First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
Is it worse for a woman to be a nymphomanic than a man?
17271 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
44 / M / Verginia
Offline
Posted 1/15/15 , edited 1/15/15

severticas wrote:


bernardwheelerjr wrote:

Every male should have right to bank some sperm and get a vacotomy at 16. Problem solved. This would prevent unwanted fatherhood lolz

Males only have 2 "reproductive health" options a vacotomy or a condom. An unwanted pregnacy for a male = 21 years of child support.
Fall behind on your payments and you ar barred fro student lloans you loose your drivors licence, passport, any state professional licences you need to work, and you could go to jail.


lol, I could literally imagine a stand up comedian saying that. Great stuff.


It does sound funny till you find yourself on the bad side of that "joeke" as it is all too real. Even if you dodge the std bullets 1/2 your income belongs to your baby exmama for the next 21 years . If the shots, implants pills and condoms, worked womon would not need abortions for birth control.
Vactomys should be a "male health" issue and availabe as abortions are to womnen lolz
Posted 1/15/15
It's bad for anyone to be a nymphomaniac. You question doesn't really make any sense.
1606 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Bullhead City, AZ
Offline
Posted 1/15/15
There's nothing wrong with someone who gets extra-pleasure during sex. Just make sure not to put anything in ya that doesn't belong there. Like food. Mmm.

What?
Posted 1/15/15
Personally, I go with it being worse for women to be sex addicts, but only because being a pregnant nympho may put unborn children at risk (i.e.; getting in the hands of a psycho puts two in danger, etc...). Not much worse, mind you, and to the point of it being hazy difference in my mind.
Posted 1/15/15 , edited 1/15/15
2 words (technically 1 word and 1 acronym)

STD(I) and Value

STD(I) is truly neutral, doesn't care if you're a man or woman.

Value is decided by people, is the vagina more valuable than the penis? Maybe, because we still circumcise baby boys

So IF women have more value, reproductive wise, then the reason it COULD be worse would be that they would be devaluing themselves.
(I feel like I'm stepping on a minefield and thin ice)
37370 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / Florida
Online
Posted 1/16/15
20190 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M
Offline
Posted 1/16/15
i dont trust female nymphs, they just wanna F**k, dont expect anything deep
21050 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / M / NYC Metro Area
Offline
Posted 1/16/15


Nymph, I was waiting for you to join this thread
45863 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
26 / F / New Jersey, USA
Offline
Posted 1/17/15
Sometimes, I feel like I am one already.
45489 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M
Offline
Posted 1/17/15
Well, it's not called nymphomania in men.

It's called satyromania in men.
Sogno- 
47225 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / F / SC
Offline
Posted 1/17/15
hm well i learned a new term today

Crunchyroll, always educational
22221 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / UK
Offline
Posted 1/17/15
I don't like the idea of dating someone who has had a load of partners I just don't find it an attractive qualitiy.

But if we're talking about someone who just likes a lot of sex it doesn't bother me, in fact i'm willing to sacrifice my body to help those in need!
6209 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / NB / US
Offline
Posted 1/17/15

Still_Ginger wrote:

People have the right to make themselves happy. I don't think it's bad to be a nymphomaniac whatsoever, I definitely don't think it's "gross". It doesn't impact my life whatsoever so why do I have the right to judge?

However all things in life have consequences, and you have to handle things responsibly.

If a person is able to handle it responsibly, then I see no reason why anybody should have a problem with their actions. They are consenting adults after-all.

If they aren't able to handle it responsibly, well, they are going to have their own set of problems and they're going to have to deal with that.

Either way its nobodies business really.




This. Took the words right out of my finger tips from my keyboard.
5649 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 1/17/15
I think theres pretty even consequences for both sides...with that being said, from a hygiene standpoint, A pussy can get WAAAYYY nastier than a dick can from a bunch of promiscuous hookups
42238 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
dead
Offline
Posted 1/17/15 , edited 1/17/15
Problem with female nymphs as said before is that STDs are more commonplace. Men can get them, but not to the extent that we can. Our little cooches can get infected and infested with all kinds of nasty critters (Yes, I'm trying to use a term that doesn't nearly offend to the extent that the pussycat one does, but isn't as technical as the medical term)
First  Prev  1  2  3  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.