First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next  Last
If Crunchyroll chan was a woman, how silky smooth would her sexy skin be?
Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/1/15
Well I printed her out and she felt like paper
40005 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
M / HI
Offline
Posted 3/1/15
Would be SUPA HOT FIYA
9551 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
18 / M
Offline
Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/1/15

PeripheralVisionary wrote:


CalifCat wrote:

Can you stop looking at women as objects, it is getting annoying. and she probably has stubble on her legs, pits and elsewhere...and isn't a virgin. *bursting your unrealistic view on females*


You do realize CR is literally an object, right? I can say whatever I want about her. Don't afford her any rights, it's what creepy otaku's do. Let me be erotic in peace so long as I know the difference between objects and women. You're inferring I only notice the aesthetic characteristics about a woman, which is a large assumption, is it not? Is it wrong to objectify an object because she's female? Of course not, objects are what women pretend to be behind the screen on pornographic websites. Porn actresses make themselves to be object in the video, but as long as we treat a video like a video and a woman like a woman, I see no problem than some crestfallen attempt to white knight/internet warrior in order to assuage your bruised ego from today's suffering, You think there is meaning in your suffering? Think again, suffering is meaningless, which is why it must be eliminated. You don't know true suffering yet, but oh you will.


P.S.I'm not assuming all women are virgins or only pretty women are virgins. After all, how would I enjoy my milf fantasies?


Don't speak only to me, speak to all the men that indulge in objectifying media.


Dude seriously I dont think you can tell the difference between a women and a sex object. Every single post ive seen you make on this forum involving women involves them as a sex object in some way. The assumption that your sexist was made because you only ever refer to women as sex objects. If I constantly refer to minorities using stereotypes it would be safe to assume I was racist. If you constantly refer to women as sex objects its safe to assume your sexist unless you bring up any convincing argument otherwise(which you didnt).
55109 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / West
Offline
Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/1/15

megahobbit wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:


CalifCat wrote:

Can you stop looking at women as objects, it is getting annoying. and she probably has stubble on her legs, pits and elsewhere...and isn't a virgin. *bursting your unrealistic view on females*


You do realize CR is literally an object, right? I can say whatever I want about her. Don't afford her any rights, it's what creepy otaku's do. Let me be erotic in peace so long as I know the difference between objects and women. You're inferring I only notice the aesthetic characteristics about a woman, which is a large assumption, is it not? Is it wrong to objectify an object because she's female? Of course not, objects are what women pretend to be behind the screen on pornographic websites. Porn actresses make themselves to be object in the video, but as long as we treat a video like a video and a woman like a woman, I see no problem than some crestfallen attempt to white knight/internet warrior in order to assuage your bruised ego from today's suffering, You think there is meaning in your suffering? Think again, suffering is meaningless, which is why it must be eliminated. You don't know true suffering yet, but oh you will.


P.S.I'm not assuming all women are virgins or only pretty women are virgins. After all, how would I enjoy my milf fantasies?


Don't speak only to me, speak to all the men that indulge in objectifying media.


Dude seriously I dont think you can tell the difference between a women and a sex object. Every single post ive seen you make on this forum involving women involves them as a sex object in some way. The assumption that your sexist was made because you only ever refer to women as sex objects. If I constantly refer to minorities using stereotypes it would be safe to assume I was racist. If you constantly refer to women as sex objects its safe to assume your sexist unless you bring up any convincing argument otherwise(which you didnt).


Thank you, thank you...I appreciate you seeing what I see in regards to what I was trying to convey to the OP. Much obliged kind sir.
11764 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
F / Edo
Offline
Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/1/15
wouldn't she be crunchy?
Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/1/15

CalifCat wrote:


megahobbit wrote:

Dude seriously I dont think you can tell the difference between a women and a sex object. Every single post ive seen you make on this forum involving women involves them as a sex object in some way. The assumption that your sexist was made because you only ever refer to women as sex objects. If I constantly refer to minorities using stereotypes it would be safe to assume I was racist. If you constantly refer to women as sex objects its safe to assume your sexist unless you bring up any convincing argument otherwise(which you didnt).


Thank you, thank you...I appreciate you seeing what I see in regards to what I was trying to convey to the OP. Much obliged kind sir.


Quite a wiggle though, think you can give OP props for that xxD
Sogno- 
45742 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
Offline
Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/1/15
she's so cute~ of course she would have smooth skin. She wouldn't even need to wax or shave. Lucky girl >.>

Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/1/15

megahobbit wrote:


PeripheralVisionary wrote:


CalifCat wrote:

Can you stop looking at women as objects, it is getting annoying. and she probably has stubble on her legs, pits and elsewhere...and isn't a virgin. *bursting your unrealistic view on females*


You do realize CR is literally an object, right? I can say whatever I want about her. Don't afford her any rights, it's what creepy otaku's do. Let me be erotic in peace so long as I know the difference between objects and women. You're inferring I only notice the aesthetic characteristics about a woman, which is a large assumption, is it not? Is it wrong to objectify an object because she's female? Of course not, objects are what women pretend to be behind the screen on pornographic websites. Porn actresses make themselves to be object in the video, but as long as we treat a video like a video and a woman like a woman, I see no problem than some crestfallen attempt to white knight/internet warrior in order to assuage your bruised ego from today's suffering, You think there is meaning in your suffering? Think again, suffering is meaningless, which is why it must be eliminated. You don't know true suffering yet, but oh you will.


P.S.I'm not assuming all women are virgins or only pretty women are virgins. After all, how would I enjoy my milf fantasies?


Don't speak only to me, speak to all the men that indulge in objectifying media.


Dude seriously I dont think you can tell the difference between a women and a sex object. Every single post ive seen you make on this forum involving women involves them as a sex object in some way. The assumption that your sexist was made because you only ever refer to women as sex objects. If I constantly refer to minorities using stereotypes it would be safe to assume I was racist. If you constantly refer to women as sex objects its safe to assume your sexist unless you bring up any convincing argument otherwise(which you didnt).


It's like saying I can't say most criminals are black without being pegged a racist. And what part of my argument was unconvincing? All I said was I know the difference, wasn't that enough? What do you know about me in real life? What sort of person do you make me out to be? Are not you stereotyping me to be a perverted 18 year old kid addicted to porno? It's a logical assumption that you are indeed stereotyping me. I don't need an argument to say that I'm not a sexist. You need an argument to prove that I am. I didn't refer to women, I referred to sex objects. Nowhere in my post have I said women were only good for their sexual capacity, now did I?

TL;DR There's a difference between judging based on stereotypes and acknowledging their existence and possible validity. I'm merely acknowledging the sexiness of a sex object.
15947 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / Cold and High
Offline
Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/1/15


sorry its a bit out of place but also covers a few things (if someone could find something better?)
it can show how OP would mean about what he said in some way and a bit about object subject things and how it would go from "fantasy"/online/gaming object that is created for the fantasy and how it there could be an other side for the reality where you hide the object feelings/thoughs about wommen and create a more reality/similarity with females that you couldn't do/able online or when gaming?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9Ju-1I1DTU (see after things like on 8:30 and 10:30 etc)
hope there is better more usefull videos out there I used this link mostly from the gamergate episode.. sorry about that will delete this post if its not usefull..

Okey that was a mess but hope you get the bits out of it... sorry about that
Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/1/15
Careful, don't want megahobbit wiping out evidence xD. All substantial of course lol.


See this curve heading in that Pedo vs Loli direction.
15947 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / Cold and High
Offline
Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/1/15


some real good 3D, 3D glasses ;P
6315 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
22 / M / Hongdae
Offline
Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/20/15
Back on topic.

CR-chan would be an idol. And I would follow her home tirelessly everyday and sometimes some of her thigh-socks would go missing. Wonder where those went...
Posted 3/1/15 , edited 3/1/15

Freddy96NO wrote:



some real good 3D, 3D glasses ;P


Oh you know, just watching Turbo last longer much longer. (this thread being Turbo).
10330 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
21 / M / USA
Offline
Posted 3/1/15

HeadofEraser wrote:


harutoharuta wrote:

Er... Knock yourself out, PV. Knock yourself out.



Haha do you mind if I ask what episode this was from? There're far too many zany concepts in Gintama for me to keep track.


Episode 216 - "I Can't Remember a Damn Thing About the Factory Tour"
13652 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
こ ~ じ ~ か
Offline
Posted 3/1/15

Kingzoro02 wrote:

Back on topic.

CR-chan would be an idol. And I would follow her home tirelessly everyday and then one day wake up as her.


FTFY.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.