First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
What are your thoughts about Intelligence and brain development
731 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
36 / M / Denver
Offline
Posted 3/23/14

Sychop wrote:


Hayagriva wrote:

But you're not writing from experience. Forgive me, you seem less flexible in your ability to communicate. You see if you agreed with what I wrote, we would not be having this discussion. If you take issue with it, it could only be because you disagree with it. Since it's founded on logic, the only reason to disagree with it is because you represent some or all of the negative aspects, and that bothers you. The inescapable beauty of the principle is that technically if it bothered you - you can only work on it. Arguing doesn't do anything. The only person who summarizes what other people say is technically a snob with no social grace who wants to show people they're more intelligent - and thus doesn't have any real intelligence.


If you thought I was disagreeing with you then I believe you got me wrong and so, it would mean that you felt attacked hence this conversation. Your baseless assumptions on why someone would summarize other people also literally null your original post. Has it not occurred to you that I was merely complimenting you? You are the only one in need of reflection. I might be a snob but you are the worst kind, the kind with no grace. You are the only one looking for faults. Try as you may, you only make yourself look stupid.


There's always another level of personal responsibility. If someone thinks you're attacking them, first check the quality of your own communication. You said you didn't read it, then gave a quote. That looked like pure ignorance, and it would be. If you read it, and were giving OTHER people a quote because you deemed my post too long, that makes you the exact snob I penned you for. I knew from the beginning my post would piss off pseudo-intellectuals like you, and accepted the inevitable consequences. You don't seem to accept the consequences of summarizing what other people say to gratify your own ego. You have nobody to blame but yourself for the result, I'm just reminding you of your own responsibility for it. If you don't like that, too bad.

Now you're just trolling. Badly, I might add. I think you and I are done here.
Posted 3/23/14

Hayagriva wrote:


Sychop wrote:


Hayagriva wrote:

But you're not writing from experience. Forgive me, you seem less flexible in your ability to communicate. You see if you agreed with what I wrote, we would not be having this discussion. If you take issue with it, it could only be because you disagree with it. Since it's founded on logic, the only reason to disagree with it is because you represent some or all of the negative aspects, and that bothers you. The inescapable beauty of the principle is that technically if it bothered you - you can only work on it. Arguing doesn't do anything. The only person who summarizes what other people say is technically a snob with no social grace who wants to show people they're more intelligent - and thus doesn't have any real intelligence.


If you thought I was disagreeing with you then I believe you got me wrong and so, it would mean that you felt attacked hence this conversation. Your baseless assumptions on why someone would summarize other people also literally null your original post. Has it not occurred to you that I was merely complimenting you? You are the only one in need of reflection. I might be a snob but you are the worst kind, the kind with no grace. You are the only one looking for faults. Try as you may, you only make yourself look stupid.


There's always another level of personal responsibility. If someone thinks you're attacking them, first check the quality of your own communication. You said you didn't read it, then gave a quote. That looked like pure ignorance, and it would be. If you read it, and were giving OTHER people a quote because you deemed my post too long, that makes you the exact snob I penned you for. I knew from the beginning my post would piss off pseudo-intellectuals like you, and accepted the inevitable consequences. You don't seem to accept the consequences of summarizing what other people say to gratify your own ego. You have nobody to blame but yourself for the result, I'm just reminding you of your own responsibility for it. If you don't like that, too bad.

Now you're just trolling. Badly, I might add. I think you and I are done here.


I have completed my work here. Try to step out of the box a little more and don't expect everything to be handed to you in long paragraphs. Learning and sharing what you know does not make you a snob, the idiot who feels inferior to the suggestion and pegs someone a "pseudo-intellectual" is but only pointing out their own problem. If it does not add any value why so serious?
731 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
36 / M / Denver
Offline
Posted 3/23/14

Sychop wrote:


Hayagriva wrote:


Sychop wrote:


Hayagriva wrote:

But you're not writing from experience. Forgive me, you seem less flexible in your ability to communicate. You see if you agreed with what I wrote, we would not be having this discussion. If you take issue with it, it could only be because you disagree with it. Since it's founded on logic, the only reason to disagree with it is because you represent some or all of the negative aspects, and that bothers you. The inescapable beauty of the principle is that technically if it bothered you - you can only work on it. Arguing doesn't do anything. The only person who summarizes what other people say is technically a snob with no social grace who wants to show people they're more intelligent - and thus doesn't have any real intelligence.


If you thought I was disagreeing with you then I believe you got me wrong and so, it would mean that you felt attacked hence this conversation. Your baseless assumptions on why someone would summarize other people also literally null your original post. Has it not occurred to you that I was merely complimenting you? You are the only one in need of reflection. I might be a snob but you are the worst kind, the kind with no grace. You are the only one looking for faults. Try as you may, you only make yourself look stupid.


There's always another level of personal responsibility. If someone thinks you're attacking them, first check the quality of your own communication. You said you didn't read it, then gave a quote. That looked like pure ignorance, and it would be. If you read it, and were giving OTHER people a quote because you deemed my post too long, that makes you the exact snob I penned you for. I knew from the beginning my post would piss off pseudo-intellectuals like you, and accepted the inevitable consequences. You don't seem to accept the consequences of summarizing what other people say to gratify your own ego. You have nobody to blame but yourself for the result, I'm just reminding you of your own responsibility for it. If you don't like that, too bad.

Now you're just trolling. Badly, I might add. I think you and I are done here.


I have completed my work here. Try to step out of the box a little more and don't expect everything to be handed to you in long paragraphs. Learning and sharing what you know does not make you a snob, the idiot who feels inferior to the suggestion and pegs someone a "pseudo-intellectual" is but only pointing out their own problem. If it does not add any value why so serious?


If I wanted a TL;DR I would have written one. If they can't read the entirety of my posts, the contents are not for them. If I wanted a short post, I would have written it. You shared a quote and some antagonistic behavior for your own amusement, that does not make you intelligent, it makes you the opposite. If I expected honest feedback and fell for your little troll tricks, that doesn't make me an idiot, it just means I trust too early, and makes you a waste of time. If me wasting my time gives you a chuckle, I suppose it can't be helped regardless of how I feel about it. Too late for that now.

Posted 3/23/14

Hayagriva wrote:


Sychop wrote:


Hayagriva wrote:


Sychop wrote:


Hayagriva wrote:

But you're not writing from experience. Forgive me, you seem less flexible in your ability to communicate. You see if you agreed with what I wrote, we would not be having this discussion. If you take issue with it, it could only be because you disagree with it. Since it's founded on logic, the only reason to disagree with it is because you represent some or all of the negative aspects, and that bothers you. The inescapable beauty of the principle is that technically if it bothered you - you can only work on it. Arguing doesn't do anything. The only person who summarizes what other people say is technically a snob with no social grace who wants to show people they're more intelligent - and thus doesn't have any real intelligence.


If you thought I was disagreeing with you then I believe you got me wrong and so, it would mean that you felt attacked hence this conversation. Your baseless assumptions on why someone would summarize other people also literally null your original post. Has it not occurred to you that I was merely complimenting you? You are the only one in need of reflection. I might be a snob but you are the worst kind, the kind with no grace. You are the only one looking for faults. Try as you may, you only make yourself look stupid.


There's always another level of personal responsibility. If someone thinks you're attacking them, first check the quality of your own communication. You said you didn't read it, then gave a quote. That looked like pure ignorance, and it would be. If you read it, and were giving OTHER people a quote because you deemed my post too long, that makes you the exact snob I penned you for. I knew from the beginning my post would piss off pseudo-intellectuals like you, and accepted the inevitable consequences. You don't seem to accept the consequences of summarizing what other people say to gratify your own ego. You have nobody to blame but yourself for the result, I'm just reminding you of your own responsibility for it. If you don't like that, too bad.

Now you're just trolling. Badly, I might add. I think you and I are done here.


I have completed my work here. Try to step out of the box a little more and don't expect everything to be handed to you in long paragraphs. Learning and sharing what you know does not make you a snob, the idiot who feels inferior to the suggestion and pegs someone a "pseudo-intellectual" is but only pointing out their own problem. If it does not add any value why so serious?


If I wanted a TL;DR I would have written one. If they can't read the entirety of my posts, the contents are not for them. If I wanted a short post, I would have written it. You shared a quote and some antagonistic behavior for your own amusement, that does not make you intelligent, it makes you the opposite. If I expected honest feedback and fell for your little troll tricks, that doesn't make me an idiot, it just means I trust too early, and makes you a waste of time. If me wasting my time gives you a chuckle, I suppose it can't be helped regardless of how I feel about it. Too late for that now.



Oh now you are feeling sorry for yourself, brilliant. Next, you can start to better yourself.
731 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
36 / M / Denver
Offline
Posted 3/23/14

Sychop wrote:


Hayagriva wrote:


Sychop wrote:


Hayagriva wrote:


Sychop wrote:


Hayagriva wrote:

But you're not writing from experience. Forgive me, you seem less flexible in your ability to communicate. You see if you agreed with what I wrote, we would not be having this discussion. If you take issue with it, it could only be because you disagree with it. Since it's founded on logic, the only reason to disagree with it is because you represent some or all of the negative aspects, and that bothers you. The inescapable beauty of the principle is that technically if it bothered you - you can only work on it. Arguing doesn't do anything. The only person who summarizes what other people say is technically a snob with no social grace who wants to show people they're more intelligent - and thus doesn't have any real intelligence.


If you thought I was disagreeing with you then I believe you got me wrong and so, it would mean that you felt attacked hence this conversation. Your baseless assumptions on why someone would summarize other people also literally null your original post. Has it not occurred to you that I was merely complimenting you? You are the only one in need of reflection. I might be a snob but you are the worst kind, the kind with no grace. You are the only one looking for faults. Try as you may, you only make yourself look stupid.


There's always another level of personal responsibility. If someone thinks you're attacking them, first check the quality of your own communication. You said you didn't read it, then gave a quote. That looked like pure ignorance, and it would be. If you read it, and were giving OTHER people a quote because you deemed my post too long, that makes you the exact snob I penned you for. I knew from the beginning my post would piss off pseudo-intellectuals like you, and accepted the inevitable consequences. You don't seem to accept the consequences of summarizing what other people say to gratify your own ego. You have nobody to blame but yourself for the result, I'm just reminding you of your own responsibility for it. If you don't like that, too bad.

Now you're just trolling. Badly, I might add. I think you and I are done here.


I have completed my work here. Try to step out of the box a little more and don't expect everything to be handed to you in long paragraphs. Learning and sharing what you know does not make you a snob, the idiot who feels inferior to the suggestion and pegs someone a "pseudo-intellectual" is but only pointing out their own problem. If it does not add any value why so serious?


If I wanted a TL;DR I would have written one. If they can't read the entirety of my posts, the contents are not for them. If I wanted a short post, I would have written it. You shared a quote and some antagonistic behavior for your own amusement, that does not make you intelligent, it makes you the opposite. If I expected honest feedback and fell for your little troll tricks, that doesn't make me an idiot, it just means I trust too early, and makes you a waste of time. If me wasting my time gives you a chuckle, I suppose it can't be helped regardless of how I feel about it. Too late for that now.



Oh now you are feeling sorry for yourself, brilliant. Next, you can start to better yourself.


Nothing of the sort, just pointing out facts, the same fallacy I always have. Also, welcome to Crunchyroll. Plenty of prime targets for you here, troll.
Sailor Candy Moderator
200584 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
28
Offline
Posted 12/28/15
"Year-end cleanup. Closing threads with no activity since 2014."
First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.