First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
Hawthorne Police Department Kill Rottweiler Dog in front of owner.
15258 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
http://myanimelis...
Offline
Posted 7/10/13 , edited 7/10/13

cheapshotfail wrote:

Sad, but technically the owner should have secured the dog better. Not that what the police officer did was justified, since there were plenty of things other than shooting that he could have done.

Either way, my point is that the owner should have rolled up the windows, and all of this would have been averted.


I want to keep you in the back of my car w/the windows rolled up in the Arizona heat right now along w/that officer. You'll have plenty of time to discuss this. Bring your lil puter so you can blog about it too. if you so happen to escape my car and approach me in an aggressive manner, then you won't be warned: I am shooting to kill.

-edit-

don't forget that you can exercise your right to a Citizen's Arrest. not only that, the police believe in a power that has been bestowed on them. in the end if you believe the cop is a harm to himself or other's you can kill him because they'll be trying to kill you as seen in this incident.

no wonder they removed "Serve and Protect" from all the police enforcement agencies.

if you watched the video you saw that lethal force was necessary, the cops had FROM 3:09 - 3:23 to access the situation(for all those who said the cops had a SPLIT second, go fuck yourselves.). the dog stayed at bay and even cowered = kill. makes sense, right?

needless to say, the owner did NOTHING wrong.
#'merica!
12685 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / California
Offline
Posted 7/10/13 , edited 7/10/13
^If the guy stuck his key in the ignition to roll up the windows, the cops would probably think he's trying to get away and bust him for resisting arrest. It's a lose-lose.

The guy actually did nothing but record, which does not break the law. It's just that power-tripping cops don't like being recorded and will make up reasons to arrest you for whatever they can think of and screw you over if they don't like you. True story.

There was at least one other person obviously recording this video, yet the cops arbitrarily chose the closest one to arrest. If nobody else was recording, the cops would easily be able to come up with BS reasons with which to get the guy in trouble. People should record more to keep cops accountable for their actions and maybe, just maybe, they will start doing their 'job' and start actually protecting people instead of act like a group of lowlife thugs with nothing to keep them in line. I'll bet the system still doesn't punish the majority of crooked cops despite video evidence. It's all set up so that the citizen loses and whatever the cop says has more weight than what we say.


1965 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / F / Planet Earth
Offline
Posted 7/10/13
Poor doggie *sniffles*
27813 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Urban South
Offline
Posted 7/10/13

Morbidhanson wrote:
The guy actually did nothing but record, which does not break the law. It's just that power-tripping cops don't like being recorded and will make up reasons to arrest you for whatever they can think of and screw you over if they don't like you. True story.

There was at least one other person obviously recording this video, yet the cops arbitrarily chose the closest one to arrest.

I thought so too, but apparently it wasn't the video they objected to, but the loud music he was playing in his car. There was an armed standoff with a hostage situation in the house they had surrounded, and Mr. Rosby's intrusive and loud behavior was deemed likely to escalate the standoff and endanger the hostages.

With that knowledge, I had to reevaluate the choice of the officer to shoot the dog, as gunshots are even more likely to set off a shit storm than loud and intrusive music. The officer should have beaten the dog into submission with a baton, even if it meant getting mauled in the process, because of the risk of starting a firefight and getting a bunch of people shot.
12685 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / California
Offline
Posted 7/10/13
They could have sent ONE cop to tell the guy to turn the music down and stop getting in the way due to the risk of harm in the hostage situation. No need to send more than one cop, and no need to arrest the guy for playing music and not knowing what was going on.
42385 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Norway
Offline
Posted 7/10/13
It's too bad, but it's not like me ranting about it is going to revive the dog either.
19828 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
19 / M
Offline
Posted 7/10/13


Your comment was so aggressive and long that I don't care to read it.

It's clear that we've reached a difference of opinions here, but there's no need for hostility. I'll agree to disagree, even though you haven't shown me courtesy deserving of it.
1204 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / The good ole US o...
Offline
Posted 7/10/13
First off, he wasn't detained for filming, he was also talking sh*t. Aka he was interfering with a police investigation which is why he was detained. So sick of hearing how this is 1943 Germany.
Could the cops have used some restraint? Probably. But they also shouldn't have to be dealing with some asshole who gets his jollies trying to give cops sh*t when they are trying to do their job and stay safe. Now they have to pay attention to this jackoff instead of the guy they are trying to arrest.
And if one more person goes "omg why did they shoot the dog it was just barking", wtf. Stop making up your own reality. It is clear that the dog tried to bite And lunge multiple times, in fact they let the dog get away with it a couple times. There is a reason nothing will come of this because they didn't do anything wrong. If a dog attacks a cop it has every right to put it down, this is nothing new, should the cop just take a bite and possible mauling or more severe injury just because all of a sudden the dog is more important? If it was just barking, ok, you have a point but Jesus Christ it freaking was attacking the officer multiple times.
Another typical e-protest where people act like a bunch of spoiled crybabies. Welcome to the real world.
15258 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
http://myanimelis...
Offline
Posted 7/10/13

cheapshotfail wrote:



Your comment was so aggressive and long that I don't care to read it.

It's clear that we've reached a difference of opinions here, but there's no need for hostility. I'll agree to disagree, even though you haven't shown me courtesy deserving of it.


lol! if you didn't read it how do you know it's aggressive? -.- Hostility: opposite to an idea. it's a discussion thread. of course there are going to be differences. show you courtesy? I didn't agree w/locking the dog in the back of a car, windows rolled up, during the summer. the dog did what it was supposed to do. what don't I deserve? your agreeing disapproval? lol... wow.
15258 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
http://myanimelis...
Offline
Posted 7/10/13

FlamingoKnight wrote:

First off, he wasn't detained for filming, he was also talking sh*t. Aka he was interfering with a police investigation which is why he was detained. So sick of hearing how this is 1943 Germany.
Could the cops have used some restraint? Probably. But they also shouldn't have to be dealing with some asshole who gets his jollies trying to give cops sh*t when they are trying to do their job and stay safe. Now they have to pay attention to this jackoff instead of the guy they are trying to arrest.
And if one more person goes "omg why did they shoot the dog it was just barking", wtf. Stop making up your own reality. It is clear that the dog tried to bite And lunge multiple times, in fact they let the dog get away with it a couple times. There is a reason nothing will come of this because they didn't do anything wrong. If a dog attacks a cop it has every right to put it down, this is nothing new, should the cop just take a bite and possible mauling or more severe injury just because all of a sudden the dog is more important? If it was just barking, ok, you have a point but Jesus Christ it freaking was attacking the officer multiple times.
Another typical e-protest where people act like a bunch of spoiled crybabies. Welcome to the real world.


it never came close to the officer. re-watch the video. talk about creating your own reality. he jumped up once when the cop raised his gun to it RIGHT before he shot it. the reason the officer's came over is because he was being loud... and the solution: to fire off a few rounds. shoulda handcuffed the officer for being loud too, no?
Phersu 
37101 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Existence.
Offline
Posted 7/10/13


And that sums up how I feel about how this should of went down. Bad situation all around, and in the end the pooch got....you know. Man, that's sad.
1204 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
24 / M / The good ole US o...
Offline
Posted 7/10/13

Compl3te wrote:


FlamingoKnight wrote:

First off, he wasn't detained for filming, he was also talking sh*t. Aka he was interfering with a police investigation which is why he was detained. So sick of hearing how this is 1943 Germany.
Could the cops have used some restraint? Probably. But they also shouldn't have to be dealing with some asshole who gets his jollies trying to give cops sh*t when they are trying to do their job and stay safe. Now they have to pay attention to this jackoff instead of the guy they are trying to arrest.
And if one more person goes "omg why did they shoot the dog it was just barking", wtf. Stop making up your own reality. It is clear that the dog tried to bite And lunge multiple times, in fact they let the dog get away with it a couple times. There is a reason nothing will come of this because they didn't do anything wrong. If a dog attacks a cop it has every right to put it down, this is nothing new, should the cop just take a bite and possible mauling or more severe injury just because all of a sudden the dog is more important? If it was just barking, ok, you have a point but Jesus Christ it freaking was attacking the officer multiple times.
Another typical e-protest where people act like a bunch of spoiled crybabies. Welcome to the real world.


it never came close to the officer. re-watch the video. talk about creating your own reality. he jumped up once when the cop raised his gun to it RIGHT before he shot it. the reason the officer's came over is because he was being loud... and the solution: to fire off a few rounds. shoulda handcuffed the officer for being loud too, no?


You didn't see it lunge at the officer? At 3:18? Your 360p shaky camera perspective isn't nearly enough to overrule the judgement of the man in the video.
7359 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F / ┬┴┬┴┤ʕ•ᴥ├┬┴┬┴
Offline
Posted 7/10/13
Why were stun guns even invented if they aren't going to be used
15258 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
http://myanimelis...
Offline
Posted 7/10/13

Doomsdaywolf wrote:

Why were stun guns even invented if they aren't going to be used


or baton's or mace/pepper spray.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.