First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  Last
Post Reply Female President. Yay or Nah?
27508 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
23 / M / Kaguya's Panties
Online
Posted 3/7/15
If she can do the job, there is no logical way to argue that it's a bad idea.
6407 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / F / Hotel California
Offline
Posted 3/7/15

kardonius wrote:

Doesn't matter what they've got downstairs, what matters for me is their political ideology and stances on issues that are important to me.


^ If only politicians had the same mindset as you.


KyotoTofu wrote:

I will never get the reasoning behind people wanting to talk about politics in something completely non political.


^ Discussions... Yay!




Kaiten1978 wrote:

Yes, I'd like a female President. Breaking the gender barrier in America would be great. It is long overdue. All of the American women who could potentially run for President share my views. That won't be a problem. I'd particularly like if Senator Warren ran, but that seems unlikely. Assuming (and I am) that she wins the nomination I plan on voting for Hilary.


^ Amen to that.


kamahl01 wrote:

Don't think it matters, no reason not to have one. Even if I had a problem with it, more than half the country is female,so.......


^ Someone with good reasoning!


Kingzoro02 wrote:

If they can do the job well, then it doesnt matter to me.
Might be trouble when they're on their period though.


^ I expected no less from King!


morechunch wrote:

Regardless of candidates, I'm all for female president next election. I think a female president would be held more overtly accountable to keep gender discrimination down, and I like when a president is held overtly accountable for things.

It's kind of embarrassing that we the people would keep so many bad presidents in office for two terms but our two major political parties have never run a woman. It's like we don't even care about who specifically could do better, and now we're seriously most-likely looking at a leadership history that will read Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama-(Bush v Clinton).

More important than the gender, the two party system seems like a cyclical bust to me. But yeah, female president, there's literally no reason to vote based on gender other than Hillary probably can't backslide on supporting gender equality issues even if she doesn't do much to alleviate them.

So yay, female president. Deregulation is assured with either a Bush or a Clinton, but this Clinton might have more overt pressure to hold on to some of the anti-discriminatory sentiments we've got, and I suppose that would have to be good enough with those options.

I say Hillary with Jeb as VP, just to get things really snowballing.

Or Jack Lemmon and James Garner, for a different kind of 3 star election story.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117119/


^ I like the way you think.
Posted 3/7/15 , edited 3/7/15
Female presidents are nothing new to me, as I've lived in Liberia and Philippines, both countries that had female presidents already. As long as she puts the interests of the people of the state first before her own party and is not a ranging feminist then I'm fine.
3659 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
25 / M / Wisconsin
Offline
Posted 3/7/15
I don't care what gender they r as long as they think outside the box cause that's what the US needs
5449 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
54 / M / Tacoma, WA. wind...
Offline
Posted 3/7/15
Woman President?
Sure.

24968 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M / Atlanta, GA, USA
Offline
Posted 3/7/15 , edited 3/8/15
We're not voting in a male or female. We're voting in a political party.

I wouldn't even notice that Obama's black if everyone didn't keep talking about it. Just like I didn't notice a comedian group were all mexicans till they made racist jokes against whites. In my opinion, people who bring that stuff up ought to be flayed and have their skin and genitals put on display, since they're so into that.

Present company excluded. You're all great.
6407 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / F / Hotel California
Offline
Posted 3/7/15 , edited 3/7/15

Kavalion wrote:

We're not voting in a male or female. We're voting in a political party.

I wouldn't even notice that Obama's black if everyone didn't keep talking about it. Just like I didn't notice a comedian group were all mexicans till they made racist jokes against whites. In my opinion, people who bring that stuff up ought to be flayed and have their skin and genitals put on display, since they're so into that.

Present company excluded. You're all great.


I think that's more of a punishment to the public than the people who are getting skinned...

"Cannot Unsee" If you know what I mean.
11624 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
30 / M / New York
Online
Posted 3/7/15
Im all for a female president. A liberal one that is.
18398 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
45 / M / savannah
Offline
Posted 3/7/15 , edited 3/8/15
voting for some one based on whats between thar legs is just foolish. Male or female don't mater what maters is can they do the job right.
698 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
36 / M
Offline
Posted 3/7/15
I'm fine with a female president. I'm not fine with Hilary or Palin though. They both scare me. For different reasons, but yeah...
23208 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
27 / M / Long Island
Offline
Posted 3/7/15 , edited 3/7/15
I wouldn't mind a woman president...

as long as it's not this woman.

6407 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
20 / F / Hotel California
Offline
Posted 3/7/15

LordDust wrote:

I'm fine with a female president. I'm not fine with Hilary or Palin though. They both scare me. For different reasons, but yeah...


Different reasons? I'm curious, PM me them?
6506 cr points
Send Message: Send PM GB Post
29 / M
Offline
Posted 3/7/15

Kavalion wrote:

We're not voting in a male or female. We're voting in a political party.

I wouldn't even notice that Obama's black if everyone didn't keep talking about it. Just like I didn't notice a comedian group were all mexicans till they made racist jokes against whites. In my opinion, people who bring that stuff up ought to be flayed and have their skin and genitals put on display, since they're so into that.

Present company excluded. You're all great.


Present.

But I also disagree on the means of retribution. I think they should just be denied the right to wear pants.

Surely we can agree that's the only way to tell anymore.

It will produce a withering and will complicate things for some in the winter. But then we, too, who demanded retribution will be forced to witness the withering, and we might see the pathos and say "here, I'm not wearing these, have some pants." Sexists would be wearing the wrong gender's pants, and only appreciate enough that Levi's Pipes would return from the past victorious!

Oh these ideals, I can only have fun with them because I agree, I'm right behind you, but let's agree that it exists before we go trying to build monuments to genitals all over the place everywhere.
First  Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next  Last
You must be logged in to post.