessment as “probably the greatest indictment ever seen on a standing president throughout history.” White House press secretary Jay Carney reacted strongly against the charges declaring, “we believe that the president’s recess appointments are constitutionally sound.” However, the federal court seems to disagree having put in place ” a list of charges presented as conclusions” according to Larouche.

The court appears to take the view that no such recess was in place. As such, the president was in violation of Section 5 of Article 1 of the Constitution that stipulates that a president cannot make appointments without the consent of the Senate. The failed Obama gambit had hoped to apply the section of the Constitution that reads: “The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.”

The Washington Post reports on the seriousness of this abuse of office, “is more than an unconstitutional attempt to circumvent the Senate’s advise-and-consent role. It is a breathtaking violation of the separation of powers and the duty of comity that the executive owes to Congress.” Crucially, no other president in history has ever tried to force through such alleged “ recess appointments” while Congress is still in session.

The offenses occurred last year when President Obama opted to bypass Congress and unilaterally appoint three people to seats on the National Labor Relations Board . He also made Richard Cordray (pictured with Obama) head of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (after the Senate blocked action on his nomination). Cordray’s appointment, made on the same date, has been challenged in a separate court case.

Lyndon Larouche has characterized the events as probably the worst violation by any sitting president trying to use a “procedural loophole.” Jubilant Republicans are already looking to set in motion impeachment proceedings. Larouche, who studied the court indictments, believes Obama’s offenses are “far graver” than those that led to the impeachment and removal from office of disgraced Republican president, Richard Nixon, after the Watergate scandal.

I found this to be a helpful link.

http://www.justice.gov/olc/sitting_president.htm

Considering your source is "Before It's News", a site whose front page boldly displays "Beyond Science", "Alternative", "UFOS", & "Prophecy News" I'm just going to call bullshit on this one now, along with the majority of all the posts I've seen you make thus far.

None of the info in OP's post is factual, it's nothing more than idiotic fantasy.

President Obama has been charged with no crimes, this would make international news if he was.
Some whackjob and their court of "mental illness" may have formally charged him, but I don't think the USA recognizes the honorable court of Derp as a valid judicial organization.

tl;dr- Article is bullshit from a well known conspiritard website.

ROFLMMFAO

Oh look, another of -Vega-'s tin foil hat posts.

Well...

•Authorized drone strikes in Pakistan murdering thousands of men, women and children in a sovereign country (an act of war)
•Expanded the war in Afghanistan murdering thousands more (an act of war)
•Started an incredibly massive bombing campaign against the civilians in Libya (an act of war)
•Brazenly attempted to assassinate a sovereign country's head of State (a heinous war crime of the highest order and an act of war)
•Started a war on Yemen (an act of war)
•Started a covert war on parts of Northern Somalia (an act of war)

If this was real, it would be on the news 24/7 non-stop. Citizen courts, have no real authority

Yep. That pictures says it all.

you underestimate the connection between mainstream media and the current administration.

No I don't. I understand fully the connection, all one has to do is look at MSNBC and see it populated with Obama supporters and former Obama Admin officials to see the link. CNN is also guilty of treading lightly. FOX is probably the most guilty, instead of using their status as an outsider to ask real, tough questions of the administration, they have instead used this outsider position to promote a thinly veiled racist agenda. There are several mainstream papers that are guilty of this as well.

I have B.A. in Political Science, and while this certainly [u]does not make me an expert on anything, it does give me a bit more background than some. In times long past , citizen courts did have some authority, but those days are long gone, and we will not see them again. Take Clinton, he lied under oath and it was news for days, weeks, months. Though lying under oath is an impeachable offense, what he lied about is hardly criminal (the cheating on your wife part, the sleeping with interns is another matter). Obuse of office is a much more serious offense and would warrant much more attention, even from the mainstream media.

make me an expert on anything, it does give me a bit more background than some. In times long past , citizen courts did have some authority, but those days are long gone, and we will not see them again. Take Clinton, he lied under oath and it was news for days, weeks, months. Though lying under oath is an impeachable offense, what he lied about is hardly criminal (the cheating on your wife part, the sleeping with interns is another matter). Obuse of office is a much more serious offense and would warrant much more attention, even from the mainstream media.

interesting, but what constitutes as "abuse of office"? ( not sure why the top bit hasn't quoted )

The killing of people by the administration should count as abuse of office.