First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
Pregnant Men
10187 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / F / The state of Wash...
Offline
Posted 11/5/14 , edited 11/5/14
Here's another fun topic for you.

In general women will have babies regardless of their economic status and even if they are not married, even though abortions and birth control are available. this is why there is such a large population of people in the world.

Well, what if men had the babies instead of women. Considering the nature of men, would a man allow himself to get pregnant and have a baby if he was poor, unemployed, and / or unmarried?

If men had the babies instead of women, would the population of people in poverty worldwide be smaller?

To clarify the woman would inseminate the man and the man would be pregnant. the roles would be reversed.

Yeah, now as it is a man would have a lot of kids as long as all the women he goes with allow themselves to get pregnant and have all those kids. However, if the man was the one to get pregnant by a woman would he make the decision to go through the pain of pregnancy and have kids? Would he want to take on the role of mother that women do? Would a man allow himself to be a single parent, living in poverty. Or would he use birth control or abortions?

Don't play dumb guys. You know what I mean.



Tell me what you think. I REALLY want to know, especially from you guys!

Would men have fewer children?
Posted 11/5/14 , edited 11/5/14

brookline wrote:

In general women will have babies regardless of their economic status and even if they are not married, even though abortions and birth control are available. this is why there is such a large population of people in the world.


Funny. There's a large population because it's our instinct to reproduce. Like bacteria but slower.
11419 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Eng Land
Online
Posted 11/5/14 , edited 11/5/14
I don't like the thought of a kid slipping out of my penis
45489 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 11/5/14
Do you not understand how biology works?
4504 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
UK
Offline
Posted 11/5/14

brookline wrote:

Here's another fun topic for you.

In general women will have babies regardless of their economic status and even if they are not married, even though abortions and birth control are available. this is why there is such a large population of people in the world.

Well, what if men had the babies instead of women. Considering the nature of men, would a man allow himself to get pregnant and have a baby if he was poor, unemployed, and / or unmarried?

If men had the babies instead of women, would the population of people in poverty worldwide be smaller?



Tell me what you think. I REALLY want to know, especially from you guys!

Would men have fewer children?


When I last checked it requires a man and woman to conceive a baby. People have babies regardless of their socio-economic status and or marital status. That is why we have a large population. Heck there's even a man with hundreds of children because he wanted reputation of having the most children. He managed this because of polygamy. He can marry 4 at a time. As soon as a wife was getting on a bit so birth became difficult then he divorced that wife and found another to replace her.

If men could carry babies we'd call them hermaphrodites or women then the whole concept of male would be non existent.
Posted 11/5/14

BLACKOUTMK2 wrote:

I don't like the thought of a kid slipping out of my penis


Thankfully you have no penis.
11419 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / M / Eng Land
Online
Posted 11/5/14

Riesel wrote:


BLACKOUTMK2 wrote:

I don't like the thought of a kid slipping out of my penis


Thankfully you have no penis.


What do you mean? In the context of birthing the kid?
48531 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / AZ
Offline
Posted 11/5/14
That would be creepy

11738 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M
Offline
Posted 11/5/14 , edited 11/5/14


brookline wrote:
Tell me what you think. I REALLY want to know, especially from you guys!


You aren't thinking of impregnating a guy to find out, are you?
17189 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
(´◔౪◔)✂❤
Offline
Posted 11/5/14
All these question are framed with so many assumptions. It takes two to conceive a baby.

I'm sure trans men can have a baby too if they wanted to. I think human hermaphrodites are biologically impossible. They are called Inter Sex
10060 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M / Across the Narrow...
Offline
Posted 11/5/14
Hopefully , probably , no.
42447 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / F / New Jersey, USA
Offline
Posted 11/5/14
How about a C-section?!
258 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / F
Offline
Posted 11/5/14
i think this topic is funny, kind of stupid but
On a serious note if men had babies there would so much pregnaunt men around. Waaay more than women, second hypothesis there would be no pregnaught men, because how would they get pregnaught? Also where would the babies come from!?

the possibilities r endless.
20321 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / The null void
Offline
Posted 11/5/14
quick question, could you get yourself pregnant??? would it come out a lil retard baby from self-incest?
26821 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Chicago, IL
Offline
Posted 11/5/14
Interesting twist there. lol.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.